https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114661
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df9451936c6c9e4faea371e3f188e1fc6b6d39e3
commit r15-2053-gdf9451936c6c9e4faea371e3f188e1fc6b6d39e3
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115937
--- Comment #8 from Ellery ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Can you attach the file ./arch/arm64/kernel/module.lds ?
Thanks a lot.
It turns out that my scripts/module-common.lds and arch/arm64/kernel/module.lds
both define a pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115848
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Alexandr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115937
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115948
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-16
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115912
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #10)
> libharfbuzz_subset_la-hb-subset.cc.300r.ext_dce.xz:
> https://dev.gentoo.org/~sam/bugs/gcc/gcc-harfbuzz-dce/libharfbuzz_subset_la-
> hb-subset.cc.300r.ext_dce.xz.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82255
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
This sounds very similar to what I am now running into
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2024-July/244362.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e3aa9c9278db69d4bdb661a750a7268789188d6
commit r15-2054-g1e3aa9c9278db69d4bdb661a750a7268789188d6
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, interesting. We even vectorize this with just -mavx512f but end up
using vector(16) int besides vector(8) long and equality compares of
vector(16) int:
vpcmpd $0, %zmm7, %zmm0, %k2
accordi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a177be05f6952c3f7e62186d2e138d96c475b81a
commit r15-2055-ga177be05f6952c3f7e62186d2e138d96c475b81a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115749
--- Comment #11 from kong lingling ---
After adjusted rtx_cost of imulq for COST_N_INSNS (4) to COST_N_INSNS (3), I
tested the benchmark on Sierra Forest machine based on gcc trunk, and the
algorithm with 2 multiplications is 2% faster. For Spec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115950
Bug ID: 115950
Summary: Missed SVE fold to INCP
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14 Regression]
|531
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88545
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The wmemchr case is covered by PR 115040
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75c0bf997d2808561451e62aa6b7ae7c8e32b9e9
commit r15-2058-g75c0bf997d2808561451e62aa6b7ae7c8e32b9e9
Author: Stefan Sc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115921
--- Comment #1 from Siarhei Volkau ---
Also take in account examples like this:
uint32_t high_const_and_compare(uint32_t x)
{
if ( (x & 0x7000) == 0x3000)
return do_some();
return do_other();
}
It might be profitable to u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115949
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
With -mlra on GCC 12 we get the following error:
internal compiler error: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn
achieved (90)
177 | }
| ^
0xb86282 lra_constraints(bool)
../../gcc/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
r15-2054-g1e3aa9c9278db6, when backported to the branch, avoids the failure,
it's still latent of course.
The fortran loop is the DO KR=1,NRM loop from
module_mp_fast_sbm.fppized.f90:6100 which is the JERT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-16
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115951
Bug ID: 115951
Summary: [15 Regression] pgo+lto enabled bootstrap fails
building gnat (ICE in fold_stmt, at
gimple-range-fold.cc:701)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Ok, I'd tested the backports on gcc-13 recently, so I'm going to install both
patches in both gcc-13 and gcc-14, the latter under the assumption that if it
works in gcc-13 and trunk, it will be fine for g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:102bcf147892855463c5854119aacda752ed033c
commit r14-10426-g102bcf147892855463c5854119aacda752ed033c
Author: Alexandre O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bc63f1c70331763989d72b7df051e0ce67ff84c
commit r14-10427-g7bc63f1c70331763989d72b7df051e0ce67ff84c
Author: Alexandre O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Summary|521.wrf_r ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115952
Bug ID: 115952
Summary: g++ 14.1.0 internal compiler error for ambiguous
function template overloads
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115952
--- Comment #1 from Slobodkins, Arkadijs ---
Created attachment 58683
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58683&action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b9d6829b503cfc72c4271ead2948d8100cce25c
commit r13-8915-g0b9d6829b503cfc72c4271ead2948d8100cce25c
Author: Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52959e34c8a7a0473784ca044487d05e791286c1
commit r13-8916-g52959e34c8a7a0473784ca044487d05e791286c1
Author: Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115953
Bug ID: 115953
Summary: --wrap does now work with lto
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115952
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|g++ 14.1.0 internal |[14 Regression] g++ 14.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aslobodkins at mail dot smu.edu
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103909
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannes.kalmbach@googlemai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115942
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115951
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85316
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|--wrap does now work with |--wrap does not work with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||koule2333 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115954
Bug ID: 115954
Summary: Alignment of _Atomic structs incompatible between GCC
and LLVM
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Just to note with BFD ld from 2.41.0 I see
1
a-t.o 3
194 b4b00c6ef6ad050b PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY __wrap_cook
198 b4b00c6ef6ad050b PREVAILING_DEF main
214 b4b00c6ef6ad050b RESOLVED_IR cook
when building
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcb2a35a0c04417c407a97d9ff05c2af1d6d1b8d
commit r11-11578-gbcb2a35a0c04417c407a97d9ff05c2af1d6d1b8d
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64 x86_64-*-*
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115954
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Not sure what the x86 psABI says here (possibly nothing for aggregate
> _Atomic).
It doesn't consider _Atomic [influencing the ABI] at all.
Note I think your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115955
Bug ID: 115955
Summary: atomic::wait _S_for uses a poor hash function
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115954
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And I'll note the original JTC1/SC22/WG14 - N2771 Title: C23 Atomics paper
mentions "ABI would have been fully determined to be compatible with non-atomic
type, leaving no room to implementations for introd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115951
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115955
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115954
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Not sure what the x86 psABI says here (possibly nothing for aggregate
> _Atomic).
I've been asking for it to say something for years.
https://groups.google.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115954
--- Comment #5 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Not sure what the x86 psABI says here (possibly nothing for aggregate
> > _Atomic).
>
> It doesn't consider _Atomic [i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95457
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Summary|FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115956
Bug ID: 115956
Summary: ICE: in change_stack, at reg-stack.cc:2732
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115459
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8fdef7fc25dafc8c7a12727c1046b3c7f2b89bb
commit r14-10433-gc8fdef7fc25dafc8c7a12727c1046b3c7f2b89bb
Author: Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> https://wg21.link/P2419R2 localized chrono formatting (also p2372r3)
Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/657386.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115776
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110356
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103953
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105336
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103953
--- Comment #2 from Arsen Arsenović ---
seems to have been r12-9435-g6fd32842404ac1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115527
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104872
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115957
Bug ID: 115957
Summary: ICE on procedure-local CONST declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115957
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103963
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115957
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 58685
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58685&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106671
--- Comment #19 from jvoisin ---
> That's not a good reason to weaken the security of the generated code.
Having BTI will more valid targets is still better than no BTI at all, and it
would still be better than what clang is doing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105595
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102392
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|X86_64-linux-gnu|x86_64-linux-gnu
Version|12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115527
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #6)
> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
> @@ -4815,6 +4815,7 @@ clear_padding_type (clear_padding_struct *buf, tree
> type,
> unsigned int prev_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47229
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:016c947b02e79a5c0c0c2d4ad5cb71aa04db3efd
commit r15-2065-g016c947b02e79a5c0c0c2d4ad5cb71aa04db3efd
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95817
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Ravier ---
A place where this does seem to give faster results in real code is code where
multiple conditions like this are placed in a row, in e.g. the code at
https://github.com/openbsd/xenocara/blob/0c50e27b4c04e035
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115527
--- Comment #9 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> (In reply to qinzhao from comment #6)
> > --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
> > @@ -4815,6 +4815,7 @@ clear_padding_type (clear_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d702a957753caf020cb550d143e9e9a62f79e9f5
commit r14-10434-gd702a957753caf020cb550d143e9e9a62f79e9f5
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115867
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca275b68ef11d7d70bff8d7426e45b3734b3
commit r14-10436-gca275b68ef11d7d70bff8d7426e45b3734b3
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115701
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e01012c459c931ae39558b019107226c232fa4d1
commit r14-10438-ge01012c459c931ae39558b019107226c232fa4d1
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59ed01d5e3d2b0e59163d3248bdba9f1e35de599
commit r14-10440-g59ed01d5e3d2b0e59163d3248bdba9f1e35de599
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115701
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f74a5f5dc12bc337068f0f6a554d72604488959
commit r14-10437-g6f74a5f5dc12bc337068f0f6a554d72604488959
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to fail|14.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06829e593d2e5611e7924624cb8228795691e2b7
commit r14-10439-g06829e593d2e5611e7924624cb8228795691e2b7
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.1.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 115867, which changed state.
Bug 115867 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected vector_type, have
integer_type in TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS, at tree.h:4246
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115867
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 115843, which changed state.
Bug 115843 Summary: [14 Regression] 531.deepsjeng_r fails to verify with -O3
-march=znver4 --param vect-partial-vector-usage=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.1.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115957
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9709fafb2c498ba2f4c920f953c9b78fa3bf114
commit r15-2067-gd9709fafb2c498ba2f4c920f953c9b78fa3bf114
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115957
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:851ec9960b084ad37556ec627e6931e985e41a24
commit r15-2070-g851ec9960b084ad37556ec627e6931e985e41a24
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115891
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f9faebb8ebfc0103461641cc49ba0b21877b2b1
commit r15-2069-g9f9faebb8ebfc0103461641cc49ba0b21877b2b1
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115929
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fec38d7987dd6d68b234b0076b57ac66a30a3a1d
commit r15-2071-gfec38d7987dd6d68b234b0076b57ac66a30a3a1d
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115891
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112520
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
I think get_field_by_name needs updating to handle the struct layout
changes. DECL_NAME(field) is null for the unnamed union and it causes
a segmentation fault when dereferenced by IDENTIFIER_POINTER.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115929
--- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford ---
As it turned out, the two tests exposed different bugs. I've submitted a patch
for the other one and will close once that's resolved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115954
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/i386-ABI/-/issues/1 for x86_64 abi.
Aarch64 should most likely also do the same ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f966b6a8ff0244dd6f8bf36d876799d5f9bbaee
commit r15-2072-g9f966b6a8ff0244dd6f8bf36d876799d5f9bbaee
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Tue J
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo