https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
--- Comment #48 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to OH from comment #47)
> Will/Could this be back-ported to the 12.x or lower versions? (Wasn't clear
> to me from previous comments if this would be the case).
Changing the behavior mid-release
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111820
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111820
>
> --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111843
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||meta-bug
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111842
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to n.deshm...@samsung.com from comment #5)
> > The code is part of a third party library hence adding a explicit cast is
> > not possible.
>
> Well t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111720
--- Comment #13 from JuzheZhong ---
Confirm ARM SVE has the same issue:
https://godbolt.org/z/TjcaM6xsP
#include
void fn(uint8_t * __restrict out) {
uint8_t arr[32] = {1, 2, 7, 1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 4, 9, 9, 1, 2, 7,
1, 3, 4, 5, 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111846
Bug ID: 111846
Summary: ice in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2156
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111820
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
> But we end up here with niters_skip being INTEGER_CST and ..
>
> > 1421 || (!vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p (loop_vinfo)
>
> possibly vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p. Note
> LOOP_VINFO_PEELIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111847
Bug ID: 111847
Summary: Debug info for structure members is not generated for
structure in template class
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111820
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> > But we end up here with niters_skip being INTEGER_CST and ..
> >
> > > 1421 || (!vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p (loop_vinfo)
> >
> > possibly vect_u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111847
Jiří Engelthaler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111756
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56122|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110040
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-17
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111848
Bug ID: 111848
Summary: RISC-V: RVV cost model pick unexpected big LMUL
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111848
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
Sorry, it pick LMUL = 4:
f3:
ble a4,zero,.L11
csrrt0,vlenb
sllit1,t0,4
csrra6,vlenb
sub sp,sp,t1
csrra5,vlenb
sllia6,a6,3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110311
--- Comment #57 from Richard Biener ---
It might be not ideal but it seems unless somebody finds the time to analyze
the difference the "fix" did and thereby identifies the problem itself closing
the bug is the most efficient way of dealing with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111799
--- Comment #4 from Theodoros Theodoridis ---
Oops, there was a bug in my reduction, here's the fixed code:
https://godbolt.org/z/shxffzs8E
void foo(void);
typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
static int b;
static int c;
static int *f = &b;
st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110170
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d005deb6c8a956b4f7ccb6e70e8e7830a40fed9
commit r11-11065-g0d005deb6c8a956b4f7ccb6e70e8e7830a40fed9
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111846
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We are dividing 4 by 8. We get here with basic-block vectorization and
a group size of 4 but we let vectorizable_simd_clone_call choose its
own vector type (it chooses 8 lanes).
While we properly constrai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Same with renamed vars, so that the long variable names don't make it
unreadable:
int a, b;
unsigned int c, d, e;
void
foo (int x)
{
b += d;
c += b < d;
b += e = a < x;
c += b;
c += b < e;
}
I b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110603
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110641
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110733
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-17
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-17
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110733
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> This seems to be fixed, at least I can't reproduce on current trunk.
Same here. Works fine with g4efe9085d08 (20231011)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 110838, which changed state.
Bug 110838 Summary: [14 Regression] wrong code on x365-3.5, -O3, sign extraction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110838
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110838
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111054
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-08-20 00:00:00 |2023-10-17
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111846
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:323209cd73bf1d81d91637677db5883afc8ae5f6
commit r14-4682-g323209cd73bf1d81d91637677db5883afc8ae5f6
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111259
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111260
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111262
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111268
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|2023-09-07 00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111268
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, we have
(gdb) p debug (node)
t.c:3:6: note: node 0x3f341d0 (max_nunits=1, refcnt=1) vector(2) long unsigned
int
t.c:3:6: note: op: VEC_PERM_EXPR
t.c:3:6: note: stmt 0 _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
t.c:3:6: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111328
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111336
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|2023-09-08 00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|2023-09-13 00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111520
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111671
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111702
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111727
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
I think slyfox's fix in 043a6fcbc27f8721301eb2f72a7839f54f393003 (PR111559)
sorted this, maybe?
I can't reproduce it anymore, anyway. Feel free to close as appropriate and
I'll reopen if it returns?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111756
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef6696af08a888b53e0e21b17c0a1f87ffdfc3c6
commit r14-4683-gef6696af08a888b53e0e21b17c0a1f87ffdfc3c6
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111756
--- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulley ---
Closing now that the patch has been applied.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111756
--- Comment #7 from Gaius Mulley ---
Will close once it has been applied to the gcc-13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111262
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111476
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE when|[14 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111838
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50502
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
The sample compiles without error with GCC 13.1.0 and 14.0.0 20231008.
Close as fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111849
Bug ID: 111849
Summary: GCC replaces volatile struct assignments with memcpy
calls
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111727
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111792
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111336
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111845
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55119
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org ---
I think this is OBE: fixed 2014-08-01, r213412, by making attr->file_length
__int64.
The comment in adaint.c is still wrong! Just tested on macOS with a 5GB
download.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/621989.html for the
prototype patch. I still think it might be too aggressive, an alternative I
didn't yet implement is turning everything in split_o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111726
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> We should use the non-standard but thread-safe lgamma_r if available.
And if not available, we can use std::log(std::abs(std::tgamma(x))).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111840
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111842
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111842
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to n.deshm...@samsung.com from comment #5)
> The warning is valid but I wish to suppress it like the other
> conversion warning using -Wno flag.
Why?
Why not just write the code correctly? It'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111840
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111726
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the abs is not needed for some of the lgamma calls, as the argument is
guaranteed to be non-negative. Unfortunately, that's not the case for all of
them.
lgamma_r, lgammaf_r and lgammal_r are pres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111726
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> lgamma_r, lgammaf_r and lgammal_r are present in glibc, musl, newlib,
> Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD at least.
And OpenBSD has lgamma_r and lgammaf_r (but not l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111260
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #9 from Andrew P
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo