[Bug target/113324] New: internal compiler error: in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113324 Bug ID: 113324 Summary: internal compiler error: in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1534 Product: gcc Version: 10.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/113325] New: unnecessary byte swap for memory clear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113325 Bug ID: 113325 Summary: unnecessary byte swap for memory clear Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug libfortran/113313] execute_command_line hangs at run time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113313 --- Comment #2 from john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz --- Thank you! You may wish to know that in my Ubuntu system the program runs properly if the function iam is used in an assignment statement not a print statement. (Fortran Discourse gave me the

[Bug tree-optimization/113326] New: Optimize vector shift with constant delta on shifting-count operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113326 Bug ID: 113326 Summary: Optimize vector shift with constant delta on shifting-count operand Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/113313] execute_command_line hangs at run time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113313 --- Comment #3 from john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz --- I suspect that valgrind complained because I had not given an else part for the variable cmd. In my system the valgrind error message went away when I declared and evaluated cmd as follows:

[Bug libstdc++/113327] New: std::sleep_for(std::chrono::hours::max()) returns immediately

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113327 Bug ID: 113327 Summary: std::sleep_for(std::chrono::hours::max()) returns immediately Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/113326] Optimize vector shift with constant delta on shifting-count operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113326 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Component|

[Bug target/113328] New: Some fixed length vector constants can be generated using SVE index instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113328 Bug ID: 113328 Summary: Some fixed length vector constants can be generated using SVE index instruction Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords

[Bug target/113326] Optimize vector shift with constant delta on shifting-count operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113326 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Basically this requires an "un-shift" pass and most likely should be done at the RTL level though that might be too late. Maybe isel?

[Bug target/113326] Optimize vector shift with constant delta on shifting-count operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113326 --- Comment #3 from Feng Xue --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Note on aarch64 with SVE, you should be able to generate those constants > without a load, using the index instruction. Ok. Thanks for the note. This still requires

[Bug tree-optimization/111003] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-2161-g237e83e2158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111003 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113326] Optimize vector shift with constant delta on shifting-count operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113326 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Feng Xue from comment #3) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > Note on aarch64 with SVE, you should be able to generate those constants > > without a load, using the index instructi

<    1   2   3