https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
Bug ID: 112328
Summary: ice in rdg_vertex_for_stmt, at
tree-loop-distribution.cc:418
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112320
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> What target?
Sorry, I should have mentioned x86_64.
In my opinion, bugs in the middle end tend to occur on all targets.
version 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) (GCC)
[546] %
[546] % gcctk -O2 small.c
during GIMPLE pass: ch_vect
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:21:5: internal compiler error: in adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1069
21 | int main() {
| ^~~~
0x8736bd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111720
--- Comment #27 from Li Pan ---
Hi Richard and Juzhe.
I investigated this issue recently and noticed that it may be related to the
array size of the constant memory. Assume we have 2 functions as below.
vuint8m1_t fn_0 () {
uint8_t arr[3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code seems to be:
int allchars, palsetup_p, palsetup_b, palsetup_e;
int *palsetup_palette;
void palsetup() {
int g;
char *s;
switch (palsetup_p)
case 6:
s = allchars;
g = 0;
for (;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112329
Bug ID: 112329
Summary: Faulty arithmetic comparison in O2, O3 of s390x-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #115 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56482
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56482&action=edit
modula2: proposed fix to fix largeconst.mod
Here is a patch set for the modula2 fe which re-implements the ZT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70954
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
Bug ID: 112330
Summary: [14 Regression] LoongArch: LTO bootstrap failure with
GAS 2.41
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> I guess the easiest solution is raising the minimal GAS requirement of
> bootstrapping GCC 14 on LoongArch to 2.42.
Another solution might be default to -mno-relax if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Created attachment 56483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56483&action=edit
The generated assembly triggering the GAS internal error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #3 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
>
> > I guess the easiest solution is raising the minimal GAS requirement of
> > bootstrapping GCC 14 on LoongArch to 2.42.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #116 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9693459e030977d6e906ea7eb587ed09ee4fddbd
commit r14-5054-g9693459e030977d6e906ea7eb587ed09ee4fddbd
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> >
> > > I guess the easiest solution is raising the minimal GAS requirement of
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #5 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> (In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> > >
> > > > I guess the easiest solu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112331
Bug ID: 112331
Summary: middle-end: Fail vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> > (In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112331
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
I suspect it is SRA issue again ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #7 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #6)
> (In reply to chenglulu from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> > > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #7)
> Uh, I also thought about this gcc and binutils matching issue when I
> submitted r14-4674, but I didn't think about whether this should be solved?
> How to fix it？
I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] LoongArch: |[14 Regression] LoongArch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110551
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #5)
> The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89e5d902fc55ad375f149f25a84c516ad360a606
>
> commit r14-4968-g89e5d902fc55ad375f149f2
specs from gcc/specs
COLLECT_GCC=./gcc/xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=gcc/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/configure --disable-bootstrap
--disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Slightly shorter example:
typedef union {
double d;
int L[2];
} U;
void d2b(int*);
void _Py_dg_dtoa(double dd) {
int be;
U u;
u.d = dd;
if ((&u)->L[1])
d2b(&be);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1)
> Slightly shorter example:
>
> typedef union {
> double d;
> int L[2];
> } U;
> void d2b(int*);
> void _Py_dg_dtoa(double dd) {
> int be;
> U u;
> u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index 35d073c9a21..75c75f610c2 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -25748,7 +25748,7 @@ (define_peephole2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f3a1937a2b87ebe5f3c1bf2ceec48bfbcd4ccf
commit r14-5056-g64f3a1937a2b87ebe5f3c1bf2ceec48bfbcd4ccf
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112263
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente ---
so if I add to
std::cout << std::stacktrace::current() << '\n';
I get what needed
Dl_info dlinfo;
for (auto & entry : std::stacktrace::current() ) {
dladdr((const void*)(entry.native_hand
/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) (GCC)
[513] %
[513] % gcctk -O3 -g small.c
during GIMPLE pass: ccp
small.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #8 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
I'm sorry, I also didn't fully understand these bugs, my friend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98608
--- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker ---
PATCH (but unclear about n == 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/634896.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I confirm that the fix also fixes original python-3.11.6 build failure. Thank
you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112263
--- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Sorry, made the (almost) full exercise:
read the doc in
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/stacktrace_entry
and the code in stacktrace header file and in
libstdc++-v3/src/c++23/stacktrace.cc
(ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112334
Bug ID: 112334
Summary: ICE in gen_untyped_return arm.md:9197 while compiling
harden-cfr-bret.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112335
Bug ID: 112335
Summary: missed optimization on reset and assign unique_ptr
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2)
> While you (Gaius) here report test failure, similar to what Maciej had
> reported in PR112091 "rs6000: redefinition of 'constexpr long double
> std::abs(long d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104387
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70954
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Wmisleading-indentation|-Wmisleading-indentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107513
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> The patch for PR 96780 added -ffold-simple-inlines which works for some
> specific functions. This attribute would extend that to arbitrary functions.
I dis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
Bug ID: 112336
Summary: ICE in gen_reg_rtx emit-rtl.cc:1208 while compiling
"unsigned _BitInt(1) Foo;" with -fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |sanitizer
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well sizes than 128 that is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111835
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Siarhei Volkau from comment #3)
> I don't think that it is duplicate of the bug 104387 because there's only
> one store.
> And this bug is simply disappears if we change the source code a bit.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
Bug ID: 112337
Summary: arm: ICE in arm_effective_regno
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112335
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
__old_p_6 = MEM[(struct s * &)ps1_2(D)];
MEM[(struct s * &)ps1_2(D)] = 0B;
if (__old_p_6 != 0B)
goto ; [53.47%]
else
goto ; [46.53%]
[local count: 574129752]:
s::~s (__old_p_6);
opera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106884
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
PR 111000 was similar one but for LIM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112338
Bug ID: 112338
Summary: ieee_set_halting_mode only affects the master thread
outside of an OpenMP parallel region
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111921
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112338
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
My bet it is not described ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109740
Alexander Goomenuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emerg.reanimator at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339
Bug ID: 112339
Summary: ICE with namespaced attribute on function
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109740
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Goomenuk ---
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/using_declaration
# In class definition
...
If the derived class already has a member with the same name, parameter list,
and qualifications, *the derived cla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110694
Roman Žilka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roman.zilka at gmail dot com
--- Comment
gressive-loop-optimizations]
6 | for (b = 1; b; b++)
|~^~
small.c:6:17: note: within this loop
6 | for (b = 1; b; b++)
| ^
tkoenig@gcc188:~> gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) [master r13-4915-g9b111debbfb]
Copyrig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112340
Bug ID: 112340
Summary: [14 regression] assembler instruction counts off for
gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341
Bug ID: 112341
Summary: error: insufficient contextual information to
determine type on co_await result in function template
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112342
Bug ID: 112342
Summary: Crash when an unexpected ampersand is encountered
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111653
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112343
Bug ID: 112343
Summary: [14 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: dse
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71219
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d880e093d92084f55b10626610ef059fd9194a6a
commit r14-5059-gd880e093d92084f55b10626610ef059fd9194a6a
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112319
--- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Patch sent for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/634931.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110551
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80b1a371008c31982d35cff9b85ca6affd3ac949
commit r14-5063-g80b1a371008c31982d35cff9b85ca6affd3ac949
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109933
--- Comment #13 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Created attachment 56487
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56487&action=edit
Proposed fix
Hi Rory,
Sorry that this slipped off my plate for way too long.
I just got around to refactor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112327
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a0af6e5a99cd895a663f0221c25321ae802413f
commit r14-5067-g1a0af6e5a99cd895a663f0221c25321ae802413f
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Wed Nov 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112327
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
Adam Belay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abelay at mit dot edu
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112344
Bug ID: 112344
Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112344
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Did you copy the correct testcase? Because it looks like you just copied the
one from PR 112305 and the output is way different.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112344
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Corrected testcase:
```
int printf(const char *, ...);
void a() {
long b = 2036854775807;
char c = 3;
short d;
int e = -2147483648, f = 0;
for (; f < 7; f++)
while (e < 20) {
e += 2;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110342
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c58566450f21cf1d9951284176ea6da0cc11fc9
commit r14-5071-g1c58566450f21cf1d9951284176ea6da0cc11fc9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112344
--- Comment #3 from Junwei Zeng ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Corrected testcase:
> ```
> int printf(const char *, ...);
> void a() {
> long b = 2036854775807;
> char c = 3;
> short d;
> int e = -2147483648, f = 0;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 110342, which changed state.
Bug 110342 Summary: [C++26] P2361R6 - Unevaluated strings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110342
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112344
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #10 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #9)
> Xuerui informed me that non-LTO bootstrapping is broken too.
Well, this has nothing to do with whether to open lto or not, it is caused by
binutils inserting "nop" whe
89 matches
Mail list logo
