https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118384
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Huaqi from comment #1)
> This issue also present in arm-eabi-gcc toolchain 14.x, but not present in
> 13.x.
>
> compiler option chosen is -Os -mcpu=cortex-m0
>
> chose m0 due it don't have a m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118362
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You can always
grep E_V[0-9]*[A-Z]*mode, insn-modes.h
in the builddir, those are all the vector modes actually used.
Or
grep MODE_VECTOR insn-modes.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118385
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC 4.7 started to warn about this:
: In constructor 'A::A()':
:2:13: warning: a temporary bound to 'A::v' only persists until the
constructor exits [-Wextra]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118384
--- Comment #4 from Huaqi ---
Thanks Andrew, it is clear to me now. Do you know how it can be avoided? Since
I may want to implement my own `__muldi3` function instead of generating a
libcall.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Maybe related, but not the same. PR986 involves creating a temporary and
> binding the reference to it, that should be easier to warn about. Here's a
> simil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118384
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63181
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> > This one should be moved to its own separate option per bug 7651
>
> Indeed it should, and if we add -Wdangling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raf2 at msux dot cjb.net
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkruger at stevens dot edu
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31856
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually a dup of bug 63181.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63181 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31788
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually a dup of bug 63181.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63181 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-09
Severity|minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||94404
Alias|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 118385, which changed state.
Bug 118385 Summary: A temporary expression bound to a reference member in a
mem-initializer is ill-formed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118385
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||cwg1696
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rush102333 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=986
--- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note C++ DR 1696 changed the code in comment #0 to be invalid; that is filed as
PR 94904.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118266
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14879ba89a4f9d2263472dca1423b584c1236586
commit r15-6728-g14879ba89a4f9d2263472dca1423b584c1236586
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jan 8 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115777
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao Liu ---
> That's probably the conservative answer for BB vectorization, for loop vect
> we know all those uses will be also in vector code. For BB vectorization
> there is currently no easly reliable check to ensur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118392
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117792
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dbfc2ff0a84edf6addeaa425272a5beacbbc7db
commit r14-11175-g4dbfc2ff0a84edf6addeaa425272a5beacbbc7db
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117925
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70cea067dd2b101edc6b3710678529eb8ba2eec2
commit r14-11177-g70cea067dd2b101edc6b3710678529eb8ba2eec2
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f73ecaf1957d35a9990735ebe228c8dd6188
commit r14-11178-gf73ecaf1957d35a9990735ebe228c8dd6188
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85944
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
commit r14-11182-g845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109976
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
commit r14-11182-g845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106212
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e696cac2baa35f011f85878e76039fc3945d241
commit r14-11181-g1e696cac2baa35f011f85878e76039fc3945d241
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117925
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa1e19d821a39d973c4c8c0e8d1d19811d2fa433
commit r14-11176-gaa1e19d821a39d973c4c8c0e8d1d19811d2fa433
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112349
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f236c897af48c3ae52095a894d57e66065b8ad87
commit r14-11174-gf236c897af48c3ae52095a894d57e66065b8ad87
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d650c29562bbb18c1ea5d0064e07f48c177912b
commit r14-11172-g9d650c29562bbb18c1ea5d0064e07f48c177912b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118035
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67c457de5a3f74151fc2d0085387127bf9e4e3c5
commit r14-11179-g67c457de5a3f74151fc2d0085387127bf9e4e3c5
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117966
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83fa0822aeec8af2162825976209efb90ca40c87
commit r14-11180-g83fa0822aeec8af2162825976209efb90ca40c87
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106212
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
commit r14-11182-g845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117962
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3590d9f68207861b8973f2812adf02fdba0840ba
commit r14-11183-g3590d9f68207861b8973f2812adf02fdba0840ba
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89624
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72fe42c9a095ef9b4125bd65999cd1012dfb73b7
commit r14-11190-g72fe42c9a095ef9b4125bd65999cd1012dfb73b7
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108236
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0eb0ba218968715506c435ca4ff71043e86617c
commit r14-11184-gf0eb0ba218968715506c435ca4ff71043e86617c
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109517
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
commit r14-11182-g845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117966
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
commit r14-11182-g845a0b71c82ad8f1d9967a6f15d10ef402f7f2e5
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118392
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118194
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118344
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118206
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106883
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118353
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
One difference might be how many cores are used for the builds.
The more cores how more sensitive they are for parallelism bottlenecks.
And riscv (was) kind of special in that there were just a handful of f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #435 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #434)
> Any suggestion on how to proceed here? Oleg, do you maybe want to rebase
> your tree against master? I can re-run all tests and verify whether the
> p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #436 from Oleg Endo ---
Could be relevant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118017
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/673130.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118392
Bug ID: 118392
Summary: "-w" fails to fully inhibit "'void a::b()' has not
been declared within a" warning
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118392
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is auto_diagnostic_group but it looks like it is not working.
if (hidden_p)
{
auto_diagnostic_group d;
pedwarn (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl), 0,
"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118392
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60087
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60087&action=edit
testcase
Next time please attach or paste inline the testcase.
Note attaching has a way to paste into a field
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117997
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118017
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fab96de044f1f023f52d43af866205d17d8895fb
commit r15-6751-gfab96de044f1f023f52d43af866205d17d8895fb
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118363
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118369
--- Comment #12 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Sorry, I didn't manage to catch you on IRC today, so continuing here.
Is this conflict considered an issue that will be eventually resolved, or is it
to stay?
I wonder how to proceed; I guess on a shar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118369
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118362
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e4120500e0cfc71956dc6569fe4ff00d2c20949
commit r15-6748-g8e4120500e0cfc71956dc6569fe4ff00d2c20949
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118375
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Ugh, sorry, pasted wrong thing.
It should of course be:
```
a.c: In function ‘main’:
a.c:5:15: error: ‘program_invocation_name’ undeclared (first use in this
function)
5 | char* x = program_invocation_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118320
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am trying to figure out if we should reject the STP or allow it.
The reason why it fails in ldp_fusion1 (which is before RA) is because of this:
```
// Punt on accesses relative to eliminable regs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117997
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
Does it pass with -fno-optimize-crc?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117962
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118035
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117866
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118391
Bug ID: 118391
Summary: ICE: in add_extra_args, at cp/pt.cc:13737
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118188
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08b6e875c6b1b52c6e98f4a2e37124bf8c6a6ccb
commit r15-6752-g08b6e875c6b1b52c6e98f4a2e37124bf8c6a6ccb
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116773
Bug 116773 depends on bug 118188, which changed state.
Bug 118188 Summary: aarch64: worse code with -mtune=grace (vs -mtune=generic)
in TSVC s4115
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118188
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118188
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118391
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118391
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118320
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
case Action::CHANGE:
{
set_pair_pat (change);
change->new_uses = merge_access_arrays (attempt,
input
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117866
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21571cdd8355f2162910d40f2f7d2dd4046f
commit r15-6747-g21571cdd8355f2162910d40f2f7d2dd4046f
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118369
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose ---
let's take that on irc, maybe quicker.
I've never used the approach to get the build deps from the gcc-12 package,
maybe try
apt source gcc-12
cd gcc-12-12*
apt buil-dep .
or just
apt build-dep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118186
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I've just confirmed that that's the fix indeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da82bf0a5fe31319735af1b67218578440ed8333
commit r14-11157-gda82bf0a5fe31319735af1b67218578440ed8333
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117642
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Docs fixed for 14.3 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117847
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116108
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] GCC |[12/13 Regression] GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118093
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7c5c4931f50b9898409d0101fad47abc9a223c3
commit r14-11160-ga7c5c4931f50b9898409d0101fad47abc9a223c3
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117458
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117095
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbbc1a4ac5c7e55de1edc52cfe267b95f9621e21
commit r14-11154-gfbbc1a4ac5c7e55de1edc52cfe267b95f9621e21
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117802
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 117614, which changed state.
Bug 117614 Summary: [14 Regression] Cannot change active member of anonymous
union in constant expression since r14-4771-g1d260ab0e39ea6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117614
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE |[12/13 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18765
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b694271bec01ed971147a0f4cb68d8c9a7d0915
commit r15-6731-g3b694271bec01ed971147a0f4cb68d8c9a7d0915
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118093
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117745
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] GCC |[12/13 Regression] GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102674
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 14.3 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117095
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] Wrong|[13 Regression] Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] Probable |[13 Regression] Probable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE |[12/13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118342
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Yes, so we can use it for a == 0 ? prec : __builtin_ctzll (a); but not say
> (with small middle-end enhancements) for a == 0 ? -1 : __builtin_ctzll (a);
> because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43374
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 14.3 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117851
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 14.3 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118024
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 14.3 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3861d362ec7e3c50742fc43833fe9d8674f4070e
commit r15-6733-g3861d362ec7e3c50742fc43833fe9d8674f4070e
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117960
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] "Note|[13 Regression] "Note that
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo