https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
--- Comment #9 from 李心杨 ---
Thanks for your quick response! I've tested the patch on gcc-13.3.0 and it
works well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117525
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117525
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
convert_optab tab = unsignedp ? ufix_optab : sfix_optab;
libfunc = convert_optab_libfunc (tab, GET_MODE (to), GET_MODE (from));
gcc_assert (libfunc);
I suspect this is a regression; maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117530
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117530
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117525
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117528
Bug ID: 117528
Summary: Miscompile with -O1 and -O0/2/3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117528
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117476
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 117528 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117529
Bug ID: 117529
Summary: Missed optimization: (y != 0 && x > (unsigned)(-1) /
y) (multiplication overflow check)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117529
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117529
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced down to just:
```
bool func4(unsigned long long x, unsigned long long y)
{
if (y == 0) return 0;
unsigned long long res;
return __builtin_umulll_overflow(x, y, &res);
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117530
Bug ID: 117530
Summary: Mismatch of lambda type with itself in recursive alias
declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #26 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #25)
> (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #24)
> > There are a couple of issues. The pa backend only supports memory
> > accesses that load to a re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117527
Bug ID: 117527
Summary: [15 regression] 511.povary_r with
march_native_ofast_lto build fail since r15-5021
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117527
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117527
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117496
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117529
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116948
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
--- Comment #9 from Sam James --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116948
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00448f9b5a123b4b6b3e6f45d2fecf0a5dca66b3
commit r15-5076-g00448f9b5a123b4b6b3e6f45d2fecf0a5dca66b3
Author: Sam James
Date: Thu Oct 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116948
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f791fac1419a5dc663abd5091cf4db409539b33
commit r15-5075-g8f791fac1419a5dc663abd5091cf4db409539b33
Author: Sam James
Date: Thu Oct 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117516
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117517
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||15.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117519
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
In GCC 10 (pre-modref), it fails in pure const instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #22 from John David Anglin ---
As of commit 440be01b07941506d1c8819448bd17c8717d55f5, we have the following
additional fails on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 with LRA:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-15.c execution test
+FAIL: gcc.dg/graph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #12 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
UBSan and Wstringop-overflow have completely separate implementations (I wish
there was a more sysematic approach...).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69585
David Seifert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soap at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #8 fr
*To be removed from our mailing list, please respond to this message with
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line*
--
**
12th INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ON DEEP LEARNING
(with a special focus on Large Language Models, Foundation Models and
Generat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108843
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> Created attachment 57711 [details]
> C source code
>
> Another test case.
>
I think this is probably a different case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117520
Bug ID: 117520
Summary: C++26 std::text_encoding: == should be =
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117521
Bug ID: 117521
Summary: ICE with duplicate placeholder variables
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108843
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|timeout with -g -O3 since |[12 regression] timeout
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117522
Bug ID: 117522
Summary: Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117476
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yunboni at smail dot nju.edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
--- Comment #7 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm sorry for the strange previous comment.
The right one.
Probably I found a bug.
The bug appears after the dse2 pass.
The dse2 pass removes necessary insns. (ie insn 554)
They are removed beca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
--- Comment #6 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch:
(In reply to denisc from comment #4)
> (In reply to denisc from comment #0)
> > Created attachment 59370 [details]
> > dse2 pass dump file
> >
> > Failed testcase:
> > $ make -k check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117522
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115586
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drepper.fsp+rhbz at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115586
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
--- Comment #8 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I forgot to add condition for "except those that refer to the return value"
The patch:
diff --git a/gcc/lra-spills.cc b/gcc/lra-spills.cc
index c149c3388cd..2f86ec0026c 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-spil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #23 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #21)
> This bug was fixed by changing PA_HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK. On the 32-bit
> target we no longer allow TI and OI mode in the hard registers. I only
> allow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117474
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113928
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113905
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
I bet that the spec writers ment the following (i.e. with the text written in
brackets):
“If a procedure is determined to be a function variant through more than one
declare variant directive [for a given b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117519
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|LTO ICE when building |[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117523
Bug ID: 117523
Summary: ICE in dependent_alias_template_spec_p when call a
alias template
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #24 from John David Anglin ---
There are a couple of issues. The pa backend only supports memory
accesses that load to a register or store from a register. LRA was
creating insns like the following:
(insn 387 386 35 2 (set (subreg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113905
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Isn't this explicitly prohibited by the spec? Second bullet point at the top
of page 295 in TR13 says:
"If a procedure is determined to be a function variant through more than one
declare varian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #25 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #24)
> There are a couple of issues. The pa backend only supports memory
> accesses that load to a register or store from a register. LRA was
> creating in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113905
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm. Look also at item 2 at the bottom of page 283, that says that construct
selectors for a variant function are added to its enclosing OpenMP context. I
thought this was the reason for the re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117519
Bug ID: 117519
Summary: LTO ICE when building gloox: lto1: internal compiler
error: symtab_node::verify failed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117519
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Fore ---
Created attachment 59573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59573&action=edit
reduced preprocessed clientbase.ii and instantmucroom.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
They're not completely distinct (some of the middle-end overflow warnings do
use builtin_object_size and friends), fwiw, as does UBSAN.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
One dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117525
Bug ID: 117525
Summary: canvas.cc:1675:1: internal compiler error: in
expand_fix, at optabs.cc:5952
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117526
Bug ID: 117526
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr108357.c fails without integer
argument promotion
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117524
Bug ID: 117524
Summary: Segmentation fault with -fipa-cp-clone
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117524
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117476
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 117524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
65 matches
Mail list logo
