https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Version|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #5 from Natalie Perlin ---
Created attachment 58217
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58217&action=edit
Most of the source files of the modules used for the fv_dynamics.F90
Most of the source files for the modules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-16
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #6 from Natalie Perlin ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
>
> Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming
> 13.3 release next week?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107919
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 107919, which changed state.
Bug 107919 Summary: Possibly false-positive "maybe-uninitialized" with GCC 12
on complex variant-variant-tuple-unique_ptr types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107919
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #22 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #20)
Thanks for looking into this.
> The IL we generate the jump function from is:
>
> _1 = cclauses_2(D) != 0B;
> c_parser_omp_all_clauses (_1);
>
> Which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025
--- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang ---
My guess is that for the prime judging loop:
for (i = 5; i < max; i += 6)
if ((n % i == 0) || (n % (i + 2) == 0))
return 0;
In GCC13, it extracts the first l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79958
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
commit r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
Author: Richard Biener
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114774
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
commit r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
commit r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
commit r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7e0133661659ed2d210f939a398
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79958
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100220
Bug 100220 depends on bug 100314, which changed state.
Bug 100314 Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (vs.
-O1) (inlining differences due to missed dse)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114774
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
--- Comment #20 from Alex Coplan ---
I'd just like to ping this serious wrong code bug. It's unfortunate that this
wasn't addressed for the 14.1 release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> So from a point of view of float to int conversion, both are valid for out
> of range values.
Looking at CVTTPS2DQ instruction from
https://www.intel.com/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 109087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
It depends on if you consider a float to int conversion or not. For (long
long)float . The value if the float was out of range is unspecified so
returning one value or another is both valid.
So the question
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115113
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] Ada |[15 Regression] Ada
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111501
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10)
[...]
>> I wonder how best to handle this: just skip the test on sparc*-sun-solaris2*
>> && !gas?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114715
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56415e39029012aa3675d3b4b71fb248cf43049e
commit r12-10445-g56415e39029012aa3675d3b4b71fb248cf43049e
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114655
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42a0393655d8e4662ba001c3759cf00b639eddb9
commit r12-10446-g42a0393655d8e4662ba001c3759cf00b639eddb9
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114734
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46b2e98983ebc62440c43217f2b3bbe72f8b0191
commit r12-10447-g46b2e98983ebc62440c43217f2b3bbe72f8b0191
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114027
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6661a7c098a46eff4afc98b55c89e3a71d63d674
commit r12-10450-g6661a7c098a46eff4afc98b55c89e3a71d63d674
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114231
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7b1d814da0aa2e7331c56180264a8b786012971
commit r12-10448-ga7b1d814da0aa2e7331c56180264a8b786012971
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114375
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1b21855e131bb818aedc953f403812b494917fc
commit r12-10449-gc1b21855e131bb818aedc953f403812b494917fc
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114027
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d650c041d37a3df2bec46a67e42f9976d7fd2bf
commit r12-10451-g2d650c041d37a3df2bec46a67e42f9976d7fd2bf
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3
commit r15-573-gf6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718
commit r15-574-gb8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
--- Comment #4 from Sebastien Bardeau ---
Thanks for the hints. It seems to me that an intent(out) class without
component initialization values is probably out of the standard (unpredictable
results). So on my side the work-around I choose is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
Andrew Carlotti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acarlotti at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc bootstrap was
already broken.
The problem in this PR can be trigge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114231
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.3.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115105
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
> Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
So the var_decl in question is fpstate.0:
unit-size
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x1035003f0 precision:8 min max
pointe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80182
--- Comment #8 from Peter Damianov ---
This might arguably actually be a BFD linker problem. Both lld and mold don't
have the problem for the example. Gold also has the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-08-11 00:00:00 |2024-5-16
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26)
> > --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> > prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
> > Aarch has no spa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115113
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et:
>
> aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname
> s11-sparc.cfarm
> aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ uname -a
> SunOS s1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115099
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #1 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |i386-pc-solaris2.11,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183
commit r15-576-g52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183
Author: Pan Li
Date: Wed May 15 10:14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183
commit r15-576-g52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183
Author: Pan Li
Date: Wed May 15 10:14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010
commit r15-577-gd4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010
Author: Pan Li
Date: Wed May 15 10:14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010
commit r15-577-gd4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010
Author: Pan Li
Date: Wed May 15 10:14
Four-Week Workshop.With a focus on practical quantum algorithms.Hands-On
Experience with Qiskit and IBM Quantum SystemsOne Month Asynchronous Workshop
delivered on Canvas, featuring more than 200 participants from 80 top
universities and companies.
Featured Events:
IBM's Quantum Computer Pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #18)
[...]
> Regarding the mentioned element-wise costing how should we proceed here?
> I'm going to remove the hunk in question, run SPEC2017 on x86 and post a
> patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0
commit r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0
commit r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 13962, which changed state.
Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize
pointer comparisons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Bug 65686 depends on bug 13962, which changed state.
Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize
pointer comparisons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113164
Bug 113164 depends on bug 13962, which changed state.
Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize
pointer comparisons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61818
Bug 61818 depends on bug 13962, which changed state.
Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize
pointer comparisons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
> > --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> > This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et:
> >
> > aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname
> > s11-sparc.cfarm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #30 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #29)
> > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/home/aldyh/bld/clean'
> > > Comparing stages 2 and 3
> > > Bootstrap comparison failure!
> > > gcc/tree-vect-stmts.o diffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
[...]
> Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here?
>
> srcdir/configure --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.11
>
> srcdir/configure --b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30920
Anton Lorenzen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anton.lorenzen at ed dot ac.uk
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
--- Comment #4 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96d53252aefcbc2fe419c4c3b4bcd3fc03d4d187
commit r15-581-g96d53252aefcbc2fe419c4c3b4bcd3fc03d4d187
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950
--- Comment #7 from Jeevitha ---
In GCC 11, we encountered a different issue that didn't result in an ICE.
The following is the error message in GCC 11:
error: too few arguments to function '__builtin_vsx_splat_2di'
11 | vsll_result = __
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950
Jeevitha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115117
Bug ID: 115117
Summary: std::exp(Inf) result invalid with --disable-c99
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #32 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #31)
> > --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> [...]
> > Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here?
> >
> > srcdir/configure --b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564
--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17)
> Handling pointer-vs-pointer in ptrs_compare_unequal isn't enough since we
> have
>
> # PT = nonlocal null
> unsigned int * x_7(D) = x;
> ...
> # PT = n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950
--- Comment #9 from Shivam Gupta ---
Good explanation 👍
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 7:32 PM, jeevitha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs <
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950
>
> Jeevitha changed:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115091
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115118
Bug ID: 115118
Summary: [15 Regression] 5-13% slowdown of 470.lbm on zen4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115118
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.0|15.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114850
--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Pewterschmidt
---
This issue is no longer reproducible in GCC 14.
Should I mark this as `RESOLVED` ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119
Bug ID: 115119
Summary: Typo in
_Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109227
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremypewterschmidt at gmail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114850
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
No ++this is correct. We want to increment the iterator and not the what the
iterator points too here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875
--- Comment #15 from Sebastien Bardeau ---
I confirm that my duplicate bug report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110157 faces this issue in Fortran
code; to my viewpoint it is not so useless to fix it. Anyway for the time being
I ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115120
Bug ID: 115120
Summary: Bad interaction between ivcanon and early break
vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115121
Bug ID: 115121
Summary: ++this is accepted in uninstantiated template
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115121
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115122
Bug ID: 115122
Summary: Incorrect detection of C99 support when
cross-compiling
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
> >
> > Can you please try the 14-release like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #4)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3)
> > Hi Filip,
> >
> > Do you generate these runs with counters based PGO or compiler
> > instrumentation?
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115123
Bug ID: 115123
Summary: [15 Regression] RISCV vector scan-assembler failures
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo