https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114970
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113832
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #83 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113606
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113847
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115011
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114793
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114134
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115021
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114941
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114801
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114302
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114945
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115249
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-01
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115001
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114948
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115042
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114987
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116131
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115142
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Looking at the change, I do not see how that could disable inlining. It
> should only reduce size of the function size estimates in the heuristics.
>
> I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115056
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I've just noticed that the error is not an uncaught exception, it's:
terminate called without an active exception
That's very odd.
I think you'll need to selectively comment out the calls in main():
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115156
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115267
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116059
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116083
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115981
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:973097d801a30385cd39a570624eefa7547f8ff3
commit r14-10528-g973097d801a30385cd39a570624eefa7547f8ff3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #7 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
I have posted a patch for the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114659
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed03af4ef3b9ad0bd3b7c5c678c02253e5cb9e0f
commit r15-2478-ged03af4ef3b9ad0bd3b7c5c678c02253e5cb9e0f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
--- Comment #17 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|13.4
--- Comment #21 from Wilco ---
Fixed on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116142
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
>
> > Can you check if the following makes things work for you?
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116172
Bug ID: 116172
Summary: Uses of global main should also forbidden in
freestanding modes
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116138
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] |[15 regression] PGO+LTO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks, Jeff! I'm confirming: GCC/GCN target libraries are again bit-wise
identical to before, and likewise test suite results back to normal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116167
--- Comment #2 from Larry Smith ---
Thanks for the quick reply. Probably a very rare scenario so a fix maybe low
priority, but for my purposes the situation is required in a particular SFINAE
context for an open source function traits library
(h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109224
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wmismatched-new-delete |Wmismatched-new-delete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109224
--- Comment #5 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(actually, it's simpler to make the operator new simply have template in the reproducer rather than the pack constrained to size 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116096
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64ca25aec4939aea79bd812b089fbb666ca6f2fd
commit r15-2539-g64ca25aec4939aea79bd812b089fbb666ca6f2fd
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109224
--- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenović ---
so, indeed, this appears to fix the original testcase:
modified gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
@@ -1762,7 +1762,16 @@ new_delete_mismatch_p (tree new_decl, tree delete_decl)
void *np = NULL, *dp = NUL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116169
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-01
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not really sure if this paper was a DR or not. Seems clang rejects this for
-std=c++17 and earlier and accepts with a warning for -std=c++20 and later,
what we probably should do is silently make it deleted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116096
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Albuquerque 2017 doesn't mention it was a DR when voted in, so yes, C++20 or
later I guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115021
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116015
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116015
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah. (I would like to take a look soon but I'm not going to assign it to
myself until I have a patch/know what exactly is going on.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Arsen Arsenovic :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32e678b2ed752154b2f96719e33f11a7c6417f20
commit r15-2540-g32e678b2ed752154b2f96719e33f11a7c6417f20
Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from Dimitar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Cheers Dimitar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
It looks like it's because the old unrolled code for the pointer version did a
subtract and used the difference to optimize the IV check away to every 4
elements. This explains the increase in instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e88a1a34aae0abd3019423d3ceae045c9931adb
commit r15-2606-g7e88a1a34aae0abd3019423d3ceae045c9931adb
Author: Dimitar Dimitrov
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116173
Bug ID: 116173
Summary: [15 regression] /analyzer/call-summary.cc:727:28:
warning: unused variable ‘summary_cast_reg’
[-Wunused-variable]
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5ccdfdcab0b24afba2a661af861bec1d63f0595
commit r15-2637-gc5ccdfdcab0b24afba2a661af861bec1d63f0595
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114767
--- Comment #8 from mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk ---
If it is tricky to teach gfortran that it can flip the signs of alternate
elements in a vector trivially with an xor, would a possible step to an
improvement be to teach it that the cost of vpermpd (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140
--- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan ---
Yeah, I'm looking into this as Tamar mentioned above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116175
Bug ID: 116175
Summary: ICE with dependent format attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116175
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-01
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174
Bug ID: 116174
Summary: Alignment request is added before endbr with
-fcf-protection=branch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116143
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
But even then, we should have something like attribute ((used)) to force it to
always be considered used -- this is exactly what that attribute is for!
It only doesn't have to be there if some symbol o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155
--- Comment #5 from Dimitar Dimitrov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Unlike PR 116148, pru is little-endian but
>
> This test in the testcase:
> if (sizeof (union with_fam_2) != __alignof__ (int))
> __builtin_abort ();
101 - 200 of 333 matches
Mail list logo