https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #9)
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #8)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> > > Created attachment 60350 [details]
> > > ira: Don't increase callee-saved regi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
bitstream.i:
```
typedef struct {
int quant_type;
short *mpeg_quant_matrices
} DECODER;
char BitstreamReadHeaders_matrix[];
void set_intra_matrix();
void BitstreamReadHeaders(struct length *bs, DECODER *dec)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r15-3509-gd34cda720988674bcf8a24267c9e1ec61335d6de
But guess is a backend bug rather than middle-end, so it was latent before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115932
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111673
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116829
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118753
Bug 118753 depends on bug 117082, which changed state.
Bug 117082 Summary: [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-17.c
since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118497
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118753
Bug 118753 depends on bug 117081, which changed state.
Bug 117081 Summary: [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c since
r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60407&action=edit
New testcase that shows happens all the way back to GCC 12.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117036
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Feb 2 07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118777
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.1.0, 14.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe
--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2025-01-23 11:10:47.842729956 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2025-02-07 00:08:47.985933719 +0100
@@ -17703,12 +17703,12 @@
})
(define_expand "3_mask"
- [(set
tps://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60405&action=edit
MRE to produce dangling reference warning
gcc version 15.0.1 20250206 (experimental)
(Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-9a409f5c862c5b2625c4b94145031394ef28-binutils-2.42)
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20250206/configure
--prefix=/opt/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The reduced one started with
r14-1412-g45466eecf5ef669164c0922e5be8fd288b144886
Again, latent before that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67771
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Various glibc functions work around this using FIX_INT_FP_CONVERT_ZERO, I
suppose the new log10f implementation taken from CORE-MATH needs such a
workaround as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60399|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
--- Comment #28 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 60399
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60399&action=edit
Patch
Fixes fma testcases on hppa.
This is a glibc bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107919
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
No, there's no plan to backport any of the fixes done as part of this PR (but I
also did not verify if that would help).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118598
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118634
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118584
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118343
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107919
Rogério de Souza Moraes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogerio.souza at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118771
Bug ID: 118771
Summary: [15 regression] aarch64 bootstrap fails unless
--disable-werror
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118750
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a03303b4d5b2ca58e5750a4d5bd735d85a091273
commit r15-7389-ga03303b4d5b2ca58e5750a4d5bd735d85a091273
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116242
Bug 116242 depends on bug 112853, which changed state.
Bug 112853 Summary: RISC-V: RVV: SPEC2017 525.x264 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112853
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107919
--- Comment #11 from Rogério de Souza Moraes
---
This still affects GCC 12.4.0. Are there any plans to fix it for 12.5.0?
On GCC 13.3.0 the issue does not happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118773
Bug ID: 118773
Summary: [15 Regression] Invalid rejection of attribute with
dependent argument since r15-3046
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118773
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118773
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 60398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60398&action=edit
gcc15-pr118773.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118750
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60396|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102116
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #29 from Sam James ---
```
char a;
static int b, c, f;
char *d = &a;
static char *e = &a;
void g(int h, int i) {
int j = 1;
for (; c != -3; c = c - 1) {
int k[10];
f = 0;
for (; f < 10; f++)
k[f] = 0;
*d = k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118770
--- Comment #2 from ymity.me at gmail dot com ---
Pretty sure recursion doesn't result in crash normally, i don't quite see why
it should be marked as dup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118608
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118770
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ymity.me from comment #2)
> Pretty sure recursion doesn't result in crash normally, i don't quite see
> why it should be marked as dup.
The crash is because of not detecting of a recursion afte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116829
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo