[Bug driver/115440] unrecognized command-line option '--c++17'; did you mean '--stdc++17'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115440 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/115446] New: [15 Regression] Segfault when exporting operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115446 Bug ID: 115446 Summary: [15 Regression] Segfault when exporting operator new Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/115446] [15 Regression] Segfault when exporting operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115446 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug c++/115446] [15 Regression] Segfault when exporting operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115446 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- s/unsigned long/decltype(sizeof(0))/ to make the testcase more portable since not all targets use `unsigned long` as size_t.

[Bug pch/115312] [14/15 Regression] ICE when including a PCH via compiler option -include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312 --- Comment #3 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #2) > I have made a native Windows MinGW-w64 build where the lines "gcc_assert > (!the_parser);" were commented out in file gcc/cp/parser.cc and got > confirmation this

[Bug ipa/115447] New: GCC fails to tail call unless variable wrapped in a block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115447 Bug ID: 115447 Summary: GCC fails to tail call unless variable wrapped in a block Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/69374] install.texi is bit-rotten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bc26cceb243c6f359f65a1afa5515f911f3327d commit r15-1189-g6bc26cceb243c6f359f65a1afa5515f911f3327d Author: Gerald Pfeifer Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/115447] GCC fails to tail call unless variable wrapped in a block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115447 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 58408 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58408&action=edit testcase from godbolt

[Bug tree-optimization/115447] GCC fails to tail call unless variable wrapped in a block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115447 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/115447] GCC fails to tail call unless variable wrapped in a block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115447 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note if you don't do the assignment (to extend the lifetime of the temp), GCC does tail calls bar unlike clang/LLVM.

[Bug analyzer/115436] False positive with -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115436 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/115448] New: Improvements to CFG edge visualization in diagnostic paths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115448 Bug ID: 115448 Summary: Improvements to CFG edge visualization in diagnostic paths Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/115449] New: `(truncate)a` and `(nop_convert)~(truncate)a`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115449 Bug ID: 115449 Summary: `(truncate)a` and `(nop_convert)~(truncate)a` Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE Severity: enhanc

[Bug tree-optimization/115449] `(truncate)a` and `(nop_convert)~(truncate)a` are bitwise inversion of each other

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115449 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/115389] Invalid ROP hashst offset is emitted when using -mabi=no-altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115389 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- So, what value do we output? And why?

[Bug target/115389] Invalid ROP hashst offset is emitted when using -mabi=no-altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115389 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > So, what value do we output? And why? It would be nice if the assembler told us, btw :-)

[Bug target/115176] rbit pattern should use bitreverse rtl now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115176 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug rtl-optimization/115384] [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088 since r15-1047-g7876cde25cbd2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115384 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d496d2cd1d5d8751a1637abca89339d6f9ddd3b commit r15-1191-g1d496d2cd1d5d8751a1637abca89339d6f9ddd3b Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Jun

[Bug rtl-optimization/115384] [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088 since r15-1047-g7876cde25cbd2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115384 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115449] `(truncate)a` and `(nop_convert)~(truncate)a` are bitwise inversion of each other

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115449 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 58409 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58409&action=edit Patch which I am testing Just attaching it for now.

[Bug tree-optimization/115450] New: cpu2017 502.gcc runtime miscompute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115450 Bug ID: 115450 Summary: cpu2017 502.gcc runtime miscompute Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiza

[Bug tree-optimization/115450] cpu2017 502.gcc runtime miscompute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115450 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >[r15-1006-gd93353e6423eca] Do single-lane SLP discovery for reductions Interesting because PR 115256 bisect it to an earlier patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/115450] [15 Regression] cpu2017 502.gcc runtime miscompute on aarch64 with SVE since r15-1006-gd93353e6423eca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115450 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug d/115295] [15 regression] Various gdc testsuite regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115295 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 58410 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58410&action=edit candidate patch This patch reverts dg-additional-sources to the earlier behavior, in which sources are added

[Bug target/115451] New: ARM neon: float32 comparison intrinsics get scalar implementation since GCC 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115451 Bug ID: 115451 Summary: ARM neon: float32 comparison intrinsics get scalar implementation since GCC 11 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/115451] ARM neon: float32 comparison intrinsics get scalar implementation since GCC 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115451 --- Comment #1 from Povilas Kanapickas --- Link to godbolt https://godbolt.org/z/MbnMhzrTT

[Bug d/115295] [15 regression] Various gdc testsuite regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115295 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #4) > Created attachment 58410 [details] > candidate patch > > This patch reverts dg-additional-sources to the earlier behavior, in which > sources are added regard

[Bug testsuite/115262] [15 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c fails after r15-831-g05daf617ea22e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115262 --- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2) > (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1) > > It looks like the test wants to see xxsel, but after that change we get > > xxlor and what looks like a slight diff

[Bug target/115452] New: ICE when dump stv2 for gcc.target/i386/pr70322-2.c with -march=cascadelake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115452 Bug ID: 115452 Summary: ICE when dump stv2 for gcc.target/i386/pr70322-2.c with -march=cascadelake Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug other/115453] New: [15 regression] Noise from ne wdlopen, pthread configure checks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453 Bug ID: 115453 Summary: [15 regression] Noise from ne wdlopen, pthread configure checks Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/115453] [15 regression] Noise from new dlopen, pthread configure checks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- 246:configure:8884: checking for library containing dlopen 634:ac_cv_search_dlopen='none required' 246:configure:8884: checking for library containing dlopen 634:ac_cv_search_dlopen='none required'

[Bug bootstrap/115453] [15 regression] Noise from new dlopen, pthread configure checks since r15-1177-g75299e4fe50aa8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 regression] Noise from |[15 regression] Noise from

[Bug bootstrap/115453] [15 regression] Noise from new dlopen, pthread configure checks since r15-1177-g75299e4fe50aa8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/115453] [15 regression] Noise from new dlopen, pthread configure checks since r15-1177-g75299e4fe50aa8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Also, a typo: it has ac_cv_search_pthread_crate (not create).

[Bug bootstrap/115453] [15 regression] Noise from new dlopen, pthread configure checks since r15-1177-g75299e4fe50aa8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > Also, a typo: it has ac_cv_search_pthread_crate (not create). Someone had rust crate on their mind when they did the patch :).

[Bug bootstrap/115453] [15 regression] Noise from new dlopen, pthread configure checks since r15-1177-g75299e4fe50aa8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Also it is not just old glibc but most non-"modern" libc out there (e.g. Solaris I think). So maybe don't reference glibc in the comments in configure.ac either. Just say some libc.

[Bug target/115389] Invalid ROP hashst offset is emitted when using -mabi=no-altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115389 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > So, what value do we output? And why? The invalid offset is zero, so: hashst r0,0(r1) As the assembler mentions, the range of valid offsets is [-512,-8] and

[Bug libstdc++/115454] New: std::experimental::find_last_set is buggy on x86-64-v4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115454 Bug ID: 115454 Summary: std::experimental::find_last_set is buggy on x86-64-v4 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/113681] [14/15 Regression] ICE in tree_profiling, at tree-profile.cc:803 since r14-6201-gf0a90c7d7333fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113681 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66f48557e11a530646e5562c50a75b4b9839f171 commit r15-1196-g66f48557e11a530646e5562c50a75b4b9839f171 Author: Alexandre Oliva Date:

[Bug testsuite/115365] [15 regression] New test case gcc.dg/pr100927.c from r15-1022-gb05288d1f1e4b6 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115365 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|New test case |[15 regression] New test

[Bug c++/115425] [13/14/15 regression] ICE: tree check: expected type_pack_expansion or expr_pack_expansion, have error_mark in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.cc:13778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115425 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: tree check: expected |[13/14/15 regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/115455] New: ICE: verify_flow_info failed during GIMPLE pass: cfg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115455 Bug ID: 115455 Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed during GIMPLE pass: cfg Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug target/69374] install.texi is bit-rotten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:919e88f7915b57ae3a2152a1947dbfac3fccfe88 commit r15-1197-g919e88f7915b57ae3a2152a1947dbfac3fccfe88 Author: Gerald Pfeifer Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/115438] [15 Regression] 503.bwaves_r regressed 5-11% on different x86_64 machines at -Ofast -march=native since r15-1006-gd93353e6423eca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115438 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/115445] [15 Regression] [modules] ICE when repeating an export of function declared in GMF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115445 --- Comment #1 from m.cencora at gmail dot com --- Works fine on gcc-14 and clang

<    1   2   3