[Bug ipa/4131] The C++ compiler doesn't place a const class object to ".rodata" section with non trivial constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/24928] static const objects should go to .rodata

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ajrobb57 at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/84099] Dynamic initialization is performed for static local variables in case when constant initialization is permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84099 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Sorry PR 4131. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4131 ***

[Bug ipa/4131] The C++ compiler doesn't place a const class object to ".rodata" section with non trivial constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #37

[Bug target/117722] RISC-V: Failed to vectorize x264_pixel_sad_4x4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117722 --- Comment #20 from Vineet Gupta --- It seems this was about abd/sad expander which was added to trunk in gcc-15 cycle. Can this be closed now ?

[Bug c++/84099] Dynamic initialization is performed for static local variables in case when constant initialization is permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84099 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Sorry this is a dup of bug 24928 (was looking at the wrong bug). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 24928 ***

[Bug target/65197] static initialization via intel intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65197 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Sorry I meant PR 4131. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4131 ***

[Bug ipa/4131] The C++ compiler doesn't place a const class object to ".rodata" section with non trivial constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ajrobb57 at gmail dot com --- Comment #38

[Bug web/119227] Does the generated HTML for cobol get installed to the website?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119227 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- FWIW I tried https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/gcobol.html but it wasn't found.

[Bug c++/24928] static const objects should go to .rodata

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug web/119227] Does the generated HTML for cobol get installed to the website?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119227 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60715 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60715&action=edit testcase to show that the issue is `1<

[Bug c/119170] Add operators _Widthof, _Minof, _Maxof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119170 --- Comment #12 from Kang-Che Sung --- Allow me to clarify some things. (In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #10)> > > The `_Widthof` > > operator working with traditional integer types is a plus but not a > > necessity. > > Here's an

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60710|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 --- Comment #5 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 60714 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60714&action=edit Test program #2 -fdump-tree-optimized

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60711 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60711&action=edit test program #2

[Bug c++/97639] [c++20,-fconcepts-ts] ICE: gcc_assert in tsubst, cp/pt.c:15464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97639 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96605] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:14929 on C++20 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96605 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

<    1   2   3