https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109071
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116629
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116907
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note it worked with r15-1075-g43530bc40b1d04 but I have no idea if it was just
not exposed at that point or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116932
Bug ID: 116932
Summary: [SH] GBR not used for some atomic imask/tcb insns
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
that defaulted to
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero.
hello.adb:
```
with Text_IO; use Text_IO;
procedure hello is
begin
Put_Line("Hello world!");
end hello;
```
```
$ gnatmake hello.adb -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -f -v
GNATMAKE 15.0.0 20241001 (ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, link-failure
CC|
during GIMPLE pass: einline
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental) f72b1a44ff582041b02d5abe0a6c8556057e6183
(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) GCC error:|
| verify_gimple failed |
| Error detected around
/usr/li
quot;[0]
> SR.41_9 = .DEFERRED_INIT (8, 2, &"_init"[0]);
> during GIMPLE pass: einline
> +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
> | 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental) f72b1a44ff582041b02d5abe0a6c855605
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115361
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #365 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #364)
> Notice that it already has the hard-reg GBR assigned. Yet for some reason I
> don't understand, the following LRA pass then pulls that out and replaces
> GBR w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116931
--- Comment #5 from Matt Bentley ---
Nevermind, I realised my mistake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
azanella's patch at
https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20240913142239.2949727-2-adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org/
fixes job control.
I believe the *other* issue (bad address) was handled in glibc already as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116931
Bug ID: 116931
Summary: False "duplicate 'const'" errors when typedefs used on
pointer types in function definitions
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116931
--- Comment #2 from Matt Bentley ---
Enlighten me here, how is this invalid C++ code?
Because a typedef should mean that int_pointer is int *, so it should work,
right?
If it's invalid merely because it's typedef'd instead of verbatim, it's a
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116931
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #2)
> Enlighten me here, how is this invalid C++ code?
> Because a typedef should mean that int_pointer is int *, so it should work,
> right?
> If it's invalid merely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #367 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
I just tried building a slightly older version of WebKit and ran into a new ICE
with Kaz' sh-lra-take3 branch:
/usr/bin/g++-15 -DBUILDING_GTK__=1 -DBUILDING_WEBKIT=1 -DBUILDING_WITH_CMAKE=1
-DB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #368 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 59264
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59264&action=edit
Preprocessed source from from comment #367
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116917
Bug ID: 116917
Summary: [13 Regression] raised TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR :
comperr.adb:414 during RTL pass: dwarf2, in
connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.cc:3079 on
s390
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116924
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps we should just add (void) casts before those calls. It is fine that
those builtins have no effects with -ffast-math, they do have effects without
it, and I'm not sure if we want to conditionalize th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116924
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116924
Bug ID: 116924
Summary: -ffast-math -Wunused-value warnings in
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116924
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59254
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59254&action=edit
Slightly better testcase
Modified testcase which still depends on SRA. But I will move over to using
bitcast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116903
Alfred Agrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blubban at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116909
--- Comment #6 from Federico Kircheis ---
Thank, I think this covers all my concern.
Nevertheless I was still looking how to avoid the assembly, eventually to be
sure to have a more portable piece of code (with less ifdefs) between compilers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
--- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley ---
Closing now that the patch has been applied.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116924
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116903
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh right, I always forget that browsers have compatibility features for
ECMAScript regexes:
https://262.ecma-international.org/#sec-additional-ecmascript-features-for-web-browsers
Those are optional for n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116903
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The C++ standard references
Ecma International, ECMAScript2 Language Specification, Standard Ecma-262,
third edition, 1999
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59252
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59252&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
This is the simple patch which I mentioned in comment #18 . I still need to add
test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #19)
> Created attachment 59252 [details]
> Patch which I am testing
>
> This is the simple patch which I mentioned in comment #18 . I still need to
> add testcases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe r15-1738-g09737d9605521df9232d9990006c44955064f44e .
ld-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental)
3e1bd6470e4deba1a3ad14621037098311ad1350 (Gentoo Hardened 15.0. p, commit
4dffefc137f5ba6524cdb6eb598313646c5df6c8)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116909
--- Comment #3 from Federico Kircheis ---
Thank you for the fast response @Andrew Pinski , I'm sorry to have made a
duplicate questino.
This is what I've understood:
1) does g++ specify the behavior of the program in this case?
The answer is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116926
Bug ID: 116926
Summary: [15 Regression] Recent changes in dot-product causing
ICE on c6x port
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59255
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59255&action=edit
C++ testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-01
Ever confirmed|0
c-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r15-3987-20241001125221-g60fa7f51c84-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116902
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27ddda8b4cb51739e841053c29d9b5f503467e99
commit r15-3988-g27ddda8b4cb51739e841053c29d9b5f503467e99
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116842
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27ddda8b4cb51739e841053c29d9b5f503467e99
commit r15-3988-g27ddda8b4cb51739e841053c29d9b5f503467e99
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
`-std=c++20 -O1 ` is enough for the reduced testcase even on x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116906
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59250|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116890
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:698e0ec89bc0960e074d208bffe47f5addd9
commit r15-3992-g698e0ec89bc0960e074d208bffe47f5addd9
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
I think you missed the %array_functions in DoCheckUnbounded.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116916
Bug ID: 116916
Summary: Confusing error message
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116905
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57376
mauro russo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ing.russomauro at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116629
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords|
_TARGET=-Os -g ' 'CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-Os
-g '
Thread model: single
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116916
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
I think that "predefined" means something like "System or one of its
children", and the message indicates that (as Arnaud told me, probably
about 10 years ago) the language that the compiler sup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fda30a3c8a7c6b06f02be40e3fd0740f893a1b4f
commit r15-3990-gfda30a3c8a7c6b06f02be40e3fd0740f893a1b4f
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116891
--- Comment #8 from Walter Mascarenhas ---
sorry, I did not pay enough attention.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 5:18 AM pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116891
>
> --- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51815
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Andre Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #4)
> > The GCN target FAILs that I originally had reported here:
> >
> > > [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116882
Jean-Michaël Celerier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116906
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e1bd6470e4deba1a3ad14621037098311ad1350
commit r15-3986-g3e1bd6470e4deba1a3ad14621037098311ad1350
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #364 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #345)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #341)
> > Do you have any idea how that might work? The only thing I can think of
> > right now is to remove R0 from list o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080
--- Comment #17 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
This patch should fix it. Please confirm.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index f92f7f1af9c6..f58aed462971 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Version|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116909
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Even after reading the other threads, I'm not sure how portable
It works on all targets that gcc supports because r is a generic inline-asm
constraint.
-g60fa7f51c84-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116920
Bug ID: 116920
Summary: GCC should warn about redundant case around default in
switch
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59248
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59248&action=edit
Reduced as I can get it today
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59248|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116909
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/Simple-Constraints.html
Documents the r constraints.
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#OutputOperands
Documents the `+`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116920
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116921
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116914
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-01
Ever confirmed|0
-g60fa7f51c84-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116906
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Summary|[12/13/14/15 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116910
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116860
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I should add that the other new test introduced here also fails:
g:a88d6c6d777ad7c9235e2e620318f26e5347e50a, r15-3866-ga88d6c6d777ad7
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
Bug ID: 116918
Summary: The -fswig option is broken as the generated interface
file has incorrect syntax
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116891
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Walter Mascarenhas from comment #6)
> Hi Andrew,
>
>The proper optimization in this case would be to use the instruction
> vfnmsub132pd followed by a change of sign. It could be something l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107635
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-01
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116919
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116898
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdbd0607d5933cdecbf7e009a42f1d9486dddf44
commit r15-3984-gbdbd0607d5933cdecbf7e009a42f1d9486dddf44
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116785
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116899
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de25f1729d212c11d6e2955130f4eb1d272b5ce7
commit r15-3985-gde25f1729d212c11d6e2955130f4eb1d272b5ce7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116915
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116896
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> That way targets can emit whatever is beneficial.
x86 already has an implementation of tri-state integer from conditional codes:
--cut here--
;; Produce a tri-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116902
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's again hoist_defs_of_uses but now we get the order of defs of two different
hoistings out-of-sync.
es-rtl-df-extra-aarch64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241001 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116927
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59258
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59258&action=edit
Better testcase
`-O2 -fchecking -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-delete-dead-exceptions` is enough
with this C++ one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Summary|during RTL pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116922
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116914
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59259
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59259&action=edit
reduced.ii
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
