https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:281699fbff6262766674ab13087d37db751cd40a
commit r14-4802-g281699fbff6262766674ab13087d37db751cd40a
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f93c6027fb09c94ca8dc7fe13f92a3b9205b68a
commit r13-7967-g4f93c6027fb09c94ca8dc7fe13f92a3b9205b68a
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Component|middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #3 from Linus Torvalds ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect without an input, the cse will happen as there is no other writes
> in the loop.
Yes, it looks to me like the CSE simply didn't think of the memory c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105467
--- Comment #2 from jpakkane at gmail dot com ---
It would be preferable to have the default work out of the box than having
every end user having to add compiler flags to make things work.
Ninja is the most popular underlying build system for m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like postreload_cse is causing the issue ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:857a6ee25ff5cbb97715de4dd97e1641285c6085
commit r14-4804-g857a6ee25ff5cbb97715de4dd97e1641285c6085
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7069ea909f5292a17d22e5e68218373186820d29
commit r14-4805-g7069ea909f5292a17d22e5e68218373186820d29
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:857a6ee25ff5cbb97715de4dd97e1641285c6085
commit r14-4804-g857a6ee25ff5cbb97715de4dd97e1641285c6085
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109827
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7069ea909f5292a17d22e5e68218373186820d29
commit r14-4805-g7069ea909f5292a17d22e5e68218373186820d29
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 109826, which changed state.
Bug 109826 Summary: Incompatible pointer types in ?: not covered by
-Wincompatible-pointer-types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 109827, which changed state.
Bug 109827 Summary: Pointer/integer mismatch in ?: not covered by
-Wint-conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109827
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109827
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111860
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:084addf8a700fab9222d4127ab8524920d0ca481
commit r14-4806-g084addf8a700fab9222d4127ab8524920d0ca481
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231020 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111903
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This fixes the issue:
diff --git a/gcc/convert.cc b/gcc/convert.cc
index 64b7001843c..5357609d8f0 100644
--- a/gcc/convert.cc
+++ b/gcc/convert.cc
@@ -1006,8 +1006,13 @@ convert_to_complex_1 (tree type, tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111545
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111904
Bug ID: 111904
Summary: Miscompilation with -O3
-fharden-control-flow-redundancy?
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111904
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
gllib/memset_explicit.o is apparently the same between the two directories
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
--- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle ---
Created attachment 56162
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56162&action=edit
proof-of-concept patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
--- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle ---
This patch addresses the regression, but probably isn't the correct fix.
The issue is that the backend now has a way of representing the concatenation
of two registers (for example, TI is constructed for two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101955
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e28869670c9879fe7c67caf6cc11af202509ef78
commit r14-4810-ge28869670c9879fe7c67caf6cc11af202509ef78
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Sat O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106245
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e28869670c9879fe7c67caf6cc11af202509ef78
commit r14-4810-ge28869670c9879fe7c67caf6cc11af202509ef78
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Sat O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111905
Bug ID: 111905
Summary: -O3 vectorization terribly pessimizes the code for an
already unrolled loop
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111905
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56163
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56163&action=edit
testcase
Please next time put the testcase inline or attach it rather than just link
godbolt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111905
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111857
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66c26e5cfdf65ae024fcb658629dc5a9a10f3f85
commit r14-4812-g66c26e5cfdf65ae024fcb658629dc5a9a10f3f85
Author: Pan Li
Date: Fri Oct 20 16:2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111857
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111001
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 56164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56164&action=edit
sh_pr11001_fix.patch
Can you please try this patch? It should solve the problem, but not sure if
there could be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
Adrian, can you please give it another go with the patch I've posted in PR
111001 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56164
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111904
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111897
--- Comment #2 from Agner Fog ---
Thank you Jonathan.
The problem is that the C++ standard is becoming so complicated that nobody can
master it, not even the persons who wrote the example in the proposal.
`_Float16 A{1.0};` gives a warning, wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111520
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo