[Bug target/118540] RISC-V: ICE for unsupported target attribute

2025-02-14 Thread pan2.li at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118540 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #1 from L

[Bug tree-optimization/118852] [15 regression] Train run of 502.gcc_r compiled with -Ofast -fprofile-generate -march=x86_64-v3 fails

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > A testcase would be the following - we don't perform loop-header copying > for an isolated testcase, thus manually here. > > void * > foo (void **p, void **l

[Bug middle-end/118864] Add nomerge attribute

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118864 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-14 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/118874] ICE in copy_rtx, at rtl.cc:372

2025-02-14 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118874 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug middle-end/118874] New: ICE in copy_rtx, at rtl.cc:372

2025-02-14 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118874 Bug ID: 118874 Summary: ICE in copy_rtx, at rtl.cc:372 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c++/118856] [15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl at gimplify.cc:3346 on mesonlsp-4.3.7 since r15-7481

2025-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118856 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Oh, the lack of the allocator calls is due to constexpr and those doing nothing at all. I wonder why it isn't being optimized out for the pre- r15-7481 case. And why do the ~allocator calls remain even if t

[Bug tree-optimization/108608] [12 Regression] AArch64 vectorizer ICE in vect_transform_reduction and __builtin_fmax

2025-02-14 Thread fengfei.xi at horizon dot auto via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108608 --- Comment #13 from fengfei.xi at horizon dot auto --- (In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #12) > (In reply to fengfei.xi from comment #11) > > could you please explain under what specific circumstances this change might > > lead to slow

[Bug tree-optimization/118817] [14 Regression] stringop-overflow and array-bound error with LTO/O3

2025-02-14 Thread shahzad.malik.muzaffar at cern dot ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118817 --- Comment #15 from Malik Shahzad MUZAFFAR --- I confirm that cherry-pick the following two changes - https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a1d2ea57722c248777e1130de076e28c443ff8b - https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77d01927bd7c989d431035251a5c196fe39bcec9 on top of

[Bug tree-optimization/118852] [15 regression] Train run of 502.gcc_r compiled with -Ofast -fprofile-generate -march=x86_64-v3 fails

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- The bug also reproduces with -msse4.2 instead of -march=x86-64-v2 and there it seems to reproduce more reliably. When I edit tree-flow-inline.h to perform loop header copying vectorization is then the wit

[Bug fortran/118884] New: [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

2025-02-14 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
vtv --with-zstd --without-isl --enable-default-pie --enable-host-pie --disable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto' Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.1 20250214 (ex

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

2025-02-14 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 60502 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60502&action=edit cget24.f-pp.f.xz

[Bug fortran/118845] [15 regression] ICE when building lapack-3.12.0 on x86 (compare_parameter, at fortran/interface.cc:2521)

2025-02-14 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118845 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- Thanks. It doesn't ICE anymore, but it does get rejected: PR118884.

[Bug c++/70037] [concepts] comdat group error and an ICE with a conceptified tuple implementation

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/118868] __builtin_assoc_barrier with pointers cause ICE

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Hmm, I'm not sure the GIMPLE verification is sensible, I'd have simply > required compatible types. Right, I agree; I suspect I missed that PAREN_EXPR is not f

[Bug c++/118876] [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in add_stmt, at cp/semantics.cc:551 - register_dtor_fn

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118876 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/118876] [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in add_stmt, at cp/semantics.cc:551 - register_dtor_fn

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118876 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60501 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60501&action=edit Reduced testcase

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

2025-02-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- > I'll take a look. Found it, will probably submit tomorrow.

[Bug c++/82794] ICE: Cannot allocate memory for concept with default argument

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82794 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/82936] Segment fault crash for non-type template parameter(test case small enough)

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82936 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/118883] New: [C++17] Incorrectly requires initializer for static constexpr class-member

2025-02-14 Thread foom at fuhm dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118883 Bug ID: 118883 Summary: [C++17] Incorrectly requires initializer for static constexpr class-member Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug other/118878] [ice][avr] internal compiler error: in avr_out_plus_1, at config/avr/avr.cc:8801

2025-02-14 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118878 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/118876] [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in add_stmt, at cp/semantics.cc:551 - register_dtor_fn

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118876 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug c/118875] Accept standard names with uppercase C

2025-02-14 Thread eyalroz1 at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118875 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0) > I think you're assuming there's some specific code to deal the uppercase > form, but it just looks for a close

[Bug other/118878] New: [ice][avr] internal compiler error: in avr_out_plus_1, at config/avr/avr.cc:8801

2025-02-14 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118878 Bug ID: 118878 Summary: [ice][avr] internal compiler error: in avr_out_plus_1, at config/avr/avr.cc:8801 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c/118875] Accept standard names with uppercase C

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118875 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|driver |c Severity|normal

[Bug target/118879] New: Missed optimisation: std::in_range simpler size check

2025-02-14 Thread thiago at kde dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118879 Bug ID: 118879 Summary: Missed optimisation: std::in_range simpler size check Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 82794, which changed state. Bug 82794 Summary: ICE: Cannot allocate memory for concept with default argument https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82794 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/82794] ICE: Cannot allocate memory for concept with default argument

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82794 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77ba1ab85d3a45005bfff90b2fd262e102e5383a commit r15-7537-g77ba1ab85d3a45005bfff90b2fd262e102e5383a Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri

[Bug c++/70037] [concepts] comdat group error and an ICE with a conceptified tuple implementation

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fd4e414830bb84b1cf1a7df4945d26c078729c9 commit r15-7536-g9fd4e414830bb84b1cf1a7df4945d26c078729c9 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri

[Bug c++/70037] [concepts] comdat group error and an ICE with a conceptified tuple implementation

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 70037, which changed state. Bug 70037 Summary: [concepts] comdat group error and an ICE with a conceptified tuple implementation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037 What|Removed

[Bug c++/82794] ICE: Cannot allocate memory for concept with default argument

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82794 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/82936] Segment fault crash for non-type template parameter(test case small enough)

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82936 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfd1b1abab9d3159e6f43e234ab78638f92d613e commit r15-7538-gdfd1b1abab9d3159e6f43e234ab78638f92d613e Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri

[Bug c++/118856] [15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl at gimplify.cc:3346 on mesonlsp-4.3.7 since r15-7481

2025-02-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118856 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/82936] Segment fault crash for non-type template parameter(test case small enough)

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82936 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/110503] [13/14/15 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r13-322-g7f04b0d786e

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110503 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Looking into this again, we have: # RANGE [irange] int [0, 1] _11 = 1 % _10; Which is just `_10 != 1` But that does not fix the situtation fully. I guess for GCC 16, I will finish up my test_for_si

[Bug c++/118856] [15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl at gimplify.cc:3346 on mesonlsp-4.3.7 since r15-7481

2025-02-14 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118856 --- Comment #12 from Sergei Trofimovich --- The change fixes mesonlsp-4.3.7 tests for me. Thank you!

[Bug c++/106980] Concept on a variadig template

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106980 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug tree-optimization/110503] [13/14/15 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r13-322-g7f04b0d786e

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110503 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- One thing we should note is that VRP and forwprop go and forth between: ``` # RANGE [irange] int [0, 1] _11 = 1 % _10; _3 = (unsigned int) _11; # RANGE [irange] unsigned int [0, 0][+INF, +INF] _14

[Bug target/113331] AMDGCN: Compilation failure due to duplicate .LEHB/.LEHE symbols

2025-02-14 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113331 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/118865] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118865 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c3cc57f0e71a7a945fb10c817260dd8a7894e7f commit r15-7547-g0c3cc57f0e71a7a945fb10c817260dd8a7894e7f Author: Andrew Pinski Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/118865] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118865 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/118867] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c3cc57f0e71a7a945fb10c817260dd8a7894e7f commit r15-7547-g0c3cc57f0e71a7a945fb10c817260dd8a7894e7f Author: Andrew Pinski Date: T

[Bug middle-end/99098] [meta-bug] invalid/missing -Wfree-nonheap-object warnings

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99098 Bug 99098 depends on bug 118865, which changed state. Bug 118865 Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118865 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/118876] [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in add_stmt, at cp/semantics.cc:551 - register_dtor_fn

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118876 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60500 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60500&action=edit testcase (not preprocessed though)

[Bug c++/83144] ICE using trailing return type and constexpr with GCC 7.X

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83144 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/86933] GCC fails to recognize specialization of variadic non-type template parameter declared with `auto`

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86933 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80b9c9c844458779556995a5be7c08a8894d0f96 commit r15-7539-g80b9c9c844458779556995a5be7c08a8894d0f96 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Fr

[Bug c++/102626] [c++20] compiler crash when invoking constexpr function in the constructor of template class

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102626 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/118265] Failure in resolving non-type template parameters with nested parameter pack of form ...B>

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118265 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/100538] g++ miscompile / ICE with variadic member function pointer argument list

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100538 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101603] [meta-bug] pointer to member functions issues

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603 Bug 101603 depends on bug 100538, which changed state. Bug 100538 Summary: g++ miscompile / ICE with variadic member function pointer argument list https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100538 What|Removed

[Bug c++/115486] ICE: Segfault while compiling partial template specialization with expanded parameter pack of function pointers

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115486 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Resol

[Bug c++/86933] GCC fails to recognize specialization of variadic non-type template parameter declared with `auto`

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86933 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Miles

[Bug middle-end/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #22 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9611ce687904a22da2febbc97acba2ae0f0c3780 commit r15-7542-g9611ce687904a22da2febbc97acba2ae0f0c3780 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug c++/92969] Segmentation fault compiling partial specialization of auto-deduced member function pointers

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92969 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug c++/101603] [meta-bug] pointer to member functions issues

2025-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603 Bug 101603 depends on bug 92969, which changed state. Bug 92969 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling partial specialization of auto-deduced member function pointers https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92969 What|Removed

[Bug other/118878] [ice][avr] internal compiler error: in avr_out_plus_1, at config/avr/avr.cc:8801

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118878 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dc4e220ca2272d668ddb3041ccd9e69b968e532 commit r15-7544-g1dc4e220ca2272d668ddb3041ccd9e69b968e532 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug other/118878] [ice][avr] internal compiler error: in avr_out_plus_1, at config/avr/avr.cc:8801

2025-02-14 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118878 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/113331] AMDGCN: Compilation failure due to duplicate .LEHB/.LEHE symbols

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113331 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b9bdb2d286e6872f4195ba2e710130cf6b2805d commit r15-7543-g2b9bdb2d286e6872f4195ba2e710130cf6b2805d Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug c++/83144] ICE using trailing return type and constexpr with GCC 7.X

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83144 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- template class tuple; struct _Head_base { int _M_head_impl; }; template struct _Tuple_impl; template struct _Tuple_impl<_Idx, _Head, _Tail...> : _Head_base {}; template struct tuple<_T1, _T2> : _Tuple_i

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 92431, which changed state. Bug 92431 Summary: ICE with spaceship in constexpr evaluation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92431 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/96676] Segmentation fault on parsing simple variadic template function call

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96676 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-10-01 00:00:00 |2025-2-14 --- Comment #4 from Marek Pola

[Bug target/94282] [amdgcn] ld: error: undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b9bdb2d286e6872f4195ba2e710130cf6b2805d commit r15-7543-g2b9bdb2d286e6872f4195ba2e710130cf6b2805d Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug c++/92431] ICE with spaceship in constexpr evaluation

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92431 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96364] ICE on valid code in cp_finish_decl with auto return type and double attributes

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96364 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/83144] ICE using trailing return type and constexpr with GCC 7.X

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83144 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e44f7ecb7b9ad6893f7784b1a303a5463b46cd5 commit r15-7546-g8e44f7ecb7b9ad6893f7784b1a303a5463b46cd5 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri

[Bug c++/83144] ICE using trailing return type and constexpr with GCC 7.X

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83144 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 83144, which changed state. Bug 83144 Summary: ICE using trailing return type and constexpr with GCC 7.X https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83144 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/106685] ICE with concepts and ptr to member functions in requires

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106685 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/118883] [C++17] Incorrectly requires initializer for static constexpr class-member

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118883 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0386r2.pdf

[Bug c++/118883] [C++17] Incorrectly requires initializer for static constexpr class-member

2025-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/108617] nullptr comparision in constexpr function reported as not constexpr when using -fsanitize=returns-nonnull-attribute

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108617 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug sanitizer/71962] error: ‘((& x) != 0u)’ is not a constant expression

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71962 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.schackier at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 108617, which changed state. Bug 108617 Summary: nullptr comparision in constexpr function reported as not constexpr when using -fsanitize=returns-nonnull-attribute https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108617

[Bug sanitizer/71962] error: ‘((& x) != 0u)’ is not a constant expression

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71962 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdimov at gmail dot com --- Comment #14

[Bug c++/108617] nullptr comparision in constexpr function reported as not constexpr when using -fsanitize=returns-nonnull-attribute

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108617 Bug 108617 depends on bug 104426, which changed state. Bug 104426 Summary: -fsanitize=undefined causes constexpr failures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104426 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/104426] -fsanitize=undefined causes constexpr failures

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104426 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/118867] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16) > So one issue with FRE/PRE not figuring out on the predicates is due to the > SSA_NAME NOT being last. I mean the SSA_NAME being last and NOT first is getting

[Bug c++/113826] string_view::find sometimes not working in constexpr contexts under -fsanitize=undefined

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113826 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug sanitizer/71962] error: ‘((& x) != 0u)’ is not a constant expression with fsanitize=undefined

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71962 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ivan.lazaric.gcc at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/118867] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

2025-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60503 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60503&action=edit Patch for the canonical of variants (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > We have helpers for foldi

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

2025-02-14 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

2025-02-14 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Not disagreeing, however: Warning: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)) cget24.f-pp.f:545:32: 237 |IF( CSLECT( W( I ) ) ) |

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

2025-02-14 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Should I ask LAPACK upstream to build with -std=legacy?

[Bug target/116594] [meta-bug] xtheadvector brokeness

2025-02-14 Thread majin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116594 --- Comment #3 from Jin Ma --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > All known brokeness of xtheadvector . Hi, I conducted regression testing on XTheadVector and compared it with rv64gcv_zvfh. The results indicate that XTheadVector has

[Bug rtl-optimization/118873] -favoid-store-forwarding makes a mess out of a STLF fail

2025-02-14 Thread konstantinos.eleftheriou at vrull dot eu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118873 --- Comment #1 from Konstantinos Eleftheriou --- These subregs are generated from `store_bit_field`. We could fix this by updating `store_bit_field` or avoid calling it in those cases and handle this in-place. Actually, we're rejecting cases wit

[Bug ada/114065] gnat build with -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 fails on 32bit archs

2025-02-14 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065 --- Comment #34 from Matthias Klose --- two months now passed, and we are in stage4 now for over a month. what is the status of that now?

[Bug c++/118876] New: [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE on valid code

2025-02-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118876 Bug ID: 118876 Summary: [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE on valid code Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp Severity: normal

[Bug driver/118875] New: Accept standard names with uppercase C

2025-02-14 Thread eyalroz1 at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118875 Bug ID: 118875 Summary: Accept standard names with uppercase C Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug tree-optimization/118852] [15 regression] Train run of 502.gcc_r compiled with -Ofast -fprofile-generate -march=x86_64-v3 fails

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 60498 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60498&action=edit runtime testcase > ./xgcc -B. t.i -fgnu89-inline -fno-strict-aliasing -fallow-store-data-races > -O3 -msse4

[Bug tree-optimization/118817] [14 Regression] stringop-overflow and array-bound error with LTO/O3

2025-02-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118817 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, shahzad.malik.muzaffar at cern dot ch wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118817 > > --- Comment #15 from Malik Shahzad MUZAFFAR dot ch> --- > I confirm

[Bug rtl-optimization/118610] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr85467.c FAILs

2025-02-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118610 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- > (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1) >> Indeed, I have reopened PR rtl-optimization/118067 > > Sorry, I can not reproduce it with tod

[Bug tree-optimization/118852] [15 regression] Train run of 502.gcc_r compiled with -Ofast -fprofile-generate -march=x86_64-v3 fails

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 60497 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60497&action=edit patch to tree-ssa-sccvn.c Applying the attached patch to SPEC sources shows the vectorized loop not processi

[Bug debug/118790] [15 Regression] ICE when building fiat (crash in loc_list_from_tree_1)

2025-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118790 --- Comment #36 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74ea20e16cf18b42071557b71a42ea31c8192425 commit r15-7526-g74ea20e16cf18b42071557b71a42ea31c8192425 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/118865] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118865 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/118867] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,

[Bug c/118868] __builtin_assoc_barrier with pointers cause ICE

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, I'm not sure the GIMPLE verification is sensible, I'd have simply required compatible types.

[Bug middle-end/118869] infinite recusion in gimplifier with __builtin_assoc_barrier and structs

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118869 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Rejecting this (assoc barrier on non-arithmetic type) would be best I think.

[Bug c++/117293] SFINAE in class partial specialization "leaks" its side-effects

2025-02-14 Thread m.cencora at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117293 --- Comment #8 from m.cencora at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #7) > Substituting U=string into overload_set::type during > overload resolution certainly has the side effect of instantiating that > class template speci

[Bug tree-optimization/118852] [15 regression] Train run of 502.gcc_r compiled with -Ofast -fprofile-generate -march=x86_64-v3 fails

2025-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

  1   2   >