[Bug c++/115645] [11/12/13/14 Regression] new S[1][1]() requires non-explicit default ctor since r11-3092

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115645 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- This has started to fail since r15-1946 using size_t = decltype(sizeof(0)); void* operator new(size_t, void* p) { return p; } void* operator new[](size_t, void* p) { return p; } #define VERIFY(C) if (!(

[Bug middle-end/115882] Don't alwsys promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115882 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2664.htm

[Bug c++/115645] [11/12/13/14 Regression] new S[1][1]() requires non-explicit default ctor since r11-3092

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115645 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Sorry :(. I'll take a look.

[Bug middle-end/115882] Don't alwsys promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115882 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- http://wg21.link/P0371

[Bug middle-end/115882] Don't alwsys promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115882 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-07-11 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/115884] New: overload when one specific subroutine has no arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115884 Bug ID: 115884 Summary: overload when one specific subroutine has no arguments Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug target/115880] [14 regression] GCC 14+ fails to parse CoreFoundation header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2) > I have posted patches (which need an update [on my shorter TODO] that > implement the availability attribute). That makes a fix unnecessary - I > would much rathe

[Bug libstdc++/115885] New: Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern "C" block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115885 Bug ID: 115885 Summary: Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern "C" block Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/115884] overload when one specific subroutine has no arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115884 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug libstdc++/115885] Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern "C" block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug libstdc++/115797] [15 Regression] 'extern "C" { #include }' fails with 'error: template with C linkage' since r15-1857-gde19b516edbf91

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115797 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kacper.slominski72 at gmail dot co

[Bug libbacktrace/97082] new test 'mtest' fails for Mach-O/Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97082 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b870086904cfd480cf4297525ece00d169482ec7 commit r15-1984-gb870086904cfd480cf4297525ece00d169482ec7 Author: Ian Lance Taylor Date

[Bug libstdc++/115885] Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern "C" block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115885 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note doing extern "C" around includes is bad form and is even undefined according to the C++ standard.

[Bug target/115886] New: 4 different ways of implementing concat with stride produce different results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115886 Bug ID: 115886 Summary: 4 different ways of implementing concat with stride produce different results Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libstdc++/115885] Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern "C" block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115885 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/115885] Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern "C" block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115885 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > Perhaps g++ could issue a warning about it, then? That is PR 91770.

[Bug libstdc++/115797] [15 Regression] 'extern "C" { #include }' fails with 'error: template with C linkage' since r15-1857-gde19b516edbf91

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115797 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/115872] [12/13/14/15 regression] ICE in fab pass (error: missing definition with -g & -O3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115872 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/115752] [13/14/15 Regression] [loongarch -O1] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115752 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abeb6c8a62758faa0719e818e6e8a7db15a6793b commit r15-1986-gabeb6c8a62758faa0719e818e6e8a7db15a6793b Author: Lulu Cheng Date: Thu Jul

[Bug target/115752] [13/14/15 Regression] [loongarch -O1] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115752 chenglulu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/115752] [13/14/15 Regression] [loongarch -O1] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115752 --- Comment #16 from Xi Ruoyao --- Should we do a backport to 13 and 14?

[Bug libbacktrace/97082] new test 'mtest' fails for Mach-O/Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97082 --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I think that mtest should pass now on Darwin. I think the dwarf5 tests may still be failing. This seems to be because dsymutil does not understand dwarf5, at least on the compile farm macOS machine that

[Bug target/115752] [13/14/15 Regression] [loongarch -O1] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115752 --- Comment #17 from chenglulu --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #16) > Should we do a backport to 13 and 14? Yes, I'm doing test.

[Bug tree-optimization/115867] [14/15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected vector_type, have integer_type in TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS, at tree.h:4246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115867 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f4478f0f31263997bfdc4159f90e58dd79b38f9 commit r15-1990-g4f4478f0f31263997bfdc4159f90e58dd79b38f9 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/115873] New test case gcc.dg/vect/slp-54.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115873 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords|

[Bug target/115874] sh.c appears to be missing include of stdio.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115874 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build --- Comment #2 from Richard Bien

[Bug target/115880] [13/14/15 regression] GCC 14+ fails to parse CoreFoundation header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Summary|[14 r

[Bug rtl-optimization/115883] [15 Regression] late-combine exposing LRA problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115883 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||cris Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/115887] New: ICE: in gsi_insert_on_edge_immediate, at gimple-iterator.cc:849 with -O -fnon-call-exceptions -finstrument-functions and _BitInt()

LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20240711 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/115886] 4 different ways of implementing concat with stride produce different results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115886 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/115877] [15 Regression] wrong code at -Os (missing zero extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/96992] Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96992 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/88624] [Coarray] Rejects allocatable coarray passed as a dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88624 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84244] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] [Coarray] ICE in recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr, at tree.c:4535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84244 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from Andre V

[Bug tree-optimization/115659] powerpc fallout from removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115659 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7e4000397842671fe7e5c0473f1fa62707e1db9 commit r15-1991-gf7e4000397842671fe7e5c0473f1fa62707e1db9 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Fri Jul

[Bug fortran/103312] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_component since r9-1098-g3cf89a7b992d483e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103312 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29b2e1cdb6f182d3f519a4b96cdc98032a10f81d commit r14-10410-g29b2e1cdb6f182d3f519a4b96cdc98032a10f81d Author: Paul Thomas Da

[Bug fortran/103312] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_component since r9-1098-g3cf89a7b992d483e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103312 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b22831d3c74a1b3e72dab840e2818e495ecd567 commit r13-8907-g1b22831d3c74a1b3e72dab840e2818e495ecd567 Author: Paul Thomas Dat

[Bug fortran/103312] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_component since r9-1098-g3cf89a7b992d483e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103312 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/114189] Target implements obsolete vcond{,u,eq} expanders

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189 Bug 114189 depends on bug 115659, which changed state. Bug 115659 Summary: powerpc fallout from removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115659 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/115659] powerpc fallout from removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115659 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/96373] [11 Regression] SVE miscompilation on vectorized division loop, leading to FP exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96373 --- Comment #22 from Kewen Lin --- As PR108977 requires these fixes are backported to GCC11, I'm curious that do we plan to backport the fixes to GCC11 as well?

<    1   2