[Bug tree-optimization/115009] [15 regression] AVR: ICE in alloc, at value-range-storage.cc:598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac255c7afeb8a558bd6224ff77277eebcd849d6e commit r15-357-gac255c7afeb8a558bd6224ff77277eebcd849d6e Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/115009] [15 regression] AVR: ICE in alloc, at value-range-storage.cc:598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/115024] New: 128 bit division performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024 Bug ID: 115024 Summary: 128 bit division performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform Product: gcc Version: 14.

[Bug target/115024] 128 bit division performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024 --- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58159 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58159&action=edit gcc-13 disassembly gcc-13 disassembly

[Bug target/115024] 128 bit division performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024 --- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58160 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58160&action=edit gcc-14 disassembly gcc-14 disassembly

[Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall` attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5d8fd9ce05611093191d500ebc39f150d0ece2b commit r15-358-ge5d8fd9ce05611093191d500ebc39f150d0ece2b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall` attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Does even the committed version work fine on mingw32?

[Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall` attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968 --- Comment #23 from LIU Hao --- I am afraid I can't do a complete bootstrap any more due to https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31720. LD is segfaulting randomly. I will backport the commit to GCC 14 branch and make a non-bootstrap

[Bug target/115024] 128 bit division performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024 --- Comment #3 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58161 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58161&action=edit perf output for gcc-13 compiled code

[Bug target/115024] 128 bit division performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024 --- Comment #4 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58162 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58162&action=edit perf output for gcc-14 compiled code

[Bug target/114987] [14/15 Regression] floating point vector regression, x86, between gcc 14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and target clones on skylake platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114987 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|[14/15 regressi

[Bug middle-end/114989] Compile time hog when building paml

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114989 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > callgraph functions expansion : 3.16 ( 86%) 0.32 ( 52%) 3.50 ( > > 81%) 111M ( 75%) > > So expand is usually fast. The only slow part I know of

[Bug target/114987] [14/15 Regression] floating point vector regression, x86, between gcc 14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and target clones on skylake platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114987 --- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang --- What I have found is that the binary built with GCC13 and GCC14 will regress on Cascadelake and Skylake. But when I copied the binary to Icelake, it won't. Seems Icelake might fix this with micro-tuning. I

[Bug middle-end/114989] Compile time hog when building paml

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114989 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14.0|13.2.1 --- Comment #5 from Richard Bie

[Bug target/114987] [14/15 Regression] floating point vector regression, x86, between gcc 14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and target clones on skylake platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114987 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao Liu --- > I tried to move "vmovdqa %xmm1,0xd0(%rsp)" before "vmovdqa %xmm0,0xe0(%rsp)" > and rebuilt the binary and it will save half the regression. 57.93 │200: vaddps 0xc0(%rsp),%ymm3,%ymm5

[Bug c++/114994] [14/15 Regression] fmtlib named argument compiler error introduced in g++-14.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/114996] [15 Regression] [RISC-V] 2->2 combination no longer occurring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114996 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Version|14.0

[Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall` attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968 --- Comment #24 from LIU Hao --- GCC 14 branch built successfully on i686-w64-mingw32 with the backported commit. I have also built boost 1.84 successfully. I'm now trying to fix the LD fault..

[Bug target/115025] New: prime computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025 Bug ID: 115025 Summary: prime computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115025] prime computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025 --- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58164 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58164&action=edit gcc-13 disassembly

[Bug target/115025] prime computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025 --- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58165 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58165&action=edit gcc-14 disassembly

[Bug target/115025] prime computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025 --- Comment #3 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58166 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58166&action=edit perf output for gcc-13 compiled code

[Bug target/115025] prime computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025 --- Comment #4 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58167 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58167&action=edit perf output for gcc-14 compiled code

[Bug target/114987] [14/15 Regression] floating point vector regression, x86, between gcc 14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and target clones on skylake platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114987 --- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang --- Furthermore, when I build with GCC11, the codegen is much better: vaddps 0xc0(%rsp),%ymm5,%ymm2 vaddps 0xe0(%rsp),%ymm4,%ymm1 vmovaps %ymm2,0x80(%rsp) vmovdq

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 --- Comment #6 from Martin Doucha --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #5) > No, "Freestanding Environment" has a very specific meaning in the C > standard. If we must add this it'd be a separate -m{something} argument. I would say that "ex

[Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall` attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968 --- Comment #25 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a805de33f7be4f6886906ca5f4da493f3b743c76 commit r14-10193-ga805de33f7be4f6886906ca5f4da493f3b743c76 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall` attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall` attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968 --- Comment #27 from LIU Hao --- Thank you!

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 58168 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58168&action=edit proposed patch in testing

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] New: msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 Bug ID: 115026 Summary: msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/114981] [avr] Improve powi implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114981 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af64af69c3cc85dbe00c520651a54850bf5cadc1 commit r15-360-gaf64af69c3cc85dbe00c520651a54850bf5cadc1 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Date

[Bug target/114981] [avr] Improve powi implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114981 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcdd723779f9ad9af9638e11ffe56786de2d02ce commit r14-10194-gfcdd723779f9ad9af9638e11ffe56786de2d02ce Author: Georg-Johan

[Bug target/114981] [avr] Improve powi implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114981 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- OK, this is embarrassing. We are incorrectly folding a POINTER_PLUS_EXPR range operation: Folding statement: x_7 = 2048B + _2; -Queued stmt for removal. Folds to: 2062B +Queued stmt for removal. Folds

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 58169 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58169&action=edit proposed patch

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Jeff, if you still have your tree around, could you try this patch? I'll queue it with the rest of patches I will push before enabling prange when the IPA issues are sorted out.

[Bug tree-optimization/114998] [14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r14-9767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114998 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Breakpoint 5, release_ssa_name_fn (fn=0x76be4000, var=) at ../../src/gcc-14-branch/gcc/tree-ssanames.cc:619 619 vec_safe_push (FREE_SSANAMES_QUEUE (fn), var); (gdb) p v.m_vecpfx $7 =

[Bug target/115002] [14/15 regression] wide integer vector performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone

[Bug tree-optimization/115004] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization for Dead Code Elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115004 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5 Known to work|

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- I didn't misunderstanding it. I just think it is not a valid request. Especially when it comes to it is only this special kvm kernel. Someone in theory could also use an offset from esp and run into a simi

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 --- Comment #9 from Martin Doucha --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > Someone in theory could also use an offset from esp and run into a similar > failure. Well yes, but that would be an actual stack overflow and the whole point i

[Bug target/113578] Incorrect sign printed for -nan on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113578 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #2) > If a conversion from float to double (for passing in variable arguments) > occurs at runtime on RISC-V, that will produce a positive-signed NaN (that's > wha

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- int f(int *a) { int b; size_t t = (size_t)&b; size_t t1 = (size_t)a; return *(int*)(((size_t)&b)+(t-t1)); } Is kinda of valid c but might fail with your definition.

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 --- Comment #11 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > int f(int *a) > { > int b; > size_t t = (size_t)&b; > size_t t1 = (size_t)a; > return *(int*)(((size_t)&b)+(t-t1)); > } > > Is kinda of valid c but might

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez --- > Created attachment 58168 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58168&action=edit > proposed patch in testing I just tried

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 --- Comment #12 from Martin Doucha --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #7) > I think your report was misunderstood. Anyway, when EBP is not a frame > pointer, I think the chances are low that it is derived from ESP. Would > accurate

[Bug c/115027] New: Missing warning: unused struct's with self-referential initialisers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115027 Bug ID: 115027 Summary: Missing warning: unused struct's with self-referential initialisers Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/115011] [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization: (bool) (f ? 1: t) ==> 1 when bool t = (0 >= f) + x;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115011 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for addressing the data segment through EBP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* --- Comment #13 from Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/115021] [14/15 regression] unnecessary spill for vpternlog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115021 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2 Priority|P3

[Bug c/115023] __builtin_assoc_barrier does not talk about contracting even though it prevents it too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115023 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- It's supposed to behave like parens in the Fortran standard, maybe they have good wording.

[Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- I see it's a common issue on Solaris: instead of the expected Depset:0 decl entity:204 function_decl:'::fprintf' as found on Linux, we have Depset:0 decl entity:26 function_decl:'::std::printf' What's the

[Bug c/115027] Missing warning: unused struct's with self-referential initialisers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115027 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] [15 Regression] msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|msp430-elf fails|[15 Regression] msp430-elf

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka --- So this is problem in ipa_value_range_from_jfunc? It is Maritn's code, I hope he will know why types are wrong here. Once can get type compatibility problem on mismatched declarations and LTO, but it seems th

[Bug target/115028] New: [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028 Bug ID: 115028 Summary: [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 58170 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58170&action=edit trunk assembler input

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 58171 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58171&action=edit gcc-14 assembler input

[Bug middle-end/113982] Poor codegen for 64-bit add with carry widening functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113982 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, since PR95853 we also recognize bool(r > ~0ULL) as the check rather than bool(r >> 64).

[Bug target/115029] New: FFT computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115029 Bug ID: 115029 Summary: FFT computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |i386-pc-solaris2.11, |

[Bug c++/115030] New: Constrained auto variable declaration with partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115030 Bug ID: 115030 Summary: Constrained auto variable declaration with partial specialization Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/115029] FFT computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115029 --- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58174 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58174&action=edit gcc-13 disassembly

[Bug target/115029] FFT computation performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115029 --- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58175 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58175&action=edit gcc-14 disassembly

[Bug c++/115030] Constrained auto variable declaration with partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115030 --- Comment #1 from Seyed Sajad Kahani --- Created attachment 58176 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58176&action=edit report_2.cc, additional invalid code Moreover, by replacing 'c' with A{} that makes it an invalid code (

[Bug c++/115030] Constrained auto variable declaration with partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115030 --- Comment #2 from Seyed Sajad Kahani --- Created attachment 58177 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58177&action=edit a similar code that works, as a clue (clue_1.cc) Additionally, the problem will disappear by enclosing v

[Bug tree-optimization/114998] [14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r14-9767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114998 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34d15a4d630a0d54eddb99bdab086c506e10dac5 commit r15-362-g34d15a4d630a0d54eddb99bdab086c506e10dac5 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/114998] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r14-9767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114998 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 Regression] ICE on |[14 Regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/115031] New: g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115031 Bug ID: 115031 Summary: g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X FAILs Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail Target Milestone|---

[Bug modula2/115032] New: gm2/iso/run/pass/packed.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115032 Bug ID: 115032 Summary: gm2/iso/run/pass/packed.mod FAILs Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: modula2

[Bug modula2/115032] gm2/iso/run/pass/packed.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115032 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- The failure started on 20240205.

[Bug tree-optimization/115033] New: Incorrect optimization of by-reference closure fields by fre1 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033 Bug ID: 115033 Summary: Incorrect optimization of by-reference closure fields by fre1 pass Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/115033] Incorrect optimization of by-reference closure fields by fre1 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-05-10 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug libstdc++/110054] stdx::simd masked store should not use non-temporal store instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110054 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db0c654ae689e92d8ba0421815a820278b777b06 commit r11-11427-gdb0c654ae689e92d8ba0421815a820278b777b06 Author: Matthias Kret

[Bug libstdc++/109822] Converting std::experimental::simd masks yields an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109822 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4190a95cb837c5d221d9c5677f49f3c7d4d5576f commit r11-11428-g4190a95cb837c5d221d9c5677f49f3c7d4d5576f Author: Matthias Kre

[Bug libstdc++/114750] converting load/store of simd fails compilation on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114750 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb2f4a191cc74b6ab2899798db8a59a9b2a3f23f commit r11-11431-gfb2f4a191cc74b6ab2899798db8a59a9b2a3f23f Author: Matthias Kret

[Bug libstdc++/114803] simd conversion to [[gnu::vector_size(N)]] type hits invalid code in experimental/bits/simd_builtin.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114803 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e3663ba96df1315f53b4b488f4c2e63633c7b2f commit r11-11434-g9e3663ba96df1315f53b4b488f4c2e63633c7b2f Author: Matthias Kret

[Bug libstdc++/114803] simd conversion to [[gnu::vector_size(N)]] type hits invalid code in experimental/bits/simd_builtin.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114803 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/114750] converting load/store of simd fails compilation on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114750 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug libstdc++/110054] stdx::simd masked store should not use non-temporal store instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110054 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug libstdc++/109822] Converting std::experimental::simd masks yields an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109822 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- Fixed powerpc test failure on all branches.

[Bug rtl-optimization/115013] [15 Regression] LRA: PR114810 fix result in ICE in the RISC-V Vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115013 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/115034] New: Missed optimization: reduntant store of identical value in the slot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115034 Bug ID: 115034 Summary: Missed optimization: reduntant store of identical value in the slot Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #11) > I have reverted the prange enabling patch until the IPA pass is fixed. Thank you!

[Bug tree-optimization/115033] Incorrect optimization of by-reference closure fields by fre1 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033 --- Comment #2 from Spenser --- Created attachment 58178 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58178&action=edit Pre-processed C++ reproducer

[Bug tree-optimization/115034] Missed optimization: reduntant store of identical value in the slot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115034 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note there is some memory model requirements here that I always forget if this can happen or not.

[Bug tree-optimization/115033] Incorrect optimization of by-reference closure fields by fre1 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/115033] Incorrect optimization of by-reference closure fields by fre1 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033 --- Comment #3 from Spenser --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Please attach the preprocessed source rather than just a snippet of code. Sorry about that. Thought I added it when submitting the report, but I think the file was to

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] [15 Regression] msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbd420a1c3e2bb549dc83b53cc9a31aa6b23952c commit r15-363-gcbd420a1c3e2bb549dc83b53cc9a31aa6b23952c Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/115035] New: Missed optimization: fold min/max in phi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115035 Bug ID: 115035 Summary: Missed optimization: fold min/max in phi Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/115026] [15 Regression] msp430-elf fails gcc.dg/pr66444.c with prange enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115026 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #6 from Aldy Herna

[Bug middle-end/115036] New: division is not shortened based on value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115036 Bug ID: 115036 Summary: division is not shortened based on value range Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: m

[Bug middle-end/115037] New: Unused std::vector is not optimized away.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115037 Bug ID: 115037 Summary: Unused std::vector is not optimized away. Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle

[Bug ipa/106935] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.cc:1505 since r10-5098-g9b14fc3326e08797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106935 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/115034] Missed optimization: reduntant store of identical value in the slot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115034 --- Comment #2 from XChy --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Note there is some memory model requirements here that I always forget if > this can happen or not. Hmm. Could you please provide some documents about the memory model o

[Bug middle-end/115037] Unused std::vector is not optimized away.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115037 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be a dup of another bug which talks about the same thing.

[Bug c++/115038] New: ICE in seh_cfa_offset since 14.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 Bug ID: 115038 Summary: ICE in seh_cfa_offset since 14.1.0 Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

  1   2   >