https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
--- Comment #8 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #1)
> Jeff, did any of your recent constant patches help with this or is this
> something different?
Vector constant runs into different paths as DImode. Those patches a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59484
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59484&action=edit
C++98 testcase without double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117336
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117337
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k4lizen at proton dot me
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117336
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-06-04 00:00:00 |2024-10-28
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117337
Bug ID: 117337
Summary: Wreturn-type false positive on [[noreturn]] override
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59482
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59482&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It needs to be on a line on its own, and start with dg-
So:
! { dg-gfortran-onepass }
And rename the proc to match.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think you should also do:
set DO_ONE_PASS 0
After checking it, so that it doesn't remain set between tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102793
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note for the testcase in comment #0, noccmp is missing a VRP here.
if bar != 0, then `d != b` is also true.
For ccmp, GCC trunk (15) does notice that even due to r15-3866-ga88d6c6d777ad7
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114326
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder where this is from.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* |
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110721
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.5.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117252
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Testcase was added in r11-4701-g2e391ceb77bda0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> It needs to be on a line on its own, and start with dg-
>
> So:
>
> ! { dg-gfortran-onepass }
>
> And rename the proc to match.
Did this:
! { dg-do run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116415
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:507ed9118b29d7a5a2b751876bec9a1f5009de01
commit r13-9154-g507ed9118b29d7a5a2b751876bec9a1f5009de01
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117338
Bug ID: 117338
Summary: VRP changing `(a & 1) == 0` into `(bool)~a` gets in
the way of ccmp generation
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117339
Bug ID: 117339
Summary: Missing ccmp in the case of addition in the inner
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Bug ID: 117341
Summary: GCC 13.2.0 and 14.2.0 generate wrong code with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 117340, which changed state.
Bug 117340 Summary: gdb-interface problem? on deferred-length character array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117340
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||furutaka.kazuyoshi at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
10.5: 1 1 0 0
11.5: 1 1 0 0
12.4.1: 1 1 1 0
13.3.1: 1 1 1 0
14.2.1: 1 1 1 1
15.0.0: 1 1 1 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117338
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117339
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59483&action=edit
Semi-self contained testcase
Still uses prints but no headers are in use now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116768
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||newsigma at 163 dot com
--- Comment #13 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117340
Bug ID: 117340
Summary: gdb-interface problem? on deferred-length character
array
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37820
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to brian from comment #1)
> To list predefined macros, use -dM with an empty input file, e.g. "gcc
> -dM -E -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117340
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Last re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77723
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111900
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116415
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab74b2d86471cdb5b8a327e734630f1288125d9e
commit r14-10849-gab74b2d86471cdb5b8a327e734630f1288125d9e
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80653
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93677
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101125
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117326
Bug ID: 117326
Summary: ICE: in assign_temp, at function.cc:990 with -flto and
attribute constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117307
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Two old latent issues.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc
index 202af7a8952..54ad5c8f3dc 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc
@@ -3565,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
--- Comment #4 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to denisc from comment #0)
> Created attachment 59370 [details]
> dse2 pass dump file
>
> Failed testcase:
> $ make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=atmega128-sim
> --tool_opts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117170
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117170
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
> I think if it's working fine for you, I'm not going to worry about it until I
> have cause to log in again and figure out what I did wrong (which i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117328
Bug ID: 117328
Summary: Iterated component association fails for array indexed
by Stream_Element_Offset
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14907
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 59467
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59467&action=edit
A patch
I am testing this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117327
Bug ID: 117327
Summary: SPARC miscompile - branch past end of function
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55725
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|anonymous access result |anonymous access result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117327
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad0084337e901ddaedd48c14e7a5dad9fc2a093e
commit r15-4715-gad0084337e901ddaedd48c14e7a5dad9fc2a093e
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117297
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|late combine undoes too |[15 Regression] late
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117303
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117297
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117321
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yup, with optimization enabled the compiler can expand nextafter16 directly,
but for -O0 we need an extern symbol, which does not come from libstdc++
(although possibly we could define one as a weak symbol
ðāļāļāļāļāļļāļāļēāļāđāļāļ°āļāļģāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļāđāļāđāļēāļāļāļāļāļļāļĢāļāļīāļ
āļāļĩāđāļāļāļāļ°āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļē/āļāļēāļāļīāļāļĒāđ/ āļŦāļāļ. āļāļļāļāļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļąāđāļ§āđāļ
āļāļļāļāļŦāļĄāļļāļāđāļ§āļĩāļĒāļāļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āļŠāļąāđāļ āļāļāļļāļĄāļąāļāļīāļāđāļēāļĒ
âïļāđāļĢāļīāđāļĄāļāđāļ 1.5% - 0.5%
âïļāļāļāļļāļĄāļąāļāļīāļŠāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ 3,000,000 āļāļēāļ
âïļāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļĨ āļ āļēāļĒāđāļ 30 āļāļēāļāļĩ (āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāđāļāđāļāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļāļāđāļ§āļ)
âïļāļāļĢāđāļāļĄāļĨāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļ°āđāļĄāļīāļāļŦāļāđāļēāļāļēāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļģāļŠāļąāļāļāļē
âāđāļĄāđāļĄāļĩāļāđāļĒāļāļēāļĒāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļāļģāļĢāļ°āļāđāļāļāļāļģāļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāļĩâ
â
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117170
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
> Bisecting has been pretty painful so I gave up for now. I ended up hitting
> other comparison failures for a lot of commits in the range.
>
> I als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98021
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117327
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117325
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117325
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117283
--- Comment #4 from xuli1 at eswincomputing dot com ---
(In reply to xu...@eswincomputing.com from comment #3)
> (In reply to Yibo He from comment #1)
> > The data initialization is long, because I find that this bug is triggered
> > when long d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117327
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Target Milestone|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117321
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117307
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19722308a286d9a00eead8ac82b948da8c4ca38b
commit r15-4717-g19722308a286d9a00eead8ac82b948da8c4ca38b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117283
--- Comment #5 from Yibo He ---
(In reply to xu...@eswincomputing.com from comment #4)
> (In reply to xu...@eswincomputing.com from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Yibo He from comment #1)
> > > The data initialization is long, because I find that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #6 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> r15-4695-gd17e672ce82e69
I'm reducing now, it's at:
```
00:05:53 INFO (26.4%, 2952452 bytes, 47018 lines)
```
Should I stop it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE on |[15 Regression] ICE on
|L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-testcase
--- Comment #9 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117283
--- Comment #6 from Yibo He ---
(In reply to xu...@eswincomputing.com from comment #3)
> (In reply to Yibo He from comment #1)
> > The data initialization is long, because I find that this bug is triggered
> > when long data input. If anyone has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Bug ID: 117330
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE on Linux 6.12-rc5: in
vect_get_operand_map, at tree-vect-slp.cc:552
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing this too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #11 from Frank Scheiner ---
Created attachment 59479
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59479&action=edit
reduced source
cvise reduced it to:
```
enum psi_states {
PSI_IO_SOME,
PSI_NONIDLE,
NR_PSI_STATES
} *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
commit r15-4723-g4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
Author: Sam James
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is one of many reasons that the world is moving to -mabi=ieeelongdouble
instead of ibmlongdouble
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
commit r15-4723-g4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
Author: Sam James
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
commit r14-10845-g2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6247aae35faaf04de48c5f3d9c4e4af6f7e3789c
commit r14-10847-g6247aae35faaf04de48c5f3d9c4e4af6f7e3789c
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
commit r14-10845-g2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #12 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> Looks to be fixed by r15-4713-g0942bb85fc5573 .
Indeed, that fixes it!
Using a cross-compiler based on r15-4713-g0942bb85fc5573:
```
# ia64-linux-gcc -c -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
Bug ID: 117331
Summary: constexpr with "long double" fails on ppc64el
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
--- Comment #1 from IOhannes m zmÃķlnig ---
ouch, i've actually posted my initial test-case that uses templates.
The original code looked like
```C++
template
T test(void) {
constexpr auto one = T (1);
constexpr auto oneThird = one / (T)
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
