[Bug lto/117201] [15 regression] libqrencode-4.1.1 miscompiled with LTO

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117201 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #10) > Created attachment 59425 [details] > test_qrencode.c $ gcc-15 -flto -o test_qrencode test_qrencode.c && ./test_qrencode Aborted(core dumped) ./tes

[Bug lto/117201] [15 regression] libqrencode-4.1.1 miscompiled with LTO

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117201 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59424|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/117240] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.cc:657 with __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v32qi() or __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v64qi()

2024-10-23 Thread liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117240 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/117201] [15 regression] libqrencode-4.1.1 miscompiled with LTO

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117201 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59425|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/116556] __builtin_object_size does not handle `ptr + (PHI<4,8>)`, only `PHI`

2024-10-23 Thread siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116556 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/115274] [14/15 regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overread in SQLite source code

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/117180] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for Tor

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117180 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/117264] Segfault when using assignment for allocatable class

2024-10-23 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117264 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.3.0 --- Comment #9 from a

[Bug lto/117201] [15 regression] libqrencode-4.1.1 miscompiled with LTO

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117201 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59385|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/117278] New: [12/13/14/15 regression] Code at -Os is larger on trunk than GCC 11.4.0

2024-10-23 Thread dccitaliano at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117278 Bug ID: 117278 Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] Code at -Os is larger on trunk than GCC 11.4.0 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/117279] New: std::string bounds check from -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not optimised out

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117279 Bug ID: 117279 Summary: std::string bounds check from -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not optimised out Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/117279] std::string bounds check from -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not optimised out

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117279 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 59427 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59427&action=edit reduced testcase The problem is once we assign p.ptr to p.local_buf, GCC thinks the whole of p escapes except

[Bug c/55791] gcc fails to detect wrong type in sizeof in malloc

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55791 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/113857] fmov should be used to zero the upper bits of the vector register

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113857 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/117277] [15 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/store_lane_spill_1.c fails

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117277 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- +FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/store_lane_spill_1.c scan-assembler-not tstrtz[0-9] Is most likely the same.

[Bug tree-optimization/117277] [15 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/store_lane_spill_1.c fails

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug tree-optimization/117277] New: [15 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/store_lane_spill_1.c fails

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117277 Bug ID: 117277 Summary: [15 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/store_lane_spill_1.c fails Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizat

[Bug target/117092] [15 regression] gcc.target/aarch64/pr109072_1.c check-function-bodies s16x4_2 fail since r15-4235-gbcccc3221b838e

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117092 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||113857 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-10-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8df549fc2c0297970cb3bcadba7929088af96522 commit r15-4587-g8df549fc2c0297970cb3bcadba7929088af96522 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed O

[Bug tree-optimization/117279] std::string bounds check from -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not optimised out

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117279 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/117278] [12/13/14/15 regression] Code at -Os is larger on trunk than GCC 11.4.0

2024-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117278 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug rtl-optimization/117226] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-tree-forwprop" on x86_64-linux-gnu with ext-dce since r15-1901-g98914f9eba5f19

2024-10-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117226 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8df549fc2c0297970cb3bcadba7929088af96522 commit r15-4587-g8df549fc2c0297970cb3bcadba7929088af96522 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed Oc

[Bug c++/117280] New: Accessing a reference member of a volatile-qualified class glvalue is misinterpreted as volatile read

2024-10-23 Thread de34 at live dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117280 Bug ID: 117280 Summary: Accessing a reference member of a volatile-qualified class glvalue is misinterpreted as volatile read Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug target/117278] [12/13/14/15 regression] Code at -Os is larger on trunk than GCC 11.4.0 since r12-6149-gdc1969dab39266

2024-10-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117278 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12/13/14/15 regression]

<    1   2