https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115949
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
The issue seems to be that the 'movsi_ie' pattern allows 'mem(reg+disp) <->
fp-reg' load/stores through the predicates 'general_movdst_operand' and
'general_movsrc_operand' but then disallows it via the constrai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> Created attachment 58717 [details]
> Fix for the regression
>
> The mechanism in the original fix was OK but the use of the locus location
> was not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 58718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58718&action=edit
patch I am testing
Paul - can you test if this patch resolves the emacs issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
Bug ID: 116021
Summary: Ada build on Darwin: gen_il-main: Symbol not found:
___builtin_nested_func_ptr_created
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
The problem with fixing this is that I cannot reproduce it; we are still trying
to determine if there's some dependency on environment - or maybe something
bizarre like the installed version of some utility li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Created attachment 58718 [details]
> patch I am testing
>
> Paul - can you test if this patch resolves the emacs issue?
Using root->grp_same_access_path doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> NOTE: my compiler builds and tests do not include any macports or homebrew
> components. The only additional content in my PATH is 1) texinfo-6.7 2)
> dejagnu and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk, not sure if we need to back port - but leaving open for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk, not sure if we need to back port, leaving open for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk, not sure if we need to back port, leaving open for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104981
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635
--- Comment #4 from Mark Harmstone ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> The patches to support CodeView is being added (and improved) for GCC 15. I
> am not sure how much will be finished by the release of GCC 15.
Support for C is v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116022
Bug ID: 116022
Summary: complete (early) unrolling foils vectorizer for vector
initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91e468b72dafc9dcd5dcf7915f1d0ef172264d53
commit r15-2185-g91e468b72dafc9dcd5dcf7915f1d0ef172264d53
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sun Jul 21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116023
Bug ID: 116023
Summary: Failure to optimize (x+x)*(y+y) to (x*y)*4 when
intermediate result is cast to larger type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
You need to use an older Ada compiler (13 or older) for bootstrapping, not any
of the broken intermediate versions between Aug 2023 and Jan 2024.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
FOR_TARGET=-Os' 'CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-Os'
Thread model: single
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240721 (experimental) (g80c37335baf)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #44 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #42)
> (In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #41)
> > I ran into exact the same trouble of C23 missing symbols on old systems. In
> > my case it is a custom build (with ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d8ef2711dfecd093077aef6123d9e93ea23454e
commit r15-2186-g9d8ef2711dfecd093077aef6123d9e93ea23454e
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sun Jul 21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is VRP which is going funny.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116015
--- Comment #3 from Pieter P ---
A temporary workaround is to wrap the default value in an immediately invoked
lambda:
struct Widget {
int n = 5;
Matrix A = [this] { return Matrix{{.rows = n}}; }();
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #48 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Please stop resetting the bug status. You create unneeded churn. This bug is
invalid.
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #43)
> This is completely BS. Old libc cannot build with the latest gcc since th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #50 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #48)
> Please stop resetting the bug status. You create unneeded churn. This bug
> is invalid.
>
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #43)
> > This is completely BS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #51 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #48)
> Please stop resetting the bug status. You create unneeded churn. This bug
> is invalid.
>
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #43)
> > This is completely BS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #52 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #47)
> Apple provides different sysroots for each (major) version of their OS to
> solve this issue. This is NOT a GCC issue nor this is a glibc issue. You can
> buld gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #53 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #48)
> Please stop resetting the bug status. You create unneeded churn. This bug
> is invalid.
>
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #43)
> > This is completely BS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #54 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #48)
> Please stop resetting the bug status. You create unneeded churn. This bug
> is invalid.
>
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #43)
> > This is completely BS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114930
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115502
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.1.1, 15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115502
Bug 115502 depends on bug 114930, which changed state.
Bug 114930 Summary: [14/15 regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of when
building libwebp with -std=c23 -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114930
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
A. Wilcox (awilfox) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awilfox at adelielinux dot org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:838999bb23303edc14e96b6034cd837fa4454cfd
commit r15-2187-g838999bb23303edc14e96b6034cd837fa4454cfd
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sun J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
So the missed optimizations that VRP/PHIopt/match expose are:
```
unsigned f(void);
int i1(void)
{
int l = 2;
l = 3 - (int)f();
return l <= 2; // f() > 0
}
int i2(void)
{
unsigned l = 2;
l = 3 - (u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|15 Regression - Wrong |Wrong result with SIZE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas ---
OK the regression is fixed - thanks for the green light, Harald.
It's a pity that I have missed the 4.2 release :-(
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93237
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104981
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #4)
> the latter seems OK to me - mind proposing a patch?
I am planning on doing some rework on the ramp code-gen in the (very) near
future - so can pick this up on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #20)
> OK the regression is fixed - thanks for the green light, Harald.
>
> It's a pity that I have missed the 4.2 release :-(
>
> Paul
It is more importan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae6d5dc35735168c13f4599e7cf3f32fbb3c06c9
commit r13-8930-gae6d5dc35735168c13f4599e7cf3f32fbb3c06c9
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116025
Bug ID: 116025
Summary: Experimental implementation of unsigned integers for
Fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116025
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecc80e18f05b77a773c6d894871572029d4fc579
commit r12-10631-gecc80e18f05b77a773c6d894871572029d4fc579
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116023
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116026
Bug ID: 116026
Summary: Copying or moving a std::variant that can be a vector
causes a maybe-uninitialized warning with
-fsanitize=address -Og -finline-functions-called-once
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116026
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the documentation warns about this case
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html#index-fsanitize_003daddress
Note that sanitizers tend to increase the rate of false po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Mark Harmstone from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > The patches to support CodeView is being added (and improved) for GCC 15. I
> > am not sure how much will be fini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3)
> You need to use an older Ada compiler (13 or older) for bootstrapping, not
> any of the broken intermediate versions between Aug 2023 and Jan 2024.
I wonder if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635
--- Comment #6 from Mark Harmstone ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> OK to put you as the assignee for this?
Of course
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
Rich Felker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
สำหรับเจ้าของกิจการ ที่มี Project ต่อยอดเพิ่มกำไรให้ธุรกิจ
แต่ยังหาทุนทรัพย์ไม่ทัน
✔️เจ้าของธุรกิจที่มีการจดทะเบียน ใบประกอบกิจการ
✔️อนุมัติสูงสุด 5,000,000 บาท
✔️ไม่เช็คเครดิต บูโรเอกสารไม่ยุ่งยาก ไม่ต้องมีบุคคลค้ำประกัน
✔️อัตราดอกเบี้ยเริ่มต้น1.5%
✔️ตัดต้นลดดอกเบี้ยทันที
ถ้าท่านสนใจบริการของเรา โ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108699
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:913bab282d95e842907fec5a552a74ef64a6d4f6
commit r15-2190-g913bab282d95e842907fec5a552a74ef64a6d4f6
Author: Sam James
Date: Sun Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
Well ok, could someone send me a binary x86_64 build of GCC for darwin20 with
Ada support that they can bootstrap with successfully, then, so that I can get
back to bootstrapping, too? Either that, or send m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116027
Bug ID: 116027
Summary: Redundant backup and restore of register with
-flive-range-shrinkage
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115982
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114531
--- Comment #21 from Rama Malladi ---
Thank you Hubicka@ and rsandifo@ for reviewing this feature request and
supporting it. Could we go ahead and dispose this as accepted or rejected?
Accordingly action the PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116027
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-O2 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -flive-range-shrinkage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Bug 77504 depends on bug 106089, which changed state.
Bug 106089 Summary: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on
assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889
Bug 108889 depends on bug 106089, which changed state.
Bug 106089 Summary: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on
assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 106089, which changed state.
Bug 106089 Summary: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on
assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
--- Comment #35 from Paul Thomas ---
Closing since it is fixed on mainline and the remedy will be backported in due
course by the fix for pr10889.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83209
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 83209, which changed state.
Bug 83209 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] [Coarray] Failure of allocation of
a coarray with a pointer component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83209
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116027
--- Comment #2 from user202729 ---
Maybe this is a less artificial example.
__attribute__((pure)) long f(__int128 a, long b);
__int128 x;
long g(){
__int128 y=x;
long z=f(0, 0);
x=1;
return f(y, z);
}
long h(){
long z=f(0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115997
--- Comment #2 from martin ---
Thanks for checking and looking up. I have not been able to use gfortran-14 due
to bug 114874 (a regression which has been resolved after release). Strangely,
the search box of bugzilla does not show relevant findl
83 matches
Mail list logo
