https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117601
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> looking into this slightly more, there needs to have a check on
> INTEGER_CST@1 if less than the size of the array if o is an array.
> (otherwise only allow 1).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117600
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Forcing -Werror was a request/decision:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/664797.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90594
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxue at os dot
amperecomputing.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117607
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241115 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
0241115090525-ge5050819808-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241115 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117610
Bug ID: 117610
Summary: -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant false positive with
{0}
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117164
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3320319ede5ce1cb34ba016f4a0d1e6588059980
commit r15-5321-g3320319ede5ce1cb34ba016f4a0d1e6588059980
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117164
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6244de432a5ba9807c6f0065e70a8025af7b1bd6
commit r13-9193-g6244de432a5ba9807c6f0065e70a8025af7b1bd6
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117610
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I believe to match clang++ behavior the needed change would be:
--- gcc/gimple.cc.jj2024-11-14 18:26:16.877459015 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple.cc 2024-11-15 13:40:43.484711373 +0100
@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112398
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98723
--- Comment #11 from Luca Bacci ---
The problem happens in
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/releases/gcc-14.2.0/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/regex_compiler.tcc#L612.
_M_translator takes __collate (the std::regex::collate flag) in account,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117600
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I had further look and I must say I really don't know what if anything is
clang++'s -fassume-sane-operator-new vs. -fno-assume-sane-operator-new option
doing.
Initially when that option has been added the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110952
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Kamil Kaznowski from comment #0)
> This proper way of handling allocator pointer is already implemented in
> std::forward_list.
This is not true:
_Fwd_list_node_base* _M_node;
The pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442
--- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka ---
> vector::size() is called **very often** so needs to be as fast as possible.
> Does this still inline identically?
Last year I made patch for inliner to ignore conditions guarding
__builtin_unreachable. Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117564
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116781
--- Comment #3 from Denis Chertykov ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #2)
> Created attachment 59602 [details]
> pr116781-gjl.diff
>
> (In reply to Denis Chertykov from comment #1)
> > Probably we have a wring definition of "*table
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116781
--- Comment #4 from Denis Chertykov ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #2)
> Created attachment 59602 [details]
> pr116781-gjl.diff
>
> (In reply to Denis Chertykov from comment #1)
> > Probably we have a wring definition of "*table
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115016
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117613
Bug ID: 117613
Summary: [modules] using-directive not exported
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117613
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117093
Jennifer Schmitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98723
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks! Please CC the libstdc++ list, as per https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html lists the other requirements.
I think this is small enough to not need a copyright assignme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117564
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:029c16c15f79dc27d44d77d82fd38aabe83bd4f7
commit r15-5323-g029c16c15f79dc27d44d77d82fd38aabe83bd4f7
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely ---
vector::size() is called **very often** so needs to be as fast as possible.
Does this still inline identically?
I tried something like that in r14-1452-gfb409a15d9babc and reverted it in
r14-1470-gb7b255
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115016
--- Comment #2 from Mark Starovoytov ---
This issue is still reproducible with 14.2 and trunk.
Another godbolt example (very similar): https://godbolt.org/z/3xrMGMYx7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117613
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
This interferes with the using-directive used to bring the chrono literal
operators from ...::chrono_literals into std::chrono, breaking
libstdc++-prettyprinters/chrono.cc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117371
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-15
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117371
--- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 59604
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59604&action=edit
Proposed fix
Thanks for the bug report. The error location was missing and here is a
proposed fix. All langua
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://hachyderm.io/@whitequark@mastodon.social/113488978156293353
So it looks like clang puts it in the .deplibs SHT_LLVM_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES
section. I don't know if lld or mold reads that section thoug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> https://hachyderm.io/@whitequark@mastodon.social/113488978156293353
>
> So it looks like clang puts it in the .deplibs SHT_LLVM_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES
> section.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117615
--- Comment #1 from Alec ---
It is worth noting that the same code compiles under clang-18 (haven't tested
other versions), although that doesn't mean they're doing the right thing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-08-24 00:00:00 |2024-11-16
--- Comment #21 from Sam James
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117622
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114014
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: 'verify_type' failed: |[14/15 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117621
Bug ID: 117621
Summary: [13/14/15 regression] runnable/mangle.d test fails
with -g (d21: error: type variant differs by
TYPE_PACKED)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117621
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114014
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117623
Bug ID: 117623
Summary: abs(a) == INT_MIN -> A == INT_MIN
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114014
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 117622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117622
Bug ID: 117622
Summary: [14/15 regression] builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c test fails
with -std=gnu23 -g (error: ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’ is not
compatible)
Product: gcc
Versio
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo