[Bug middle-end/94988] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]

2024-02-15 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/94988] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]

2024-02-15 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva --- Reasoning that the concurrent stores invoke undefined behavior would enable us to assume that the stores don't alias, which invalidates the reasoning in comment 1. Alas, I don't think gimple preserves eno

[Bug c++/49974] missing -Wreturn-local-addr for indirectly returning reference to local/temporary

2024-02-15 Thread barry.revzin at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 Barry Revzin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/49974] missing -Wreturn-local-addr for indirectly returning reference to local/temporary

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 --- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #19) > Another example of this: > > int get(); > > int const& f() { > int const r = get(); > return r; > } > > int const& g() { > int const& r = get(); >

[Bug middle-end/111156] [14 Regression] aarch64 aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c failures

2024-02-15 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 --- Comment #21 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18) > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc > index 7cf9504398c..8deeecfd4aa 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc >

[Bug target/113932] New: [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932 Bug ID: 113932 Summary: [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/113933] New: Switch pa to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933 Bug ID: 113933 Summary: Switch pa to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unas

[Bug target/113934] New: Switch avr to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934 Bug ID: 113934 Summary: Switch avr to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: una

[Bug target/113935] New: Switch bfin to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113935 Bug ID: 113935 Summary: Switch bfin to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug target/113936] New: Switch c6x to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113936 Bug ID: 113936 Summary: Switch c6x to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: una

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

2024-02-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d5d1c75f5c68b6064640c3154ae5f4c0b464905 commit r14-9017-g0d5d1c75f5c68b6064640c3154ae5f4c0b464905 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug target/113937] New: Switch fr30 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113937 Bug ID: 113937 Summary: Switch fr30 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug target/113938] New: Switch frv to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113938 Bug ID: 113938 Summary: Switch frv to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: una

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

2024-02-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2354ccb493ddca6d2e1af9cc76ad45367932f1e2 commit r13-8330-g2354ccb493ddca6d2e1af9cc76ad45367932f1e2 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

2024-02-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c81fed21c355565182e00bed58375e2f3dcf01c commit r12-10160-g7c81fed21c355565182e00bed58375e2f3dcf01c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

2024-02-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da93a3d0976ad42aa6b4f5742119f3189ea21400 commit r11-11241-gda93a3d0976ad42aa6b4f5742119f3189ea21400 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113939] New: Switch m68k to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939 Bug ID: 113939 Summary: Switch m68k to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug target/113940] New: Switch mcore to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113940 Bug ID: 113940 Summary: Switch mcore to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: u

[Bug target/113941] New: Switch mn10300 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113941 Bug ID: 113941 Summary: Switch mn10300 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113942] New: Switch msp430 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113942 Bug ID: 113942 Summary: Switch msp430 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113943] New: Switch m32c to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113943 Bug ID: 113943 Summary: Switch m32c to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug target/113944] New: Switch rl78 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113944 Bug ID: 113944 Summary: Switch rl78 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug target/113945] New: Switch visium to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113945 Bug ID: 113945 Summary: Switch visium to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113932] [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- ft32: Target Var(ft32_lra_flag) Init(0) Save pdp11, rx and vax has a TARGET_MASK which are not turned on by default either.

[Bug target/113946] New: Switch ft32 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946 Bug ID: 113946 Summary: Switch ft32 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug target/113947] New: Switch pdp11 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113947 Bug ID: 113947 Summary: Switch pdp11 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: u

[Bug target/113948] New: Switch rx to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113948 Bug ID: 113948 Summary: Switch rx to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unas

[Bug target/113949] New: Switch vax to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113949 Bug ID: 113949 Summary: Switch vax to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: una

[Bug target/113946] Switch ft32 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- ft32 has a maintainer (James Bowman) but I can't find a BZ account for him to CC.

[Bug target/113946] Switch ft32 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/113930] [modules] checking ICE in register_duplicate when using partitioned modules

2024-02-15 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113930 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103524 Summary|[modules] ICE

[Bug analyzer/109131] [13/14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positive seen in git's builtin/show-ref.c

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109131 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/110928] [14 Regression] ICE with -fanalyzer on -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds checker

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110928 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug analyzer/112975] [14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-tainted-allocation-size false positive seen in Linux kernel's drivers/xen/privcmd.c

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112975 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/112974] [14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index false positive seen on Linux kernel drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112974 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/109577] [13 Regression] -Wanalyzer-allocation-size mishandles __builtin_mul_overflow

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109577 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/110014] [13 Regression] -Wanalyzer-allocation-size mishandles realloc (..., .... * sizeof (object))

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110014 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/111229] -fanalyzer confused about conditional operator branch name

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111229 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this. Probably a duplicate of PR 100116.

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2024-02-15 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 99336, which changed state. Bug 99336 Summary: [modules] ICE combining unordered_map, memory, module partitions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99336 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/99336] [modules] ICE combining unordered_map, memory, module partitions

2024-02-15 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99336 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Miles

[Bug target/113947] Switch pdp11 to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113947 pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/107191] [modules] ICE when importing module partition (internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9061)

2024-02-15 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107191 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2024-02-15 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 107191, which changed state. Bug 107191 Summary: [modules] ICE when importing module partition (internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9061) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107191

[Bug target/113778] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx code_label) in PATTERN, at rtl.h:1506 with -march=armv9-a+sme -fhardened

2024-02-15 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113778 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113949] Switch vax to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread macro at orcam dot me.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113949 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |macro at orcam dot me.uk

[Bug target/113933] Switch pa to LRA

2024-02-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933 --- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2024-02-15 2:01 p.m., sjames at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > People are getting eager to require LRA. Please port the PA target to LRA (see > PR113932). Having tried this once, I know it's non tr

[Bug analyzer/111266] [13/14 Regression] Missing -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds for concrete offset overwrite.

2024-02-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111266 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:617bd59c659dcf6e5391409a2e9f64f75e905a96 commit r14-9018-g617bd59c659dcf6e5391409a2e9f64f75e905a96 Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug middle-end/111156] [14 Regression] aarch64 aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c failures

2024-02-15 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > Am 15.02.2024 um 19:53 schrieb tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 > > --- Comment #21 from Tamar Christina --- > (In reply to Richard B

[Bug analyzer/111266] [13 Regression] Missing -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds for concrete offset overwrite.

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111266 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] Missing |[13 Regression] Missing

[Bug analyzer/111289] [13/14 Regression] Unwarranted -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch warning

2024-02-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unwarranted |[13/14 Regression] |-

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

2024-02-15 Thread bouanto at zoho dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #4 from Antoni --- I might be able to soon create a reproducer, but for now, I can say it might be related to __attribute__ ((always_inline)).

[Bug tree-optimization/112508] [14 Regression] Size regression when using -Os starting with r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e

2024-02-15 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112508 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113950] New: PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

2024-02-15 Thread carll at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 Bug ID: 113950 Summary: PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/113950] PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

2024-02-15 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2024-02-15 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 110894, which changed state. Bug 110894 Summary: [modules] Program terminates with signal SIGSEGV https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110894 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/110894] [modules] Program terminates with signal SIGSEGV

2024-02-15 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110894 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/109953] [c++modules] segmentation fault with import "functional" during program execution

2024-02-15 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109953 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org Res

[Bug c++/110894] [modules] Program terminates with signal SIGSEGV

2024-02-15 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110894 Bug 110894 depends on bug 109953, which changed state. Bug 109953 Summary: [c++modules] segmentation fault with import "functional" during program execution https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109953 What|Removed

[Bug target/113951] New: regression redundant load

2024-02-15 Thread absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113951 Bug ID: 113951 Summary: regression redundant load Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Ass

[Bug target/113780] [ARM] Incorrect indirect tailcall generated for PAC-enabled function.

2024-02-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tejas Belagod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f436a2ab6ad15968275c9bbf3bd56647e5559e68 commit r14-9022-gf436a2ab6ad15968275c9bbf3bd56647e5559e68 Author: Tejas Belagod Date: T

[Bug target/113780] [ARM] Incorrect indirect tailcall generated for PAC-enabled function.

2024-02-15 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780 Tejas Belagod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/50774] Internal Compiler Error when march=bdver1

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50774 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/113952] New: Finish LRA transition for sparc by removing -mlra

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113952 Bug ID: 113952 Summary: Finish LRA transition for sparc by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/113953] New: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953 Bug ID: 113953 Summary: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/113954] New: Finish LRA transition for arc by removing -mlra

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113954 Bug ID: 113954 Summary: Finish LRA transition for arc by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/113955] New: Finish LRA transition for mips by removing -mlra

2024-02-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113955 Bug ID: 113955 Summary: Finish LRA transition for mips by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/12010] g++.exp and libstdc++.exp fail to find testsuite_flags when cross-compiling

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12010 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/33780] different results between O3 and O0

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33780 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- I can only reproduce this these days on 32bit x86 when x87 is in use ...

[Bug target/45335] Use ldrd to load two consecutive words

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45335 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.0, 7.3.0 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/48504] Add Variable Length Array (VLA) support for -fstack-protector(-all)

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48504 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail, xfail Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/106615] redundant load and store introduced in if-true-branch

2024-02-15 Thread absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106615 --- Comment #2 from absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Reduced testcase: > int g_44; > > void func_16(int *a, unsigned long int b) { > *a = 5; > if ((g_44 = 1) <= b) > ; >

[Bug middle-end/53103] bug locating unsigned type for non-standard precision

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53103 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/36109] GET_MODE_SIZE is inefficient for constants

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/63672] xbegin/xend/xabort missing memory barriers

2024-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63672 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-16 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/109349] riscv: Add --print-supported-extensions

2024-02-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109349 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7af0f1e107a480fbfe882cb985603960114aefb5 commit r14-9023-g7af0f1e107a480fbfe882cb985603960114aefb5 Author: Kito Cheng Date: Fri Jan

[Bug middle-end/94988] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]

2024-02-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #9) > ISTM that the test invokes undefined behavior because the assignment and the > increment in the loop both modify the same storage without an intervening > seq

<    1   2