[Bug c++/54483] undefined reference to static constexpr in .so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 --- Comment #13 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > You still need: > constexpr float A::val; In C++11 mode, yes. C++17 made all static constexpr data members implicitly inline, which change the situation. In

[Bug tree-optimization/113467] [14 regression] libgcrypt-1.10.3 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- I also see test failures for mpfr and gmp. I was hoping something else would turn up without wrapped integers so I could reduce it a bit easier :)

[Bug target/113468] New: copy of large struct violates semantics of 'volatile'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113468 Bug ID: 113468 Summary: copy of large struct violates semantics of 'volatile' Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug testsuite/111850] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4156fbf7d6d641f8aade8028e87cf302350c3c0 commit r14-8201-gf4156fbf7d6d641f8aade8028e87cf302350c3c0 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Thu Jan 1

[Bug target/113468] copy of large struct violates semantics of 'volatile'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113468 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/47409] volatile struct member bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnu at kosak dot com --- Comment #25 fro

[Bug testsuite/111850] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/113455] ROUNDING: IEEE Standard: Missing decimal rounding mode 'nearest, ties away from zero' for decimalxxx datatypes.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113455 --- Comment #4 from newbie-02 --- (In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #3) :-) - thank you, you are my hero, > If you're doing arithmetic with constant operands, it might be > folded at compile time; make sure you're using -frounding

[Bug target/113312] Add __attribute__((no_callee_saved_registers)) for Intel FRED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113312 Xin Li changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xin at zytor dot com --- Comment #22 from Xin

[Bug tree-optimization/113467] [14 regression] libgcrypt-1.10.3 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Created attachment 57133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57133&action=edit mpi-add.o (correct) Attaching a good version of mpi-add.o too for comparison (built with r14-6644-g5060825aa78b3d)

[Bug c/113469] New: RISC-V: Illegal Insn for test case 920501-8.c when make linux for rv32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113469 Bug ID: 113469 Summary: RISC-V: Illegal Insn for test case 920501-8.c when make linux for rv32 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/113374] [14 regression] ICE in find_uses_to_rename_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113374 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f3880d6ad0e40c4a8b6d94b2c93931cdf42 commit r14-8206-g0f3880d6ad0e40c4a8b6d94b2c93931cdf42 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113431] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b981d5c60b8ef78e2adecd6b5d7e36f9e5e61c54 commit r14-8207-gb981d5c60b8ef78e2adecd6b5d7e36f9e5e61c54 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113374] [14 regression] ICE in find_uses_to_rename_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113374 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/113431] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/113470] New: Should std::tuple_size be a complete type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113470 Bug ID: 113470 Summary: Should std::tuple_size be a complete type? Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Prio

[Bug other/113399] [14 Regression] -ffold-mem-offsets should not be a target option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113399 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1203fc2e6a40c65896763554f62cacfb4bd6a836 commit r14-8208-g1203fc2e6a40c65896763554f62cacfb4bd6a836 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug testsuite/113452] [14 regression] 32-bit gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-stv-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113452 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b032f4b7da56a225a0a14d40da2d47a6fcbab3f3 commit r14-8209-gb032f4b7da56a225a0a14d40da2d47a6fcbab3f3 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/113457] Trying to emulate views::concat with std::generator gives ICE on co_yield: "internal compiler error: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.cc"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113457 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 57134 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57134&action=edit Reduced as far as I can make it right now Here is more reduced testcase though I see it depends on __remove_re

[Bug tree-optimization/112774] Vectorize the loop by inferring nonwrapping information from arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112774 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:484f48f03cf9a382b3bcf4dadac09c4ee59c2ddf commit r14-8210-g484f48f03cf9a382b3bcf4dadac09c4ee59c2ddf Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug testsuite/113446] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-16.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113446 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:484f48f03cf9a382b3bcf4dadac09c4ee59c2ddf commit r14-8210-g484f48f03cf9a382b3bcf4dadac09c4ee59c2ddf Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug testsuite/113446] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-16.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113446 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/113452] [14 regression] 32-bit gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-stv-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113452 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/113399] [14 Regression] -ffold-mem-offsets should not be a target option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113399 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

<    1   2   3