https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113426
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113317
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113434
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113435
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113371
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3359942417b02de88ae84d50aac232ac01ff9e15
commit r14-8175-g3359942417b02de88ae84d50aac232ac01ff9e15
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113371
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45434
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The current mainline compiles:
--cut here--
_Bool foo(int i)
{
return (i & 0xFF) == ((i & 0xFF00) >> 8);
}
_Bool bar(int i)
{
return (i & 0xFF) <= ((i & 0xFF00) >> 8);
}
--cut here--
with -O2 to:
foo:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113156
--- Comment #17 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> The patch is semi-correct
Would you detail on this? What parts for a complete fix are (still) missing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #11 from JuzheZhong ---
I think this following:
https://godbolt.org/z/5sWEWWGox
ARM SVE GCC-11 correctly vectorize this codes.
But both GCC-12 and GCC-13 failed to vectorize it.
GCC-14 vectorize it in a wrong way.
Would it be po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12/13 regression] Timeout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #11)
> I think this following:
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/5sWEWWGox
>
> ARM SVE GCC-11 correctly vectorize this codes.
>
> But both GCC-12 and GCC-13 failed to vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113436
Bug ID: 113436
Summary: [OpenMP] 'allocate' clause has no effect for
(first)private on 'target' directives
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113437
Bug ID: 113437
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr95906.c fails on arm since
g:6686e16fda4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu |powerpc64-linux-gnu arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113436
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
BTW: The attach testcase misses 'firstprivate', which obviously needs to be
handled as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113354
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113409
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8f10456795c84bdbf45b1612321eb1f9b3c1415
commit r14-8178-gc8f10456795c84bdbf45b1612321eb1f9b3c1415
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99907
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112862
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
> this appears to be fixed; I get clean fortran testsuite results on (x86_64)
> Darwin21 and Darwin23. Please could you check and either close thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111554
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112863
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
> which Xcode version produces this?
15.1. Btw., I only see those failures on macOS 14, not earlier versions.
> on Darwin23 with XC15.1 I get cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110251
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fd32d3d22d86ab732b9b997bdabe449b8c53bbe
commit r14-8180-g3fd32d3d22d86ab732b9b997bdabe449b8c53bbe
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113409
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113438
Bug ID: 113438
Summary: ICE (segfault) in dwarf2out_decl with -g -std=c23 on
c23-tag-composite-2.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113439
Bug ID: 113439
Summary: [OpenMP] Add more collapse testcases mixing
precisions, in particular (unsigned) int vs. _BigInt
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113438
--- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan ---
I also noticed the following C23 failures, not sure if these are worth tracking
separately or not:
FAIL: gcc.dg/gnu23-tag-1.c (internal compiler error: 'verify_type' failed)
FAIL: gcc.dg/gnu23-tag-4.c (intern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104094
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-01-19 00:00:00 |2024-1-17
--- Comment #2 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110221
Saurabh Jha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saurabh.jha at arm dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112987
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52765
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111250
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111250
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Something like this (with new/improved tests):
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/assertions.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/assertions.h
@@ -31,15 +31,16 @@
#include
-#ifndef _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113440
Bug ID: 113440
Summary: Missed optimization for redundancy computation
elimination because of missed judgment for unsigned
overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86843
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56109
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113318
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df0a668b784556fe4317317d58961652d93d53de
commit r14-8182-gdf0a668b784556fe4317317d58961652d93d53de
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
#11 from Miro Palmu ---
I'm not sure if this is useful information but, using span with a view in a
ranged-based for loop triggers false positive -Wdangling-referene on gcc 14.0.1
20240117 but not on gcc 13.2.
// On godbold: https://godbolt.org/z/x9jKh4MoW
#include
#include
#include
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
Bug ID: 113441
Summary: [14 Regression] Fail to fold the last element with
multiple loop
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12/13 Regression] aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
GCC trunk RVV also process 11 elements in vector:
https://godbolt.org/z/q9bb8Gj4G
```
vsetivlizero,11,e32,m1,ta,ma
```
vector codes
```
lh s8,0(t4)
lh t4,0(t1)
ld
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113406
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c74d5c0a0f21ae1d0c195ca0d81a3d1032f27e3
commit r14-8183-g2c74d5c0a0f21ae1d0c195ca0d81a3d1032f27e3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113410
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a98a24ac65c1a0ee598e5b54d9e4c921a9744a08
commit r14-8185-ga98a24ac65c1a0ee598e5b54d9e4c921a9744a08
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113408
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fb78d431ff3c05997ef31837d6eb319d84a4239
commit r14-8184-g2fb78d431ff3c05997ef31837d6eb319d84a4239
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113408
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113406
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is that we ignore the dependence because
vect_preserves_scalar_order_p - which is correct iff we'd execute the
stmt within the vectorized loop body. But as we discover it invariant
we hoist i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113437
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Summary|gcc.dg/tree-ss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-17
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC
/home/mjires/git/GCC/master/configure
--prefix=/home/mjires/built/master --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --disable-multilib --disable-libsanitizer
--enable-checking
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.1 20240117 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113443
Bug ID: 113443
Summary: GCC rejects valid program involving parameter packs
with in between class type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113421
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f8ba332e988fb582f6ca32465f6d65283f53b3a
commit r14-8186-g9f8ba332e988fb582f6ca32465f6d65283f53b3a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113421
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113437
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target|arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> It might be
>
> t.c:29:22: missed: Data access with gaps requires scalar epilogue loop
>
> required when vectorizing the load groups. We end up with
>
> t.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110852
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b00be6f1576993369522c16dba992bec9adab9b2
commit r14-8187-gb00be6f1576993369522c16dba992bec9adab9b2
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110852
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113444
Bug ID: 113444
Summary: hardware_concurrency should take into account CPU
affinity
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
> >
> > Both allocation with source and assignment are broken :-(
>
> With numerical output from foo ([1,2,3,4,5]), we get:
>
>1 3 5
gcc/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/configure --disable-multilib
CFLAGS='-O1 -g0' CXXFLAGS='-O1 -g0' LDFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.1 20240117 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113446
Bug ID: 113446
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-16.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113446
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 57113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57113&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 scev-16.c.179t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113446
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113399
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Just something that was missed when this option was changed from target
dependent to target independent. It definitely should not be a target option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113447
Bug ID: 113447
Summary: [14 regression] issue20185.go etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113447
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113448
Bug ID: 113448
Summary: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c etc. XPASS
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113448
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113449
Bug ID: 113449
Summary: [14 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure on
f95-lang.o since r14-8174
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113450
Bug ID: 113450
Summary: std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113449
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Version|13.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113450
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113449
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113449
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 57114
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57114&action=edit
f95-lang.ii.xz
../prev-gcc/xg++ -B ../prev-gcc/ -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fcompare-debug
f95-lang.ii -S
x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113451
Bug ID: 113451
Summary: [14 regression] 32-bit g++.dg/abi/mangle-regparm1a.C
FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113451
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113445
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113445
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] bootstrap |[14 Regression] bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113452
Bug ID: 113452
Summary: [14 regression] 32-bit gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-stv-1.c
FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113449
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113445
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 113449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113452
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compare-debug-failure
Last reconfirm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65257
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65257
--- Comment #2 from nightstrike ---
I should clarify that I tested this with mingw-w64, not mingw.org where the bug
was originally reported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65257
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113114
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
The following ICEs in the same way without ILP32 (reduced from a testsuite run
with -funroll-loops):
$ cat t.c
float val[128];
float x;
void bar() {
int i = 55;
for (; i >= 0; --i)
x += val[i];
}
$ gc
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
