https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117172
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116510
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hello All,
I found a bug in gcc-13.2.0-llvm-17.0.5-mingw-w64ucrt-11.0.1-r3 for Windows.
This bug occurs when translating the file "bug.c" with the -O3 option. There is
no error when translating it with the -O2 option.
To check this bug, download bug.c file and other files from Google disk:
htt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117185
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > I would suggest to change reload_in_progress || lra_in_progress back to
> > just reload_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178
--- Comment #12 from Alejandro Colomar ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #9)
> >
> > I think it's simpler to have -Wc++-compat warn about any uses of
> > [[gnu::nonstring]] at all, si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116590
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116591
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116593
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Riscv |riscv
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117184
Bug ID: 117184
Summary: m2 fails with "terminate called after throwing an
instance of 'unsigned int'" with LRA on alpha
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117185
Bug ID: 117185
Summary: Bootstrap fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:910
with LRA on non-BWX alpha
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #68 from Julian Waters ---
I don't know why but apparently using force_reg and copy_to_mode_reg to load
into registers instead of using gen_rtx_SET and emit_insn fixes the garbage
movabsq instructions. I was going to ask why, but I su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117166
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
maybe changing
if (line_delta < 0
|| (line_delta > 10
&& line_delta * map->m_column_and_range_bits > 1000)
to
if (line_delta < 0
|| line_delta > INT_MAX / map->m_column_and_ran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117176
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117185
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I would suggest to change reload_in_progress || lra_in_progress back to
just reload_in_progress for resolve_reload_operand - this code can't work for
LRA.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117174
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117177
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
The change fixed python-3.12.7 build failure for me. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117166
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
line_delta > 1000 / map->m_column_and_range_bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116347
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-17
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116720
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #12 from Filip Kastl ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #9)
> Yes I guess we should keep better switches at -O1 because machine generated
> code may have lot of switches.
>
> I don't think we need perfect clustering? Perhaps t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111565
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cmuellner at gcc dot gnu.org
Ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Denis Chertykov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7393cbb5f2cae50b42713e71984064073aa378a
commit r15-4406-ge7393cbb5f2cae50b42713e71984064073aa378a
Author: Denis Chertykov
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #402 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
I've opened PR 117182 for a wrong fldi0/1 issue. Looks target + RA issue.
FYI, with the patches in PR 116932, PR 117111 and PR 117182 on top of
devel/sh-lra, c/c++ testsuite shows only one regression ag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117185
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I would suggest to change reload_in_progress || lra_in_progress back to
> just reload_in_progress for resolve_reload_operand - this code can't work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 80235, which changed state.
Bug 80235 Summary: ICE: coarrays, submodule
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117185
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117151
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente ---
fine.
I was trying to understand (reverse-engineering) what cuda and hip were using
in device and host code...
In case anybody is interested I think that cuda/nvcc uses their own
implementation (in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e74d25cd00629e001038cf6ff83e48d7ca6f4873
commit r15-4410-ge74d25cd00629e001038cf6ff83e48d7ca6f4873
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Oleg Endo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2390cbad85cbd122d4e58c94f7891d7c5fde49b3
commit r15-4411-g2390cbad85cbd122d4e58c94f7891d7c5fde49b3
Author: Oleg Endo
Date: Thu Oct
On 17/10/24 12:16 +0300, Сергей wrote:
Hello All,
I found a bug in gcc-13.2.0-llvm-17.0.5-mingw-w64ucrt-11.0.1-r3 for Windows.
This bug occurs when translating the file "bug.c" with the -O3 option. There is
no error when translating it with the -O2 option.
To check this bug, download bug.c f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117187
Bug ID: 117187
Summary: __niter_base overloads need to be declare before use
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117187
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
Bug ID: 117186
Summary: aarch64 wrong code for (a < b) < (b < a)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116424
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:420e17e642e0b1e9ebf1502613ea1c0acfa8a0e1
commit r14-10798-g420e17e642e0b1e9ebf1502613ea1c0acfa8a0e1
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116476
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0784e8934e96187e17c1b02dce1e0ed35d2229dd
commit r14-10799-g0784e8934e96187e17c1b02dce1e0ed35d2229dd
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116534
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36de56d3d643e7b8131fa6671b9e85258a1d1ca1
commit r14-10800-g36de56d3d643e7b8131fa6671b9e85258a1d1ca1
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116476
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116534
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
--- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to denisc from comment #24)
> Johann do you think that it is better to open a new bug for lra-pr116550-2.c
Yes, seems to be a different issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116578
Bug 116578 depends on bug 117172, which changed state.
Bug 117172 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr111820-2.c and
gcc.target/i386/pr111820-3.c with forced SLP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117172
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117172
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
>
> --- Comment #12 from Filip Kastl ---
> (In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #9)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117172
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1081f4cb34ea22e6ba07ddcb88cada3ec60bc9c4
commit r15-4408-g1081f4cb34ea22e6ba07ddcb88cada3ec60bc9c4
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
--- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
I allowed me to add some test cases. Unfortunatels, one of them is failing
with the patch and -mlra, whereas is passes with -mno-lra.
In $builddir/gcc:
$ make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
Bug 113934 depends on bug 116550, which changed state.
Bug 116550 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1,
at final.cc:2807
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 116550, which changed state.
Bug 116550 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1,
at final.cc:2807
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550
--- Comment #24 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #23)
> (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #22)
> > Unfortunately, one of them [lra-pr116550-2.c} is failing
> > with the patch and -mlra, wherea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117123
--- Comment #9 from Filip Kastl ---
Btw, here is a reduced testcase:
-
struct Potato {
bool isMashed;
};
void dont_be_here();
int patatino_a;
void patatino() {
if (patatino_a && patatino_a % 2 == 0 && patatino_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #15 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
An upper limit has the problem that very large switches may never get
the bitmasks or the jump clusters. Would be good to have a heuristic
that still works for them.
Bit clustering always wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #14 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
On 2024-10-17 05:59, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
>
> --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de de> ---
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, phee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
before is before r15-4397-g70f59d2a1c51bd
--- before.s2024-10-17 20:17:06.172435278 +
+++ after.s 2024-10-17 20:15:24.703424849 +
@@ -15,21 +15,21 @@ main:
movlc(%rip), %eax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] wrong code |[15 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117194
Bug ID: 117194
Summary: [15 Regression] Wrong code on highway-1.2.0
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115879
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2)
> _BitInt() is not needed, this can be also triggered at least by memset() and
> memcpy() with the memory operand having negative offset to address to a
> variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117188
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
Bug 113934 depends on bug 116779, which changed state.
Bug 116779 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at
cfgrtl.cc:1303
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
*** Bug 116779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 116779, which changed state.
Bug 116779 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at
cfgrtl.cc:1303
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The tree code represents the following obtab:
@cindex @code{widen_ssum@var{m}3} instruction pattern
@cindex @code{widen_usum@var{m}3} instruction pattern
@item @samp{widen_ssum@var{m}3}
@itemx @samp{widen_us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
>
> > The andn is swapped.
> Indeed:
>
> +(define_expand "andn3"
> + [(set (match_operand:MMXMODEI 0 "register_oper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 105361, which changed state.
Bug 105361 Summary: Incorrect end-of-file condition for derived-type I/O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117194
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
;; vect_iftmp.29_100 = .BIT_ANDN ({ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }, _68);
(insn 33 32 34 (set (reg:V8QI 128)
(mem/u/c:V8QI (symbol_ref/u:DI ("*.LC2") [flags 0x2]) [0 S8 A64])) -1
(expr_list:REG_EQUA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104827
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
Bug ID: 117195
Summary: Invalid IR after vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104826
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117196
Bug ID: 117196
Summary: Should no_sanitize_address turn off hwaddress too?
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117196
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
"I believe this is a compiler bug, as there doesn't seem to be a
separate attribute to prevent instrumentation in this mode.
"
At least the above is not true.
`__attribute__((no_sanitize("hwaddress")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117196
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The documentation for GCC's no_sanitize_address attribute is at least clear
that it does not disable it for hwasan:
"when compiling with the -fsanitize=address option."
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another option would be to revert r15-4402 and r15-4377 and reapply once this
fix is tested and approved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> The andn is swapped.
Indeed:
+(define_expand "andn3"
+ [(set (match_operand:MMXMODEI 0 "register_operand")
+(and:MMXMODEI
+ (not:MMXMODEI (matc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6604a05fa27bc21c3409e767552daca3fcf43964
commit r15-4419-g6604a05fa27bc21c3409e767552daca3fcf43964
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 59372
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59372&action=edit
gcc15-pr117190.patch
Untested fix.
As the ICE shows, I think we need to use bitsize_int instead of size_int (o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> before is before r15-4397-g70f59d2a1c51bd
> - movq16(%rsp), %xmm2
> + movq16(%rsp), %xmm1
Isn't this reading from uninitialized stack slot?
m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> > before is before r15-4397-g70f59d2a1c51bd
> > - movq16(%rsp), %xmm2
> > + movq16(%rsp), %xmm1
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Yes but in this case the mask will 0 forcing it all to 0 . But the mask is
> swapping around to -1 for some reason.
Also if you are worried about that, you can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
--- Comment #4 from Dan Klishch ---
SerenityOS's on-host tests seem to work fine with the patch attached here (this
was the original reproducer) and one from PR116914. Without the later, I hit
ICE similar to one outlined in the gimplify_var_or_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Note this tree code (and optab) is useful only for reductions since it is left
unspecified which of the 2x number of input lanes are accumulated to which
output lane (even accumulating _all_ input lanes to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117197
Bug ID: 117197
Summary: ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed with vector_size
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
;; MEM [(void *)&reversal] = *.LC1;
(insn 35 34 36 (set (reg:DI 667)
(symbol_ref/f:DI ("*.LC11") [flags 0x2] ))
"/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.11.0-r1/work/libgcrypt-1.11.0/cipher/mceliece
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
/home/apinski/upstream-gcc/bin/gcc -O3 -shared -fPIC -Wl,--whole-archive
mceliece6688128f.i -Wl,--no-whole-archive -flto=auto -mtls-dialect=gnu2
-march=znver2 -fno-semantic-interposition
```
Is enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59379
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59379&action=edit
Reduced testcase
`-O3 -flto -shared -fPIC -march=znver2` reproduces it with this testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59379|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117198
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
alias changes the name underneath and is not redundant .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
