[Bug ada/114398] [13/14 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of function returning limited type

2024-03-20 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/113996] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICE with LTO at -O2 on Ada code

2024-03-20 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113996 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/114347] wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int

2024-03-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:415091f09096a0ebba1fdcd4af8c2fda24cfd411 commit r14-9588-g415091f09096a0ebba1fdcd4af8c2fda24cfd411 Author: liuhongt Date: Mon Mar

[Bug target/114402] rs6000: ICE when long double is ieee128 format by default but without vsx

2024-03-20 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114402 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/114402] rs6000: ICE when long double is ieee128 format by default but without vsx

2024-03-20 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114402 --- Comment #1 from Kewen Lin --- Currently the only pattern to match IEEE128 comparison is: ;; IEEE 128-bit comparisons (define_insn "*cmp_hw" [(set (match_operand:CCFP 0 "cc_reg_operand" "=y") (compare:CCFP (match_operand:IEEE128 1

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

2024-03-20 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 --- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > After reading this ancient thread, I don't see anything left to do. Closing. GCC still emits <1>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_base_type) DW_AT_byte_size : 4

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8

2024-03-20 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- I'm narrowing it down in there, currently several headers deep. I'll finish that tomorrow.

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv since r13-7988-g82919cf4cb2321

2024-03-20 Thread liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 --- Comment #17 from Hongtao Liu --- > > > > The to_mpz args look like they could be mixing signs as well: > > I tries below, looks like mixing signs works well. debug show step_expr is -5 and signed. short a = 0xF; short b[16]; unsigned shor

[Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with named address spaces

2024-03-20 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---

<    1   2