[Bug c++/114970] [14/15 Regression] 32-bit ARM gcc-14.1 new false positive -Wunused-value

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114970 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug analyzer/113314] [14/15 Regression] -Wanalyzer-infinite-loop false positive seen on haproxy's fd.c

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/113533] Code generation regression after change for pr111267

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113832] [14/15 Regression] 6% exec time regression of 464.h264ref on aarch64

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113832 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/113907] [12/13 regression] ICU miscompiled on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #83 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114978] [14/15 regression] 548.exchange2_r 14%-28% regressions on Loongarch64 after gcc 14 snapshot 20240317

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113357] [14/15 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap failure in stage2 due to segfault compiling unwind-dw2.c since r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94 (tree-switch-conversion.cc miscompiled)

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113357 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug analyzer/113606] [14/15 Regression] -Wanalyzer-infinite-recursion false positive on code involving strstr, memset, strnlen and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113606 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113847] [14/15 Regression] 10% slowdown of 462.libquantum on AMD Ryzen 7700X and Ryzen 7900X

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113847 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug d/114434] gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115002] [14/15 regression] wide integer vector performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/113441] [14/15 Regression] Fail to fold the last element with multiple loop since g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113652] [14/15 regression] Failed bootstrap on ppc unrecognized opcode: `lfiwzx' with -mcpu=7450

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114411] [14/15 Regression] 12% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/114630] [14/15 Regression] [modules] building module with submodule causes corrupt gcm

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/115011] [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization: (bool) (f ? 1: t) ==> 1 when bool t = (0 >= f) + x;

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115011 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113600] [14/15 regression] 525.x264_r run-time regresses by 8% with PGO -Ofast -march=znver4

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113600 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/113688] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/114793] [14/15 Regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fschedule-insns2 -fselective-scheduling2" on x86_64-linux-gnu (the generated code hangs)

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114793 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114412] [14/15 Regression] 7% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on aarch64

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115024] [14/15 regression] 128 bit division performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/114568] [14/15 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr84556.cc fails to produce executable since r14-9706-gb8e7aaaf350a45

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114134] [14/15 Regression] Extra mov instructions for simple function compared with GCC13 since r14-2386

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114134 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/115021] [14 regression] unnecessary spill for vpternlog

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115021 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libbacktrace/114941] [14 regression] libbacktrace build is broken for FDPIC uclibc targets by r14-5173-g2b64e4a54042

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114941 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115025] [14/15 regression] prime computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114801] [14/15 Regression] arm: ICE in find_cached_value, at rtx-vector-builder.cc:100 with MVE intrinsics

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114801 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114302] [14/15 Regression] GCN regressions after: vect: Tighten vect_determine_precisions_from_range [PR113281]

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114302 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/114945] [14/15 regression] Sporadic std::vector::resize() -Wstringop-overflow or -Warray-bounds warning with gcc 14

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114945 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115071] [14/15 regression] performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") on skylake

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug d/115249] [14/15 regression] gdc.test/runnable/test34.d etc. FAIL

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115249 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/114828] [14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-ftree-pre -fselective-scheduling -fsel-sched-pipelining -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114828 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114860] [14/15 regression] [aarch64] 511.povray regresses by ~5.5% with -O3 -flto -march=native -mcpu=neoverse-v2 since r14-10014-ga2f4be3dae04fa

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/116140] [15 Regression] 5-35% slowdown of 483.xalancbmk and 523.xalancbmk_r since r15-2356-ge69456ff9a54ba

2024-08-01 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-01 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115576] [14/15 regression] Worse code generated for simple struct conversion since r14-2386-gbdf2737cda53a8

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115576 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115258] [14 Regression] register swaps for vector perm in some cases after r14-6290

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/115001] [14/15 Regression] pr109062.c fails on hybrid Intel CPU

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/114948] [15 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-ch" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114948 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/116024] [14/15 Regression] unnecessary integer comparison(s) for a simple loop since r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115042] [14/15 Regression] valgrind test fails to compile on armv7

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115042 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114987] [14/15 Regression] floating point vector regression, x86, between gcc 14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and target clones on skylake platforms

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114987 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/116131] [14/15 Regression] RISC-V: Unrecognizable insn with xtheadmemidx on rv32

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116131 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115142] [14 Regression] Unrecognizable insn in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 with -ftree-ter

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115142 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/116098] [14/15 Regression] _Bool value from tagged union is incorrect when built with optimization since r14-1597-g64d90d06d2db43

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115029] [14/15 regression] FFT computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115029 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/116140] [15 Regression] 5-35% slowdown of 483.xalancbmk and 523.xalancbmk_r since r15-2356-ge69456ff9a54ba

2024-08-01 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2) > Looking at the change, I do not see how that could disable inlining. It > should only reduce size of the function size estimates in the heuristics. > > I think

[Bug tree-optimization/115275] [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization for Dead Code Elimination

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/115056] [14/15 regression] False positive -Wstringop-overflow and -Warray-bounds

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115056 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/109656] [14/15 regression] 26_numerics/random/random_device/cons/token.cc fails after r14-289-gf9412cedd6c0e7

2024-08-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've just noticed that the error is not an uncaught exception, it's: terminate called without an active exception That's very odd. I think you'll need to selectively comment out the calls in main(): int

[Bug tree-optimization/115494] [14/15 Regression] wrong code at -O{2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-3485

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/115156] [14/15 Regression] passing zero to __builtin_clzl() check missing

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115156 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/115841] [12/13 Regression] 521.wrf_r ICEs when building with -march=znver4 -Ofast -flto --param vect-partial-vector-usage=1

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/115267] [14/15 Regression] Undue warning about undefined behavior in loop with varying limits

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115267 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/115897] [14/15 Regression] vector_size attribute on alias template has no effect when used in a dependent variable template-id

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/115354] [14/15 Regression] Large -Os code size increase related to -ftree-sra since r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115354 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115981] [14/15 Regression] Redundant vmovaps to itself after vmovups since r14-537

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115981 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/116071] [14 Regression] Non-inline destructor for class template rejected with -std=gnu++14 -fconcepts

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116071 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/116053] [14/15 Regression] during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 2 with -O1 -finstrument-functions -fno-forward

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116053 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/116059] [14/15 Regression] Miscompile at -O2 since r14-6420-g85c5efcffed

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116059 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/116083] [14/15 Regression] Re-surfacing SLP vectorization slowness for gcc.dg/pr87985.c

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116083 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|14.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115981] [14/15 Regression] Redundant vmovaps to itself after vmovups since r14-537

2024-08-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115981 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:973097d801a30385cd39a570624eefa7547f8ff3 commit r14-10528-g973097d801a30385cd39a570624eefa7547f8ff3 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-08-01 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #7 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- I have posted a patch for the fix.

[Bug target/114659] gcc miscompiles a __builtin_memcpy on i386, leading to wrong results for SNaN

2024-08-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114659 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed03af4ef3b9ad0bd3b7c5c678c02253e5cb9e0f commit r15-2478-ged03af4ef3b9ad0bd3b7c5c678c02253e5cb9e0f Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/114659] gcc miscompiles a __builtin_memcpy on i386, leading to wrong results for SNaN

2024-08-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||15.0 --- Comment #17 from Richard Bien

[Bug target/110061] libatomic: 128-bit atomics should be lock-free on AArch64

2024-08-01 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.3|13.4 --- Comment #21 from Wilco --- Fixed on t

[Bug tree-optimization/116142] vec_widen_smult_{odd,even}_M ineffective for a simple widening dot product (vect_used_by_reduction is not set?)

2024-08-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116142 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > > Can you check if the following makes things work for you? > > > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tre

[Bug c++/116172] New: Uses of global main should also forbidden in freestanding modes

2024-08-01 Thread de34 at live dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116172 Bug ID: 116172 Summary: Uses of global main should also forbidden in freestanding modes Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invali

[Bug middle-end/116138] [15 regression] PGO+LTO bootstrap broken on aarch64 since r15-2196-g88d16194d0c8a6

2024-08-01 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116138 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 regression] |[15 regression] PGO+LTO

[Bug target/110061] libatomic: 128-bit atomics should be lock-free on AArch64

2024-08-01 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/116104] [15 Regression] GCN vs. "[rtl-optimization/116037] Explicitly track if a destination was skipped in ext-dce"

2024-08-01 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Schwinge --- Thanks, Jeff! I'm confirming: GCC/GCN target libraries are again bit-wise identical to before, and likewise test suite results back to normal.

[Bug c++/116167] "static_cast" of member function pointer (non-noexcept) to noexcept erroneously succeeds if not overloaded

2024-08-01 Thread admin at hexadigm dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116167 --- Comment #2 from Larry Smith --- Thanks for the quick reply. Probably a very rare scenario so a fix maybe low priority, but for my purposes the situation is required in a particular SFINAE context for an open source function traits library (h

[Bug middle-end/109224] Wmismatched-new-delete false positive with a templated operator new (common with coroutines)

2024-08-01 Thread arsen at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109224 Arsen Arsenović changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wmismatched-new-delete |Wmismatched-new-delete

[Bug middle-end/109224] Wmismatched-new-delete false positive with a templated operator new (common with coroutines)

2024-08-01 Thread arsen at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109224 --- Comment #5 from Arsen Arsenović --- (actually, it's simpler to make the operator new simply have template in the reproducer rather than the pack constrained to size 0)

[Bug c++/116162] GCC rejects explicitly default move ctor with const X&& parameter

2024-08-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/116096] [15 Regression] during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2848 (unrecognizable insn ashift:TI?) with -O2 -flive-range-shrinkage -fno-peephole2 -mst

2024-08-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116096 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64ca25aec4939aea79bd812b089fbb666ca6f2fd commit r15-2539-g64ca25aec4939aea79bd812b089fbb666ca6f2fd Author: liuhongt Date: Fri Jul

[Bug middle-end/109224] Wmismatched-new-delete false positive with a templated operator new (common with coroutines)

2024-08-01 Thread arsen at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109224 --- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenović --- so, indeed, this appears to fix the original testcase: modified gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc @@ -1762,7 +1762,16 @@ new_delete_mismatch_p (tree new_decl, tree delete_decl) void *np = NULL, *dp = NUL

[Bug c++/116169] [DR882] `int main() = delete` is incorrect accepted

2024-08-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116169 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-01 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug c++/116162] GCC rejects explicitly default move ctor with const X&& parameter

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Not really sure if this paper was a DR or not. Seems clang rejects this for -std=c++17 and earlier and accepts with a warning for -std=c++20 and later, what we probably should do is silently make it deleted

[Bug rtl-optimization/116096] [15 Regression] during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2848 (unrecognizable insn ashift:TI?) with -O2 -flive-range-shrinkage -fno-peephole2 -mst

2024-08-01 Thread liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116096 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/116162] GCC rejects explicitly default move ctor with const X&& parameter

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Albuquerque 2017 doesn't mention it was a DR when voted in, so yes, C++20 or later I guess.

[Bug rtl-optimization/115021] [14 regression] unnecessary spill for vpternlog

2024-08-01 Thread liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115021 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/116015] ICE in replace_placeholders_r for simple default member initializer

2024-08-01 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116015 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug c++/116015] ICE in replace_placeholders_r for simple default member initializer

2024-08-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116015 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Yeah. (I would like to take a look soon but I'm not going to assign it to myself until I have a patch/know what exactly is going on.)

[Bug c++/112341] error: insufficient contextual information to determine type on co_await result in function template

2024-08-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Arsen Arsenovic : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32e678b2ed752154b2f96719e33f11a7c6417f20 commit r15-2540-g32e678b2ed752154b2f96719e33f11a7c6417f20 Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ Date:

[Bug testsuite/116154] gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c fails on pru-unknown-elf

2024-08-01 Thread dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154 Dimitar Dimitrov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/116154] gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c fails on pru-unknown-elf

2024-08-01 Thread dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154 Dimitar Dimitrov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Dimitar

[Bug testsuite/116154] gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c fails on pru-unknown-elf

2024-08-01 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- Cheers Dimitar.

[Bug libstdc++/116140] [15 Regression] 5-35% slowdown of 483.xalancbmk and 523.xalancbmk_r since r15-2356-ge69456ff9a54ba

2024-08-01 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- It looks like it's because the old unrolled code for the pointer version did a subtract and used the difference to optimize the IV check away to every 4 elements. This explains the increase in instruction

[Bug testsuite/116155] c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c fails on pru-unknown-elf

2024-08-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e88a1a34aae0abd3019423d3ceae045c9931adb commit r15-2606-g7e88a1a34aae0abd3019423d3ceae045c9931adb Author: Dimitar Dimitrov Dat

[Bug analyzer/116173] New: [15 regression] /analyzer/call-summary.cc:727:28: warning: unused variable ‘summary_cast_reg’ [-Wunused-variable]

2024-08-01 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116173 Bug ID: 116173 Summary: [15 regression] /analyzer/call-summary.cc:727:28: warning: unused variable ‘summary_cast_reg’ [-Wunused-variable] Product: gcc Version: 1

[Bug tree-optimization/116120] [15 regression] Wrong code for (a ? x : y) != (b ? x : y) since r15-2106-g44fcc1ca11e7ea35dc9fb25a5317346bc1eaf7b2

2024-08-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5ccdfdcab0b24afba2a661af861bec1d63f0595 commit r15-2637-gc5ccdfdcab0b24afba2a661af861bec1d63f0595 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mo

[Bug tree-optimization/114767] gfortran AVX2 complex multiplication by (0d0,1d0) suboptimal

2024-08-01 Thread mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114767 --- Comment #8 from mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk --- If it is tricky to teach gfortran that it can flip the signs of alternate elements in a vector trivially with an xor, would a possible step to an improvement be to teach it that the cost of vpermpd (

[Bug libstdc++/116140] [15 Regression] 5-35% slowdown of 483.xalancbmk and 523.xalancbmk_r since r15-2356-ge69456ff9a54ba

2024-08-01 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140 --- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan --- Yeah, I'm looking into this as Tamar mentioned above.

[Bug testsuite/116155] c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c fails on pru-unknown-elf

2024-08-01 Thread qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/116120] [15 regression] Wrong code for (a ? x : y) != (b ? x : y) since r15-2106-g44fcc1ca11e7ea35dc9fb25a5317346bc1eaf7b2

2024-08-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/116175] New: ICE with dependent format attribute

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116175 Bug ID: 116175 Summary: ICE with dependent format attribute Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/116175] ICE with dependent format attribute

2024-08-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-01 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug target/116174] New: Alignment request is added before endbr with -fcf-protection=branch

2024-08-01 Thread gcc at breakpoint dot cc via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174 Bug ID: 116174 Summary: Alignment request is added before endbr with -fcf-protection=branch Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/116143] [15 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/diagnostic-* test fails intermittently

2024-08-01 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116143 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- But even then, we should have something like attribute ((used)) to force it to always be considered used -- this is exactly what that attribute is for! It only doesn't have to be there if some symbol o

[Bug testsuite/116155] c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c fails on pru-unknown-elf

2024-08-01 Thread dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155 --- Comment #5 from Dimitar Dimitrov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Unlike PR 116148, pru is little-endian but > > This test in the testcase: > if (sizeof (union with_fam_2) != __alignof__ (int)) > __builtin_abort ();

<    1   2   3   4   >