https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] FAIL:|[14 Regression] FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 114107, which changed state.
Bug 114107 Summary: poor vectorization at -O3 when dealing with arrays of
different multiplicity, good with -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114107
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 115385, which changed state.
Bug 115385 Summary: Peeling for gaps can be optimized more or needs to peel
more than one iteration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115385
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115459
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.0|15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115463
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115471
Bug ID: 115471
Summary: Fail to capture (with initializer) constant bit-fields
by reference in lambda expression
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115470
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14820327c720dad2ca34eb9fa73c0d9b435b6688
commit r15-1241-g14820327c720dad2ca34eb9fa73c0d9b435b6688
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115466
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115472
Bug ID: 115472
Summary: ICE :tree check expected class 'type', have
'exceptional' (error_mark) in check_goto_1, at
cpdecl.cc4007
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115461
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115462
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68845
Franz Sirl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30688
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115473
Bug ID: 115473
Summary: MIPS: -Os rtx_cost compare not correct
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106083
Sergey Fedorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vital.had at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115456
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dac1049c1211e6d06c2536b86445a6334c3866d
commit r15-1243-g3dac1049c1211e6d06c2536b86445a6334c3866d
Author: Pan Li
Date: Thu Jun 13 15:2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #18 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #16)
> This issue has been fixed in FreeBSD's main branch on powerpc* in
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/
> ?id=448c505c33cc334193590f3844406d6a74f26e2a
>
> Sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590
--- Comment #17 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> Oh yes there could be a bug here when the byte (lbarx/stbcx.) and half-word
> (lharx/sthcx.) instruction support was added (which was for Power8;
> r0-123873-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115474
Bug ID: 115474
Summary: Missed optimization: fold `std::max(a > b, a)` to `a`
(bool a, bool b)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95782
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115438
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I reproduced the larger regression with -march=zen3 on a zen4 machine.
9.27% 94741 bwaves_r_peak.g bwaves_r_peak.gcc7-m64 [.]
bi_cgstab_block_
5.96% 60744 bwaves_r_base.g bwaves_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115475
Bug ID: 115475
Summary: AArch64 should define __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BF16 when
appropriate
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115475
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115318
--- Comment #2 from Alfred Agrell ---
struct a { int c; };
template
struct ddd {
int f()
{
using a2 = decltype([](int a::*)->a{}(&a::c));
return [](int a2::*){ return 2; }(&a::c);
}
};
int xs() { return ddd().f(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0970ff46ba6330fc80e8736fc05b2eaeeae0b6a0
commit r15-1244-g0970ff46ba6330fc80e8736fc05b2eaeeae0b6a0
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115454
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115438
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Fixing that doesn't seem to help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115376
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> After trying and several attempts to find a small reproducer, I'm afraid
> that I won't be able to provide better help than the ALS team could.
Note that a small reproducer is not mandatory, so it's usual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115438
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Another difference is that for
C Local r*r norm
r2=0.0
do k=2,nzl+1
do j=1,ny
do i=1,nx
do l=1,nb
r(l,i,j,k) = b(l,i,j,k-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113376
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99a1fe6c12c733fe4923a75a79d09a66ff8abcec
commit r15-1255-g99a1fe6c12c733fe4923a75a79d09a66ff8abcec
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc38bdf093c44918edff819ae6c73d03c726b341
commit r15-1256-gcc38bdf093c44918edff819ae6c73d03c726b341
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Nice - thank you both. I think we can close this.
libstdc++_libbacktrace.a does exist on the gcc-13 branch, but isn't enabled by
default so you probably aren't seeing these FAILs there.
If anybody start
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115456
--- Comment #4 from Monk Chiang ---
The test case, if add this option: -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl
It has a new internal compiler error.
compress_run-2.c:25:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
25 | }
| ^
(insn 30 29 31 2 (set (reg:HF 156 [ _2 ])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e490bea69205ec4cad8caf21f19d8a8a89a7b43
commit r15-1260-g9e490bea69205ec4cad8caf21f19d8a8a89a7b43
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:916a0f026e1516de4608b308cd7e4b68b8e562bb
commit r15-1264-g916a0f026e1516de4608b308cd7e4b68b8e562bb
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72ccc99d6fc22aaae4aaf74027329acafd70cbfc
commit r15-1271-g72ccc99d6fc22aaae4aaf74027329acafd70cbfc
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253
--- Comment #16 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106393
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> > The rest may have to be implemented in the analyzer.
>
> Hm, let's ask David?
Please open it as a fresh bug aga
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115466
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
--- Comment #7 from Andi Kleen ---
I'm not sure how it would speed up the linker if gcc did it. The linker would
still need to do it because there might be matches between different .o files.
Also linker wouldn't know if the compiler supported th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fed7e9bbc57d502e141e079a6be2706bdbd4560
commit r15-1292-g7fed7e9bbc57d502e141e079a6be2706bdbd4560
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115370
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83a765768510d1f329887116757d6818d7846717
commit r15-1293-g83a765768510d1f329887116757d6818d7846717
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #7)
> I'm not sure how it would speed up the linker if gcc did it. The linker
> would still need to do it because there might be matches between different
> .o files. Also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115463
--- Comment #3 from Hongyu Wang ---
Should be fixed, but will wait for the confirm of SPEC result on znver/skylake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115463
Bug 115463 depends on bug 115370, which changed state.
Bug 115370 Summary: [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115370
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115463
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99678
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115463
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83a765768510d1f329887116757d6818d7846717
commit r15-1293-g83a765768510d1f329887116757d6818d7846717
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115021
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao Liu ---
It's fixed by r15-1100-gec985bc97a0157
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115474
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a few more:
```
int func(bool a, bool b) {
bool t = b < a;
return t | a; // a
}
int func1(bool a, bool b) {
bool t = b < a;
bool t1 = t < a;
return t | t1; // a
}
int func2(bool a, bool b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115461
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
The LLVM testsuite still passes.
Looking a bit deeper:
$ LSAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=1,log_pointers=1 ./a.out
[...]
0x5080
==1522380==LeakSanitizer: checking for leaks
[...]
==1522381==Scanning STACK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99678
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d387ecb2b2f44f33fd6a7c5ec7eadaf6dd70efc9
commit r15-1294-gd387ecb2b2f44f33fd6a7c5ec7eadaf6dd70efc9
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115370
Hongyu Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24537
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115194
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8878fecc251762bc32c24e659695557797e03fd9
commit r15-1296-g8878fecc251762bc32c24e659695557797e03fd9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
Bug ID: 115476
Summary: __has_unique_object_representation ICE with array of
uninstantiated type of unknown bound
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114683
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115194
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13823
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Dan Evison from comment #0)
> This seems to a problem with the default allocator, since running the
> program
> with GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW set, removes the problem, and dramatically speeds up
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38678
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
MSVC and libc++ both behave the same as libstdc++, calling rdbuf()->sgetn():
https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/e36ee6c2b9bc6f5b1f70776c18cf5d3a93a69798/stl/inc/istream#L522
https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115466
--- Comment #4 from Carl Love ---
comment 1
Yes, I can confirm if I add the alignment statement to the declarations it
works fine.
I originally tried to use the built-in as part of a re-write of a function in
the Milvus AI source code. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115477
Bug ID: 115477
Summary: compiling with gcc flips the sign of a float return
value
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115478
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
r15-1120-g2277f987979445
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115478
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
In check_trait_type, we do
if (kind == 1 && TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE && !TYPE_DOMAIN (type))
return true; // Array of unknown bound. Don't care about completeness.
and then end up crashing in r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|rust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114683
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:609764a42f0cd3f6358562cab98fc220d3d2d9fd
commit r15-1297-g609764a42f0cd3f6358562cab98fc220d3d2d9fd
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
--- Comment #5 from Mital Ashok ---
Sorry, I misread the cppreference quote. Though it should be ill-formed instead
of UB I think.
GCC also crashes on this invalid code:
class Foo;
static_assert(__has_unique_object_representations(Foo[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115461
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Forgot to add: since the runtime is shared, this observation applies to both
GCC and LLVM.
$ gcc k.c -fsanitize=leak; ./a.out
0x5080
$ LSAN_OPTIONS=use_stacks=0 ./a.out
0x5080
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28103
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115478
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115194, which changed state.
Bug 115194 Summary: [modules] "reference to is ambiguous" when
multiple paths to same symbol exist through module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115194
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115478
Bug ID: 115478
Summary: [15 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/bitint-args.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115479
Bug ID: 115479
Summary: undefined reference to [abi:cxx11] with variadic
template of constexpr template structs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115479
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you provide a non godbolt version of this using a shell script invoking gcc
directly>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105863
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 58418
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58418&action=edit
gcc15-pr105863-wip.patch
WIP patch, which already does something. Started now working on the testsuite.
I'd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69621
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awright at tradebot dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113723
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Aha, so
static_assert(__has_unique_object_representations(Foo<0>[]));
is valid and should be treated just like
static_assert(__has_unique_object_representations(Foo<0>));
but
class Foo;
stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28103
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It looks like we've been setting badbit in ostream::_M_write(const charT*,
streamsize) since it was added in r0-47606-g8d0a564bba54f7
That function was used to replace the similar code in basic_ostream::wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115477
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115425
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28103
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think we can just do this in __ostream_insert:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ostream_insert.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ostream_insert.h
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo