https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115064
Bug ID: 115064
Summary: Possible problem with money_put
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115065
Bug ID: 115065
Summary: AVR clz is not always fast as can be
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
Bug ID: 115066
Summary: [debug, gsplit-dwarf, gdwarf-4, g3]
DW_MACRO_define_strp used for debug_str_offsets index
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Looking at the source code, I wonder if this would fix it:
...
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
index eedb13bb069..045858bf638 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
@@ -29045,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115031
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6)
>> What's there looks good to me.
>
> Cool, thank you. I cherry picked the chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #58 from Iain Sandoe ---
As far as I can tell, (at least on targets with TLS support) since the
variables __once_callable and __once_call have a single instance per thread,
the current implementation does not support nested once_call(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115059
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't want to change anything in libstdc++ here. Either std::is_convertible
should be sufficient to check "convertible to" constraints, or "convertible to"
should exclude these kind of games.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115063
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Looking at the source code, I wonder if this would fix it:
> ...
> diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
> index eedb13bb069..045858bf638 100644
> --- a
f_iterator();
return {beg, end};
}
int main() {
std::cout << fn() << "\n";
}
https://godbolt.org/z/rGqW5he87
The above code always triggers the following warning when -O2
-Wnull-dereference is used since GCC-12:
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20240513/include/c++/15.0.0/st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113982
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b621482296f6dec0abb22ed39cc4ce6811535d47
commit r15-427-gb621482296f6dec0abb22ed39cc4ce6811535d47
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
Summary|Incorrect opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113982
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115034
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115036
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
former fold_stmt_using_ranges has code to narrow ops.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target|X86_64-mingw32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Summary|valgrind test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-mingw64
Summary|Sile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115059
--- Comment #2 from Jiang An ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> I don't want to change anything in libstdc++ here. Either
> std::is_convertible should be sufficient to check "convertible to"
> constraints, or "convertible to" sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
--- Comment #12 from Thorsten Otto ---
Created attachment 58187
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58187&action=edit
2nd test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
--- Comment #13 from Thorsten Otto ---
Now its getting really strange. I've attached a 2nd test case above. With that,
the bug can be reproduced also with gcc 11.4.0 (but not with gcc-10, gcc-12 or
gcc-13).
It is slightly larger than the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
--- Comment #3 from Richar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> And with -gstrict-dwarf -gdwarf-4?
With:
...
$ gcc.sh -gdwarf-4 -gsplit-dwarf /data/vries/hello.c -g3 -gstrict-dwarf
...
we get:
...
.section.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113578
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Hmm, you could be right. It looks like the printf in Apple libc doesn't print
"-nan" even when not converting from float to double.
According to
https://developer.r-project.org/Blog/content/post/2020-11-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Just make it if (dwarf_split_debug_info) then?
That works as well indeed:
...
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
index eedb13bb069..70b7f5f42cd 100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115067
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105580
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
Bug 86172 depends on bug 115067, which changed state.
Bug 115067 Summary: Bogus -O2 -Wnull-dereference for istreambuf_iterator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115067
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112658
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111266
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109772
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
--- Comment #14 from Thorsten Otto ---
A bisect between 10.0.0 and 11.4.0 for the 2nd testcase gave me this commit:
commit 512c6ba04102295fccc62a173ee0086ca733c920
From: Richard Biener
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:29:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Avo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107231
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107169
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115068
Bug ID: 115068
Summary: RISC-V: Illegal instruction of vfwadd
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114958
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb1649f8b4ad5043dd0e65e4e3a643a0ced018a9
commit r15-429-gfb1649f8b4ad5043dd0e65e4e3a643a0ced018a9
Author: Matthias Kretz
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4af8ebdb0318b5e9ed3dfdea5501a3260f3acea
commit r15-430-gc4af8ebdb0318b5e9ed3dfdea5501a3260f3acea
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Mon Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.5|15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 98529, which changed state.
Bug 98529 Summary: [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54052
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d629308c699bb8fe90c2afeb7fa1acb12cb5526b
commit r13-8763-gd629308c699bb8fe90c2afeb7fa1acb12cb5526b
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852
--- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov ---
FWIW, this project contains a subset of module interface files that
(reportedly) can be used to build a (probably incomplete) `std` module with
`libstdc++` using Clang (the README says it requires `libc++`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60276
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a9b159a86081053289be0c44339623ff59717a2
commit r15-431-g8a9b159a86081053289be0c44339623ff59717a2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115058
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88545
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069
Bug ID: 115069
Summary: 8 bit integer vector performance regression, x86,
between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using avx2 target clones on
skylake platform
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069
--- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58189
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58189&action=edit
gcc-13 disassembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069
--- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58190
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58190&action=edit
gcc-14 disassembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115040
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Then this is partly a dup of bug 88545
Yes, that would manually transform the find_epi8 case into a memchr call, but
Clang doesn't need a manual transform in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b
commit r15-434-g6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114974
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b
commit r15-434-g6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114903
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b
commit r15-434-g6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor ---
The following minimized testcase ICEs with r15-312-g36e877996936ab
cross-compiler to ppc64le with -O2 nicely:
void omp_clause_elt_check(int *, const char *, const char *);
enum { C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_COUNT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #18 from Robin Dapp ---
A bit of a follow-up: I'm working on a patch for reassociation that can handle
the mentioned cases and some more but it will still require a bit of time to
get everything regression free and correct. What it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88545
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> + using _ValT = typename iterator_traits<_InputIterator>::value_type;
> + if constexpr (is_same_v<_ValT, _Tp>)
> + if constexpr (__is_byte<_Va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109071
--- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
with the following added heuristic in array-bound checker:
+ /* If the stmt is duplicated and splitted, the warning level is not 2,
+ and the current block is not dominating the exit block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
Bug ID: 115070
Summary: ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method
with intent(out) statement
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071
Bug ID: 115071
Summary: performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13
using -O3 and _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") on skylake
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071
--- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58192
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58192&action=edit
gcc-13 disassembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071
--- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58193
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58193&action=edit
gcc-14 disassembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115072
Bug ID: 115072
Summary: Memory link with unlimited polymorphic function result
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
I think I've found what's going on: really has
#if !defined(_XPG4_2) || defined(__EXTENSIONS__)
#ifndef NC_TPI_CLTS
#define NC_TPI_CLTS 1 /* must agree with netconfig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114988
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41b3cf262e61aee9d26380f1c820e0eaae740f50
commit r15-435-g41b3cf262e61aee9d26380f1c820e0eaae740f50
Author: Pan Li
Date: Sat May 11 15:25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073
Bug ID: 115073
Summary: RISC-V: Gimple fold not honor
C[LT]Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115013
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e7855e4e817a7f5a1e332cd95e780e57052dba
commit r15-436-g44e7855e4e817a7f5a1e332cd95e780e57052dba
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or another option is to use C23 , that is well defined for all
values.
But you need recent glibc (2.39 snapshots or 2.40) & gcc (14) for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note -fsanitize=undefined does detect this undefinedness at runtime already
too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114974
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed
commit r14-10201-g57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed
commit r14-10201-g57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114903
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed
commit r14-10201-g57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114974
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114903
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112658
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
