https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104594
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113377
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Note that adding a scalar call in function one:
>
> r(1) = two (i(1), j)
>
> generates sane code:
>
> *((integer(kind=4) *) __result.0 + (sizetype) ((offset.1 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95564
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87724
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108822
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:502a3c03e40e8920afb734c077b045f6c5efd087
commit r14-8292-g502a3c03e40e8920afb734c077b045f6c5efd087
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113498
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1338ad23ff3c1e4f552cdb64e36cef12eda2e050
commit r14-8294-g1338ad23ff3c1e4f552cdb64e36cef12eda2e050
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113498
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113377
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
>
> Note that the following scalar example also fails:
>
"Fortunately", it is invalid. :-)
>From 15.5.2.12 (Argument presence and restrictions on arguments not present
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111357
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 111357, which changed state.
Bug 111357 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] __integer_pack fails to work with
values of dependent type convertible to integers in noexcept context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|14.0
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113508
Bug ID: 113508
Summary: widen_ssumm3 documentation needs to mention which mode
is m here
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109929
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Hmm, it seems no longer happening with current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113471
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94b2e6cb1cc4feb122bf77f19a657c97bffa9b42
commit r14-8295-g94b2e6cb1cc4feb122bf77f19a657c97bffa9b42
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.1 20240119 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113508
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The current documentation reads:
```
Operands 0 and 2 are of the same mode, which is wider than the mode of operand
1. Add operand 1 to operand 2 and place the widened result in operand 0. (This
is used expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113377
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> >
> > Note that the following scalar example also fails:
> >
> "Fortunately", it is invalid. :-)
>
> From 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113377
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 57166
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57166&action=edit
Testcase exercising passing of integer optional dummy arguments
This testcase passes with NAG and i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113500
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I am testing a patch that allows writing floating-point utc_time, gps_time etc.
with any format string, and allows writing floating-point sys_time with a
non-empty spec.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113458
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a patch which implements V4QI for many operations (extends and
widden_sum) (though I need to fix the cost model).
I am able to get:
```
sshll v30.4h, v30.8b, #0
smull v31.4s, v31.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113471
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510
Bug ID: 113510
Summary: [ARM Thumb] ICE in extract_constrain_insn with CPU
cortex-m23
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113458
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> But the load is still using inserts and tbl. I have not figured out why
> though.
Looks like I have to support const PERMs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 57168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57168&action=edit
Preprocessed version of pr71494.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108640
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a834414794d80f21550dd0591e260fc833f49eb9
commit r14-8298-ga834414794d80f21550dd0591e260fc833f49eb9
Author: Mikael Pettersson
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113511
Bug ID: 113511
Summary: lack of libm2 ABI compatibility on powerpc platforms
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113512
Bug ID: 113512
Summary: Incorrect results for std::format("{:#.3g}", flt)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113512
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1dea0fed946ba40bd6bbe40ad1386aa9303418c
commit r14-8299-gf1dea0fed946ba40bd6bbe40ad1386aa9303418c
Author: Mikael Pettersson
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108640
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113513
Bug ID: 113513
Summary: [OpenMP] libgomp: cuCtxGetDevice error with
OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=true OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD="mandatory"
for libgomp.c/target-52.c
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 59 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113514
Bug ID: 113514
Summary: Wrong __builtin_dynamic_object_size when using a set
local variable
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113514
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The answer is not really and it is complex.
So I will note that clang/LLVM returns 48 for `f.bar[argc], 1` and 0 for `,3`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113514
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
In the case of the constant proping into `&f.bar[argc][0]`, it is not know if
you are doing an offset of the original struct or an offset into the array.
GCC's internal IR changes into the former as it is mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113458
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > But the load is still using inserts and tbl. I have not figured out why
> > though.
>
> Looks like I have to su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102998
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113514
--- Comment #3 from Bill Wendling ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The answer is not really and it is complex.
>
Okay. It just seems counter-intuitive.
> So I will note that clang/LLVM returns 48 for `f.bar[argc], 1` and 0 for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113514
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Siddhesh, there's some discussion at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78526 as to what the GCC behaviour is
supposed to be vs documented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113515
Bug ID: 113515
Summary: Wrong documentation for -Wstringop-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102998
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm, I ran into PR113515 with this example.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113516
Bug ID: 113516
Summary: POLLPRI redefined on windows building ada
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59425
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113517
Bug ID: 113517
Summary: vector SLP cost model should be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107603
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment
king-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.1 20240119 (experimental) (GCC)
unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-multilib
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-8284-20240119180625-g54519030b05-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-riscv64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.1 20240119 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113492
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to uecker from comment #2)
>
> I agree that "int:3" with -funsigned-bitfields should produce a type which
> is compatible to one with "unsigned:3" and that forming a composite type
> has to work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520
Bug ID: 113520
Summary: ICE when building swi-prolog-9.1.2 with LTO (tree
check: expected array_type, have integer_type in
array_ref_low_bound)
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
10/11/12/13/14 all reproduce it for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in replace_child, at |[14 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This code is definitely undefined.
Is builtin_names really defined as an array in one TU but an int in another
one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The code has:
```
struct bname builtin_names[] =
{
...
};
```
header file:
```
extern struct name builtin_names[]; /* object-array of built-in's */
```
Wich is underfined but in a different way than t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Yeah, after you asked, I just realised the original does ICE differently. Let's
retitle this one and I'll reduce it properly again for the original (but it is
similar)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-xpce/commit/641bbb1d83416be2fb910dbffcd6ba32db1c0b8e
Was the commit which "fixed" compiling with GCC 4.0 but really it is broken.
I suspect the fix is to use s/struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95112
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 163 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
