https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #12 from Simon Martin ---
Yeah, I tried with a revert and it does change anything.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117449
Bug ID: 117449
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in gen_reg_rtx on aarch64 via
aarch64_emit_opt_vec_rotate
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117449
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-05
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-05
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117442
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c16e4ecd8fdc2230a313fe795333fa97652ba19f
commit r14-10886-gc16e4ecd8fdc2230a313fe795333fa97652ba19f
Author: Paul Thomas
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c16e4ecd8fdc2230a313fe795333fa97652ba19f
commit r14-10886-gc16e4ecd8fdc2230a313fe795333fa97652ba19f
Author: Paul Thomas
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116977
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
David, thanks for the pointers; Vedant is looking into this.
Question:
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> Note that the analyzer assumes that pointers in different memory spaces can't
> alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388
--- Comment #3 from Tomáš Trnka ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
> Do you want to apply the fix or shall I do the honours?
I'd love to do it, but I don't have commit access. So if I understand it
correctly, I would have to send a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116634
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3545aab00152ed3db1d7ce6ca4e1671dde276980
commit r15-4961-g3545aab00152ed3db1d7ce6ca4e1671dde276980
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14 Regression] constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110279
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Di Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c19ba52519be975d4464b063d3d5a2c700dd241
commit r15-4956-g5c19ba52519be975d4464b063d3d5a2c700dd241
Author: Di Zhao
Date: Tue Nov 5 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117129
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117099
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117099
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117440
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in merge, at |[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117444
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117444
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-05
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117444
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f185a89fc4b6e6f5ae5475cd7c723b3acf39976b
commit r15-4962-gf185a89fc4b6e6f5ae5475cd7c723b3acf39976b
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
--- Comment #8 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
>
>
> - however, for O0 we get a MAIN__ function which contains:
>:
> FRAME.3.FRAME_BASE.PARENT = 0B;
> __builtin_init_trampoline (&FRAME.3.t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117449
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117289
--- Comment #5 from David Faust ---
For BTF this is OK. The duplication with -std=gnu23 is not ideal, obviously,
since it causes unnecessary bloat. But the resulting BTF information is still
correct, if not "optimal".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] ICE |[13 Regression] ICE using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117449
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:161e246cf32f1298400aa3c1d86110490a3cd0ce
commit r15-4963-g161e246cf32f1298400aa3c1d86110490a3cd0ce
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] |[13 Regression]
|-fchec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rejects valid code on |attribute thought to be the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #8)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
>
> /usr/local/bin/ld: warning: /tmp/ccVWAwWh.o: requires executable stack
> (because the .note.GNU-stack section is executabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc failed to optimize |mod is not optimized to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We're assuming that an iterator's reference type can be converted to the
key_type. This doesn't compile on trunk:
#include
struct K {
explicit K(int) noexcept { }
bool operator==(const K&) const {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116634
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce25ca4da198ebc269d41ee6a9ac880ae8f67ad6
commit r14-10887-gce25ca4da198ebc269d41ee6a9ac880ae8f67ad6
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117416
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70015
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89493
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||101057
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117446
Bug ID: 117446
Summary: Rejects valid code on template parameter packs not
expanded with '...'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117158
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1d92aeb8583c8d1491c97703680c5fb88ed1fe4
commit r15-4957-gb1d92aeb8583c8d1491c97703680c5fb88ed1fe4
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117446
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Yuchang Su from comment #0)
> It is rejected by Clang, but accepted by GCC.
Is this backwards? It's rejected by GCC, and gives a warning with clang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117101
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5821f5c8c89a054e34cea00e042996dfdcd7e102
commit r15-4958-g5821f5c8c89a054e34cea00e042996dfdcd7e102
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117101
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117447
Bug ID: 117447
Summary: ICE in BPF GCC-trunk segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
bunch of
instructions to simulate dividing by multiplying and subtracting, even with -O3
enabled.
Godbolt link: https://godbolt.org/z/bn5avY8n3
g++ version:
```
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117129
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f31b72b75ef7cde61469c774162db7b1cc4c3d03
commit r15-4959-gf31b72b75ef7cde61469c774162db7b1cc4c3d03
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117099
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f31b72b75ef7cde61469c774162db7b1cc4c3d03
commit r15-4959-gf31b72b75ef7cde61469c774162db7b1cc4c3d03
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
OK, so trying to understand if there is still an issue with trampolines ( as
noted before, AFAIU gfortran has been using trampolines for a very long time,
so one might expect to have seen fallout before ).
1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117451
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-05
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116623
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Torbjorn Svensson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e152a734337a06ed085c2e6700f21cda9ca7ad17
commit r15-4966-ge152a734337a06ed085c2e6700f21cda9ca7ad17
Author: Torbjörn SVENSSON
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117453
Bug ID: 117453
Summary: Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117453
--- Comment #1 from Yunbo Ni ---
I'm not sure if it is a duplicate case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3621d2ac22b75b154c2964c0db84b58be427f3a8
commit r15-4964-g3621d2ac22b75b154c2964c0db84b58be427f3a8
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117450
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is a dup ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117450
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is a dup ...
Of? I went through all the PRs with "decltype" in their title and didn't find
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
--- Comment #10 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> >
>
> > /usr/local/bin/ld: warning: /tmp/ccVWAwWh.o: requires ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117451
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Miscompile with -00/1/2 and |[14/15 Regression]
|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
--- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #11)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #10)
> > I suppose the question then comes down to where does the
> >
> > .section.note.GNU-stack,"x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|Miscompile with -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117426
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 117451 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117451
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111843
Bug 111843 depends on bug 117451, which changed state.
Bug 117451 Summary: [14/15 Regression] Miscompile with -00/1/2 and -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117451
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117426
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
What is happening is sccp is rewriting some code to avoid undefined signed
integers but then that does not get optimized away in some cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111843
Bug 111843 depends on bug 117453, which changed state.
Bug 117453 Summary: [14/15 Regression] Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117453
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117426
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 117453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117426
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> What is happening is sccp is rewriting some code to avoid undefined signed
> integers but then that does not get optimized away in some cases.
Note -fno-tree-sc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117454
Bug ID: 117454
Summary: Template parameter hidden by base class name
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117454
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117454
--- Comment #2 from Darrell Wright ---
Thanks, yeah, I forgot to add that, I did try something like -Wall -Wextra
-pedantic -pedantic-errors -Wshadow -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117450
Bug ID: 117450
Summary: [DR1753] Allow ~decltype
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101057
Bug 101057 depends on bug 117445, which changed state.
Bug 117445 Summary: ICE: in gimple_build_assign_1, at gimple.cc:480
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #10)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9)
> > (In reply to kargls from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > >
> >
> > > /usr/local/bin/ld:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117451
Bug ID: 117451
Summary: Miscompile with -00/1/2 and -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117450
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > This is a dup ...
>
> Of? I went through all the PRs with "decltype" in their title and didn't
> find it.
PR 7
-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r15-4963-20241105175800-g161e246cf32-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241105 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117158
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Simon Martin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fdd38d576c20d5a337b5c7d14108981d0751434
commit r12-10804-g5fdd38d576c20d5a337b5c7d14108981d0751434
Author: Simon Martin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92589
Kees Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69698
Bug 69698 depends on bug 92589, which changed state.
Bug 92589 Summary: heuristic to avoid flexible array members too liberal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92589
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117454
--- Comment #4 from Darrell Wright ---
#include
struct Base {
using Type = int;
};
template
struct Derived : Base {
Type field;
};
static_assert( std::is_same_v{}.field), double> );
I think this should warn too, the intent is clea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117454
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-05
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117456
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The assert after all:
gcc_assert (VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (type))
|| type_has_mode_precision_p (type));
/* fall through */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117456
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117460
Bug ID: 117460
Summary: riscv64 backend emits large relocations due to loop
strength reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117459
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117459
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117460
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117455
Bug ID: 117455
Summary: ld warning about executable stack, follows from PR
117434
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101463
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:124f2f62e01c6f110279608ad09e0f1d378e4899
commit r14-10890-g124f2f62e01c6f110279608ad09e0f1d378e4899
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101463
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] Using |[12/13 Regression] Using a
u-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r15-4963-20241105175800-g161e246cf32-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117442
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c4184682d1cdfc43296f9550a48eaadb7501bbd
commit r15-4969-g8c4184682d1cdfc43296f9550a48eaadb7501bbd
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66528
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c4184682d1cdfc43296f9550a48eaadb7501bbd
commit r15-4969-g8c4184682d1cdfc43296f9550a48eaadb7501bbd
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117442
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
