https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112449
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to post+gcc from comment #10)
> The standard says
>
> > This annex does not require the full support for signaling NaNs specified
> > in IEC 60559. This
> annex uses the term NaN, unless explic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112467
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112464
--- Comment #4 from Robin Dapp ---
Is there another way to make it more robust?
Or does the existing
void
vect_finish_replace_stmt (vec_info *vinfo,
stmt_vec_info stmt_info, gimple *vec_stmt)
{
gimple *scalar_stmt =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
--- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong ---
Thanks Richard.
I tried your patch. It does fix this issue.
But I wonder whether we should also adjust the following COND_LEN_UNARY too ?
Like this:
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index f559bfa4f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Yes, I'm testing a more complete patch right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112464
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #4)
> Is there another way to make it more robust?
>
> Or does the existing
>
> void
> vect_finish_replace_stmt (vec_info *vinfo,
> stmt_vec_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112463
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> One problem with -Wsign-conversion is that it is not enabled with
> -Wextra/-Wall .
However, I don't understand why -Wsign-compare is enabled by -Wextra but n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112446
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112461
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] Simple |[14 regression] premature
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112461
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #9 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
```
#include
#define M_1 0xad5d6da /* 1010110101011101011011011010 */
char g_1 = -1;
short g_2 = -1;
char v1 = -1;
short v2 = 1;
int main(){
char l_1 = -1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112474
Bug ID: 112474
Summary: MIPS: missed optimization for assigning HI reg to zero
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112449
--- Comment #12 from post+gcc at ralfj dot de ---
> GCC will not create an sNaN out of nowhere.
That's the part I was hoping for. :) I just don't think it obviously follows
from any docs (the C standard or GCC docs).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112474
--- Comment #1 from Siarhei Volkau ---
Minimal example for showcase the issue:
#include
uint64_t mthi_example(uint32_t a, uint32_t b, uint32_t c, uint32_t d)
{
uint64_t ret;
ret = (uint64_t)a * b + (uint64_t)c * d + 1u;
return ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112313
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112313
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20aa06490ab57da7729a24bae7c4ec2f5918ec91
commit r14-5317-g20aa06490ab57da7729a24bae7c4ec2f5918ec91
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112475
Bug ID: 112475
Summary: [UBSAN][OpenMP] ICE during GIMPLE pass: sanopt in
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112308
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Stubbs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e24b0fed9234716c146aaf6f8c1b39170e43a6f3
commit r14-5318-ge24b0fed9234716c146aaf6f8c1b39170e43a6f3
Author: Andrew Stubbs
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112308
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112475
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Reduced testcase:
#pragma omp declare target
struct Surface { virtual double sag(); };
#pragma omp end declare target
Surface main_devPtr;
main() {
#pragma omp target
main_devPtr.sag();
}
Printing in 'o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112476
Bug ID: 112476
Summary: [14 Regression] unrecognizable insn with -O2
-march=la464 on loongarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088
--- Comment #15 from JuzheZhong ---
Hi,Richard.
Confirmed Robin's patch doesn't help with this issue.
The root cause of this issue is failed to recognize it as possible
vectorization of conditional reduction which means is_cond_scalar_reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112473
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah it changed in C++20, previously it said "T shall be an integral type" so was
just UB.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112473
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Although you couldn't use std::pair as a NTTP until C++20 anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
it's not exactly clear what the transform is you propose. it looks like a
re-association but SSA names do not match up but the transform only replaces
a single op with 0!?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112477
Bug ID: 112477
Summary: Assignment of value-initialized iterators differs from
value-initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110221
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5f1956498251a4973d52c8aad3faf34d0443169
commit r14-5320-ge5f1956498251a4973d52c8aad3faf34d0443169
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 110221, which changed state.
Bug 110221 Summary: With AVX512 fully masking gfortran.dg/pr68146.f ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110221
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112476
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088
--- Comment #17 from JuzheZhong ---
Sorry for confusing and not enough information.
I am trying to transform:
+ reduc_1 = PHI <..., reduc_2>
+ ...
+ if (...)
+ tmp1 = reduc_1 + rhs1;
+ tmp2 = tmp1 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112475
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly further cleaned up:
#pragma omp declare target
struct S { virtual double foo (); };
#pragma omp end declare target
S s;
int
main ()
{
#pragma omp target
s.foo ();
}
The problem is that ubsan_ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112464
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7b971cf61ae0091dbc777c9aa056e6f1293da2f
commit r14-5322-gd7b971cf61ae0091dbc777c9aa056e6f1293da2f
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Fri Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1e717bd8b043e07e74accff3235d04e6eb719cc
commit r13-8036-gf1e717bd8b043e07e74accff3235d04e6eb719cc
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06ee3438a4fcf98031fccda8ea8ff592a41cf218
commit r13-8039-g06ee3438a4fcf98031fccda8ea8ff592a41cf218
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111397
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:049ec9b981d1f4f97736061d5cf7d0ae990b57d7
commit r13-8037-g049ec9b981d1f4f97736061d5cf7d0ae990b57d7
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ee6e01fba873580f0ee6c88a3f733e79af2e8a3
commit r13-8040-g5ee6e01fba873580f0ee6c88a3f733e79af2e8a3
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e8599fc8079cdc2a9ef934c765613e2f0a4cdf9
commit r13-8042-g8e8599fc8079cdc2a9ef934c765613e2f0a4cdf9
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111583
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b28be88c311f1bc4c62309906177ab3d97800deb
commit r13-8041-gb28be88c311f1bc4c62309906177ab3d97800deb
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111818
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffb0615cf1aa628ca8aa10bda31fe1bc554eccf3
commit r13-8044-gffb0615cf1aa628ca8aa10bda31fe1bc554eccf3
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111764
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db010f96743a4f289975a0432209c38ec34635e9
commit r13-8043-gdb010f96743a4f289975a0432209c38ec34635e9
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd7800a3a73fa07b4688c75edcaaaf923802f020
commit r13-8038-gbd7800a3a73fa07b4688c75edcaaaf923802f020
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111917
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28d9e033a8e95c024e27cb495db610aac37a0f88
commit r13-8045-g28d9e033a8e95c024e27cb495db610aac37a0f88
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112438
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb906061e10662280f602886c3659ac1c7522a37
commit r14-5326-gfb906061e10662280f602886c3659ac1c7522a37
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Fri Nov 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112477
Giuseppe D'Angelo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Giuse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112435
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112438
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112478
Bug ID: 112478
Summary: riscv: asm clobbers not honored
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112478
--- Comment #1 from Michael T. Kloos ---
Added Andrew Waterman to CC list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112475
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
> I admit I haven't paid much attention what the latest OpenMP standard
> currently requires for virtual method calls.
OpenMP 5.0 "2.12.5 target Construct" [175:25-26] has:
"The effect of invoking a virtu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96917
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:705ab7927c81b77503d229513fac991106617766
commit r14-5330-g705ab7927c81b77503d229513fac991106617766
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79378
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:705ab7927c81b77503d229513fac991106617766
commit r14-5330-g705ab7927c81b77503d229513fac991106617766
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0410b754e56c0868203c2412e0585ba070ea938d
commit r14-5331-g0410b754e56c0868203c2412e0585ba070ea938d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79378
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96917
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366
Bug 54366 depends on bug 96917, which changed state.
Bug 96917 Summary: decltype(auto) variable initialized with lambda by-reference
capture has incorrect type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96917
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 96917, which changed state.
Bug 96917 Summary: decltype(auto) variable initialized with lambda by-reference
capture has incorrect type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96917
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 79620, which changed state.
Bug 79620 Summary: decltype() inside a lambda capturing-by-value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396
--- Comment #2 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 56554
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56554&action=edit
Patch fixing the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=63
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 63192, which changed state.
Bug 63192 Summary: non-mutable lambda capture by value on reference does not
apply const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86697
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jzwinck at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112475
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
• The run-time type information (RTTI) of an object can only be accessed from
the device on which it was constructed.
is weird, because RTTI can be queried not just on objects, but on types, and
there doesn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92101
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka ---
*** Bug 92101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111792
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96917
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Vihrov ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df66fa08578a28b3acc8bdb6257b68c245a6a0fa
commit r14-5333-gdf66fa08578a28b3acc8bdb6257b68c245a6a0fa
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112478
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Waterman ---
Although I sketched the first draft of this patch, it’s Jeff Law who brought it
to fruition. He is more suited to help than I am.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111702
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111702
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
HI, sorry for the breakage, will take a look.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82242
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov ---
The small testcase from comment 3 is now improved on trunk, possibly thanks to
work in PR 110215.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112479
Bug ID: 112479
Summary: Missing -Woverflow warnings with bit fields with
assignment of a constant
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112435
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> Created attachment 56553 [details]
> gcc14-pr112435.patch
>
> Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/635760.html ?
But I thin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112480
Bug ID: 112480
Summary: optional::reset emits inefficient code when T is
trivially-destructible
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109122
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56557&action=edit
reduction but not best though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110779
--- Comment #20 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56558
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56558&action=edit
Proposed fix (libgm2/acinclude.m4 and libgm2/configure.host)
Here is a proposed patch for a new file libgm2/ac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110779
--- Comment #21 from Gaius Mulley ---
I've just noticed that the patch doesn't address the issue of
GLIBCXX_IS_NATIVE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112467
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112480
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-10
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112467
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109122
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110307
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #13)
> Note to self: check how control_flow_insn_p relates.
Did you have a chance to look at this bit? matoro asked me to cherry-pick it
downstream but it's in gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
Bug ID: 112481
Summary: [14 Regression] RISCV: ICE: Segmentation fault when
compiling pr110817-3.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
