[Bug tree-optimization/114154] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||114074 --- Comment #2 from Richard Bie

[Bug analyzer/114159] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in call_info, at analyzer/call-info.cc:143 with -fanalyzer -fanalyzer-call-summaries --param=analyzer-max-svalue-depth=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114159 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.3

[Bug tree-optimization/114161] New: Missing Loop Optimization for Unexecuted Loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114161 Bug ID: 114161 Summary: Missing Loop Optimization for Unexecuted Loop Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tr

[Bug tree-optimization/114162] New: Missing Optimization: Loop is vectorized instead of removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114162 Bug ID: 114162 Summary: Missing Optimization: Loop is vectorized instead of removed Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug ipa/114161] Missing Loop Optimization for Unexecuted Loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114161 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug ipa/114161] Missing Loop Optimization for Unexecuted Loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114161 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |ipa --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/114162] Missing Optimization: Loop is vectorized instead of removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114162 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-29 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/114162] Missing Optimization: Loop is vectorized instead of removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114162 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug c++/114163] New: Calling member function of an incomplete type compiles in gcc and does not compile in clang and msvc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114163 Bug ID: 114163 Summary: Calling member function of an incomplete type compiles in gcc and does not compile in clang and msvc Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/113994] [13/14 Regression] Probable C++ code generation bug with -O2 on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- Looks like wrong liveness information. The problem is that df_analyze_loop only considers basic blocks which strictly belong to a loop which is not enough. During loop2_doloop basic block 9

[Bug target/113994] [13/14 Regression] Probable C++ code generation bug with -O2 on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug analyzer/110483] [14 Regression] Several gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-*.c tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110483 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/114143] Non-thumb arm32 code in thumb multilib for libgcc and in -mthumb build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114143 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- You're going to need --with-multilib=aprofile,rmprofile if you want the full set of multilibs. But beware it builds a *lot* of them. We don't enable this by default because it conflicts with --with-arch

[Bug tree-optimization/114162] Missing Optimization: Loop is vectorized instead of removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114162 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Time for a final-value-replacement meta-bug...

[Bug ipa/114161] Missing Loop Optimization for Unexecuted Loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114161 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/114143] Non-thumb arm32 code in thumb multilib for libgcc and in -mthumb build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114143 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #4) > You're going to need --with-multilib=aprofile,rmprofile if you want the full > set of multilibs. But beware it builds a *lot* of them. Sorry, I mean --wi

[Bug libstdc++/101228] tbb/task.h is Deprecated in newer TBB.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101228 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- Maybe we could do something like this: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/parallel_backend_tbb.h +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/parallel_backend_tbb.h @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ #include "parallel_backend_utils.

[Bug tree-optimization/114164] New: simdclone vectorization creates unsupported IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114164 Bug ID: 114164 Summary: simdclone vectorization creates unsupported IL Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug tree-optimization/114164] simdclone vectorization creates unsupported IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114164 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* CC|

[Bug c++/114165] New: &scalar+1 and array+1 rejected as template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114165 Bug ID: 114165 Summary: &scalar+1 and array+1 rejected as template parameters Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/114166] New: word_mode vectorization still relies on vector lowering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114166 Bug ID: 114166 Summary: word_mode vectorization still relies on vector lowering Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/114166] word_mode vectorization still relies on vector lowering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114166 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- g++.dg/opt/pr82929.C with -m32, that is.

[Bug tree-optimization/114166] word_mode vectorization still relies on vector lowering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114166 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, |

[Bug c++/114163] Calling member function of an incomplete type compiles in gcc and does not compile in clang and msvc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114163 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug target/113994] [13/14 Regression] Probable C++ code generation bug with -O2 on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 57574 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57574&action=edit patch A quick-and-dirty thing would be indeed to simply include all exit blocks like with the attached. I'll

[Bug target/113994] [13/14 Regression] Probable C++ code generation bug with -O2 on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Ick, it's via iv_analysis_loop_init used from doloop and unroll.

[Bug target/113994] [13/14 Regression] Probable C++ code generation bug with -O2 on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) flow_bb_inside_loop_p( has missing space before (. Anyway, getting rid of its use would likely not be backportable...

[Bug c++/114163] Calling member function of an incomplete type compiles in gcc and does not compile in clang and msvc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114163 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #2 from Jian

[Bug c++/114163] Calling member function of an incomplete type compiles in gcc and does not compile in clang and msvc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114163 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- https://wg21.link/CWG1836 https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.ref#4

[Bug c++/114167] New: Capturing a auto..., then unpacking it in a lambda taking Ts..., confuses GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114167 Bug ID: 114167 Summary: Capturing a auto..., then unpacking it in a lambda taking Ts..., confuses GCC Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/113994] [13/14 Regression] Probable C++ code generation bug with -O2 on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > Ick, it's via iv_analysis_loop_init used from doloop and unroll. In that context I'll note that if it is doloop itself that does the DF live query then it's

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 --- Comment #7 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 57575 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57575&action=edit Proposed fix Here is a proposed fix - it adds a new testlong4.mod test inside the extensions/cpp directory and

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- Looks good: I've just tested both testcases on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (both 32 and 64-bit). Everything PASSes just fine. Thanks.

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b9bde5903d80ad8a30f5e7ecb6fc4208290 commit r14-9236-g4b9bde5903d80ad8a30f5e7ecb6fc4208290 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Thu

[Bug target/114116] [14 Regression] Broken backtraces in bootstrapped x86_64 gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114116 Lukas Grätz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lukas.graetz@tu-darmstadt.d

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Version|12.0

[Bug middle-end/92830] -fdiagnostics-url shows the wrong URL for warnings which are not in 'gcc' but e.g. in 'gfortran'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92830 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #5) > The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa29cf0c3f19b648e30b16fd2485c3c17a528a6e > > commit r10-7994-gfa29cf0c3f19b648e30b

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #10 from Gaius Mulley --- > I'm optimistically changing the version of the bug from 12 to 14 and closing > it. Right, that was my intent ;-) > Feel free to re-open if t

[Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 --- Comment #19 from Alexander Westbrooks --- I have pushed an approved patch to the trunk.

[Bug target/114116] [14 Regression] Broken backtraces in bootstrapped x86_64 gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114116 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Lukas Grätz from comment #7) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > > Yeah. Not to mention, one can call backtrace even if -g0; you just don't > >

[Bug target/114116] [14 Regression] Broken backtraces in bootstrapped x86_64 gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114116 --- Comment #9 from Lukas Grätz --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > (In reply to Lukas Grätz from comment #7) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > > > Yeah. Not to mention, one

[Bug target/114116] [14 Regression] Broken backtraces in bootstrapped x86_64 gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114116 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Lukas Grätz from comment #9) > > Not on my computer. When I used -g I got: > > > no_return_to_caller: > .LFB0: > .loc 1 16 1 view -0 > .cfi_startproc > .loc 1 17 3 view .LVU1 >

[Bug target/114116] [14 Regression] Broken backtraces in bootstrapped x86_64 gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114116 --- Comment #11 from Lukas Grätz --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > (In reply to Lukas Grätz from comment #9) > > > > > Not on my computer. When I used -g I got: > > > > > > no_return_to_caller: > > .LFB0: > > .loc 1 16 1 view

[Bug tree-optimization/111407] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption due to widening_mul opt on conflict across an abnormal edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111407 --- Comment #13 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12) > (In reply to qinzhao from comment #10) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > > the fix has been in GCC14, shall we backport the patch t

[Bug target/114116] [14 Regression] Broken backtraces in bootstrapped x86_64 gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114116 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Lukas Grätz from comment #11) > > I applied it, double checked, make distclean, configure, make again. > > But your result seems different. Have you applied Jakub Jelinek's patch to No. > save %r

[Bug middle-end/111632] gcc fails to bootstrap when using libc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632 --- Comment #10 from Dimitry Andric --- Note there are other issues with poisoned identifiers, so I'll ask again: is a non-bootstrapped build even supposed to work, and officially supported, or not? Or more qualified, is a non-bootstrapped buil

[Bug target/114168] New: [RISC-V] Compiler generates impossible addend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114168 Bug ID: 114168 Summary: [RISC-V] Compiler generates impossible addend Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/102435] gcc 9: aarch64 -ftree-loop-vectorize results in wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102435 --- Comment #3 from Dimitry Andric --- Note, in the mean time Ubuntu updated their default gcc version for Ubuntu 20.04 to 9.4.0: https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal-updates/devel/gcc-9 so this issue won't be encountered there anymore. Thanks.

[Bug rtl-optimization/114169] New: miss optimization of repeat load&store in place

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114169 Bug ID: 114169 Summary: miss optimization of repeat load&store in place Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/114170] New: [modules] error streaming in header unit with instantiated variable template with non-trivial initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114170 Bug ID: 114170 Summary: [modules] error streaming in header unit with instantiated variable template with non-trivial initializer Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug d/114171] New: [13/14 Regression] gdc -O2 -mavx generates misaligned vmovdqa instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114171 Bug ID: 114171 Summary: [13/14 Regression] gdc -O2 -mavx generates misaligned vmovdqa instruction Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/110242] ICE on valid (decltype with lambda)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110242 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/114172] New: ICE with riscv rvv VSETVL intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114172 Bug ID: 114172 Summary: ICE with riscv rvv VSETVL intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/110242] ICE on valid (decltype with lambda)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110242 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 110107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/110107] ICE on invalid code with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110107 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/107430] [meta-bug] lambda in decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430 Bug 107430 depends on bug 110107, which changed state. Bug 110107 Summary: ICE on invalid code with lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110107 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libcc1/113977] debug info for alignment of structure is unspecified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113977 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc0e18a960f9dff3e740f4d0cb5b25b3f68d920a commit r14-9239-gbc0e18a960f9dff3e740f4d0cb5b25b3f68d920a Author: Tom Tromey Date: Mon Fe

[Bug analyzer/110483] [14 Regression] Several gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-*.c tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110483 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Thanks; let's keep using this PR for the stuff in comment #5. I've been looking at these on gcc211 in the compile farm: * I see out-of-bounds-diagram-11.c failing as you describe (the overflow in test6 is

[Bug c++/107457] ICE when template lambda alias used as default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107457 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/111898] [12/13/14 Regression][SH] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when building PostgreSQL 16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111898 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Looks like that the issue no longer shows and postgresql-16 builds fine [1]. So, we can probably close this. > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgresql-16&arch=sh4&ver=1

[Bug analyzer/114159] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in call_info, at analyzer/call-info.cc:143 with -fanalyzer -fanalyzer-call-summaries --param=analyzer-max-svalue-depth=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114159 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/114173] New: miss optimization of redundant load operation, may confused by type conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114173 Bug ID: 114173 Summary: miss optimization of redundant load operation, may confused by type conversion Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug libcc1/113977] debug info for alignment of structure is unspecified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113977 --- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey --- This is fixed on trunk now. I think that means it'll be in GCC 14... ? Which maybe I shouldn't have done according to the current status. Anyway, I'm not sure any more how gcc manages bugs, so I don't know if

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: provide a TSAN instrumented libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug c++/98520] nodiscard not diagnosed in comma operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98520 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/85973] [[nodiscard]] on class shall emit a warning for unused anonymous variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85973 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tiagomacarios at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/114153] std::less<> prefers operator const void*() over operator<=>() in C++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114153 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 57577 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57577&action=edit Check for <=> Something like this (but it's also needed for std::greater and std::less_equal)

[Bug c++/113987] [12/13/14 Regression] Binding a reference to an uninitialized data member should not cause -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113987 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b83f3cd3ff765fb82344b848b8a128763b7a4233 commit r14-9240-gb83f3cd3ff765fb82344b848b8a128763b7a4233 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/114164] simdclone vectorization creates unsupported IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114164 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I'm not sure who's responsible to reject this, whether the vectorizer can > expect there's a way to create the mask arguments when the simdclone is > marked usa

[Bug lto/114174] New: [aarch64] Offloading to nvptx-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114174 Bug ID: 114174 Summary: [aarch64] Offloading to nvptx-none Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug libstdc++/114103] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/lock_free_aliases.cc -std=gnu++20 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114103 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- This additional change should fix that: --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc @@ -643,6 +643,7 @@ namespace std::chrono void unlock() { infos_mutex.unlock(); }

[Bug target/114175] New: [14] RISC-V: Execution tests on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 Bug ID: 114175 Summary: [14] RISC-V: Execution tests on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug target/114132] [avr] Code sets up a frame pointer without need

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114132 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f43ad6a60adb8dd4af9a3c78dfe78597e891c9e commit r14-9241-g2f43ad6a60adb8dd4af9a3c78dfe78597e891c9e Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug libgomp/66553] openmp tasks produce libgomp warnings with fsanitize=thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66553 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/114132] [avr] Code sets up a frame pointer without need

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114132 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/113960] [11/12/13/14 Regression] std::map with std::vector as input overwrites itself with c++20, on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113960 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5cdda8acb06c20335855ed353ab9a441c12128a commit r14-9242-gf5cdda8acb06c20335855ed353ab9a441c12128a Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug lto/114174] [aarch64] Offloading to nvptx-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/114175] [14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/96265] building nvptx-none on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pgodbole at nvidia dot com --- Comment #

[Bug lto/114174] [aarch64] Offloading to nvptx-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114174 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Prachi Godbole from comment #0) > In the meanwhile are there any workarounds? e.g. if for a particular march, > if poly_int can be expressed using 1 coefficient or -msve-vector-bits=128 is > set

[Bug rtl-optimization/38534] gcc 4.2.1 and above: No need to save called-saved registers in 'noreturn' function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38534 --- Comment #44 from Lukas Grätz --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #39) > (In reply to Lukas Grätz from comment #36) > > > > #2 0x004011d2 in baz (a=a@entry=42, b=b@entry=43, c=c@entry=44, > > > d=, > > > e=, f= > > reading

[Bug c++/99426] [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nathan at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104919] [modules] enum in constexpr function causes "failed to read compiled module cluster 1: Bad file data"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104919 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Tar

[Bug c++/106009] [modules] internal compiler error: in import_entity_index with templated local enum in header unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106009 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/113987] [12/13 Regression] Binding a reference to an uninitialized data member should not cause -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113987 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12/13 Regression] Binding

[Bug tree-optimization/114151] [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since g:a0b1798042d033fd2cc2c806afbb77875dd2909b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > > What was definitely missing is consideration of POLY_INT_CSTs (and > variable polys, as I think there's no range info for those). > Ranger doesn't do a

[Bug libstdc++/77776] C++17 std::hypot implementation is poor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 g.peterh...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g.peterh...@t-online.de --- Com

[Bug fortran/114141] ASSOCIATE and complex part ref when associate target is a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/114175] [14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #2 from Edwin Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Does the > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/646882.html > patch fix that? > The test was committed ahead exactly to find out what targets have

[Bug middle-end/114156] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5335 with -O -m32 and _BitInt(128) __builtin_memmove()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114156 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/114175] [14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #2) > Applied the patch on top of r14-9243-g02ca9d3f0c5. Looks like the problem is > still there. > - else if (TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P (funtype)) > + else if (TYPE_NO

[Bug target/114175] [14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #4 from Edwin Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > (In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #2) > > Applied the patch on top of r14-9243-g02ca9d3f0c5. Looks like the problem is > > still there. > > - else if (TYPE_NO_NAMED

[Bug target/114175] [14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jakub at redhat dot com| --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelin

[Bug target/114175] [14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- The testcase btw performs double arithmetics and casts result to int, but it is all whole numbers, (double) 1 + 2.0 + (double) 3 + 4.0, so it would really surprise me if it didn't yield the expected 10 unles

[Bug middle-end/111523] Unexpected performance regression with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero for e.g. systemctl unmask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111523 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 Alexander Westbrooks changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] [PDT] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 82943, which changed state. Bug 82943 Summary: [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/114100] [avr] Inefficient indirect addressing on Reduced Tiny

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114100 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cda3836161834c5f21f264885891fe4d0ce90da1 commit r14-9244-gcda3836161834c5f21f264885891fe4d0ce90da1 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] [PDT] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 86148, which changed state. Bug 86148 Summary: parameterized type compile time error https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86148 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/86148] parameterized type compile time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86148 Alexander Westbrooks changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Assignee|pault

  1   2   >