[Bug tree-optimization/117424] [12/13/14/15 regression] Miscompile with different optimization flags since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117424 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1e776ce58ae4a6ae67886adb4ae806598e2c7ef commit r15-7249-gf1e776ce58ae4a6ae67886adb4ae806598e2c7ef Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/118629] [14/15 Regression] ice in cp_parser_expression_statement with __FUNCTION__ inside decltype for the trailing return type of a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118629 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug d/118495] Unable to build gdc (D compiler) for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118495 --- Comment #14 from Iain Buclaw --- The compiler itself doesn't depend on the phobos standard library part of libphobos, only druntime. User applications would use Phobos however.

[Bug c++/118285] [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/115458] [15 regression] [RISC-V] ICE in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1868 unable to find a register to spill since r15-518-g99b1daae18c095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115458 Palmer Dabbelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/117202] SLP permutation for VLA vectors broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117202 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 60309 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60309&action=edit refreshed patch I picked this from a branch where it was updated.

[Bug middle-end/118684] wrong alignment for stack temporary created during RTL expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118684 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54bdeca3c6214485d15454df30183a56ad3e473b commit r15-7257-g54bdeca3c6214485d15454df30183a56ad3e473b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/118684] wrong alignment for stack temporary created during RTL expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118684 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug other/118675] Missing escaping of "{" and "}" within messages in SARIF output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118675 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/118285] [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- With minor tweaks to that: --- pr118285-3.C2025-01-28 16:30:15.798692471 +0100 +++ pr118285-5.C2025-01-28 16:46:09.572904490 +0100 @@ -6,21 +6,21 @@ template struct initializer } struct A

[Bug target/118663] [15 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_emit_move, at config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:11091 during libgcc build - caused by r15-7008-g9f009e8865cda0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118663 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01339d29b7663d85eea6145eac2b1ad1da428c11 commit r15-7250-g01339d29b7663d85eea6145eac2b1ad1da428c11 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug target/118125] [15 Regression] 7-16% slowdown of 510.parest_r on x86-64(-v3) since r15-6110-g92e0e0f8177530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118125 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #4) > [...] Unfortunately when I > then looked at SLP vectorization when all IPA-VR propagations were > allowed again, this particular case was not there (but there we

[Bug target/118538] throw not caught causing an seg fault rather than a `terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'` message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski --- I was wrong, it is only static linking where the issue I had saw was an issue.

[Bug libstdc++/118681] [C++17] unsynchronized_pool_resource may fail to respect alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118681 --- Comment #4 from Diego Ramirez --- I think the way to fix this is finding the the first pool block size `B` such as `B >= size` and `B & (alignment - 1) == 0` (or in other words `gcd(B, alignment) == alignment)`). The starting point in `pool

[Bug target/117202] RISC-V: SLP permutation for VLA vectors broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117202 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/118396] [15 regression] -O1+ leads to reading uninitialized data when virtual destructor is present since r15-6369-gfa99002538bc91

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118396 --- Comment #19 from Carlos Galvez --- I can confirm that recent versions of trunk fixed the problem described in this thread, thank you so much! > Sounds like another regression? I need to run more tests to confirm. It is a very huge file, it

[Bug tree-optimization/118505] [15 regression] aarch64: 25% regression in TSVC s258 since r15-3436-gb2b20b277988ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60310 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60310&action=edit Original benchmark Just uploading the standalone benchmark without any changes to the constant formation. Not

[Bug fortran/118683] UBSAN: Invalid value for type ar_type since r15-7070-g0d1e62b83561ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118683 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 60311 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60311&action=edit Patch Confirmed. Running f951 under gdb, it appears that the fix for pr117774, which dealt with in

[Bug libgcc/118685] FreeBSD static executables segfault due to libgcc missing crtbeginT.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118685 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerald at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug testsuite/116860] [15 Regression] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/fold-xor-and-or.c from r15-3866-ga88d6c6d777ad7 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116860 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|konstantinos.eleftheriou@vr |law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/118683] UBSAN: Invalid value for type ar_type since r15-7070-g0d1e62b83561ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118683 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Last reconfirme

[Bug c++/118673] [14/15 regression] LLVM's libMLIR miscompiled since r14-1705-g2764335bd336f2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/118681] New: [C++17] unsynchronized_pool_resource may fail to respect alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118681 Bug ID: 118681 Summary: [C++17] unsynchronized_pool_resource may fail to respect alignment Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/118638] [14 Regression] Miscompile with -Os and -O0/1/2/3 since r14-4810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14 Regression] Miscompile

[Bug rtl-optimization/118682] New: Improve make_extraction for multiplication by odd CONST_INTs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118682 Bug ID: 118682 Summary: Improve make_extraction for multiplication by odd CONST_INTs Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/113257] -march=native or -mcpu=native are ineffective, but -march=native -mcpu=native works on arm64 M2 Ultra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113257 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb45b829bb3fb658aa34a340264dee9755d34e69 commit r13-9351-geb45b829bb3fb658aa34a340264dee9755d34e69 Author: Tamar Christ

[Bug target/110901] -march does not override -mcpu in calls to assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110901 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57a9595f05efe2839a39e711c6cf3ce21ca1ff33 commit r13-9352-g57a9595f05efe2839a39e711c6cf3ce21ca1ff33 Author: Tamar Christi

[Bug d/118495] Unable to build gdc (D compiler) for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118495 --- Comment #12 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #11) > Apparently MinGW-w64 dosn't like extern char** environ; > > To avoid this issue for now I commented out the following in > gcc/cp/module.cc: > extern char **

[Bug libstdc++/111053] std::ranges::copy is missing important optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111053 Peter Dimov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdimov at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/118682] Improve make_extraction for multiplication by odd CONST_INTs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118682 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I was thinking about --- gcc/combine.cc.jj 2025-01-28 10:13:59.158871918 +0100 +++ gcc/combine.cc 2025-01-28 10:37:32.160477873 +0100 @@ -7637,6 +7637,15 @@ make_extraction (machine_mode mode, rtx

[Bug c++/118187] Constraints of template template parameter not checked for non-dependent arguments despite [temp.names]/8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118187 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/118280] [14/15 Regression] __atomic_test_and_set in Microblaze are broken (exposed by r14-4286)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280 --- Comment #12 from Michael Eager --- If you have a patch, please send it to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/115614] Invalid (?) template substitution on variadic constrained packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115614 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-01-28 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/117778] [14/15 Regression] ICE maybe_add_lambda_conv_op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117778 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- The following should run fine but we issue an error since r12-5860-g6a071b2d40a107: commit 6a071b2d40a1078b4029c2b77ef29ffca4e7050c Author: Marek Polacek Date: Thu Nov 25 09:08:03 2021 -0500 c++: Ha

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 118285, which changed state. Bug 118285 Summary: [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/118285] [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3b0b98b3ba57840ab2cfbc9d44d001c1e9167bf commit r15-7260-gc3b0b98b3ba57840ab2cfbc9d44d001c1e9167bf Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug c++/118285] [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 118285, which changed state. Bug 118285 Summary: [14 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libstdc++/103924] views::join combined with std::string cannot be used in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103924 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/118285] [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hewillk at gmail dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug d/118495] Unable to build gdc (D compiler) for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118495 --- Comment #13 from Brecht Sanders --- I understand that would give me a gdc with runtime and no libphobos. What is needed to make that usable as a compiler? Do I need to build libphobos spearately or from a different source?

[Bug preprocessor/118674] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118674 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P4 Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/118638] [14 Regression] Miscompile with -Os and -O0/1/2/3 since r14-4810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- I certainly plan to backport it to those releases as well. But it is just latent there...

[Bug tree-optimization/117424] [12/13/14/15 regression] Miscompile with different optimization flags since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117424 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/108367] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 3) since r12-5138-ge82c382971664d6f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108367 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > I can't reproduce this starting in GCC 14.1.0. From the looks of it, it was > a patch to loop ch which "fixes" the ICE but that would mean this has gone > latent; ju

[Bug rtl-optimization/118638] [14 Regression] Miscompile with -Os and -O0/1/2/3 since r14-4810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638 --- Comment #20 from Sam James --- Should it be a 12/13/14 regression given it was latent before?

[Bug c/116357] [12/13/14/15 Regression] The item's address of the array is not correct if aligned is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116357 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efd21533974e260c6864b8f546cfa5abc55ceefa commit r15-7243-gefd21533974e260c6864b8f546cfa5abc55ceefa Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c/116357] [12/13/14 Regression] The item's address of the array is not correct if aligned is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116357 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] The

[Bug libstdc++/118681] [C++17] unsynchronized_pool_resource may fail to respect alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118681 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60307 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60307&action=edit testcase from godbolt Next time attach the testcase instead of just linking godbolt.

[Bug libstdc++/118681] [C++17] unsynchronized_pool_resource may fail to respect alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118681 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/118681] [C++17] unsynchronized_pool_resource may fail to respect alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118681 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- synchronized_pool_resource::do_allocate has the similar code but with a lock for the pool case.

[Bug target/110901] -march does not override -mcpu in calls to assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110901 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8daec2ad9a20c31a98efb4602080e1e5d0c19fe commit r14-11255-gf8daec2ad9a20c31a98efb4602080e1e5d0c19fe Author: Tamar Christ

[Bug fortran/118683] New: UBSAN: Invalid value for type ar_type since r15-7070-g0d1e62b83561ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118683 Bug ID: 118683 Summary: UBSAN: Invalid value for type ar_type since r15-7070-g0d1e62b83561ba Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/113257] -march=native or -mcpu=native are ineffective, but -march=native -mcpu=native works on arm64 M2 Ultra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113257 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c6fde4bac6c20e0b04c3feb820abe5ce0e48d9b commit r14-11254-g7c6fde4bac6c20e0b04c3feb820abe5ce0e48d9b Author: Tamar Chris

[Bug rtl-optimization/118638] [14/15 Regression] Miscompile with -Os and -O0/1/2/3 since r14-4810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b529a417249335724d1f74bcf3167f6f9a623823 commit r15-7246-gb529a417249335724d1f74bcf3167f6f9a623823 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/117424] [12/13/14/15 regression] Miscompile with different optimization flags since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117424 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- t.c:15:35: note: vect_compute_data_ref_alignment: t.c:15:35: note: force alignment of *_3 ... t.c:15:35: note: ==> examining statement: _4 = *_3; t.c:15:35: note: vect_model_load_cost: aligned. t

[Bug target/118505] [15 regression] aarch64: 25% regression in TSVC s258 since r15-3436-gb2b20b277988ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski --- Note many if not all modern branch predictors and figure out patterns for 256 wise. So increasing it to 1000 forces the branch predictor not to be predict which way the branch is taken.

[Bug c++/118673] [14 regression] LLVM's libMLIR miscompiled since r14-1705-g2764335bd336f2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 regression] LLVM's |[14 regression] LLVM's

[Bug target/118687] New: RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687 Bug ID: 118687 Summary: RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm) Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/118687] RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Plus shouldn't this be filed over to https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues for the assembler macro?

[Bug target/118687] RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Plus this seems like just a bug in the riscv llvm backend to accept this ...

[Bug tree-optimization/118688] patch splitting should happen when it is known only path is hot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118688 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-01-29 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/118687] RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687 --- Comment #5 from Vineet Gupta --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Basically what I am saying this should be filed in gas rather than in GCC. Yeah understood but is this really the right thing to do - to re-implement all the con

[Bug target/118687] RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I think invalid for GCC. Not sure how binutils will respond to a request to do a lot of constant synthesis. And even if binutils handles it it's probably a bad thing to do anyway -- think about the impac

[Bug target/118687] RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-01-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/118687] RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Basically what I am saying this should be filed in gas rather than in GCC.

[Bug tree-optimization/118688] New: patch splitting should happen when it is known only path is hot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118688 Bug ID: 118688 Summary: patch splitting should happen when it is known only path is hot Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimiz

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #438 from Oleg Endo --- Could be relevant https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/673346.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/672694.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-Janua

[Bug c++/118285] [14 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 Regression] GCC |[14 Regression] GCC rejects

[Bug target/19520] protected function pointer and copy relocation don't work right

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520 --- Comment #34 from Thiago Macieira --- H.J. fixed this a few years ago. It requires the -mno-direct-extern-access flag.

[Bug target/118505] [15 regression] aarch64: 25% regression in TSVC s258 since r15-3436-gb2b20b277988ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Component|tree-optimiz

[Bug tree-optimization/114277] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization: x*(x||b) => x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114277 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So on the RISC-V specific side of this we will need a bit of work and all things that would help address some of the weaknesses in utilization of the zicond extension. First, for the comparison in the con

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 117270, which changed state. Bug 117270 Summary: [15 Regression] 9% exec time slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117270 What|Removed |Adde

[Bug c++/117855] [14/15 Regression] ICE with deduction guides, default template arguments and inherited deduction guides

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117855 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/117855] [14/15 Regression] ICE with deduction guides, default template arguments and inherited deduction guides

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117855 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c061ad5a36ba0c07d3d9d82a85aebb887def759d commit r14-11256-gc061ad5a36ba0c07d3d9d82a85aebb887def759d Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug target/117270] [15 Regression] 9% exec time slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117270 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/117270] [15 Regression] 9% exec time slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117270 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98b2009b8768f8790dff9edbe00742bcdf2b7482 commit r15-7254-g98b2009b8768f8790dff9edbe00742bcdf2b7482 Author: Richard Sandiford Da

[Bug target/115673] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115673 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > Re-confirmed. > > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c scan-assembler-times > (?:call|jmp)[ \\t]+\\*% 3 > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c scan-

[Bug target/118642] -specs=sync-none.specs doesn't work with LTO.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118642 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0204dcf930b5093d0811a007b7f47aa42e55e787 commit r15-7258-g0204dcf930b5093d0811a007b7f47aa42e55e787 Author: Richard Earnshaw Dat

[Bug c++/118285] [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- The extra VAR_DECLs whose addresses are recorded in the initializers are created in #0 make_node (code=VAR_DECL) at ../../gcc/tree.cc:1244 #1 0x01609ce1 in build_decl (loc=4611686018427387913, code

[Bug target/118642] -specs=sync-none.specs doesn't work with LTO.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118642 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #3 from Ri

[Bug tree-optimization/117202] SLP permutation for VLA vectors broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117202 --- Comment #5 from Richard Sandiford --- FWIW, gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/mask_struct_store_run-3.c seems to produce similar VEC_PERM_EXPRs for SVE, but it works there. The idea is that we're unpacking one vector of [16,16] chars into

[Bug c++/118285] [14/15 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string usages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/117202] RISC-V: SLP permutation for VLA vectors broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117202 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai,

[Bug libgcc/118685] FreeBSD static executables segfault due to libgcc missing crtbeginT.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118685 --- Comment #1 from Dimitry Andric --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/674663.html

[Bug middle-end/118684] New: wrong alignment for stack temporary created during RTL expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118684 Bug ID: 118684 Summary: wrong alignment for stack temporary created during RTL expansion Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/117424] [12/13/14 regression] Miscompile with different optimization flags since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117424 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||15.0 Summary|[12/13/14/15 r

[Bug c++/118396] [15 regression] -O1+ leads to reading uninitialized data when virtual destructor is present since r15-6369-gfa99002538bc91

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118396 --- Comment #18 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Carlos Galvez from comment #17) > (FYI I'm trying to test this but now I get out-of-memory errors when trying > to compile a single .cpp file, will test with a newer patch in case it got > fixe

[Bug c++/118626] C++20 std::variant causes a segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/118626] C++20 std::variant causes a segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka --- A valid reduced testcase: template struct _Nth_type; template struct variant { template static constexpr long __accepted_index = 0; template using __to_type = _Nth_type<_Np>; template using __accepte

[Bug tree-optimization/106570] [12/13/14/15 Regression] DCE sometimes fails with depending if statements since r12-2305-g398572c1544d8b75

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106570 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #2) > I think this is a duplicate of PR106379 . At the VRP2 stage I see: > >[local count: 1073741824]: > if (c_6(D) == s_7(D)) > goto ; [34.00%] > els

[Bug other/118675] Missing escaping of "{" and "}" within messages in SARIF output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118675 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4bd06774ced72d5f0059ec55022840ad3f37fa4 commit r15-7255-gb4bd06774ced72d5f0059ec55022840ad3f37fa4 Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug c++/106880] [12/13/14/15 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106880 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/118538] throw not caught causing an seg fault rather than a `terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'` message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually I think I know what this is. Ubuntu defaults to PIE.

[Bug target/118533] [15 regression] bfloat16_scalar_*.c failures since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118533 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/118684] wrong alignment for stack temporary created during RTL expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118684 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Does that also happen if you remove the undefined behaviour?

[Bug c++/118629] [14/15 Regression] ice in cp_parser_expression_statement with __FUNCTION__ inside decltype for the trailing return type of a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118629 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Of course, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ isn't in the standard, so we can do whatever we want, but __func__ is said to be implicitly defined in function parameter scope, so at least __func__ in the late return type sh

[Bug sarif-replay/118686] New: Poor error message for ill-formed UTF-8 sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118686 Bug ID: 118686 Summary: Poor error message for ill-formed UTF-8 sequence Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug sarif-replay/118686] Poor error message for ill-formed UTF-8 sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118686 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Of course, we shouldn't be generating malformed data, but that can be a separate bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/112859] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-2097-g9f34b780b0461e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112859 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ccbc8c9d182c380e396631b2b5a683de4fddba9 commit r15-7252-g3ccbc8c9d182c380e396631b2b5a683de4fddba9 Author: Richard Biener Date:

  1   2   >