https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116323
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note for recent GCC, CONVERT and SHUFFLE should be defined as:
# define CONVERT(vector, type) __builtin_convertvector(vector.data,
type::data_type)
# define SHUFFLE(a, b, ...) __builtin_shufflevector(a.da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116668
Bug ID: 116668
Summary: A very strange error when trying to copy substrings
from a select type generic
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116668
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116668
--- Comment #2 from Jordan ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you provide the full source where the ICE happens including all module
> sources?
>
> Also since you got the gfortran from your distro you should read the
> intern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
I have a patch implementing the clang++ behavior, that is, warning by default
in C++20:
116162.C:3:4: warning: explicitly defaulted move constructor is implicitly
deleted [-Wdefaulted-function-deleted]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116641
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c07cf418fdde0c192e370a8d76a991cc7215e9c4
commit r15-3575-gc07cf418fdde0c192e370a8d76a991cc7215e9c4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116159
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc7a1fb0238e379d466316aa219734ac61f4bc0e
commit r15-3576-gfc7a1fb0238e379d466316aa219734ac61f4bc0e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115866
--- Comment #8 from Andi Kleen ---
It doesn't even try to convert the switch because of
t.c.179.ifcvt:
Can not ifcvt due to multiple exits
if (loop->num_nodes > 2)
{
/* More than one loop exit is too much to handle. */
if (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #239 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #238)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #237)
> > Let me try to bisect the stack overflow bug. Will report back once I kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116669
Bug ID: 116669
Summary: compiler crash on circular derived type component
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116670
Bug ID: 116670
Summary: symbol X has no implicit type in associate with
type-bound procedures
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116670
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Gronkiewicz ---
actually get_number() does not need to be elemental. I missed it while reducing
my module to the minimum test case, apologies.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110421
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Gronkiewicz ---
Any progress? Still an issue in 14.2.0.
a.f90:21:25:
21 | t2 = typ2(t1=typ1a())
| 1
internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:1553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116671
Bug ID: 116671
Summary: Compiling iostream and string as modules fails if
string is compiled first
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116671
bmlushma at uwaterloo dot ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bmlushma at uwaterloo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116671
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Works on the trunk:
[apinski@xeond2 test]$ ls
[apinski@xeond2 test]$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/g++ -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -c -x
c++-system-header string
[apinski@xeond2 test]$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/g++ -std=c++20 -fm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #240 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
My trial of the 3-stage bootstrap of gcc with enabling c,c++,lto,ada on qemu
has been done successfully with "-g -O2 -m4 -mlra" flags. I'm using the gcc
master commit 592a335de563a3a9e36d362c5b9f3fb0a990
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #241 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #240)
> My trial of the 3-stage bootstrap of gcc with enabling c,c++,lto,ada on qemu
> has been done successfully with "-g -O2 -m4 -mlra" flags. I'm us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #242 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #241)
> (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #240)
> Did that include patch 59000?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #243 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #242)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #241)
> > (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #240)
> > Did that include patch 59000?
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
