[Bug other/103331] There should be a rule to make build.log in the top-level Makefile

2023-10-20 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103331 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > I'm assuming that the way that build.log is normally generated is by just > appending `| tee build.log` to the end of a normal `make` command? hm, doing it that

[Bug c/109827] Pointer/integer mismatch in ?: not covered by -Wint-conversion

2023-10-20 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109827 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/111890] New: ICE in build_new_op, friend operator in nested template specialization with constrained return type

2023-10-20 Thread kcayimckaghxtnkrvg at cwmxc dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890 Bug ID: 111890 Summary: ICE in build_new_op, friend operator in nested template specialization with constrained return type Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug plugins/86441] instantiate_class_template() unable to re-execute constexpr function

2023-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86441 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug jit/102824] building pdf/dvi documentation for libgccjit fails

2023-10-20 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- I've been testing this on the compile farm, and there seems to be a wide amount of variation between machines with regards to whether this fails or not; I think it might have to do with different machines ha

[Bug tree-optimization/111891] New: ICE regression, in vectorizable_simd_clone_call, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:4073 on x86_64, gfortran

2023-10-20 Thread mjires at suse dot cz via Gcc-bugs
ter Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.0 20231020 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-O2' '-march=native' '-shared-libgcc' '-dumpdir' 'a-' /home/mjires/checks/master/bin/../libexec/

[Bug c/109826] Incompatible pointer types in ?: not covered by -Wincompatible-pointer-types

2023-10-20 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation

2023-10-20 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 --- Comment #19 from Alex Coplan --- (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #18) > So for backports, it sounds like we want r13-2658 without the verify_gimple > changes, and the other two patches as is. Is that right? Would it make sense > to sq

[Bug c++/108238] auto return type and some attributes don't get along

2023-10-20 Thread pobrn at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108238 --- Comment #5 from Barnabás Pőcze --- Based on a suggestion from Jakub Jelínek, I have tried to modify `is_late_template_attribute()` instead, but it appears that function does not run in this case.

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glaubitz at physik dot fu-b

[Bug c/111887] GCC: 14: A potential miscompilation with __builtin_inf

2023-10-20 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111887 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Would that break (__FINITE_MATH_ONLY__ ? huge : __builtin_inf())?

[Bug target/111892] New: [SH] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction when building e2fsprogs

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892 Bug ID: 111892 Summary: [SH] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction when building e2fsprogs Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/111893] New: range-op misses {L, R}ROTATE_EXPR handling

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111893 Bug ID: 111893 Summary: range-op misses {L,R}ROTATE_EXPR handling Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-o

[Bug target/111892] [SH] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction when building e2fsprogs

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Full source code tree available here: https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/e2fsprogs-5VkWTa.tgz

[Bug tree-optimization/111893] range-op misses {L,R}ROTATE_EXPR handling

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111893 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 --- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- @Segher: In case it's trivial to fix, could you get this fixed or revert the patch?

[Bug target/81426] [SH]: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when building webkit2gtk

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426 --- Comment #13 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #12) > > This is still present in gcc-13, I just ran into it while cross-building the > > Haskell compiler GHC for sh4: > > > > Have you tried using the -mlr

[Bug tree-optimization/111893] range-op misses {L,R}ROTATE_EXPR handling

2023-10-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111893 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think it is, but obviously an out of range constant can propagate into the rotates at any time after the rotate pattern matching.

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Oleg Endo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d0ca7ecd4f4dfef4145ad3a41fa0a72c8b19697 commit r14-4782-g1d0ca7ecd4f4dfef4145ad3a41fa0a72c8b19697 Author: Oleg Endo Date: Fri Oct 2

[Bug tree-optimization/111882] [13/14 Regression] : internal compiler error: in get_expr_operand in ifcvt with Variable length arrays and bitfields inside a struct

2023-10-20 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111882 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Oleg Endo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ce4e99303d01d348229cca22bf8d3dd63004e01 commit r13-7966-g3ce4e99303d01d348229cca22bf8d3dd63004e01 Author: Oleg Endo Date:

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Oleg Endo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21ce4f97b2c158778fbf96858e7e589ad648b3c8 commit r12-9932-g21ce4f97b2c158778fbf96858e7e589ad648b3c8 Author: Oleg Endo Date:

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Oleg Endo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e784ba28ae0214b02ae45734d5106ca421711a8a commit r11-11069-ge784ba28ae0214b02ae45734d5106ca421711a8a Author: Oleg Endo Date:

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/111892] [SH] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction when building e2fsprogs

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-20 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/111891] [14 Regression] ICE regression, in vectorizable_simd_clone_call, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:4073 on x86_64, gfortran

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111891 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 --- Comment #12 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #11) > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5) > > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Harold Gutch from comme

[Bug target/101177] sh3: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2023-10-20 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177 --- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #12) > > That was super-fast! Thanks a lot! Not really. ~2 years from patch to commit. Sorry about that.

[Bug target/111892] [SH] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction when building e2fsprogs

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Is that on a native sh system or are you cross-compiling? From which host? Yes, building on a native system (SH7785LCR) running Debian unstable on

[Bug target/111892] [SH] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction when building e2fsprogs

2023-10-20 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- This

[Bug target/51708] [SH] CSE constants after combine/split

2023-10-20 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51708 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug tree-optimization/111866] [14 regression] ICE when compiling gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c

2023-10-20 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111866 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- patch submitted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/633713.html

[Bug tree-optimization/111000] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-2944-g3d48c11ad08

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111000 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d118738e71cf4615f170fff8dabe66442206d008 commit r14-4786-gd118738e71cf4615f170fff8dabe66442206d008 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111000] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-2944-g3d48c11ad08

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111000 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

2023-10-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah, that is what I meant. Note, I do see the from_chars inlines even with -std=c++23 in preprocessed dump when including , the difference is in #if __cplusplus > 202302L # include #endif in bits/basic_st

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

2023-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/111445] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-1077-g57bf3751511

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- For the testsuite, not fixed by the fix for PR110243: /* { dg-do run } */ extern void abort (void); short a, b; unsigned char c = 255; unsigned cnt; void __attribute__((noipa)) check (int x) { if (x !=

[Bug tree-optimization/111891] [14 Regression] ICE regression, in vectorizable_simd_clone_call, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:4073 on x86_64, gfortran

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111891 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d70575f542f575133eb4c49eda89ab61eedf83b8 commit r14-4788-gd70575f542f575133eb4c49eda89ab61eedf83b8 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111891] [14 Regression] ICE regression, in vectorizable_simd_clone_call, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:4073 on x86_64, gfortran

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111891 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/111445] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-1077-g57bf3751511

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- -Os -fallow-store-data-races -fdisable-tree-sccp -fno-tree-loop-im makes the case simpler to look at, IVOPTs only mangles the last loop there: Analyzing # of iterations of loop 2 exit condition [d_26 +

[Bug tree-optimization/111445] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-1077-g57bf3751511

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

2023-10-20 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/111336] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3 since r14-2472-g14b10ff30ad

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111336 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e7e4498c3cdc27e087ab80aa76dac41819702f commit r14-4789-g44e7e4498c3cdc27e087ab80aa76dac41819702f Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e7e4498c3cdc27e087ab80aa76dac41819702f commit r14-4789-g44e7e4498c3cdc27e087ab80aa76dac41819702f Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] Wrong|[13 Regression] Wrong code

[Bug tree-optimization/111336] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3 since r14-2472-g14b10ff30ad

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111336 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/111131] SLP of gathers incomplete

2023-10-20 Thread carlos.seo at linaro dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31 Carlos Eduardo Seo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlos.seo at linaro dot org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/111131] SLP of gathers incomplete

2023-10-20 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 20 Oct 2023, carlos.seo at linaro dot org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31 > > Carlos Eduardo Seo changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/111383] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-5138-ge82c382971

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 111383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1fc2cc0a8a8b97dbc3dc6715fd4f384d9204845 commit r14-4791-ga1fc2cc0a8a8b97dbc3dc6715fd4f384d9204845 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111445] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-1077-g57bf3751511

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9692309ed6b625f0fb358c0e230404b5603f69a6 commit r14-4790-g9692309ed6b625f0fb358c0e230404b5603f69a6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111383] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-5138-ge82c382971

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111383 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1fc2cc0a8a8b97dbc3dc6715fd4f384d9204845 commit r14-4791-ga1fc2cc0a8a8b97dbc3dc6715fd4f384d9204845 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111445] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-1077-g57bf3751511

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.3|12.4 Summary|[13 Regression

[Bug middle-end/110233] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/111383] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-5138-ge82c382971

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111383 Bug 111383 depends on bug 110233, which changed state. Bug 110233 Summary: [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110233 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 110233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/111894] New: Missed vectorization opportunity

2023-10-20 Thread Mark_B53 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111894 Bug ID: 111894 Summary: Missed vectorization opportunity Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiza

[Bug tree-optimization/111365] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111365 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 111365 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/111866] [14 regression] ICE when compiling gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111866 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb15fad3190a8b33e3e451b964ff1ecf08bbb113 commit r14-4792-geb15fad3190a8b33e3e451b964ff1ecf08bbb113 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111866] [14 regression] ICE when compiling gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c

2023-10-20 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111866 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/111895] New: error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2' and 'int' to binary 'operator!='

2023-10-20 Thread nabijaczleweli at nabijaczleweli dot xyz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895 Bug ID: 111895 Summary: error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2' and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c/111896] New: call with wrong stack alignment

2023-10-20 Thread lukas.graetz--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111896 Bug ID: 111896 Summary: call with wrong stack alignment Product: gcc Version: 9.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Ass

[Bug c++/111897] New: Initialization of _Float16 with f.p. constant gives false warning

2023-10-20 Thread agner at agner dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111897 Bug ID: 111897 Summary: Initialization of _Float16 with f.p. constant gives false warning Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/106086] ICE: trying to capture 'this' in instantiation of generic lambda

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106086 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:909672f02ff75a6a94c88dee4aa41e92edb1d1ed commit r14-4795-g909672f02ff75a6a94c88dee4aa41e92edb1d1ed Author: Patrick Palka Date: F

[Bug c++/106086] ICE: trying to capture 'this' in instantiation of generic lambda

2023-10-20 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106086 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99757] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7736

2023-10-20 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99757 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/104068] ICE Segmentation fault with type alias

2023-10-20 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104068 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/110644] Error in gfc_format_decoder

2023-10-20 Thread aluaces at udc dot es via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110644 --- Comment #10 from Alberto Luaces --- Ok, indeed they were some warnings. I had to use &gfc_current_locus, as you suggested, so now all of them are pointed at the end of the file. Yes, I am using OOP: we have a "states" class that has its as

[Bug c++/111895] error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2' and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' on enum class bitfield cast to bool

2023-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82165] Operator overloading doesn't work with enum bit fields

2023-10-20 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/111897] Initialization of _Float16 with f.p. constant gives false warning

2023-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111897 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/111896] call with wrong stack alignment

2023-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111896 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/111860] [14 Regression] incorrect vUSE after guard block loop skip block during vectorization.

2023-10-20 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111860 --- Comment #21 from Tamar Christina --- patch submitted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/633734.html

[Bug target/111898] New: [SH] [12 13 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when building PostgreSQL 16

2023-10-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111898 Bug ID: 111898 Summary: [SH] [12 13 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when building PostgreSQL 16 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/80858] When trying to copy std::unordered_map illegally, error message doesn't tell what's wrong

2023-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80858 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/80858] When trying to copy std::unordered_map illegally, error message doesn't tell what's wrong

2023-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80858 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > :5:8: required from here > /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-13.2.0/include/c++/13.2.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:97:23: > error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incompl

[Bug c++/80858] When trying to copy std::unordered_map illegally, error message doesn't tell what's wrong

2023-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80858 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- The problem isn't limited to implicitly-declared special members. If we adjust comment 4 so that B::operator=(const B&) is user-declared but defined as defaulted: struct Empty { }; template struct A {

[Bug target/111896] call with wrong stack alignment

2023-10-20 Thread lukas.graetz--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111896 --- Comment #2 from Lukas Grätz --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > No I think you are looking into the wrong location. > > When a call happens, it pushes a value on the stack aligning the stack that > is incoming into that functi

[Bug tree-optimization/111882] [13/14 Regression] : internal compiler error: in get_expr_operand in ifcvt with Variable length arrays and bitfields inside a struct

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111882 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24cf1f600b8ad34c68a51f48884e72d01f729893 commit r14-4798-g24cf1f600b8ad34c68a51f48884e72d01f729893 Author: Andre Vieira

[Bug ipa/101354] [11 regression] naked function mishandled - store optimized away

2023-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lukas.graetz@tu-darmstadt.d

[Bug target/111896] call with wrong stack alignment

2023-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111896 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/111896] call with wrong stack alignment

2023-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111896 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > This was fixed via PR 101354 's fix. > The simple workaround is to add noipa in an additional to naked. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1

[Bug target/111896] call with wrong stack alignment

2023-10-20 Thread lukas.graetz--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111896 --- Comment #5 from Lukas Grätz --- Thanks a lot!

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d9263f292c3efc4e37c3a88117388e86d19b954 commit r14-4799-g1d9263f292c3efc4e37c3a88117388e86d19b954 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Th

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

2023-10-20 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/111899] New: [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'ust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 Bug ID: 111899 Summary: [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'ust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope' Product: gcc

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I noticed it via the build bot: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-October/798851.html

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- I'm testing simply removing all occurrences of NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR in the parts of rust FE that were reused from the C++ FE

[Bug fortran/110644] Error in gfc_format_decoder

2023-10-20 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110644 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 03:13:06PM +, aluaces at udc dot es wrote: > Ok, indeed they were some warnings. I had to use &gfc_current_locus, as you > suggested, so now all of them are pointed at the end of

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ac53c025e08b4c464b02cfc595e422813023c81 commit r14-4800-g5ac53c025e08b4c464b02cfc595e422813023c81 Author: Patrick Palka Date: F

[Bug preprocessor/111900] New: newlines in arguments in function-like macros are not preserved

2023-10-20 Thread ben at wibking dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111900 Bug ID: 111900 Summary: newlines in arguments in function-like macros are not preserved Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

2023-10-20 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/111901] New: Apparently bogus CSE of inline asm with memory clobber

2023-10-20 Thread torvalds--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901 Bug ID: 111901 Summary: Apparently bogus CSE of inline asm with memory clobber Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug c/111902] New: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2023-10-20 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 56159 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56159&action=edit unreduced testcase # gcc -v gcc version 14.0.0 20231020 (exper

  1   2   >