[Bug target/111408] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-2866-ge68a31549d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111408 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cb9cecdb582b44b04e9c49532ddf0065b5c3612 commit r12-10050-g9cb9cecdb582b44b04e9c49532ddf0065b5c3612 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/112339] ICE with clang::no_sanitize and -fsanitize=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:029b826f62d2d193e93539749a534b9a13ade728 commit r12-10048-g029b826f62d2d193e93539749a534b9a13ade728 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/112795] [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1761303c77219281c22ab50b4a9ce65920c4023 commit r12-10051-gf1761303c77219281c22ab50b4a9ce65920c4023 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/112837] [12 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have 'e' (rtx plus) in ix86_elim_entry_set_got, at config/i386/i386.cc:8612 with -fcompare-elim -fpie -fprofile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112837 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d02372f39dc6506a4ff88a7f01fb5570a82606c0 commit r12-10053-gd02372f39dc6506a4ff88a7f01fb5570a82606c0 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/112845] [11/12 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 with -Os -fcf-protection -c since r8-3504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112845 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87d013f7c877f944adbbaa4e94244baf990cb9f2 commit r12-10054-g87d013f7c877f944adbbaa4e94244baf990cb9f2 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/112816] [11/12 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0246a37ebdef4ffc863fe4c56e812c0614026e02 commit r12-10052-g0246a37ebdef4ffc863fe4c56e812c0614026e02 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bf040fcd23aaa7d8c4873d1170776ab117bc213 commit r12-10055-g4bf040fcd23aaa7d8c4873d1170776ab117bc213 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/112727] [11/12/13 Regression] UBSAN creates GIMPLE path with uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112727 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b8f9636c1b19fff7723995f2d58d41f3d30c46d commit r12-10056-g2b8f9636c1b19fff7723995f2d58d41f3d30c46d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/112873] F2023 degree trig functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113039] New: [14 Regression] -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039 Bug ID: 113039 Summary: [14 Regression] -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/113040] New: [14 Regression] libmvec test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113040 Bug ID: 113040 Summary: [14 Regression] libmvec test failures Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/113039] [14 Regression] -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113039] [14 Regression] -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > This may be caused by r14-2692-g1c6231c05bdcca This commit changes the behavior of -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch. Workaround is to use -fcf-protection -fcf-protect

[Bug target/98792] Fail to use SHRN instructions for narrowing shift on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 98792, which changed state. Bug 98792 Summary: Fail to use SHRN instructions for narrowing shift on aarch64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/113041] New: misleading diagnostic for variable of non-literal type in constexpr function in C++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113041 Bug ID: 113041 Summary: misleading diagnostic for variable of non-literal type in constexpr function in C++20 mode Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/113042] New: popcount of 8bits and 128bits can be improved for !TARGET_CSSC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042 Bug ID: 113042 Summary: popcount of 8bits and 128bits can be improved for !TARGET_CSSC Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimiza

[Bug target/113042] popcount of 8bits and 128bits can be improved for !TARGET_CSSC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113034] Miscompilation of __m128 ne comparison on LoongArch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113034 --- Comment #1 from Jiajie Chen --- As pointed out by @lrzlin, the expected output should be: ``` 1 -1 0 ```

[Bug c++/113031] [14 Regression] ICE in cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1 starting with r14-6508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39f9c426f58448d6df340cdccd84e05721a20921 commit r14-6619-g39f9c426f58448d6df340cdccd84e05721a20921 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/96461] [SVE] Use the HISTCNT instruction for simple histogram loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96461 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug target/113043] New: ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113043 Bug ID: 113043 Summary: ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4246 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/103781] generic/cortex-a53 cost model for SLP for aarch64 is good

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103781 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/113042] popcount of 8bits and 128bits can be improved for !TARGET_CSSC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Blah, adding popcountti2 does not work as the middle-end (in fold_builtin_bit_query) splits it into 2 __builtin_popcountll already ...

[Bug modula2/112946] Assignment of string to enumeration or set crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

<    1   2