[Bug middle-end/110015] openjpeg is slower when built with gcc13 compared to clang16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110015 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- runtimes on zen4 hardware. trunk -O3 -flto -march-native 42171 42964 42106 clang -O3 -flto -march=native 37393 37423 37508 gcc 13 -O3 -flto -march=native

[Bug target/109811] libjxl 0.7 is a lot slower in GCC 13.1 vs Clang 16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109811 --- Comment #16 from Sam James --- Thank you all for the effort.

[Bug middle-end/112653] PTA should handle correctly escape information of values returned by a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112653 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- On ARM32 and other targets methods returns this pointer. Togher with making return value escape this probably completely disables any chance for IPA tracking of C++ data types...

[Bug target/109812] GraphicsMagick resize is a lot slower in GCC 13.1 vs Clang 16 on Intel Raptor Lake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109812 --- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka --- On zen4 hardware I now get GCC13 with -O3 -flto -march=native -fopenmp 2163 2161 2153 Average: 2159 Iterations Per Minute clang 17 with -O3 -flto -march=native -fopenmp

[Bug c++/102341] [modules] "error: conflicting exporting declaration" for anything previously declared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102341 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9dd8be6fc2debc4fbd0950386d4e98878af27a45 commit r14-5838-g9dd8be6fc2debc4fbd0950386d4e98878af27a45 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c/112707] New: gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 Bug ID: 112707 Summary: gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid' Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Fore --- Created attachment 56683 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56683&action=edit trimmed file with cvise

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Fore --- Created attachment 56684 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56684&action=edit assembly output of sharedbook.i

[Bug target/112707] [14 regression] gcc 14 outputs invalid assembly on ppc: Error: unrecognized opcode: `fctid'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug sanitizer/112708] New: "gcc -fsanitize=address" produces wrong debug info for variables in function prologue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112708 Bug ID: 112708 Summary: "gcc -fsanitize=address" produces wrong debug info for variables in function prologue Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/112708] "gcc -fsanitize=address" produces wrong debug info for variables in function prologue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112708 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Is this with or without optimization?

[Bug sanitizer/112708] "gcc -fsanitize=address" produces wrong debug info for variables in function prologue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112708 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >Which means that the culprit is gcc. Not always ...

[Bug sanitizer/112708] "gcc -fsanitize=address" produces wrong debug info for variables in function prologue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112708 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also did you add -fvar-tracking-assignments ? (there are other reports asking to turn on -fvar-tracking-assignments for -O0 except it is a big compile time increase in many cases).

[Bug tree-optimization/112709] New: ICE verify_flow_info failed during GIMPLE pass: asan0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112709 Bug ID: 112709 Summary: ICE verify_flow_info failed during GIMPLE pass: asan0 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug sanitizer/112708] "gcc -fsanitize=address" produces wrong debug info for variables in function prologue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112708 --- Comment #4 from Bruno Haible --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Is this with or without optimization? Since in step 5, I specified CFLAGS=-ggdb, it is without optimization. (configure sets CFLAGS="-O2 -g" only if CFLAGS is no

[Bug target/109811] libjxl 0.7 is a lot slower in GCC 13.1 vs Clang 16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109811 --- Comment #17 from Artem S. Tashkinov --- Terrific results, thanks a ton! Maybe this bug report could be closed now?

[Bug sanitizer/112708] "gcc -fsanitize=address" produces wrong debug info for variables in function prologue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112708 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Haible --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Also did you add -fvar-tracking-assignments ? No, I haven't. I have specified CFLAGS=-ggdb, indicating that - I don't care about the optimization level, - bu

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 Alex Henrie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexhenrie24 at gmail dot com --- Comment

<    1   2