https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114958
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
the regression is now PR115247
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115247
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:241a6cc88d866fb36bd35ddb3edb659453d6322e
commit r15-889-g241a6cc88d866fb36bd35ddb3edb659453d6322e
Author: Matthias Kretz
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115262
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
--- Comment #2 from jchrist at linux dot ibm.com ---
I tried this, but it seems like pcom does not handle vectors at all: In the
gimple input I have
vectp.5_32 = r_26(D);
# VUSE <.MEM_52>
vect__51.6_1 = MEM [(doubleD.32 *)vectp.5_32];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a99ebb88f8f25e76ebed5afc22e64fa77a2f0d3f
commit r15-890-ga99ebb88f8f25e76ebed5afc22e64fa77a2f0d3f
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Wed Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|14.2
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270
Bug ID: 115270
Summary: gnat doesn't link on 32-bit Linux/sparc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Looking again the reason for the "bad" vectorization with pcom applied is
t.c:23:23: missed: Build SLP failed: operation unsupported _51 =
r__r0_lsm0.7_7;
that is, pcom leaves around SSA name copies whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90069
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f97d98d174e3ef9f3a9a83c179d787abde5e066
commit r15-891-g2f97d98d174e3ef9f3a9a83c179d787abde5e066
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ---
Maybe it's time to ping the patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 58304
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58304&action=edit
Tentative fix
Please give it a try when you have a chance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58b8c87b7fb281e35a6817cc91a292096fdc02dc
commit r15-892-g58b8c87b7fb281e35a6817cc91a292096fdc02dc
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115247
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90069
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86754
Bug 86754 depends on bug 90069, which changed state.
Bug 90069 Summary: Polymorphic Return Type Memory Leak Without Intermediate
Variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90069
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:499d00127d39ba894b0f7216d73660b380bdc325
commit r15-893-g499d00127d39ba894b0f7216d73660b380bdc325
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date: Wed Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
--- Comment #5 from jchrist at linux dot ibm.com ---
I tried your patch and it leaves an awful amount of dead stores to the
accumulator within the loop. I also still see the stores inside the loop in
gimple. Is this really desired? Or is this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Dave, does this fix it for hppa-linux-gnu too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115271
Bug ID: 115271
Summary: [OpenMP] Declare variant not stored in Fortran module
file
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272
Bug ID: 115272
Summary: [debug] complex type is hard to related back to base
type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115269
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Created attachment 58304
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58304&action=edit
> Tentative fix
>
> Please give it a try when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c6e75a6d1cc2858fc945266a5edb700edb44389
commit r15-894-g9c6e75a6d1cc2858fc945266a5edb700edb44389
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba2843b9b35b9700155677f90555700b6ad4e16
commit r14-10258-gfba2843b9b35b9700155677f90555700b6ad4e16
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115273
Bug ID: 115273
Summary: [12 Regression] passing zero to ctz() check missing
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115273
--- Comment #1 from Bi6c ---
Created attachment 58306
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58306&action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115261
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Thanks for the pointer. Indeed, adding an extendv2siv2di pattern solves this
and the code looks optimal then. I will come up with a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to jchrist from comment #5)
> I tried your patch and it leaves an awful amount of dead stores to the
> accumulator within the loop. I also still see the stores inside the loop in
> gimple. Is th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115182
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, the missed store motion is because of the IS_NAN (k) check which
makes the memory accesses only conditional executed and thus possibly
trap. We "fix" that only during loop unswitching which hoists the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1065a7db6f2a69770a85b4d53b9123b090dd1771
commit r15-895-g1065a7db6f2a69770a85b4d53b9123b090dd1771
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115252
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f46eaad445e680034df51bd0dec4e6c7b1f372a4
commit r15-896-gf46eaad445e680034df51bd0dec4e6c7b1f372a4
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 114435, which changed state.
Bug 114435 Summary: PCOM messes up vectorization some times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 114435, which changed state.
Bug 114435 Summary: PCOM messes up vectorization some times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> So the "pcom messes up SLP" part should be fixed now. The pass dependence
> of invariant/store motion and unswitching (and likely also loop splitting) is
> s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 115252, which changed state.
Bug 115252 Summary: The SLP vectorizer failed to perform automatic
vectorization on pixel_sub_wxh of x264
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115252
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
How does it work for 'double' vs. 'long double' themselves?
<1><32>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_base_type)
<33> DW_AT_byte_size : 16
<34> DW_AT_encoding: 4(float)
<35> DW_AT_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> How does it work for 'double' vs. 'long double' themselves?
>
> <1><32>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_base_type)
> <33> DW_AT_byte_size : 16
> <34>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > How does it work for 'double' vs. 'long double' themselves?
> >
> > <1><32>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_base_typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
It will be a few days before I can test. I've had three hard drives fail on my
main hppa
system in the past few weeks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
Bug ID: 115274
Summary: Bogus -Wstringop-overread in SQLite source code
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Compiled attached sqlite3.c
Looks like it didn't attach. Can you try again? Maybe compress it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
With this patch:
...
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
index 8ec3856873e..ea3318396e0 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
@@ -13247,6 +13247,7 @@ base_type_die (tree type, bool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
--- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Ok, I couldn't attach the source file due to size limits, but you can get it
from https://sqlite.org/download.html . I get this warning with the latest
version, which is 3.46.0 at the time of this writing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> It will be a few days before I can test. I've had three hard drives fail on
> my
> main hppa
> system in the past few weeks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275
Bug ID: 115275
Summary: [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization for Dead Code
Elimination
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8)
> Should be fixed on trunk, it's not a regression, but we probably want
> backporting this?
For code correctness bugs, yes, we want them backported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93988
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93988
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #2)
> Also, I see the "__unknown__" there now -- better IMO to let gdb synthesize
> a name instead.
Attempt to synthesize the name in gcc:
...
commit d2b7f315ad976ff18c71e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
--- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov ---
> Please try compress it.
I did try with xz -9e and it was still 1.5M (the limit is 1M). I doubt any
compression method will be able to shave those 50% off.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8)
> > Should be fixed on trunk, it's not a regression, but we probably want
> > backporting this?
>
> For code correctness bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Bug 114600 comment 10 has a std module implementation attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.3.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
Bug ID: 115276
Summary: libgm2 wraptime.InitTM returns NIL
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eff00046409a7289bfdc1861e68b532895f91c0e
commit r15-902-geff00046409a7289bfdc1861e68b532895f91c0e
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression] pragma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114529
--- Comment #4 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 58307
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58307&action=edit
Work in progress patch
This is only partially complete and it is being saved here to show the
direction of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
Bug ID: 115277
Summary: ICF needs to match loop bound estimates
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICF needs to match loop |[13/14/15 regression] ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Bug ID: 115278
Summary: -ftree-vectorize optimizes away volatile write on
x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115279
Bug ID: 115279
Summary: [OpenMP] Fix USM/unified-shared memory handling of
'declare target enter(global_var)'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #17 from Natalie Perlin ---
anl...@gcc.gnu.org - Thank you for you comment on the new compiler version/new
bug (to file a separate report for gnu/14.1.0)
It turns out, however, that other packages from the software stack collection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 58310
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58310&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed fix - currently bootstrapping and testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #17)
> Brief note on the errors is below. Does it need to be submitted as a
> separate ticket/different bug?
Yes.
> I'd prepare a preprocessed file where the error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39263ed2d39ac1cebde59bc5e72ddcad5dc7a1ec
commit r15-906-g39263ed2d39ac1cebde59bc5e72ddcad5dc7a1ec
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] register |[14 Regression] register
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:547143df5aa0960fb149a26933dad7ca1c363afb
commit r15-908-g547143df5aa0960fb149a26933dad7ca1c363afb
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1a1f7e9f0bedea55c558ab95127679bc3e9ff72
commit r15-909-gd1a1f7e9f0bedea55c558ab95127679bc3e9ff72
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect r14-1951-g7b34cacc573538 exposes the missed optimization here.
You can see the same missed optimization with:
```
template
T min(T a, T b)
{
return a < b ? a : b;
}
template
T max(T a, T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115280
Bug ID: 115280
Summary: Concept can access private alias in a classs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115280
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115266
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115281
Bug ID: 115281
Summary: [14/15 Regression] aarch64 ICE in go_through_subreg
after r14-5129
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115281
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-ftree-vectorize optimizes |[13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:915440eed21de367cb41857afb5273aff5bcb737
commit r15-911-g915440eed21de367cb41857afb5273aff5bcb737
Author: YunQiang Su
Date: Wed Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115214
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #17 from Matthias Schiffer ---
I have now verified replacing Felix's patch with your new patch in the OpenWrt
toolchain (currently based on GCC 13.3) results in correct compilation, while a
GCC 13.3 without these patches applied exhib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> > I think there's another bug for this, but I can't seem to remember which one
> > at the moment...
>
> PR 88002
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82051
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89245
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89245
--- Comment #4 from YunQiang Su ---
It has been fixed.
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
