https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113048
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #5 from Uroš
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90693
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0152637c74c9eab7658483b1cca4e3d584dd4262
commit r14-6940-g0152637c74c9eab7658483b1cca4e3d584dd4262
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113201
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8faf1fca42a9b987fec0992ca5d63995b2640b3
commit r14-6941-gb8faf1fca42a9b987fec0992ca5d63995b2640b3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113201
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113099
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f3eb93e72703f6ea30aa27d0b6fc6db62cb4a04
commit r14-6942-g9f3eb93e72703f6ea30aa27d0b6fc6db62cb4a04
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113200
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15cc291887dc9dd92b2c93f4545e20eb6c190122
commit r14-6944-g15cc291887dc9dd92b2c93f4545e20eb6c190122
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[14 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113200
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113241
Bug ID: 113241
Summary: [13/14 Regression] Unguarded use of __is_convertible
built-in
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113241
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The reason why late gimplification/regimplification generally works fine with
SSA_NAMEs is that the
case SSA_NAME:
/* Allow callbacks into the gimplifier during optimization. */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113217
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b67ec7ff5b1aa9b3b70e9b58afc594b890abeb0
commit r14-6947-g4b67ec7ff5b1aa9b3b70e9b58afc594b890abeb0
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113217
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113242
Bug ID: 113242
Summary: g++ rejects-valid template argument of class type
containing an lvalue reference
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113145
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE when|[14 regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113145
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 113145, which changed state.
Bug 113145 Summary: [14 regression] ICE in verify_dominators when building
mit-krb5-1.21.2 since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113145
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina ---
*** Bug 113145 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112923
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112923
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56992
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56992&action=edit
Tiny example code showing the problem
The attached source will compile but consumes vast amounts of ram.
$ tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111268
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113201
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113241
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57fa5b60bbbf8038b8a699d2bcebd2a9b2e29aa4
commit r14-6958-g57fa5b60bbbf8038b8a699d2bcebd2a9b2e29aa4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113048
--- Comment #6 from Manuel Lauss ---
After be977db17c91ad6627dee70a1904a95d229aa1be I don't see this ICE any longer
on either x64 or mips bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113243
Bug ID: 113243
Summary: mips: Wrong code for pr91323.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112616
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or maybe just a bug in the PLUS_EXPR folding?
The code sets NITERSM1 to
(short unsigned int) (a.0_1 + 255) + 1 > 256 ? ~(short unsigned int) (a.0_1 +
255) : 0
and then fold_build2s PLUS_EXPR of that and 1 an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7328faf89e9b4953baaff10e18262c70fbd3e578
commit r14-6961-g7328faf89e9b4953baaff10e18262c70fbd3e578
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108976
--- Comment #9 from Dimitrij Mijoski ---
I believe this bug report should closed as resolved. Are there maybe plans for
back-porting?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113242
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113244
Bug ID: 113244
Summary: Potential thread sanitizer false positive with future
exception
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113229
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-05
Ever confirm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113229
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh forgot to mention, this is triggering because of the div optimization in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=c69db3ef7f7d82a50f46038aa5457b7c8cc2d643
But I suspect that too is jus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113229
--- Comment #6 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh forgot to mention, this is triggering because of the div optimization in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=c69db3ef7f7d82a50f46038aa5457b7c8cc2d643
But I suspect that too is jus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78100
--- Comment #4 from Dima Kogan ---
I just tried again, and I see that this bug has been fixed. I'm using
gcc (Debian 13.2.0-2) 13.2.0
Should we close this report?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108976
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think it would be good to backport it, what do you think?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113245
Bug ID: 113245
Summary: SIZE with optional DIM argument that has the
OPTIONAL+VALUE attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113245
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113235
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113235
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SMHasher SHA3-256 benchmark |SMHasher SHA3-256 benchmark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113235
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
The internal loops are:
static const unsigned keccakf_rotc[24] = {
1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55, 2, 14, 27, 41, 56, 8, 25, 43, 62, 18,
39, 61, 20, 44
};
static const unsigned keccakf_piln[24] = {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96724
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113236
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113246
Bug ID: 113246
Summary: Behavior of std::filesystem::weakly_canonical with
non-existing relative paths
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109811
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79704
Bug 79704 depends on bug 109811, which changed state.
Bug 109811 Summary: libjxl 0.7 is a lot slower in GCC 13.1 vs Clang 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109811
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96724
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-January/060090.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113244
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect this is because libstdc++.so is NOT instrumented for TSAN.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113246
--- Comment #1 from Davide Pesavento ---
Another interesting(?) behavior, when run from a non-existing (deleted) working
directory:
weakly_canonical("foo") returns "foo", while weakly_canonical("./foo") throws:
> terminate called after throwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113229
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to avieira from comment #6)
> Oh forgot to mention, this is triggering because of the div optimization in:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;
> h=c69db3ef7f7d82a50f46038aa5457b7c8cc2d6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> The reason why late gimplification/regimplification generally works fine
> with SSA_NAMEs is that the
> case SSA_NAME:
> /* Allow callbacks i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111268
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|12.3.0 |
Summary|[14 Regression] int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Roman Lozko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lozko.roma at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113247
Bug ID: 113247
Summary: RISC-V: Performance bug in SHA256
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113246
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #0)
> note that canonical("") currently throws a filesystem_error)
That's clearly correct, as canonical says that !exists(p) is an error.
> If there are no lead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113246
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #1)
> Another interesting(?) behavior, when run from a non-existing (deleted)
> working directory:
>
> weakly_canonical("foo") returns "foo", while weakly_canoni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113246
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the exception for a deleted pwd is also correct.
weakly_canonical uses status(".") to check if the current directory exists.
That returns true, even if the directory has been deleted (it still exi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113248
Bug ID: 113248
Summary: RISC-V: Invalid vsetvli fusion using
-mtune=generic-ooo
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113246
--- Comment #5 from Davide Pesavento ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> > If there are no leading elements of p that exist, should canonical() be
> > called with an empty path? or should it not be called at all?
>
> It makes no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113249
Bug ID: 113249
Summary: RISC-V: regression testsuite errors -mtune=generic-ooo
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113250
Bug ID: 113250
Summary: std::filesystem::equivalent("", "/") should throw
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106308
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113248
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cf47447f6fba84a17864fc7a19a532a62b6e736
commit r14-6967-g6cf47447f6fba84a17864fc7a19a532a62b6e736
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Sat Jan 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105347
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Summary|Failed to buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105347
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/18a7ebda99044473fdbce6376993714ff54e6690
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112787
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 112787, which changed state.
Bug 112787 Summary: Codegen regression of large GCC vector extensions when
enabling SVE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112787
What|Removed |Ad
85 matches
Mail list logo