[Bug testsuite/115545] [15 regression] missing/excess errors after r15-1394

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115545 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/115545] [15 regression] missing/excess errors after r15-1394

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115545 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to uecker from comment #3) > And I introduced a similar issue with PR115157. Except that was about enum where here we are talking about size of long. You could have tested on x86_64 with -m32 to g

[Bug tree-optimization/115547] New: `(a ^ c) & (a | c)` -> `a ^ c` not done on the gimple/tree level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115547 Bug ID: 115547 Summary: `(a ^ c) & (a | c)` -> `a ^ c` not done on the gimple/tree level Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/115547] `(a ^ c) & (a | c)` -> `a ^ c` not done on the gimple/tree level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115547 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv

[Bug middle-end/115528] [15 regression] segmentation fault in legacy F77 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115528 --- Comment #8 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #6) > (In reply to kargls from comment #5) > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4) > > > Created attachment 58462 [details] > > > Input file that triggers the

[Bug c/115548] New: ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with attribute malloc and simd enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115548 Bug ID: 115548 Summary: ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with attribute malloc and simd enabled Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/115543] DWARF call_site_parameter entries are not generated for stack-passed parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115543 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/88935] std::random_shuffle does not work if the sequence is longer than RAND_MAX elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88935 Andrea Griffini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||agriff at tin dot it --- Comment #12 f

<    1   2