https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78947
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
--- Comment #17 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
> 1) attach your *.s file and state which exact compiler you used (revision)
Generate code first:
https://slyfox.uni.cx/b/gcc/PR114872/d.tar.gz (4MB, does not fit on bugzilla's
1MB limit)
is the arc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114749
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b1f128d4c25713116c7d9fd37016f7d9a112959
commit r15-216-g4b1f128d4c25713116c7d9fd37016f7d9a112959
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Mon May 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114964
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
--- Comment #18 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
> 2) ideally show a gdb session with the important events, which setjmp was it
> (I see _setjmp and __sigsetjmp calls in the function), which exact function
> called from the function ended up aborti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
Bug ID: 114965
Summary: wrong code generated for Emacs/Gnulib strftime
(regression from 13.2)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108620
Peter Damianov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
--- Comment #19 from Dmitrii Pasechnik ---
Declaring the last argument in the call to GAP_CallFunc3Args() volatile appears
to fix the issue. Namely, apply
diff --git a/src/sage/libs/gap/element.pyx b/src/sage/libs/gap/element.pyx
index f1482997
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58112
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58112&action=edit
Slightly reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58112|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] wrong|[13/14/15 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh I see where the bug is coming from.
reassociation is turning:
_2 = pad_6 == 48;
_3 = pad_6 == 43;
_4 = _2 | _3;
Into:
_11 = (unsigned char) pad_6;
_12 = (int) _11;
_13 = 290271069732864 >> _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduded testcase that fails at -O1 (but passes at -O2):
```
[[gnu::noipa]]
static void g(char pad1) {
if (pad1 != '0' && pad1 != '+' && pad1 != '_')
__builtin_unreachable();
if (pad1 == '0' ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114964
--- Comment #2 from Ken Burtch ---
Thank you. I did my best.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114747
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4c0b0be87b4e08dab0e5e62c6f38a610a7423e7
commit r13-8701-gc4c0b0be87b4e08dab0e5e62c6f38a610a7423e7
Author: Kito Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114747
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114275
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec2365e07537e8b17745d75c28a2b45bf33be119
commit r15-220-gec2365e07537e8b17745d75c28a2b45bf33be119
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114954
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c43c673b0d431ca02d83bf6fae9cd60e9a3d0a8
commit r15-221-g0c43c673b0d431ca02d83bf6fae9cd60e9a3d0a8
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114954, which changed state.
Bug 114954 Summary: [modules] ICE in write_class_def with templated union type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114954
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114954
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189
Daniel Xu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dxu at dxuuu dot xyz
--- Comment #12 from D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
--- Comment #7 from Andrew D'Addesio ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> The warning is now included in GCC 12.
> And this makes this a dup of bug 63272.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63272 ***
Yep, the ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114966
Bug ID: 114966
Summary: fails to optimize avx2 in-register permute written
with std::experimental::simd
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114908
--- Comment #8 from Imple Lee ---
I tried another way to permute the register.
Although GCC does generate simd instructions, the generated code is
sub-optimal.
I opened PR114966 for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114966
--- Comment #1 from Imple Lee ---
This is probably a regression.
GCC 13.2 can generate optimal code.
See https://godbolt.org/z/4n8ovr7jr .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew D'Addesio from comment #7)
>
> This actually has gotten me curious. Would you have an idea/explanation
> behind that 2 function call threshold @Andrew Pinski?
Most likely it is due to ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113831
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14a16787d99831a28b0c9690e80c420d765ba26f
commit r13-8702-g14a16787d99831a28b0c9690e80c420d765ba26f
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114121
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14a16787d99831a28b0c9690e80c420d765ba26f
commit r13-8702-g14a16787d99831a28b0c9690e80c420d765ba26f
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106060
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79649a5dcd81bc05c0ba591068c9075de43bd417
commit r15-222-g79649a5dcd81bc05c0ba591068c9075de43bd417
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112992
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79649a5dcd81bc05c0ba591068c9075de43bd417
commit r15-222-g79649a5dcd81bc05c0ba591068c9075de43bd417
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114921
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0d6dcc019cd32eebf85d625f56e0f7573938319
commit r15-223-gd0d6dcc019cd32eebf85d625f56e0f7573938319
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189
--- Comment #13 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
In bpf-next we are passing -Wno-error for the particular BPF selftests that use
this construct:
progs/btf_dump_test_case_bitfields.c-CFLAGS := -Wno-error
progs/btf_dump_test_case_namespacing.c-CFLAGS :=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114959
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #2)
> The GCC FE has all the necessary logic to compute type compatibility and
> this could easily be adapted to compute equivalence classes and then set a
> TYPE_CAN
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
