[Bug tree-optimization/117140] [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in initialize_flags_in_bb for rv32gcv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/117142] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2 at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org P

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/117146] ICE on error recovery with openscad-2021.01

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117146 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-15 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/117148] `-Os` results in much larger code than `-O2` about bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117148 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #2) > > However it doesn't affect the bug. (https://godbolt.org/z/fdxbbadnj) It's > because GCC fail to inline `atomic_load_iptr`. Forcing that function to be > inlined wit

[Bug target/117128] [15 regression] GCC trunk generates larger code than GCC 14 at -Os/Oz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117128 Davide Italiano changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/117152] [15 Regression] Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117152 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- It's happening here: (gdb) bt #0 0x00f95395 in dump_function_name (pp=0x4d00c40 , t=, flags=148) at ../../src/gcc/cp/error.cc:2139 #1 0x00f94109 in dump_function_decl (pp=0x4d00c40 , t

[Bug target/117159] New: kmovw storing to memory is assumed to zero-extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117159 Bug ID: 117159 Summary: kmovw storing to memory is assumed to zero-extend Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument since r14-1143-g42d1612eb5c3b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug libstdc++/114817] Wrong codegen for std::copy of "trivially copyable but not trivially assignable" type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114817 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/665537.html

[Bug c++/117156] New: not applied option “-Wchanges-meaning”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117156 Bug ID: 117156 Summary: not applied option “-Wchanges-meaning” Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/117157] New: changes-meaning is not in the index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117157 Bug ID: 117157 Summary: changes-meaning is not in the index Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug c++/117157] changes-meaning is not in the index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117157 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11f0ea45b1b63ec7eb6a52179ca6fd4304e7e312 commit r15-4362-g11f0ea45b1b63ec7eb6a52179ca6fd4304e7e312 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tu

[Bug c++/117158] New: ICE with array access inside a template with a base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117158 Bug ID: 117158 Summary: ICE with array access inside a template with a base class Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/117128] [15 regression] GCC trunk generates larger code than GCC 14 at -Os/Oz since r14-2161-g237e83e2158a3d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117128 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 regression] GCC trunk |[15 regression] GCC trunk

[Bug tree-optimization/108770] [12/13/14/15 regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds at -O2 (gcc >= 12)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108770 --- Comment #3 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- With my patch for new option -fdiagnostics-explain-harder, the output is: t_108770.c: In function ‘init’: t_108770.c:10:13: warning: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of ‘const char *[2]’

[Bug c++/117156] not applied option “-Wchanges-meaning”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117156 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The post should say -Wno-changes-meaning disables it.

[Bug c++/117154] Aggregate initialization with protected destructor in Base class: GCC vs Clang difference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117154 --- Comment #6 from Carlos Galvez --- Alright reading Richard's comment I now understand he's not implying current behavior is correct, but rather explaining why it happens. I take it then that this is a bug in Clang then. Thanks for the clarifi

[Bug target/113341] Using GCC as the bootstrap compiler breaks LLVM on 32-bit PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113341 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/117141] gcc/match.pd: patten duplicates around signed_integer_sat_sub

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117141 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/117157] changes-meaning is not in the index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117157 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a72064c8c12f2cc3ab6fde7cd42f31f27193b5c4 commit r15-4363-ga72064c8c12f2cc3ab6fde7cd42f31f27193b5c4 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tu

[Bug middle-end/116510] [15 Regression] ice in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116510 --- Comment #12 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- Like this? It fixes the test case. I'm not sure why you want AND_EXPR, this is a truth formula. Maybe it should be TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR though to short circuit. diff --git a/gcc/tree-if-conv.cc b/gcc/

[Bug c++/117152] New: Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117152 Bug ID: 117152 Summary: Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/116064] [15 Regression] SPEC 2017 523.xalancbmk_r failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064 --- Comment #14 from Li Pan --- > So you have to use one of those two. Thanks, I see, let me update the config file and have another try.

[Bug c++/116064] [15 Regression] SPEC 2017 523.xalancbmk_r failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064 --- Comment #15 from Li Pan --- (In reply to Li Pan from comment #14) > > So you have to use one of those two. > > Thanks, I see, let me update the config file and have another try. -Wno-error=template-body works, thanks a lot.

[Bug c++/117153] [12/13/14/15 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at is_overloaded_fn(tree_node*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117153 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/117152] [15 Regression] Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |15.0 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/116064] [15 Regression] SPEC 2017 523.xalancbmk_r failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #12 from

[Bug target/113341] Using GCC as the bootstrap compiler breaks LLVM on 32-bit PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113341 --- Comment #19 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #18) > See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111995 which fixes a problem > that bisected to the same commit on ppc32. Yes, I can confirm that this p

[Bug c++/117155] New: Bogus -Wdangling-reference warning after r13-3511-gd2249cd9adf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117155 Bug ID: 117155 Summary: Bogus -Wdangling-reference warning after r13-3511-gd2249cd9adf Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80637] [CWG2918] constraint on a member function does causes ambigious and not allowing forming a pointer to the function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80637 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Summary|constraint on a

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 80637, which changed state. Bug 80637 Summary: [CWG2918] constraint on a member function does causes ambigious and not allowing forming a pointer to the function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80637

[Bug c++/116876] GCC accepts invalid call to overloaded function template when neither is at least as specialized as the other

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116876 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/117022] [C2y] Implement N3355, Named loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117022 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50f27896adb272b40ab03a56fd192e74789bef97 commit r15-4369-g50f27896adb272b40ab03a56fd192e74789bef97 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c/117022] [C2y] Implement N3355, Named loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117022 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/115328] The FORWARD keyword is not implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115328 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 59353 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59353&action=edit Proposed fix Here is a proposed fix, which passes all regressions and implements the FORWARD keyword. It also

[Bug tree-optimization/117147] [15 regression] ICE when building vtk-9.3.0 (crash in vect_build_slp_tree_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8af474aa5d5efdda7def6cdcec3f246df2c7026a commit r15-4349-g8af474aa5d5efdda7def6cdcec3f246df2c7026a Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/117137] [15 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 unrecognizable insn: (compare:CCZ reg:V2DI reg:V2DI) with -O2 -msse4 since r15-4194-g5977b746db3925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117137 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79b881df72c946f2ba61879c36ae93b0cb974617 commit r15-4350-g79b881df72c946f2ba61879c36ae93b0cb974617 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #61 from Eric Botcazou --- > Just a heads up, the minimal reproducer seems to be getting garbage movabsq > instructions emitted again with the first stage gcc in the bootstrap phase I cannot reproduce on the mainline though.

[Bug target/117137] [15 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 unrecognizable insn: (compare:CCZ reg:V2DI reg:V2DI) with -O2 -msse4 since r15-4194-g5977b746db3925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117137 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/117147] [15 regression] ICE when building vtk-9.3.0 (crash in vect_build_slp_tree_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/117137] [15 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 unrecognizable insn: (compare:CCZ reg:V2DI reg:V2DI) with -O2 -msse4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117137 --- Comment #3 from Haochen Jiang --- >From my bisect: 5977b746db3925aaba37722f5312419d5f2968a5 is the first bad commit commit 5977b746db3925aaba37722f5312419d5f2968a5 Author: Richard Biener Date: Tue Oct 8 09:01:01 2024 +0200 tree-opti

[Bug middle-end/116749] [12/13/14/15 Regression] program crash under -O3 optimization since r12-5300-gf98f373dd822b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116749 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug target/117137] [15 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 unrecognizable insn: (compare:CCZ reg:V2DI reg:V2DI) with -O2 -msse4 since r15-4194-g5977b746db3925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117137 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 Regression] ICE: in |[15 Regression] ICE: in |

[Bug middle-end/117141] gcc/match.pd: patten duplicates around signed_integer_sat_sub

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117141 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97f98855d4157a2511a713129ec77740fe6f88dc commit r15-4354-g97f98855d4157a2511a713129ec77740fe6f88dc Author: Pan Li Date: Tue Oct 15 07:3

[Bug c++/117153] [12/13/14/15 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at is_overloaded_fn(tree_node*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117153 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/117152] [15 Regression] Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117152 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||15.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/116064] [15 Regression] SPEC 2017 523.xalancbmk_r failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064 --- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Li Pan from comment #12) > Looks RISC-V backend still has this issue, can you reproduce this? > > /opt/gcc-master//bin/g++ --version > g++ (GCC) 15.0.0 20241014 (experimental) > > /opt/gcc-

[Bug c++/117153] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at is_overloaded_fn(tree_node*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117153 Bug ID: 117153 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at is_overloaded_fn(tree_node*) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/117152] [15 Regression] Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117152 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Segmentation fault in |[15 Regression] |pe

[Bug c++/117152] [15 Regression] Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117152 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/117152] [15 Regression] Segmentation fault in permerror(unsigned int, char const*, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117152 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- The backtrace with locations is: 117152.cc:3:48: error: could not convert ‘{0}’ from ‘’ to ‘S&&’ 3 | friend constexpr S::S(S&& = {0}) noexcept; |

[Bug c++/117153] [12/13/14/15 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at is_overloaded_fn(tree_node*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117153 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The backtrace with locations is: 117153.cc: In instantiation of ‘void f() [with T = double]’: 117153.cc:10:25: required from here 117153.cc:8:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 8 | d +

[Bug libstdc++/106201] filesystem::directory_iterator is a borrowable range?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106201 Bug 106201 depends on bug 94894, which changed state. Bug 94894 Summary: avoidable instantiation of conversion function template during overload resolution https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894 What|Removed

[Bug c++/105766] requires std::is_constructible<> reports 'constraint depends on itself' error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105766 Bug 105766 depends on bug 94894, which changed state. Bug 94894 Summary: avoidable instantiation of conversion function template during overload resolution https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894 What|Removed

[Bug c++/94894] avoidable instantiation of conversion function template during overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/117154] New: Aggregate initialization with protected destructor in Base class: GCC vs Clang difference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117154 Bug ID: 117154 Summary: Aggregate initialization with protected destructor in Base class: GCC vs Clang difference Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/116613] RFE: support outputting diagnostics in *multiple* formats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613 --- Comment #24 from Kamil Dudka --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #21) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #20) > > How about another option > > -fdiagnostics-set-output= > > that would work like > > -fdiagnostics-add-outpu

[Bug target/117138] [15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in range_compatible_p, at value-range.h:1796 with -O2 -msse4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117147] [15 regression] ICE when building vtk-9.3.0 (crash in vect_build_slp_tree_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Reduced testcase: ``` double Test(int p, double *sum3, double *sum4, double *wX) { double tmp; double bS1 = 0.; double bS2 = 0.; for (int i = 0; i < p; ++i) { tmp = wX[i] * wX[i];

[Bug libstdc++/117151] New: _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX_ARC and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX are not defined in a consistent way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117151 Bug ID: 117151 Summary: _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX_ARC and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX are not defined in a consistent way Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Stat

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #62 from Julian Waters --- That's gonna be a problem, sigh. The only noteworthy difference I can see between the 2 patches that is related to the secrel32 unspec is one of the GET_CODE == SYMBOL_REF is enclosed in brackets. Unless thi

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #63 from Julian Waters --- (I know the predicates have been brought up as a potential cause for this, but if it cannot be replicated with the candidate patch the problem may lie elsewhere)

[Bug target/117116] [15 regression] error: unrecognizable insn: with -march=znver3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117116 --- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #13) > > I tried to split V2SImode CONST_VECTOR to two SImode CONST elements, but > > there were some further ICEs generated, and it is getting a bit late > > here...? >

[Bug middle-end/117149] GCC's optimizer intermittently generates erroneous thread-local storage code, causing segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117149 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Also the GCC you are using defaults to using -fstack-protector by default so it is not a bug in the normal releases of GCC. See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#index-mstack-pr

[Bug c++/116506] [15 Regression] Destructors of temporary awaitables are executed too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/117136] [15 regression] ICE for gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_11.f90 since r15-4298-g3269a722b7a036

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117136 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/117140] [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in initialize_flags_in_bb for rv32gcv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/117140] [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in initialize_flags_in_bb for rv32gcv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140 --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- Ok, mine then. It looks like it's this loop: int n_3_TYPE1_int64_t = 32; int32_t x_3_int32_t = 233; int32_t x2_3_int32_t = 78; int64_t y_3_int64_t = 1234; int32_t f_3_int32_t[33 * 2 +

[Bug tree-optimization/117147] [15 regression] ICE when building vtk-9.3.0 (crash in vect_build_slp_tree_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1aac888fac6cff63a3d6522bcf9b8439e14320ad commit r15-4352-g1aac888fac6cff63a3d6522bcf9b8439e14320ad Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/117154] Aggregate initialization with protected destructor in Base class: GCC vs Clang difference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117154 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is https://wg21.link/cwg2244 and it looks like GCC already implements the suggested resolution.

[Bug c++/83417] Pointer-to-member template parameter with auto member type dependent container type does not work (C++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83417 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug libstdc++/106676] [C++20] Automatic iterator_category detection misbehaves when `::reference` is an rvalue reference, refuses to accept a forward iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106676 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/117155] Bogus -Wdangling-reference warning after r13-3511-gd2249cd9adf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117155 --- Comment #3 from Dimitry Andric --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #0) > > After r15-3941-g2531f014fb2364 ("c++: Implement -Wdangling-reference > > I think the correct commit is > r13

[Bug libstdc++/106676] [C++20] Automatic iterator_category detection misbehaves when `::reference` is an rvalue reference, refuses to accept a forward iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106676 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f65f94917866c6b18d9698eec6451c1bf21e0f9 commit r15-4356-g7f65f94917866c6b18d9698eec6451c1bf21e0f9 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug c++/117155] Bogus -Wdangling-reference warning after r13-3511-gd2249cd9adf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117155 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #0) > After r15-3941-g2531f014fb2364 ("c++: Implement -Wdangling-reference I think the correct commit is r13-3511-gd2249cd9adf5ae638577139177a50f7e62d8abd9 > [PR1

[Bug c++/117155] Bogus -Wdangling-reference warning after r13-3511-gd2249cd9adf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117155 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #0) > Clearly, there is no dangling reference here, and not even a temporary. And > even if there was a temporary, its lifetime should have been extended. No, the

[Bug c++/84884] [DR 2244] [C++17] protected constructor and aggregate initialization of base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84884 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/84884] [DR 2244] [C++17] protected constructor and aggregate initialization of base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84884 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- https://wg21.link/cwg2244

[Bug c++/84884] [DR 2244] [C++17] protected constructor and aggregate initialization of base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84884 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv

[Bug c++/117154] Aggregate initialization with protected destructor in Base class: GCC vs Clang difference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117154 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/117142] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2 at -O1 and above since r13-1754-g7a158a5776f5ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug libstdc++/97088] 17_intro/names.cc and experimental/names.cc fail with --disable-libstdcxx-pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97088 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/117150] New: mstack-protector-guard-symbol= is not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117150 Bug ID: 117150 Summary: mstack-protector-guard-symbol= is not documented Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal

[Bug target/117137] [15 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 unrecognizable insn: (compare:CCZ reg:V2DI reg:V2DI) with -O2 -msse4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117137 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/114052] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 for well-defined infinite loop since r8-5245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114052 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > Note I don't get an __builtin_unreachable() in GCC 14.1.0 nor 13.1.0. I have no idea what I was thinking when I wrote this as I just retested and it fails wit

[Bug middle-end/116749] [12/13/14/15 Regression] program crash under -O3 optimization since r12-5300-gf98f373dd822b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116749 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/117151] _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX_ARC and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX are not defined in a consistent way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117151 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to vincenzo Innocente from comment #0) > Not sure if it is intended or not but > if _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX is defined to be "0" (say on the command line) That's undefined behaviour, it's an in

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #65 from Eric Botcazou --- > Just tried it again, it emits broken assembly on both master and gcc 14 with > the "Latest TLS" patch What command line do you use to compile the minimal reproducer?

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #66 from Eric Botcazou --- > That's gonna be a problem, sigh. The only noteworthy difference I can see > between the 2 patches that is related to the secrel32 unspec is one of the > GET_CODE == SYMBOL_REF is enclosed in brackets. Unle

[Bug fortran/117136] [15 regression] ICE for gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_11.f90 since r15-4298-g3269a722b7a036

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117136 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa90febea9801d4255bf6a1e9f0fd998629c3c7c commit r15-4348-gfa90febea9801d4255bf6a1e9f0fd998629c3c7c Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug target/117138] [15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in range_compatible_p, at value-range.h:1796 with -O2 -msse4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/117110] [15 Regression] Bootstrap broken on FreeBSD with build/genmatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117110 --- Comment #8 from Simon Martin --- FWIW I can confirm that the build is restored on Darwin. Thanks!

[Bug bootstrap/117110] [15 Regression] Bootstrap broken on FreeBSD with build/genmatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117110 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/116921] [14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 unrecognizable insn: UNSPEC_PTEST with -O -msse4 since r14-2464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116921 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/116898] ICE: in block_range, at gimple-range-cache.cc:1293 with -O -finstrument-functions -fnon-call-exceptions and _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116898 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/116899] ICE: in quick_push, at vec.h:1041 with -O at _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116899 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/44952] #include implies global constructor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #64 from Julian Waters --- Just tried it again, it emits broken assembly on both master and gcc 14 with the "Latest TLS" patch

[Bug middle-end/116749] [12/13 Regression] program crash under -O3 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116749 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > r14-2709-g65ff4a45b11b5a was the fix on 14... and made it latent. It crashes on trunk with -fno-tree-ch.

  1   2   >