https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117021
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117020
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
There is very little language content in this paper (only some predefined
macros).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117022
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
There is a request for a do-while example to be added editorially.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117022
Bug ID: 117022
Summary: [C2y] Implement N3355, Named loops
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117032
Bug ID: 117032
Summary: missing vectorization of V4HI to V4DF
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117031
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So on the V4HI to V4DF missed vectorization, I filed PR 117032 since GCC does
understand if there is an indirection via V4SI.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101956
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117033
--- Comment #6 from Davide Italiano ---
I noticed you linked the LLVM bug I found.
As part of my search/analysis, I found out there are cases that sometimes clang
gets but GCC doesn't (unsurprisingly, FWIW).
Here's a simple one.
https://godbol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117034
--- Comment #2 from eczbek.void at gmail dot com ---
Is this error related?
```
template
concept A = true;
template T>
void foo(T) {}
```
Compiler Explorer link: https://godbolt.org/z/dfKaW8dxa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117033
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Davide Italiano from comment #6)
> I noticed you linked the LLVM bug I found.
> As part of my search/analysis, I found out there are cases that sometimes
> clang gets but GCC doesn't (unsurpris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117034
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to eczbek.void from comment #2)
> Is this error related?
Yes but you filed PR 116952 which is that issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117034
--- Comment #4 from eczbek.void at gmail dot com ---
Whoops.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117033
--- Comment #8 from Davide Italiano ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to Davide Italiano from comment #6)
> > I noticed you linked the LLVM bug I found.
> > As part of my search/analysis, I found out there are cases th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It's a bit of a shame I couldn't figure out how to make the zero extend
> approach work correctly. That aside, I'm concerned that this patch still
> isn't correct, because it doesn't seem to be using the p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117031
Bug ID: 117031
Summary: increasing VF during SLP vectorization permutes
unnecessarily
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 116024, which changed state.
Bug 116024 Summary: [14/15 Regression] unnecessary integer comparison(s) for a
simple loop since r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae88da5e070659d37b3c3daa4b880531769183bf
commit r15-4133-gae88da5e070659d37b3c3daa4b880531769183bf
Author: Prathamesh Kulkarn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117012
Bug ID: 117012
Summary: [15 Regression] incorrect RTL simplification around
vector AND and shifts
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wron
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96835
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117011
Bug ID: 117011
Summary: RISC-V: Logic overlap in IF_THEN_ELSE case for
instruction cost calculation
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.3.1
Summary|[13/14 regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #4)
> I haven't tested whether vector/array
> indexing triggers the same bad vectorisation.
I'm certain it won't be, because (apart from vector) they access memory
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Can you provide the output of invoking g++ with -march=native and when
> > compiling?
>
> The .ii files were id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117010
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116883
--- Comment #3 from Li Pan ---
I think xuli is working on this issue. As you know, the first week of Oct is
the National Holiday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116883
--- Comment #4 from Huaqi ---
(In reply to Li Pan from comment #3)
> I think xuli is working on this issue. As you know, the first week of Oct is
> the National Holiday.
Ok, thanks, just confirm this issue is acked.
specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20241008/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115376
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Great, thanks for checking!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117032
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 89808, which changed state.
Bug 89808 Summary: An option to disable warning "#pragma once in main file"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Ken Matsui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117035
Bug ID: 117035
Summary: ICE in unify, at cp/pt.cc:25410, when specifying
lambda expression template argument in partial
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117037
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117037
Bug ID: 117037
Summary: gcc14.2.1 riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ build opencv
5.x error
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117041
Bug ID: 117041
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:10327
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117018
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117040
Bug ID: 117040
Summary: g++ crashed for __alignof and got internal compiler
error: in poplevel, at cp/decl.cc:643
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116997
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
I gave it a try on s390 and I also end up with
MEM [(void *)Ptr.0_1] = { 7, 6291456 };
Thanks for the very fast fix :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117016
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
Wrt. working on a larger data set you might be interested in:
https://github.com/mattkretz/vir-simd?tab=readme-ov-file#simd-execution-policy-p0350
For the problem you seem to describe, I like to have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117018
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.0|14.2.1
Summary|assertion fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89786
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117042
Bug ID: 117042
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in
tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116883
--- Comment #2 from Huaqi ---
Hi there, I tested with godbolt.org with latest gcc15(trunk), this issue still
exists, and gcc14.2 still fail.
/opt/compiler-explorer/riscv32/gcc-trunk-20241008/riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/gcc/riscv32-unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117036
Bug ID: 117036
Summary: [SH] add __builtin_sh_fsca, __builtin_sh_fsrra
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117039
Bug ID: 117039
Summary: [15 Regression] Build failure:
libcpp/directives.cc:2078:34: error: unknown
conversion type character '>' in format
[-Werror=format=]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59295|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0883c88664d48463dfc79335dccaf15a69230952
commit r15-4186-g0883c88664d48463dfc79335dccaf15a69230952
Author: Artemiy Volkov
Date: Tue O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b33d43d29b148e127b1ba997f1bbc2c7028b94
commit r15-4187-g65b33d43d29b148e127b1ba997f1bbc2c7028b94
Author: Artemiy Volkov
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5f5cffb8c8243896a9d3bd0e2b8f14c70f8df1e
commit r15-4188-ge5f5cffb8c8243896a9d3bd0e2b8f14c70f8df1e
Author: Artemiy Volkov
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52fdf1e7eb89a148a9cdd1daade524f4540ab5fa
commit r15-4189-g52fdf1e7eb89a148a9cdd1daade524f4540ab5fa
Author: Artemiy Volkov
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117038
Bug ID: 117038
Summary: [15 regression] Ada bootstrap fails with LTO errors
(fe.h:361:23: error: type of ‘sinput__c_source_buffer’
does not match original declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
--- Comment #18 from dennis luehring ---
rechecked it with godbolt gcc-trunk and 14.2
gcc still does not optimize the std::vector case
clang is doing the optimization for at least 11 years
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #34 from Julian Waters ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #32)
> > It's a bit of a shame I couldn't figure out how to make the zero extend
> > approach work correctly. That aside, I'm concerned that this patch still
> > isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117038
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
r15-4141-g7e09f16ef98088
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #35 from Julian Waters ---
Created attachment 59300
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59300&action=edit
gcc 14 version, broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117038
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96945
dennis luehring changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dl.soluz at gmx dot net
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112358
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
See comment #3 in glibc bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89088
Daniel Kamil Kozar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkk089 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117016
--- Comment #4 from Pieter P ---
Thank you, I appreciate for the quick responses.
> The design goal of the fixed_size ABI was an ABI-stable "this is never going
> to break on ABI boundaries" type.
You're right, ABI stability is not something
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #31 from Julian Waters ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #30)
> AFAICT the last missing piece is the configure check for the linker.
It's a bit of a shame I couldn't figure out how to make the zero extend
approach work corr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfbee1856f5125bbabc28088f62a86f3dee5a159
commit r15-4161-gcfbee1856f5125bbabc28088f62a86f3dee5a159
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d77ba2eec2a560514de162bf9499194250f291e2
commit r15-4162-gd77ba2eec2a560514de162bf9499194250f291e2
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115507
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4d9a73e12b25a9f0ac152df2da5ceac80bd9d6a
commit r15-4163-gc4d9a73e12b25a9f0ac152df2da5ceac80bd9d6a
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente ---
hadcrafted x86 code would look like this
scalar code:
vmovss xmm0, dword ptr [rdi]
vmovss xmm1, dword ptr [rdi + 4]
vmovss xmm2, dword ptr [rsi]
vmovss xmm3, dword ptr [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da2a85ac53cbb9a9162cfb9a6da1c2bd47fc0b1b
commit r15-4160-gda2a85ac53cbb9a9162cfb9a6da1c2bd47fc0b1b
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fd38cc5d636124f0611aa5d26ac4258431f164a
commit r15-4166-g9fd38cc5d636124f0611aa5d26ac4258431f164a
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116896
--- Comment #30 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff889b35935d5e796cf308fb2368d4e319c60ece
commit r15-4167-gff889b35935d5e796cf308fb2368d4e319c60ece
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117012
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
bisect landed on
g:aac00d09859cc5934bd0f7493d537b8430337773 is the first bad commit
commit aac00d09859cc5934bd0f7493d537b8430337773
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Jun 20 12:41:13 2024 +0800
Optimize a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:932d1c3adb5759a0f37779ed027e96647bdb8b60
commit r14-10754-g932d1c3adb5759a0f37779ed027e96647bdb8b60
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89d2007d211947c0085c6852749a7d348cb458fd
commit r14-10753-g89d2007d211947c0085c6852749a7d348cb458fd
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eec5e10a79daa0a4fb41f7fb2e59db3318821e62
commit r13-9095-geec5e10a79daa0a4fb41f7fb2e59db3318821e62
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0abc47f940173863966c04d852fa75e76d07be9
commit r13-9094-gd0abc47f940173863966c04d852fa75e76d07be9
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3cf0bd981327077fc90fd89540d2fa051675636
commit r13-9092-gb3cf0bd981327077fc90fd89540d2fa051675636
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8547dab3cb619b91112466bc0dc97379240b9011
commit r13-9091-g8547dab3cb619b91112466bc0dc97379240b9011
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da4f4b27c8f8e29be2003dc3771f8eae3b90e2ff
commit r13-9093-gda4f4b27c8f8e29be2003dc3771f8eae3b90e2ff
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9fe4eae41c0e05ef213b9a47c611d5fc704006a
commit r14-10755-gc9fe4eae41c0e05ef213b9a47c611d5fc704006a
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f45fc31bd618154c270fa5a7b354d2025800862b
commit r14-10756-gf45fc31bd618154c270fa5a7b354d2025800862b
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4390e95fa5304110562777292c6d3e3dc97de8f6
commit r14-10757-g4390e95fa5304110562777292c6d3e3dc97de8f6
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116190
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70c46d8e455144cf5968d38b932692cbe0cfa2e1
commit r14-10759-g70c46d8e455144cf5968d38b932692cbe0cfa2e1
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116190
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a998902576db03a178fe21aa46ed38647f112a98
commit r13-9097-ga998902576db03a178fe21aa46ed38647f112a98
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116190
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
--- Comment #11 from Matt Bentley ---
Created attachment 59294
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59294&action=edit
-v build output for -o2 only in second "if" variant
As requested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
--- Comment #9 from Matt Bentley ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> I'm certain it won't be, because (apart from vector) they access
> memory locations that are at least one byte, not repeating very similar
> bitwise ops for ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116190
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45131b851522180c532bebb3521865e488025af0
commit r15-4143-g45131b851522180c532bebb3521865e488025af0
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Thu Sep 5 00:19:25 2024 +0200
ada: Fix wrong fina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116896
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117013
Bug ID: 117013
Summary: aarch64 should define spaceship4 optab
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
