[Bug c/117230] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in sizeof_pointer_memaccess_warning, at c-family/c-warn.cc:987 with -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117230 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20c180cf65e81257d40d6e0f3d798b5ec5364b11 commit r14-10830-g20c180cf65e81257d40d6e0f3d798b5ec5364b11 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/117268] [14 Regression] GCC target("general-regs-only") leaves __AVX__ defined after a push_options/pop_options 'scope'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117268 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #2) > > Possibly. It makes fair amounts of sense that predefined macros are > > reapplied after an options scope is e

[Bug middle-end/116891] [12/13/14 Regression] invalid optimization of -fma(-x,x,-z) when -O3 and -frounding-math are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116891 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6603ec4d113dba8dc286140cb440a89dcb411a6e commit r14-10829-g6603ec4d113dba8dc286140cb440a89dcb411a6e Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/117230] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in sizeof_pointer_memaccess_warning, at c-family/c-warn.cc:987 with -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117230 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/117199] [15 regression] libgcrypt-1.11.0 fails to link (warning: relocation against `.LC11' in read-only section `.text')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/116891] [12/13/14 Regression] invalid optimization of -fma(-x,x,-z) when -O3 and -frounding-math are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116891 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffce44e8be1fda467ea7aea02f40c22d03fdd206 commit r14-10828-gffce44e8be1fda467ea7aea02f40c22d03fdd206 Author: Richard Biene

[Bug middle-end/116891] [12/13 Regression] invalid optimization of -fma(-x,x,-z) when -O3 and -frounding-math are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116891 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12/13 Regression] invalid

[Bug c++/117269] New: Lambda with capture is accepted as NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117269 Bug ID: 117269 Summary: Lambda with capture is accepted as NTTP Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/116759] [15 Regression] ~2.5% exec time slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116759 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 Regression] 5% exec |[15 Regression] ~2.5% exec

[Bug target/117270] New: [15 Regression] 9% exec time slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117270 Bug ID: 117270 Summary: [15 Regression] 9% exec time slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optim

[Bug target/117270] [15 Regression] 9% exec time slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117270 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug fortran/117264] Segfault when using assignment for allocatable class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117264 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Terzi --- Created attachment 59414 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59414&action=edit Disassembled executable Since the error seems to be system-dependent, I disassembled the failing executable w

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- The test fails if char is unsigned.

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #69 from Julian Waters --- I apologize for vanishing suddenly and not giving progress reports, I am currently busy with some JDK work. The only thing left missing is the configure check. I will return to finishing TLS support once and

[Bug fortran/117258] tree check fail in gfc_trans_structure_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:9691

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117258 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/115860] [15 regression] Register pairs and regrename since r15-1579-g792f97b44ffc5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115860 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug tree-optimization/116588] [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre --param=vrp-block-limit=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116588 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Andrew, do you plan to backport this?

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 59416 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59416&action=edit gcc15-pr117249-2.patch Untested patch to change the gcc_assert definition.

[Bug c/117267] 'setjmp' can never be copied because it receives a non-local goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117267 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #6 from H. Peter Anvin --- No idea what you mean with #asmoptions. Using hacks in the Makefile is equivalent to having to do dependencies by hand (keep in mind that these statements will generally be part of header files.) In other

[Bug tree-optimization/117142] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2 at -O1 and above since r13-1754-g7a158a5776f5ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29d8f1f0b7ad3c69b3bdb130325300d5f73aa784 commit r15-4564-g29d8f1f0b7ad3c69b3bdb130325300d5f73aa784 Author: Martin Jambor Date: W

[Bug c/117267] 'setjmp' can never be copied because it receives a non-local goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117267 --- Comment #17 from Stas Sergeev --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16) > A warning > would be OK. Sure! Add an UB warning and rephrase the initial error. Replace this error: 'setjmp' can never be copied because it receives a non-

[Bug sanitizer/117209] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with asan.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug 85316 depends on bug 114678, which changed state. Bug 114678 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/range-sincos.c scan-tree-dump-not evrp "link_error" on s390 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114678 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/114678] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/range-sincos.c scan-tree-dump-not evrp "link_error" on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114678 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug middle-end/117271] New: [13/14/15 regression] GCC trunk emits larger code at -Os than 12.4.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117271 Bug ID: 117271 Summary: [13/14/15 regression] GCC trunk emits larger code at -Os than 12.4.0 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/117271] [13/14/15 regression] GCC trunk emits larger code at -Os than 12.4.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117271 --- Comment #1 from Davide Italiano --- https://godbolt.org/z/eExfPsjzs

[Bug c++/70481] [Regression] Libiberty Demangler segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70481 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- For the record, this was fixed for 4.9.4, 5.4.0, 6.1.0 and later.

[Bug c++/70498] Libiberty Demangler segfaults (3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70498 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- This was fixed for 4.9.4, 5.4.0, 6.2.0 and later.

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/117267] 'setjmp' can never be copied because it receives a non-local goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117267 --- Comment #15 from Stas Sergeev --- So in this case is this really good to disallow the always_inline attribute? - It just throws the meaningless error. Its meaningless because clang has no such problem, so stating "can never be copied" is pl

[Bug c/117267] 'setjmp' can never be copied because it receives a non-local goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117267 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- If the program never executes the code with UB, then the program is correct, and refusing to compile it with an error would be non-conforming. A warning would be OK.

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument since r14-1143-g42d1612eb5c3b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/117268] [14 Regression] GCC target("general-regs-only") leaves __AVX__ defined after a push_options/pop_options 'scope'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117268 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is by design.

[Bug target/117268] [14 Regression] GCC target("general-regs-only") leaves __AVX__ defined after a push_options/pop_options 'scope'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117268 --- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen --- Possibly. It makes fair amounts of sense that predefined macros are reapplied after an options scope is exited. But it does break existing code. See https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-130381

[Bug target/117268] [14 Regression] GCC target("general-regs-only") leaves __AVX__ defined after a push_options/pop_options 'scope'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117268 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101017] ICE: Segmentation fault, convert_memory_address_addr_space_1 with vector_size(32) and target_clone arch=core-avx2/default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101017 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug analyzer/117262] [15 regression] Analyzer doesn't handle RAW_DATA_CST properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117262 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug target/101017] ICE: Segmentation fault, convert_memory_address_addr_space_1 with vector_size(32) and target_clone arch=core-avx2/default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101017 --- Comment #11 from Hongtao Liu --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #10) > Did this ever happen ? > > Similar test case gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx10_1-26.c > still seems to cause a crash: > > testsuite $ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So instead of having the #asminclude in the C file you can arrange for it in the Makefile by source specific rules? That said, at what point would you request a #asmoptions directive?

[Bug target/117268] [14 Regression] GCC target("general-regs-only") leaves __AVX__ defined after a push_options/pop_options 'scope'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117268 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #2) > Possibly. It makes fair amounts of sense that predefined macros are > reapplied after an options scope is exited. But it does break existing code. > See http

[Bug fortran/117258] tree check fail in gfc_trans_structure_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:9691

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117258 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Even more mysterious: elk-9.2.12 $ find . -name \*.f90 -print | xargs grep xc_f03_lib_m ./src.orig/libxcifc.f90:use xc_f03_lib_m ./src/libxcifc.f90:use xc_f03_lib_m elk-9.2.12 $ I even tried: elk-9.2.1

[Bug c/117030] [C2y] Implement N3367, More Modern Bit Utilities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117030 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/117240] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.cc:657 with __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v32qi() or __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v64qi()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117240 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:403e361d5aa620e77c9832578b2409a0fdd79d96 commit r15-4566-g403e361d5aa620e77c9832578b2409a0fdd79d96 Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Oct

[Bug target/117240] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.cc:657 with __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v32qi() or __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v64qi()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117240 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b718f6ec1674c0db30f26c65b7a9215e9388dd6c commit r14-10831-gb718f6ec1674c0db30f26c65b7a9215e9388dd6c Author: liuhongt Date:

[Bug target/117240] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.cc:657 with __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v32qi() or __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v64qi()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117240 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2452387468423882c0732e0fad3a83e887574ccc commit r13-9145-g2452387468423882c0732e0fad3a83e887574ccc Author: liuhongt Date:

[Bug c++/117272] New: CWG2518 static_assert(false) when returning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117272 Bug ID: 117272 Summary: CWG2518 static_assert(false) when returning Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument since r14-1143-g42d1612eb5c3b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 Martin Uecker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muecker at gwdg dot de --- Comment #9 f

[Bug c++/117273] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at extend_ref_init_temps(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec**, tree_node**)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117273 Bug ID: 117273 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at extend_ref_init_temps(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec**, tree_node**) Product: gcc Version: un

[Bug tree-optimization/115274] [14/15 regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overread in SQLite source code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274 --- Comment #13 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- >when adding -fno-tree-sink, the warning disappeared. Before tree-sinking optimization, the IR is: (c.151t.pre) [local count: 1073741824]: c.0_1 = c; _2 = c.0_1 + 1; _5 = strlen (_2);

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Monakov --- On IRC Jakub mentioned gcc_assert (token() == TYPEDEF) in gengtype and Richi further noted tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.cc:gcc_assert (use->op_p = gimple_call_arg_ptr (call, 0)); cgraph.cc: gcc_assert (++edge

[Bug tree-optimization/116588] [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre --param=vrp-block-limit=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116588 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Andrew, do you plan to backport this? Wasn't planning to. Although the fast VRP pass exists in GCC 14, there is no way to call it or test it. There were also

[Bug other/116613] RFE: support outputting diagnostics in *multiple* formats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613 Bug 116613 depends on bug 105916, which changed state. Bug 105916 Summary: gfortran -fdiagnostics-format=json/sarif* output contains buffered errors https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105916 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/105916] gfortran -fdiagnostics-format=json/sarif* output contains buffered errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105916 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug jit/117275] New: test-functions.c.exe and test-tls.c.exe FAIL on ppc64le with an assertion failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117275 Bug ID: 117275 Summary: test-functions.c.exe and test-tls.c.exe FAIL on ppc64le with an assertion failure Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug jit/117275] test-functions.c.exe and test-tls.c.exe FAIL on ppc64le with an assertion failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117275 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- The particular assertion was added in r14-5930-gf31a019d1161ec aka f31a019d1161ec78846473da743aedf49cca8c27, so the test failures presumably affect gcc 14 and trunk. There may be other dormant issues on old

[Bug c++/117273] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at extend_ref_init_temps(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec**, tree_node**)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117273 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|

[Bug jit/117275] test-functions.c.exe and test-tls.c.exe FAIL on ppc64le with an assertion failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117275 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/117276] std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276 --- Comment #1 from Oliver Schönrock --- Created attachment 59419 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59419&action=edit patch which solves the problem this patch applies cleanly to libstdc++ 13.2 and 14.2 and also to head I bel

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #15 from Sam James --- I meant identify a single file which takes longer, possibly by using -time=/tmp/kernel to record how long each file takes on a good+bad build, then diffing the two.

[Bug tree-optimization/117222] [15 regression] Missed optimization with with std::vector resize in loop since r15-575-gda73261ce7731b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117222 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod --- pointer_diff depends on range_operator::fold_range to do the generic fold, which invokes wi_fold on subranges. It also in turn invokes op1_op2_relation_effect. This worked fine when pointers were implemen

[Bug target/112980] 64-bit powerpc ELFv2 does not allow nops to be generated before function global entry point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112980 --- Comment #20 from Giuliano Belinassi --- Any updates on this?

[Bug c++/93607] Deprecated alias templates don't produce warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93607 Fedor Chelnokov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug target/113860] SVE popcount can be used for 16bit, 32bit and 64bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113860 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pengxuan Zheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ffcf1f193b477f417a4c1960cd32696a23b99b4 commit r15-4579-g9ffcf1f193b477f417a4c1960cd32696a23b99b4 Author: Pengxuan Zheng Date:

[Bug middle-end/117271] [13/14/15 regression] GCC trunk emits larger code at -Os than 12.4.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117271 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Global Exported: _40 = [irange] int [-2, 2] Global Exported: _71 = [irange] int [0, 1] MASK 0x1 VALUE 0x0 Global Exported: iftmp.0_53 = [irange] int [2, 3] MASK 0x1 VALUE 0x2 Global Exported: n_52 = [irange]

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #14 from Frank Scheiner --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #13) > I would file a new bug with preprocessed sources if you can identify a > testcase which is slower. Preprocessed sources for a whole kernel build?

[Bug libstdc++/117276] std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Ev

[Bug target/113860] SVE popcount can be used for 16bit, 32bit and 64bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113860 Pengxuan Zheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pzheng at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug testsuite/117274] New: New test case g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C from r14-10826-g7de78f7353f125 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117274 Bug ID: 117274 Summary: New test case g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C from r14-10826-g7de78f7353f125 fails Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #13 from Sam James --- (In reply to Frank Scheiner from comment #11) I would file a new bug with preprocessed sources if you can identify a testcase which is slower.

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5fa2108ce0f3030cb28f47a18bc974c4224b66d commit r15-4573-gc5fa2108ce0f3030cb28f47a18bc974c4224b66d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Wed O

[Bug fortran/105916] gfortran -fdiagnostics-format=json/sarif* output contains buffered errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105916 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f565063a0602ad3b48ac687f575dea7a90cd4105 commit r15-4575-gf565063a0602ad3b48ac687f575dea7a90cd4105 Author: David Malcolm Date: W

[Bug tree-optimization/117180] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for Tor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117180 --- Comment #3 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like that my RFC patch currently has bugs that cannot locate the event accurately. need more study here to see how to locate the conditional event accurately. I need to reduce this test ca

[Bug tree-optimization/117179] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for wget (wrong order of conditions in if statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117179 --- Comment #4 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like that my RFC patch currently has bugs that cannot locate the event accurately. need more study here to see how to locate the conditional event accurately. I need to reduce this test ca

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #16 from Frank Scheiner --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #15) > I meant identify a single file which takes longer, possibly by using > -time=/tmp/kernel to record how long each file takes on a good+bad build, > then diffing th

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #17 from Sam James --- It's not really actionable without some self-contained testcase like that, unless Jakub has some other idea.

[Bug target/114064] [meta-bug] Use SVE instructions more for Advanced. SIMD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114064 Bug 114064 depends on bug 113860, which changed state. Bug 113860 Summary: SVE popcount can be used for 16bit, 32bit and 64bit https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113860 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #18 from Frank Scheiner --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #17) > It's not really actionable without some self-contained testcase like that, > unless Jakub has some other idea. Oh, don't get me wrong, I don't urge anybody to do

[Bug jit/117275] test-functions.c.exe and test-tls.c.exe FAIL on ppc64le with an assertion failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117275 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:779c0390e3b57d1eebd41bbfe43d1f329c91de6c commit r15-4580-g779c0390e3b57d1eebd41bbfe43d1f329c91de6c Author: David Malcolm Date: W

[Bug libstdc++/117276] New: std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276 Bug ID: 117276 Summary: std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/117251] SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 --- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Is it possible to define a fused and/xor+xor alternative that's split after > RA, slightly pessimized to prefer the altivec alternative, to allow the XXL

[Bug libstdc++/117276] std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276 Oliver Schönrock changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/oneapi-s

[Bug tree-optimization/117180] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for Tor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117180 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Created attachment 59423 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59423&action=edit reduced.i

[Bug c++/117272] CWG2518 static_assert(false) when returning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117272 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/p2593r1.html

[Bug c++/94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404 Bug 94404 depends on bug 117272, which changed state. Bug 117272 Summary: CWG2518 static_assert(false) when returning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117272 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/117272] CWG2518 static_assert(false) when returning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117260] [15 Regression] "phiopt: do factor_out_conditional_operation for all phis [PR112418]" vs. GCN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117260 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117260] [15 Regression] "phiopt: do factor_out_conditional_operation for all phis [PR112418]" vs. GCN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117260 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36e3e68250bf54909218298d1141138579803631 commit r15-4583-g36e3e68250bf54909218298d1141138579803631 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tu

[Bug c++/117269] Lambda with capture is accepted as NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117269 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-23 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/117179] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for wget (wrong order of conditions in if statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117179 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- I think your patch here isn't really getting it wrong, it's just that the structure of the if() across multiple lines doesn't make it obvious?

[Bug tree-optimization/117180] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for Tor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117180 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- Created attachment 59422 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59422&action=edit reduced.i First cut, will run it more.

[Bug tree-optimization/117222] [15 regression] Missed optimization with with std::vector resize in loop since r15-575-gda73261ce7731b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117222 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:774ad67fba458dd1beaa0f2d3e389aac46ca18b5 commit r15-4578-g774ad67fba458dd1beaa0f2d3e389aac46ca18b5 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/117179] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for wget (wrong order of conditions in if statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117179 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug jit/117275] test-functions.c.exe and test-tls.c.exe FAIL on ppc64le with an assertion failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117275 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Should be fixed on trunk for gcc 15 by the above patch. Keeping open to track backporting to the active release branches.

[Bug tree-optimization/117222] [15 regression] Missed optimization with with std::vector resize in loop since r15-575-gda73261ce7731b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117222 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amacleod at redhat dot com Target

[Bug tree-optimization/117179] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for wget (wrong order of conditions in if statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117179 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Created attachment 59420 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59420&action=edit reduced.i Reduced it a bit, it could be cleaned up more but I think it should be good enough.

[Bug other/116613] RFE: support outputting diagnostics in *multiple* formats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613 --- Comment #26 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #18) > (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #16) > > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #15) > > > (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #14) > > [...snip...]

[Bug tree-optimization/117179] Confusing -Warray-bounds output for wget (wrong order of conditions in if statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117179 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59420|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/117240] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.cc:657 with __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v32qi() or __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v64qi()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117240 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab84a8a4b78990942e006e9f060dc2705f2c6d8f commit r12-10784-gab84a8a4b78990942e006e9f060dc2705f2c6d8f Author: liuhongt Date:

  1   2   >