https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112934
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116812
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116691
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116578
Bug 116578 depends on bug 116691, which changed state.
Bug 116691 Summary: RISC-V: Unexpected auto-vectorization codegen in simple
vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116691
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111676
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116701
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> but if the test fails before the "close"-line is reached
> (consider the multiple "stop"-lines), it wouldn't help.
I think I'll do both: the added cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
--- Comment #4 from James McCoy ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to James McCoy from comment #2)
> > My initial bisect pointed to that, but I was using the Vim test suite as the
> > good/bad check.
> >
> > I'm rerunni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116800
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115693
Levy Hsu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admin at levyhsu dot com
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115456
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116701
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I meant:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unsigned_22.f90
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unsigned_22.f90
index bc2f810238d..17ebb973cf1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unsigned_22.f90
+
sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240922 (experimental) (GCC)
[518] %
[518] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
[519] %
[519] % gcctk -O2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse small.c
small.c: I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116812
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116701
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Can you test if adding a line
>
> close(10, status="delete")
>
> before the
>
> end program memain
>
> fixes the issue? If so, such a fix is pre-approved;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111926
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111621
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116701
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f37c6f47cd50c99350e93ef0dab31f7dc6d213a
commit r15-3782-g3f37c6f47cd50c99350e93ef0dab31f7dc6d213a
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116742
--- Comment #3 from xiaohuba2021 ---
So is there any workaround or patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116701
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #308 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #305)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #304)
> > I think this is a bit clearer, thanks! One more question
> >
> > (define_insn "block_lump_real"
> > [(se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
Looks like there is a typo in the indirect_goto constraints and that
causes the insn which loads "lab" to be deleted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116701
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1)
> The cause is that the unsigned_22 test (added in the named commit) leaves an
> output file "fort.10", which is picked up by write_check3 which th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116592
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #307 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #306)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #301)
> > I can confirm that I can successfully perform a full native bootstrap wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116594
Bug 116594 depends on bug 116592, which changed state.
Bug 116592 Summary: illegal operands th.vsetvli zero,0,e32,m8 with -O2 -O3 when
compiling for risc-v xtheadvector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116592
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116701
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |testsuite
--- Comment #1 from Hans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111926
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116813
Bug ID: 116813
Summary: std::vector index check not optimized out with
-O2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #309 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #308)
> Thanks for confirming it. In this case, wouldn't it be better to explicitly
> mention the hard reg numbers everywhere, where they are involved? Otherwise
> th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116814
Bug ID: 116814
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE on libjack2-1.9.22: in
expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:263
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116813
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
https://godbolt.org/z/4jMTb4fqv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116237
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b292b6b9e104c2418b4b19c8495fef9effe9369f
commit r14-10702-gb292b6b9e104c2418b4b19c8495fef9effe9369f
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116808
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there is a dup around.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116808
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yes this is a dup of 109920. I wonder if that should be backported or this
closed as won't fix since it is semi harmless.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116808
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #6 from Chris Jones ---
and yes, we are also using your patches for Darwin at
https://github.com/iains/gcc-14-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 59177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59177&action=edit
patch for GCC-14 (***untested)
this is against the current darwin gcc-14 branch - it is completely untested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> Created attachment 59176 [details]
> Patch under test
Does not apply to upstream GCC. I think it needs "libgcc: limit to 11 from 11"
https://github.com/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #8)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 59176 [details]
> > Patch under test
>
> Does not apply to upstream GCC. I think it nee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116755
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:482e651f5750e4648ade90e32ed45b094538e7f8
commit r15-3774-g482e651f5750e4648ade90e32ed45b094538e7f8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116754
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83c6fe130a00c6c28cfffcc787a0a719966adfaf
commit r15-3775-g83c6fe130a00c6c28cfffcc787a0a719966adfaf
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116802
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The C++ standard has an index of names defined in the library (which includes
"is") and can be used to check which names are reserved for use by the library.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116693
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59163|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116237
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112297
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #5)
> The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0eb6f8874047f7e7f13027aaac14d3de276c5e69
>
> commit r12-10370-g0eb6f88
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112297
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
yeah..
the compiler will not (for some several revisions) actually refer to
libgcc_s.1.dylib - it is only there to support existing built exes from older
compilers.
Probably dropping it after macOS 14 is the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
Chris Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonesc at hep dot phy.cam.ac.uk
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
Bug ID: 116810
Summary: tree-vect-slp.cc:3721:18: runtime error: insufficient
space for an object of type 'bool'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116811
Bug ID: 116811
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116811
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Summary|internal compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yunboni at smail dot nju.edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #306 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #301)
> I can confirm that I can successfully perform a full native bootstrap with
> the following languages enabled:
>
> - c,c++,fortran,obj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033
--- Comment #24 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #23)
> Honza, would you mind doing the older branches too?
... or I can if you're fine with it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033
--- Comment #23 from Sam James ---
Honza, would you mind doing the older branches too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
Bug ID: 116809
Summary: Failure to build GCC on macOS 15 / Xcode 16 for Intel
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #305 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #304)
> I think this is a bit clearer, thanks! One more question
>
> (define_insn "block_lump_real"
> [(set (mem:BLK (match_operand:SI 2 "sfunc_arg0_reg" "=r,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Chris Jones from comment #3)
> CN you prepare a version of the patch for the current gcc14 release ?
I guess you tried applying the attached patch and it does not ?
you mean for the Arm64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #5 from Chris Jones ---
Correct, i could not get it to apply against gcc 14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
Mark Mentovai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at moxienet dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #12 from Mark Mentovai ---
Created attachment 59179
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59179&action=edit
Drop removed unwind symbols
This implements what I referred to as my preferred option in comment 10. It
shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
Indeed, all of this is well-known;
NOTE: there is no change proposed for any OS < macOS 15.
We actually bumped our libgcc_s version some time ago because GCC has for a
while now been pulling the unwinder di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #13 from Mark Mentovai ---
Comment 12 was a Bugzilla mid-air with comment 11. I’m not arguing against
comment 11, just offering an option that worked for me.
Been a while since I’ve used Bugzilla regularly, I forgot about these quai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Mark Mentovai from comment #12)
> Created attachment 59179 [details]
> Drop removed unwind symbols
>
> This implements what I referred to as my preferred option in comment 10. It
> should apply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116715
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116111
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113980
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
71 matches
Mail list logo
