https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103312
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ce90517ed75c4af9fc0616f2670cf6dfcfa8a91
commit r15-788-g2ce90517ed75c4af9fc0616f2670cf6dfcfa8a91
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> int main()
> {
> const int n = 3;
> float d[n*n];
> float4_t a[n*n];
I'd recommend using #define n 3 or enum { n = 3 }; instead of const int n = 3;
so t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115202
Bug ID: 115202
Summary: [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization: std::min(f ?
(unsigned short)m : a, ~0)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc5e109272977f0242a2ceee3a85765cdbed1993
commit r15-789-gfc5e109272977f0242a2ceee3a85765cdbed1993
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> I'm looking into the first issue. Interesting fact:
>
> > /space/rguenther/install/gcc-14.1/bin/g++ t.C -O3 -fopt-info-vec
> > -fno-tree-slp-vectorize --par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
>
>> It's possible that all the lambda frames are inlined, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.3.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115202
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
Yes! Testing a fix for
int foo (int) {}
int bar (int) {}
typedef int (*pred)(int);
int x, y;
pred A () { if (x) return foo; else return bar; }
pred B () { if (y) return foo; else return bar; }
int __at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 58276
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58276&action=edit
Minimal patch
Minimal patch as described: just build src/libbacktrace with -funwind-tables,
same for 19_diagnost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115190
--- Comment #3 from huangqinjin at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Peter Damianov from comment #2)
> I could only reproduce this on MSYS2's gcc packages. On w64devkit, I
> couldn't reproduce it. Nor with a gcc 15 I built myself.
>
Oh yes, I made
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115190
--- Comment #4 from huangqinjin at gmail dot com ---
The repro in description shows that MSYS2 gcc read the module mapper early even
it is not used, seems to me it doesn't match the document
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Module-M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115161
--- Comment #21 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Shrunk the example down to a single simpler function while preserving the
original masking intent:
```c
cat bug.cc
#include
#include
#include
__attribute__((noipa))
static void assert_eq_p(void *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115190
--- Comment #5 from huangqinjin at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to huangqinjin from comment #3)
> (In reply to Peter Damianov from comment #2)
> > I could only reproduce this on MSYS2's gcc packages. On w64devkit, I
> > couldn't reproduce it. Nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The fix is in 13.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203
Bug ID: 115203
Summary: [15 Regression] Build fail with non LANG=C in analyzer
self test: ICE in fail_formatted at selftest.cc:63 /
tree-diagnostic-path.cc:2158: test_control_flow_5:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115190
--- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel ---
> The line ending of last line is also required. Personally feel strange.
This is explicitly handled (as a "no, not supported" case):
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/4efa7ec85a85c6024d0907a0e735ad5df7f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115202
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|11.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115204
Bug ID: 115204
Summary: unnecessary stack usage and copies (of temporaries)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xxs_chy at outlook dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115204
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
That's why I tagged is as 'target'. I'd be happy to learn that it can be
resolved target-independently.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115204
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 99% sure there is a dup of this bug already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114148
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
To investigate further, I've added comparison functions to a reduced
version of pr106010-7b.c, with
void
cmp_epi8 (_Complex unsigned char* a, _Complex unsigned char* b)
{
for (int i =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0a02467bbc35a478eb82f5a8a7e8870827b51fc
commit r15-792-gf0a02467bbc35a478eb82f5a8a7e8870827b51fc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61f5b3c59ed20438d7d9918d7a83d29a21097d4e
commit r15-791-g61f5b3c59ed20438d7d9918d7a83d29a21097d4e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
--- Comment #43 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
I see this issue in SIMD programming. Example (on x86_64 with only '-O2', i.e.
without AVX512) https://compiler-explorer.com/z/K64djP356:
typedef int V __attribute__((vector_size(64)));
V gen();
vo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
--- Comment #44 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 23 May 2024, mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
>
> --- Comment #43 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
> I see this issue in SIMD programmi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115197
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b2476d4d18c92b8aba3567ebccd2100c2f7c258
commit r15-793-g2b2476d4d18c92b8aba3567ebccd2100c2f7c258
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Indeed, the suggestion was not to disable the translations in general. A
similar issue shows up when running the testsuite. There is it solved by
"setenv LANG C" and "setenv LANG C.ASCII" – while various scr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> Thus, one way would be to have LANG=C set somewhere (e.g. via the Makefile -
> assuming it can be done portable).
I'd prefer not to do that as we may want to h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115188
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115198
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115189
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Kalibera ---
I hope there is a more elegant solution, but I could think of a best-effort
one. Check if the result of the normalization is a UNC path, if yes, check if
the original path started with a drive letter, if ye
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115190
Christoph Reiter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reiter.christoph at gmail dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115170
--- Comment #8 from Cristian Rodríguez ---
SO shall I flile a bug report to the linker instead? if -znow is used I would
expect no plt used in the whole executable..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115187
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed63cd2aa5b114565fe5499c3a6bf8da5e8e48ba
commit r15-796-ged63cd2aa5b114565fe5499c3a6bf8da5e8e48ba
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113879
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efc4255d4393cba3d2232a7152799e1b161c3062
commit r15-802-gefc4255d4393cba3d2232a7152799e1b161c3062
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
--- Comment #8 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Harald,
I simply copied all the associated functions in trans-expr.cc from mainline
and plonked them in 13-branch. That's why I said that I hadn't done any
weeding. There is also a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115205
Bug ID: 115205
Summary: ICE when using -fsanitize=hwaddress
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115205
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114947
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fa0ffa4f789683ba80e93cd10546cb7bd2c3d8a
commit r15-810-g7fa0ffa4f789683ba80e93cd10546cb7bd2c3d8a
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114947
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114947, which changed state.
Bug 114947 Summary: [modules] ICE when processing class-scope constrained
partial specialisations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114947
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115167
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 58278
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58278&action=edit
WIP patch to split out the classes into the c-family
I tried the attached patch, to move the pertinent code to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109561
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114148
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3)
> To investigate further, I've added comparison functions to a reduced
> version of pr106010-7b.c, with
>
> void
> cmp_epi8 (_Complex unsigned char*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115205
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|sanitizer |fortran
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115205
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |sanitizer
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115205
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104678
--- Comment #4 from Saurav Yadav <3y3p4tch at protonmail dot com> ---
@jason can you please have this checked? I can reproduce the issue on current
trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115206
Bug ID: 115206
Summary: ICE: segfault in code involving C++ modules,
std::format and std::println
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115207
Bug ID: 115207
Summary: [constexpr] constexpr assignment rejected as non const
on self-assignment test
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
Bug ID: 115208
Summary: [15 Regression] Memory consumption get extremely high
after r15-809
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
--- Comment #1 from Haochen Jiang ---
Forgot to mention, the memory consumption collection is collected on x86_64
target in order to get the test finished. Therefore, we could debug on x86_64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115140
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|
|powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115209
Bug ID: 115209
Summary: The implementation of concat_view refers to p2542r7
rather than the p2542r8
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
74 matches
Mail list logo
