https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
See Also|
-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.1 20250114 (experimental) (GCC)
[569] %
[569] % gcctk -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118466
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, early-break should handle this in theory. It does:
> ./cc1 -quiet t4.c -O3 -msse4 -fopt-info-vec -fdump-tree-optimized
t4.c:3:24: optimized: loop vectorized using 16 byte vectors
t4.c:3:24: optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118469
Bug ID: 118469
Summary: ICE in lexical parser if too many open parentheses
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118466
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hmm, early-break should handle this in theory. It does:
>
> > ./cc1 -quiet t4.c -O3 -msse4 -fopt-info-vec -fdump-tree-optimized
> t4.c:3:24: optimized: loop v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117939
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117997
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
The linker issue still needs investigating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118464
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118451
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117397
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87ffd205fe0f4cbabd3d22cba815b02c0466d9ed
commit r15-6890-g87ffd205fe0f4cbabd3d22cba815b02c0466d9ed
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118470
Bug ID: 118470
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at
gimplify.cc:3341
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> The last progress I see is Jason's patch review comments in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/671258.html
> Iain, any progress since then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118140
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14cb0610559fa33f211e1546260458496fdc5e71
commit r15-6891-g14cb0610559fa33f211e1546260458496fdc5e71
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Fri De
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118154
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5e9e50fc6816713d012f1d96ae308a0946d5a14
commit r15-6892-ge5e9e50fc6816713d012f1d96ae308a0946d5a14
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Thu Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > The last progress I see is Jason's patch review comments in
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-Dece
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118472
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118471
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
So it works for the non-pointer case
real(kind=8), contiguous :: a(:)
where we get
stride.1 = 1;
...
(*a.0)[(integer(kind=8)) i * stride.1 + offset.2] = 1.0e+0;
but with 'pointer' we have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117079
--- Comment #4 from Christoph Müllner ---
The reason that we don't have "MEM " in the dump
anymore is that we now have "MEM ".
Further, the size of the function in the test case shrinks from 225
instructions down to 109 (almost all vector instr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
--- Comment #12 from Jennifer Schmitz ---
Created attachment 60149
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60149&action=edit
Proposed patch for detecting abs diff for signed integers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118470
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I think this might be another coro issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > > The last progress I see is Jason's patch review comments in
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118470
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118140
--- Comment #18 from Robin Dapp ---
Fixed on trunk. Guess we still need a backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118154
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118471
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The last progress I see is Jason's patch review comments in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/671258.html
Iain, any progress since then? This is a P1 caused by my patch, so if there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118238
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 117397, which changed state.
Bug 117397 Summary: [modules] ICE in binding_cmp with imported deduction guide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117397
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117397
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116068
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116068
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118471
Bug ID: 118471
Summary: Missed folding of descriptor span field for contiguous
Fortran pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118472
Bug ID: 118472
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE : tree check: expected none of
vector_type, have vector_type in operand_equal_p, at
fold-const.cc:3749
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118472
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |middle-end
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118472
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118459
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118459
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:744a59f3f55bfc890f755c57c72919566e1bcad5
commit r15-6889-g744a59f3f55bfc890f755c57c72919566e1bcad5
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118459
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118463
--- Comment #2 from mauro russo ---
I see your point, despite I consider your modified example a bit different,
because in the original example, other compilers still accept f even on the
intantiation..
However, I suppose you are implicitly men
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-07-12 00:00:00 |2025-1-14
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118348
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118456
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22fe3c05d86b52c35850918bfb21e1f597e1b5c7
commit r15-6893-g22fe3c05d86b52c35850918bfb21e1f597e1b5c7
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118140
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118398
--- Comment #10 from mauro russo ---
As comment about point (a), I hope to be right in referring the following
standard text from [temp.constr.normal]-p(1.4):
"The normal form of a concept-id C is the normal form of
the constraint-expression of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112779
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
commit r15-6895-g1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
commit r15-6895-g1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
commit r15-6895-g1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118140
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b8488f662b070933d0427df22811bf1eaac661e
commit r14-11210-g9b8488f662b070933d0427df22811bf1eaac661e
Author: Robin Dapp
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113904
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
commit r15-6895-g1294b819e1207c0ae76db29a75256f3fafd5f262
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118460
--- Comment #2 from Torbjorn SVENSSON ---
std::hypot() is actually expanded to a min/max like expression.
Anyhow, I've reduced it further down to the following C snippet:
$ cat pr118460.c
_Float16
bar(_Float16 x, _Float16 y)
{
return x < y ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118400
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] memory |[14/15 Regression] memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118472
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
reducer:
typedef int a;
typedef struct {
a b __attribute__((__vector_size__(8)))
} c;
typedef a d __attribute__((__vector_size__(8)));
c e, f, g;
d h, j;
void k() {
c l;
l.b[1] = 0;
c m = l;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Summary|Inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113904
--- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The just-committed patches implemented most of the support for dynamic
selectors including user/condition. Remaining bugs are as noted in Comment 7:
allowing references to parameter variables of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118474
Bug ID: 118474
Summary: -Wanalyzer-allocation-size false positive with -O0
-fsanitize=integer-divide-by-zero -fanalyzer
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117973
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116068
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 60152
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60152&action=edit
gcc15-pr116068.patch
Full untested patch I'm going to test tonight then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118473
Bug ID: 118473
Summary: ELF visibility of compiler declared symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118300
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118194
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118089
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118475
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
>
> Valgrind complains about uninitialised variables:
> ```
> ==903347== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==903347==at 0x794D60: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:1069)
> ==9033
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118475
Bug ID: 118475
Summary: [15 regression] dosbox-staging-0.82.0 miscompiled?
(fails dos_files, shell_cmds tests)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118475
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60154
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60154&action=edit
sblaster.cpp.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118475
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
With 14, I don't see any of the uninit warnings.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118475
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I'm wondering if this is PR118396.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118476
Bug ID: 118476
Summary: Internal compiler error: in predicate_for_phi_result,
at ipa-fnsummary.cc:2447
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118469
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Intention was to link to the thread and not endorse a particular patch within.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
Bug ID: 118477
Summary: Race condition in 'd' Make-lang.in
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/673428.html
Both should work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118468
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|vectorizer: extra phi |vectorizer: if conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118478
Bug ID: 118478
Summary: [OpenMP][5.0] Use defined assignment for FIRSTPRIVATE
etc., if available
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118473
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So I think __stack_chk_guard is special and handled in the backend rather than
the middle end so the visibility will need to be handled in the backend.
Does this happen only for x86_64 or also for aarch64?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118473
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also do you have a simple Testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e939005c496dfd4058fa57b6860bfadcabe4a111
commit r15-6897-ge939005c496dfd4058fa57b6860bfadcabe4a111
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118473
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also the bad relocation is recorded as pr 32434
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118400
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So I think we want
2025-01-14 Jakub Jelinek
PR ipa/118400
* vec.h (vec::release): Call vec_destruct
in the using_auto_storage () case.
--- gcc/vec.h.jj2025-01-02 11:23:13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] Internal|[14 Regression] Internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118480
--- Comment #2 from Steven Munroe ---
Created attachment 60156
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60156&action=edit
Examples for vector quadword shift by const immediate for POWER9
Compile with gcc -O3 -Wall -S -mcpu=power9 -m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118479
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
We also need to handle implicit mapping with INTENT(IN) – in which case it
should decay a 'from' should decay to 'release' on map exiting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118314
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86883
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Another testcase (based off of the PR118454 testcase):
template using identity = T;
template struct A;
template
struct B {
template struct dual;
template
using ty1 = dual, Vs...>;
template
usin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118355
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e939005c496dfd4058fa57b6860bfadcabe4a111
commit r15-6897-ge939005c496dfd4058fa57b6860bfadcabe4a111
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118482
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||107430
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118482
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
using what_type = decltype(
[](auto&& self,
decltype([](decltype(self)&){}) x = {}){ return x; });
what_type x;
int main() {
if (x(x)) return 1;
}
```
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
