https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113462
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5015015ae6b29b3f1734c7693ba25b88cdd531a1
commit r14-8349-g5015015ae6b29b3f1734c7693ba25b88cdd531a1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
Bug ID: 113553
Summary: rust fails to build on spar64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #12 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #9)
> > There is a weird costing going on in the PHI nodes though:
> >
> > m_108 = PHI 1 times vector_stmt costs 0 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
>
> --- Comment #12 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113554
Bug ID: 113554
Summary: [14 Regression] m2 fails to build on
x86_64-linux-gnux32
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #14 from JuzheZhong ---
I just tried again both GCC-13.2 and GCC-14 with -fno-vect-cost-model.
https://godbolt.org/z/enEG3qf5K
GCC-14 requires scalar epilogue loop, whereas GCC-13.2 doesn't.
I believe it's not cost model issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-01-13 00:00:00 |2024-1-23
--- Comment #12 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
--- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina ---
Yes I had to rerun my baseline after updating trunk. Will post patch once peak
finishes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, I'd rather go the opposite and make the testcase at hand always invalid
and diagnosed which means diagnose taking the address of always-inline declared
functions and never emit an out-of-line body for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
--- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina ---
Yes I had to rerun my baseline after updating trunk. Will post patch once peak
finishes
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Today's gcc trunk says:
$ ~/gcc/results.20240123.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -O3 -w bug1000.c
$ ~/gcc/results.20240123.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -O3 -w -march=znver3 bug1000.c
bug1000.c: In fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> Btw, I'd rather go the opposite and make the testcase at hand always invalid
> and diagnosed which means diagnose taking the address of always-inline
> declar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hum, the vectorizer looks at the simd specs and if it says 1-lane variants
> (simdlen == 1) are available it will happily create them.
>
My understanding is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |c++
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113540
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Thanks for the explanations, but why in the following case
void foo (void)
{
volatile char t[4];
for (int i = 0; i <= 4; i++)
t[i] = 0;
return;
}
does one get the warning (contrary to the use o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to nsz from comment #2)
> is this fortran only?
>
No it should be C as well, I was just reducing from a Fortran workload that
failed so I can see what the vectorizer was doing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113556
Bug ID: 113556
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-16c.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113556
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113524
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa*-*-linux* |hppa*-*-linux*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113524
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113557
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 57192
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57192&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-multi-peel-gaps.c.179t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113557
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113557
Bug ID: 113557
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-multi-peel-gaps.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112820
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:affef534b0335592336c82918f15242576e2ab8f
commit r14-8350-gaffef534b0335592336c82918f15242576e2ab8f
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:affef534b0335592336c82918f15242576e2ab8f
commit r14-8350-gaffef534b0335592336c82918f15242576e2ab8f
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113558
Bug ID: 113558
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-4c-big-array.c
etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113558
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 57193
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57193&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-outer-4c-big-array.c.179t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113558
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107058
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2f3057fc911f9f55986b3de237b0155c0e09fe8
commit r14-8351-ge2f3057fc911f9f55986b3de237b0155c0e09fe8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #7 from Richa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113559
Bug ID: 113559
Summary: gm2/isolib/run/pass/seqappend.mod FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113555
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Second test case:
char LZ4_decompress_generic_source;
void LZ4_decompress_generic_endOnInput() {
char *ip = &LZ4_decompress_generic_source;
while (1) {
long length;
if (length) {
unsigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113559
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.2.1, 4.3.4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
>
> --- Comment #14 from JuzheZhong ---
> I just tried again both GCC-13.2 and GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
>
> --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13)
> > > You could check if we call this with sane values.
> >
> > Do you mean it's RISC-V backend cost model issue ?
>
> I responded to Tamar which means a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113511
--- Comment #2 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com ---
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> There's also the question on compatibility to libgm2 from GCC 13.
indeed - I guess the -mabi could be retained for backward compatibility.
> I suppose t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
OK, maybe the costing is simply not taking into account that we chose the
simdlen == 1 variant which _does_ exist! It's the chosen one:
4052bestn = cgraph_node::get (simd_clone_info[0]);
(gdb) p b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113114
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20e18106fac2d11ee43683291ff11d76da41d50b
commit r14-8353-g20e18106fac2d11ee43683291ff11d76da41d50b
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
index 09749ae3817..1ddbe7a2f6b 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
@@ -4071,7 +4071,7 @@ vectorizable_simd_clone_cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113114
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:659a5a908edd84894c2aa7f6f89468217d6894ca
commit r14-8354-g659a5a908edd84894c2aa7f6f89468217d6894ca
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110603
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
I'll fix the exact_log2 issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113418
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
For pr104992.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643697.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104992
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-28 06:14:46 |2024-1-23
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-28 06:14:12 |2024-1-23
--- Comment #14 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #17 from Tamar Christina ---
Ok, bisected to
g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7 is the first bad commit
commit 2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7
Author: Hao Liu
Date: Wed Dec 6 14:52:19 2023 +0800
tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #17)
> Ok, bisected to
>
> g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7 is the first bad commit
> commit 2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7
> Author: Hao Liu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #17)
> > Ok, bisected to
> >
> > g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7 is the first bad commit
> > commit 2ef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #17)
> > > Ok, bisected to
> > >
> > > g:2efe3a7de01076183972640
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
On aarch64 I can see already GCC 13.2 looking very much different from 12.3,
but I can't decipher the code to decide whether 12.3 vectorizes the loop or
not.
trunk looks similar to 13.2 here, so the bisect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #22 from Tamar Christina ---
for me with `-fno-vect-cost-model` on without this commit we generate
https://gist.github.com/Mistuke/d9252bfcb2aa766327c5f377e162f5b7 for the loop
and with the commit well.. it doesn't fit on the screen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5d43dc399bb0f15084827c59a025189c630afdd
commit r14-8357-gd5d43dc399bb0f15084827c59a025189c630afdd
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #23 from Tamar Christina ---
tamar:~/gcc-dsg/test$ extract-toolchain gcc 2efe3a7de01
A 1514 files
D 0 files
M 0 files
Extracted 'origin/manygcc-basepoints-gcc-14-6292-g2f512f6fcdd:2efe3a7de01'
> ./bin/gcc -S -o ../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #24 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #17)
> > > Ok, bisected to
> > >
> > > g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0374b028a665a2ea8d6eb2b4e5862774e9e85c2
commit r14-8358-ge0374b028a665a2ea8d6eb2b4e5862774e9e85c2
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef86659da9de59896fb0128eef418224299267e9
commit r14-8361-gef86659da9de59896fb0128eef418224299267e9
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fce3994d04fc5d7d1c91f6db5a1f144aa291439a
commit r14-8359-gfce3994d04fc5d7d1c91f6db5a1f144aa291439a
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd613df59060fb54c4e3f66f39cf59bc44d118a
commit r14-8360-g6dd613df59060fb54c4e3f66f39cf59bc44d118a
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #25 from Tamar Christina ---
> > void record_nonwrapping_chrec (tree chrec)
> > {
> > - CHREC_NOWRAP(chrec) = 1;
> > + CHREC_NOWRAP(chrec) = 0;
> >
> >if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_SCEV))
> > {
>
> Hmmm. With exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113560
Bug ID: 113560
Summary: Strange code generated when optimizing a
multiplication on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113554
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113438
--- Comment #4 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 57194
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57194&action=edit
preliminary patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113554
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bdf138a0d0141065fa9a8efa2ff86f211888a59
commit r14-8362-g2bdf138a0d0141065fa9a8efa2ff86f211888a59
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jan 23 05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113554
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
--- Comment #15 from Tamar Christina ---
Ok, the fix fixes the ICE but after rebasing to trunk I get a misscompile
during bootstrap which miscompiles the x86 backend.
This is likely related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113539
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100789
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3936c8709c25c8bc72be0c1b2cc3ae7a25dc90ec
commit r14-8363-g3936c8709c25c8bc72be0c1b2cc3ae7a25dc90ec
Author: H.J. Lu <(no_default)>
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113544
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113555
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
For the first source code, the bug seems to exist sometime between 20231119
and 20231227.
Git hashes are g:eaeaad3fcac4d7a3 and g:f19ceb2d49afdfa5
Please ignore the second source code - it is a separate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113558
--- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp ---
Created attachment 57195
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57195&action=edit
Tentative patch
Ah, it looks like nothing is being vectorized at all and the second check just
happened to match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113561
Bug ID: 113561
Summary: yet more verify_ssa fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113560
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113561
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10499
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.2.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10499
Bug 10499 depends on bug 12385, which changed state.
Bug 12385 Summary: Full debug info not emitted for C++ classes with external
virtual functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12385
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19954
Bug 19954 depends on bug 12385, which changed state.
Bug 12385 Summary: Full debug info not emitted for C++ classes with external
virtual functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12385
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14022
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-20 18:28:59 |2024-1-23
--- Comment #4 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
--- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina ---
Ok, I've submitted the patch since the ICE and miscompare are unrelated.
I'll keep this ticket open in any case. The miscompares didn't happen based on
commits from ~2 weeks ago, So this will give me a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562
Bug ID: 113562
Summary: [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
it was educational ;)
fwiw, no more miscompilations found yet with this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113294
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113356
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:639ae543449a8d6525303458497bd4b897660ec3
commit r14-8367-g639ae543449a8d6525303458497bd4b897660ec3
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Mon J
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
