[Bug lto/112716] LTO optimization with struct with variable size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to uecker from comment #7) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, muecker at gwdg dot de wrote: > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 >

[Bug c/112743] New: RISC-V: building FAIL with -march=rv64(or rv32)gc_zve32f_zvfh_zfh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112743 Bug ID: 112743 Summary: RISC-V: building FAIL with -march=rv64(or rv32)gc_zve32f_zvfh_zfh Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/112743] RISC-V: building FAIL with -march=rv64(or rv32)gc_zve32f_zvfh_zfh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112743 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #1 from L

[Bug analyzer/109077] Analyzer headers not installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109077 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:594ef1ff707866bcdc1f077c5d078a5bd250320f commit r14-5899-g594ef1ff707866bcdc1f077c5d078a5bd250320f Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug analyzer/109077] Analyzer headers not installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109077 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Should be fixed on trunk for GCC 14 by the above patch. Keeping open to track backporting to the GCC 11, 12 and 13 branches.

[Bug c++/112744] New: Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 Bug ID: 112744 Summary: Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- And, we need to do it actually for all bitints including the smallest ones, because libgcc.a will handle just 32/64/128 bit cases and not 2, 16, 37, 127, 238 etc.

[Bug tree-optimization/112719] [14 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 with -O -msse4 and __builtin_popcountl() since r14-5557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112719 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03877e7eccd2734ca93a2d13aa2abf55e0aec923 commit r14-5900-g03877e7eccd2734ca93a2d13aa2abf55e0aec923 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/112719] [14 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 with -O -msse4 and __builtin_popcountl() since r14-5557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112719 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1b03fa964527678f15e6ef416bfe37e60b3dc54 commit r14-5901-gf1b03fa964527678f15e6ef416bfe37e60b3dc54 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug middle-end/111754] [14 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2313 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6c01334ccfca8bc748c8de90ba2a636d1662490 commit r14-5902-ge6c01334ccfca8bc748c8de90ba2a636d1662490 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

Re: Strange compile error when g++ work with std=c++20.

This mailing list is for automated email from our Bugzilla bug database, not for reporting bugs directly. Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ for instructions on how to report bugs. However, Andrew already explained why GCC is correct and this is not a GCC bug. Just use DECLARE_SINGLETON(Receive

[Bug tree-optimization/112719] [14 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 with -O -msse4 and __builtin_popcountl() since r14-5557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112719 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/109849] suboptimal code for vector walking loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109849 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #23) > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aae723d360ca26cd9fd0b039fb0a616bd0eae363 > > commit r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26cd9fd0b039fb0a616bd0eae363 > Author: Martin Jambor > Date:

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---

[Bug middle-end/109849] suboptimal code for vector walking loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109849 --- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #26) > (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #23) > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aae723d360ca26cd9fd0b039fb0a616bd0eae363 > > > > commit r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26cd9fd0b

[Bug tree-optimization/52252] An opportunity for x86 gcc vectorizer (gain up to 3 times)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252 > > Andrew Pinski changed: > >What|Removed |Adde

[Bug middle-end/32667] block copy with exact overlap is expanded as memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 --- Comment #53 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, post+gcc at ralfj dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 > > --- Comment #51 from post+gcc at ralfj dot de --- > Oh great, I love it when one par

[Bug middle-end/32667] block copy with exact overlap is expanded as memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 --- Comment #54 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to post+gcc from comment #52) > For the point discussed earlier with the `restrict` in the musl memcpy, I > had another look at the definition of `restrict` and it's not entirely clear > to me any

[Bug middle-end/32667] block copy with exact overlap is expanded as memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 --- Comment #55 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to post+gcc from comment #52) > For the point discussed earlier with the `restrict` in the musl memcpy, I > had another look at the definition of `restrict` and it's not entirely clear > to me any

[Bug tree-optimization/112694] RISC-V: zve64d testing expose many ICE on C/C++ testing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112694 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f3f0b829b62f11f350867d2350e2af8639ec890 commit r14-5917-g9f3f0b829b62f11f350867d2350e2af8639ec890 Author: Juzhe-Zhong Date: Tue Nov 28

[Bug tree-optimization/112694] RISC-V: zve64d testing expose many ICE on C/C++ testing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112694 JuzheZhong changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/112732] during IPA pass: *free_lang_data ICE: 'verify_type' failed: type variant with 'TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P' with -Os -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-28 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Or make -ftrapv not cover bit-int?

[Bug lto/112732] during IPA pass: *free_lang_data ICE: 'verify_type' failed: type variant with 'TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P' with -Os -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think that is pretty much what is implemented (but not taking it into account). Ok, will try to figure out why we ICE. I think -fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv isn't really a good flag combination, because no

[Bug sanitizer/112741] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112741 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/112742] missed vectorization with src[a*b+i] where a*b is not int rather than same percission as size_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112742 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-28 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/112745] New: stage 1 libgcc_s.so fails to link on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112745 Bug ID: 112745 Summary: stage 1 libgcc_s.so fails to link on FreeBSD Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug tree-optimization/112742] missed vectorization with src[a*b+i] where a*b is not int rather than same percission as size_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112742 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ah, row*stride is loop invariant and that saves us with -m32. With -m64 we end up with [local count: 105119324]: row.0_1 = (unsigned int) row_13(D); _2 = row.0_1 * stride_14(D); [local count: 9

[Bug target/112743] RISC-V: building FAIL with -march=rv64(or rv32)gc_zve32f_zvfh_zfh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112743 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/112729] gcc.target/i386/apx-interrupt-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112729 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Hongyu Wang --- > The cfi scan fails was caused by -fno-omit-frame-pointer which force push the > frame pointer first and the cfi info become different. By default

[Bug tree-optimization/112736] [14 Regression] vectorizer is introducing out of bounds memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112736 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/112729] gcc.target/i386/apx-interrupt-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112729 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Hongyu Wang --- [...] > Hi Rainer, can you help verify if the change make these test pass on > solaris/FreeBSD? They do on Solaris/x86. Thanks. FreeBSD was more

[Bug testsuite/112729] gcc.target/i386/apx-interrupt-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112729 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug rtl-optimization/112415] [14 regression] Python 3.11 miscompiled on HPPA with new RTL fold mem offset pass, since r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415 --- Comment #52 from Manolis Tsamis --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #51) > manolis, did you have a chance to look at the remaining pass issue? You'll > need to revert Dave's commit locally which made the issue latent for > building Pytho

[Bug middle-end/109849] suboptimal code for vector walking loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109849 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #27) > Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this, the above (on pristine master > commit 006e90e1344 on an x86_64-linux) results in: > > Running target unix/-D_GLIBCXX

[Bug debug/111409] Invalid .debug_macro.dwo macro information for split DWARF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111409 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug testsuite/112728] gcc.dg/scantest-lto.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112728 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug middle-end/109849] suboptimal code for vector walking loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109849 --- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #28) > (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #27) > > Can you please try if > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638318.html > > fixes th

[Bug testsuite/112729] gcc.target/i386/apx-interrupt-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112729 --- Comment #7 from Hongyu Wang --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #5) > > Is there a reason to have -fomit-frame-pointer once before and once > after -mapx-features=push2pop2? Ah, thanks for pointing that out. Will ad

[Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:088d3cbc5f906444a7dee98bc9a6f4b724ddfc21 commit r14-5927-g088d3cbc5f906444a7dee98bc9a6f4b724ddfc21 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Tue

[Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33b6ce99b54917a910b59dbd643fd223fbba834c commit r14-5928-g33b6ce99b54917a910b59dbd643fd223fbba834c Author: Rainer Orth Date: Tue

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- One thing is obviously we shouldn't crash on it and will debug that. But, what multiple_of_p does (or its callers) is weird: 14552 /* Check for special cases to see if top is defined as multiple

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/112716] LTO optimization with struct with variable size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 --- Comment #9 from Martin Uecker --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > (In reply to uecker from comment #7) > > > > > > > Note that even without LTO when you enable inlining you'd expose two > > > different structures with two di

[Bug target/109253] libbpf: failed to find BTF info for global/extern symbol '__divdi3'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109253 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jose E. Marchesi : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f31a019d1161ec78846473da743aedf49cca8c27 commit r14-5930-gf31a019d1161ec78846473da743aedf49cca8c27 Author: Jose E. Marchesi Dat

[Bug fortran/110415] (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Jenner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b247e917ff13328298c1eecf8563b12edd7ade04 commit r14-5931-gb247e917ff13328298c1eecf8563b12edd7ade04 Author: Andrew Jenner Date: T

[Bug middle-end/109849] suboptimal code for vector walking loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109849 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely --- So far the only FAIL is still see is: FAIL: 23_containers/vector/types/1.cc -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) I'm not sure if this is caused by your patch or one of Honza's. The test only fails wit

[Bug target/110606] ICE output_operand: '%&' used without any local dynamic TLS references on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110606 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- It needs -O2 -fPIC -fno-exceptions to fail.

[Bug fortran/110415] (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415 Andrew Jenner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 110415, which changed state. Bug 110415 Summary: (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415

[Bug middle-end/111754] [14 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2313 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754 --- Comment #15 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry for the regression, and thanks for the prompt fix!

[Bug target/110606] ICE output_operand: '%&' used without any local dynamic TLS references on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110606 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- The insn that it fails on is the result from a split using *tls_ld .

[Bug target/109253] libbpf: failed to find BTF info for global/extern symbol '__divdi3'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109253 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- As for the actual crash, I have again multiple possible fixes: --- gcc/wide-int.cc.jj 2023-10-16 14:24:46.360204472 +0200 +++ gcc/wide-int.cc 2023-11-28 16:33:35.737394223 +0100 @@ -1297,6 +1297,8 @@ wi

[Bug target/112494] ICE in ix86_cc_mode, at config/i386/i386.cc:16477

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112494 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99db2ce2419245e40808a9fad45113315496a907 commit r14-5933-g99db2ce2419245e40808a9fad45113315496a907 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue N

[Bug lto/112732] during IPA pass: *free_lang_data ICE: 'verify_type' failed: type variant with 'TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P' with -Os -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112732 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f26d68d5d128c86faaceeb81b1e8f22254ad53df commit r14-5934-gf26d68d5d128c86faaceeb81b1e8f22254ad53df Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug sanitizer/112741] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112741 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f45d5e30bd98ea1d8dc29841a06b2cfa5662deb5 commit r14-5935-gf45d5e30bd98ea1d8dc29841a06b2cfa5662deb5 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug sanitizer/112741] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112741 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c/101057] [gimplefe] GIMPLE frontend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101057 Bug 101057 depends on bug 112741, which changed state. Bug 112741 Summary: ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3261 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112741 What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/112732] during IPA pass: *free_lang_data ICE: 'verify_type' failed: type variant with 'TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P' with -Os -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/112560] [14 Regression] ICE in try_combine on pr112494.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112560 Bug 112560 depends on bug 112494, which changed state. Bug 112494 Summary: ICE in ix86_cc_mode, at config/i386/i386.cc:16477 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112494 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/112494] ICE in ix86_cc_mode, at config/i386/i386.cc:16477

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112494 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Actually, maybe better variant of the first fix in the above comment would be: --- gcc/wide-int.cc.jj 2023-11-28 16:56:50.0 +0100 +++ gcc/wide-int.cc 2023-11-28 16:58:02.268776755 +0100 @@ -1985

[Bug tree-optimization/112746] New: Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination (fre1(tree) for global variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112746 Bug ID: 112746 Summary: Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination (fre1(tree) for global variable) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112280] [14 regression] ICE building libgcrypt-1.10.2 on s390 (during GIMPLE pass: ccp)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- I suspect I've just hit this when trying to build pixman on s390x too.

[Bug pch/112747] New: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow" has no effect in pre-compiled headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112747 Bug ID: 112747 Summary: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow" has no effect in pre-compiled headers. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/112746] Missed optimization for exact division with multi-use addition chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status

[Bug ada/111909] Filename case sensitivity defaulted wrongly on macOS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111909 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:396db92d3aa7412dd7133563fecbc6237fa81c02 commit r14-5936-g396db92d3aa7412dd7133563fecbc6237fa81c02 Author: Simon Wright Date: Tu

[Bug c++/103185] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ind[arr] is rejected when |[11/12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug c++/103185] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5

[Bug pch/112747] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow" has no effect in pre-compiled headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112747 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/64117] warning control #pragmas in precompiled headers are not obeyed for template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||piannetta at kalrayinc dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/103183] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ind[arr] produces an lvalue when arr is an array xvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103183 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Su

[Bug middle-end/112560] [14 Regression] ICE in try_combine on pr112494.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112560 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/112733] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in wide-int.cc during GIMPLE pass: sccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 56707 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56707&action=edit gcc14-pr112733-2.patch Second patch to be tested. Turned out it is more complicated than that. If n > m, i.e

[Bug tree-optimization/112738] [14 Regression] forwprop4 introduces invalid wide signed Boolean values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112738 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68ffaf839883253e0f288862ff20b8005c92df4e commit r14-5938-g68ffaf839883253e0f288862ff20b8005c92df4e Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mo

[Bug tree-optimization/112738] [14 Regression] forwprop4 introduces invalid wide signed Boolean values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112738 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/112748] New: memmove(ptr, ptr, n) call optimized out even at -O0 with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112748 Bug ID: 112748 Summary: memmove(ptr, ptr, n) call optimized out even at -O0 with -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/94264] Array-to-pointer conversion not performed on array prvalues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94264 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug middle-end/112748] memmove(ptr, ptr, n) call optimized out even at -O0 with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112748 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does -fsanitize=address remove it?

[Bug middle-end/112748] memmove(ptr, ptr, n) call optimized out even at -O0 with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112748 --- Comment #2 from Tavian Barnes --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does -fsanitize=address remove it? Yes, it's still removed with -fsanitize=address. While ASAN is necessary to check that the memory is really allocated, UBSAN

[Bug c++/112749] New: GCC accepts invalid code in concepts (requires clause incorrectly satisfied)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112749 Bug ID: 112749 Summary: GCC accepts invalid code in concepts (requires clause incorrectly satisfied) Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/112744] Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/112750] New: wrong code with _BitInt(256) and above and __builtin_sub_overflow_p() at -O0

gcc version 14.0.0 20231128 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/112744] Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/112606] [14 Regression] powerpc64le-linux-gnu: 'FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-fp.c scan-assembler xsnabsdp'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112606 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/102419] [11/12/13/14 Regression][concepts] return-type-requirement of "Y" does not check that T::type actually exists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102419 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||novulae at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/112749] GCC accepts invalid code in concepts (requires clause incorrectly satisfied)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112749 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug target/112751] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112751 Bug ID: 112751 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112751] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112751 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is just a testsuite issue. The functions are currently marked as noinline. You can either add -fno-ipa-vrp or mark them with noipa instead. I am not sure if noipa here is right due to having some ipa h

[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #23 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:305a2686c99bf9b57490419f25c79f6fb3ae0feb commit r14-5941-g305a2686c99bf9b57490419f25c79f6fb3ae0feb Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug c++/94264] Array-to-pointer conversion not performed on array prvalues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94264 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:305a2686c99bf9b57490419f25c79f6fb3ae0feb commit r14-5941-g305a2686c99bf9b57490419f25c79f6fb3ae0feb Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue

[Bug target/111170] [13/14 regression] Malformed manifest does not allow to run gcc on Windows XP (Accessing a corrupted shared library) since r13-6552-gd11e088210a551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/109849] suboptimal code for vector walking loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109849 --- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely --- Bisection points to r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26cd9fd0b039fb0a616bd0eae363 for that remaining FAIL as well (and it isn't fixed by the new patch). It introduced a new warning which wasn't present before: /tm

[Bug tree-optimization/52252] An opportunity for x86 gcc vectorizer (gain up to 3 times)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11) > We're lacking a way to say one of the bit_not should be single-used, > one multi-use would be OK and a fair trade-off - not sure if that > would be enough h

  1   2   >