https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110862
--- Comment #2 from Paul Dreik ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #1)
> It does throw:
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/5q3bb51YE
Sorry for being unclear. Yes, it throws but that is after the out of bounds
read has happened.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
Bug ID: 110867
Summary: ICE in combine after
7cdd0860949c6c3232e6cff1d7ca37bb5234074c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43644
jbeulich at suse dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110838
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Tested https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625868.html against
x265-3.5 test suite. All passes.
Thank you!
> > If I comment it out as above patch, then O3/PGO can get 16% and 12%
> > performance
> > improvement compared to O2 on x86.
> >
> > O2 O3 PGO
> > cycles 2,497,674,824 2,104,993,224 2,199,753,593
> > instructions1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110857
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
The sanity check fires since profile count involved are not compatible that
should never happen within a single function. Would it be possible to dump
them? From debugger one should be able to call
p this->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110868
Bug ID: 110868
Summary: crossback build fails for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu due to
check on build environment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110868
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 55670
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55670&action=edit
config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110868
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
make[5]: Leaving directory
'/home/cqwrteur/toolchains_build/gcc_build/x86_64-w64-mingw32/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/artifacts/hostbuild/x86_64-w64-mingw32/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/32/libgcc'
make[4]: Leaving directory
'/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina ---
Or rather, info_for_reduction looks at the original statement if it's a
pattern, whereas vect_is_reduction only looks at the direct statement.
You'll probably want to check vect_orig_stmt if using info_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #15 from Hao Liu ---
Ah, I see.
I've sent out a quick fix patch for code review. I'll investigate more about
this and find out the root cause.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Hao Liu from comment #15)
> Ah, I see.
>
> I've sent out a quick fix patch for code review. I'll investigate more
> about this and find out the root cause.
Thanks! I can reduce a testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #17 from Hao Liu ---
> Thanks! I can reduce a testcase for you if you want :)
That will be very helpful. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka ---
Thanks,
I think I will need to work out the remaining vectorizer problems. One issue
seems to be interaction with loop distribution. Loop distribution seems to
intorduce alias checks that are later removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110226
Bug 110226 depends on bug 80753, which changed state.
Bug 80753 Summary: __has_include and __has_include_next taints subsequent I/O
errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110220
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d379bb1191390c3be1fdd0f2fb8e8b1e2c44cd7
commit r14-2907-g1d379bb1191390c3be1fdd0f2fb8e8b1e2c44cd7
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110868
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 03:53:26PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
[snip]
> > The main difference in the compilation output about code around the
> > miss-prediction
> > branch is:
> > o In O2: predicated instruction (cmov here) is selected to eliminate above
> > branch. cmov is true better tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Personally I'd like it diagnosed in GNU modes, but this is pretty much the
poster child for "conforming extension diagnosed with -pedantic" so I can see
the argument for not diagnosing it by default.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > If I comment it out as above patch, then O3/PGO can get 16% and 12%
> > > performance
> > > improvement compared to O2 on x86.
> > >
> > > O2 O3 PGO
> > > cycles 2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110860
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110860
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
std::abs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110378
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a patch addressing the simplest case of the three on the
mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625895.html
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 08:55:35PM +0800, Changbin Du wrote:
> The result (p-core, no ht, no turbo, performance mode):
>
> O2 O3 PGO
> cycles 2,581,832,749 8,638,401,568 9,394,200,585
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
--- Comment #10 from Aaron Ballman ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Personally I'd like it diagnosed in GNU modes, but this is pretty much the
> poster child for "conforming extension diagnosed with -pedantic" so I can
> see t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110220
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07573fc45a1fefa7e5f03e1930b188f36eba3a11
commit r13-7678-g07573fc45a1fefa7e5f03e1930b188f36eba3a11
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110220
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110862
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105523
--- Comment #34 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
@Senthil: Can this PR be closed? Or will it be backported?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina ---
Hi, here's the reduced case:
> cat analyse.i
double x264_weights_analyse___trans_tmp_1;
float x264_weights_analyse_ref_mean;
x264_weights_analyse() {
x264_weights_analyse___trans_tmp_1 = floor(x2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110852
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is likely g:eab57b825bcc350e9ff44eb2fa739a80199d9bb1 which fixed
prediction order and uncovered latent bug in combininig predictions with known
probabilities. I will take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110865
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:860b0f0ef787f756c0e293671b4c4622dff63a79
commit r13-7679-g860b0f0ef787f756c0e293671b4c4622dff63a79
Author: Gaius Mulley
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #1)
> The optimization introduced by r14-2879-g7cdd0860949c6c hits during
> combination of insn
>
> (insn 31 3 32 2 (set (reg:SI 118
-solaris2.11
Between 20230731 (bf67bf4880ce5be0b6e48c7c35828528b7be12ed) and 20230801
(a5451b8b9f3a6ab0cb1a60bc8b0b76cca46b080f), Solaris/SPARC bootstrap broke e.g.
compiling cp/lex.cc in stage 2:
during RTL pass: combine
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/cp/lex.cc: In function ‘void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110869
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110870
Bug ID: 110870
Summary: g++ internal compiler error on modules with
precompiled headerfile "string"
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110870
--- Comment #1 from Jochen Hiller ---
Side-note: same code does compile fine with clang 16.0.6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110805
--- Comment #1 from Jochen Hiller ---
Side-note: same code does compile and execute fine with clang 16.0.6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110870
--- Comment #2 from Jochen Hiller ---
Sorry, typo: is plog 1.1.9, not 1.1.19, see
https://github.com/SergiusTheBest/plog/releases/tag/1.1.9
* happens with plog-1.1.9, but seems unrelated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110805
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Gcc's module support is still experimental.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110805
--- Comment #3 from Jochen Hiller ---
> Gcc's module support is still experimental.
Sure. Nevertheless reporting bugs may help to come from experimental to stable.
I mainly do prototype development using C++ modules with Clang 16, but trying
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110822
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110822
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|12.1.0 |
Summary|[13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110291
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||waffl3x at protonmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110869
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you test the patch in bug 110867 comment #1 to see if fixes the issue here
too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110864
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you test the patch in bug 110867 comment #1 to see if fixes the issue here
too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110161
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110864
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Yep! Running bootstrap+regtests with the fix now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110864
--- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Neill ---
The fix resolves the bootstrap error. Still running the testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96055
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53935
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110869
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Can you test the patch in bug 110867 comment #1 to see if fixes the issue here
> too?
Sure: sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap in progress...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88420
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110864
--- Comment #6 from Patrick O'Neill ---
No new regressions in the testsuite - that fix will work!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88286
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.3.0, 13.1.0, 14.0
Kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871
Bug ID: 110871
Summary: coroutine precondition should be evaluated before the
initial suspend
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872
Bug ID: 110872
Summary: coroutine postcondition is not evaluated
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109986
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110161
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 55674
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55674&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed patch which will be applied (if) the bootstrap succeeds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110161
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bf244e32a0d505720396fbb7df26f824c7f77eb
commit r14-2911-g8bf244e32a0d505720396fbb7df26f824c7f77eb
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110161
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26b627810a2e307d0eacf4bf290daf548feb517c
commit r13-7680-g26b627810a2e307d0eacf4bf290daf548feb517c
Author: Gaius Mulley
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110161
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #2)
> (In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #1)
> > The optimization introduced by r14-2879-g7cdd0860949c6c hits during
> > combina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tanksherman27 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #19 from Hao Liu ---
> Hi, here's the reduced case
Hi Tarmar, thanks for the case. I've modified it to reproduce the ICE without
LTO and have updated the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
--- Comment #3 from AK ---
1. clang also has noalias on nothrow versions of operator new. will
`-fassume-sane-operator-new` enable that as well?
2. as per: http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc.dynamic#allocation-2
"""If the request succeeds, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81904
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0b7a61d83534fc8f7aa593b1f0f0357a371a800
commit r14-2919-gf0b7a61d83534fc8f7aa593b1f0f0357a371a800
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jul 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Why would that depend on this new option? It's a requirement of the standard,
it has to be true always.
75 matches
Mail list logo
