https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115509
Bug ID: 115509
Summary: ICE: in set_underlying_type, at
c-family/c-common.cc:8613 with attribute aligned and
sentinel
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114528
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108230
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|assert() spuriously |[12 regression] assert()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115446
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115446, which changed state.
Bug 115446 Summary: [15 Regression] [modules] Segfault when exporting operator
new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115446
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114961
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115510
Bug ID: 115510
Summary: ICE : Segmentation fault in build_new_method_call
and finish_call_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115511
Bug ID: 115511
Summary: ICE on ambigous overload for _Float32
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115511
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-16
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115512
Bug ID: 115512
Summary: _Float32 overloads in cmath cause ICE for default AVR
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115513
Bug ID: 115513
Summary: attribute nonstring could help with printf mistakes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114996
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That makes no sense. combine only ever results in 0, 1, or 2 insns, never 3.
What you mean is that after 4 or more combinations you got what you wanter.
But
combine (like most RTL optimisations!) is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
Sergey Fedorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vital.had at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114996
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Seger, please give some suggestions. At least for the riscv case, I don't see
a path forward.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115514
Bug ID: 115514
Summary: Nonconforming reverse_iterator::operator->
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114996
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(My name is Segher)
I implemented unCSE. It does exactly this. It will still be a few days before
you will see it, sorry!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100211
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33caee556c130b2dcf311480314e942a43d6b368
commit r15-1359-g33caee556c130b2dcf311480314e942a43d6b368
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 100211, which changed state.
Bug 100211 Summary: [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] aarch64: OOB accesses in
aarch64_{save,restore}_callee_saves
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100211
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115500
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.1.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
--- Comment #5 from Göran Uddeborg ---
These messages are no longer included in the po files. I'm not sure exactly
what prevents it; gengtype-state.cc is still not in po/EXCLUDES (while plain
gengtype.cc is). In any case, I would say we can close
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115387
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115404
Bug 115404 depends on bug 115387, which changed state.
Bug 115387 Summary: [15 regression] ICE in iovsprintf.c since
r15-1081-ge14afbe2d1c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115387
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114442
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408
--- Comment #5 from gagan sidhu (broly) ---
hi andrew,
i tried compiling another program that wasn't openssl and a similar issue
arose. something is seriously wrong in 14.1.0 in terms of -mips16 and
-minterlink-mips16 mode
this is kinda urgent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
If it's "kinda urgent", please provide the full info we need, including "secret
sauce".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408
gagan sidhu (broly) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|regression between gcc |regression between gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408
--- Comment #8 from gagan sidhu (broly) ---
how did you respond so fast? i don't see you on the CC list. that's kind of
cool but eerie. that's usually MY modus operandi, lol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115500
--- Comment #5 from YunQiang Su ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4)
> On the gcc-13, gcc-14 and the trunk I get this with -O2 on rv64gc:
>
> sllia5,a0,44
> blt a5,zero,.L3
>
>
> So ISTM that we must be doi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115450
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >[r15-1006-gd93353e6423eca] Do single-lane SLP discovery for reductions
>
>
> Interesting because PR 115256 bisect it to an earlier patch.
I believe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115513
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-17
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115500
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
That's going to be a uarch issue if the slli/bltz is slower.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115515
Bug ID: 115515
Summary: constexpr ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |14.1.1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115511
--- Comment #2 from dv at vollmann dot ch ---
On 6/16/24 16:18, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115511
>
> Andrew Pinski changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
> --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
arm is OK -
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/7755/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/mail-body.txt
loongarch is also reportedly OK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
aarch64 reports just
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c check-function-bodies bar1
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/if-compare_2.c check-function-bodies bar2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #1 from R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115508
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |14.1.1
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115511
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to dv from comment #2)
>
> It looks like my report is a duplicate of 111343.
That was the one which I was thinking of too :). I will clean up the recording
of this tomorrow. one for the C++ ICE a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115515
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-17
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115516
Bug ID: 115516
Summary: constexpr use before C23 could give a better error
message
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115261
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ab143df110a40bd41b5368ef84819953bf971b1
commit r15-1365-g2ab143df110a40bd41b5368ef84819953bf971b1
Author: Stefan Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f124e6b79daa43618dbb1e67c09629676d07396
commit r14-10316-g8f124e6b79daa43618dbb1e67c09629676d07396
Author:
52 matches
Mail list logo